scholarly journals First Report of Raspberry bushy dwarf virus on Red Raspberry and Grapevine in Slovenia

Plant Disease ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 87 (9) ◽  
pp. 1148-1148 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Mavrič ◽  
M. Viršček Marn ◽  
D. Koron ◽  
I. Žežlina

In 2002, severe vein yellowing and partial or complete yellowing of leaves was observed on some shoots of red raspberry (Rubus idaeus) cvs. Golden Bliss and Autumn Bliss. Sap of infected plants of cv. Golden Bliss was inoculated onto Chenopodium quinoa and Nicotiana benthamiana. Faint chlorotic spots were observed on inoculated leaves of C. quinoa approximately 14 days after inoculation but no systemic symptoms appeared. No symptoms were observed on N. benthamiana. Raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV) was detected in the original raspberry plant using double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with polyclonal antiserum (Loewe Biochemica, Sauerlach, Germany). Systemic infections of inoculated C. quinoa and N. benthaminana were confirmed using DAS-ELISA. In 2001 and 2002, unusual virus symptoms were observed on grapevine grafts (Vitis vinifera) of cv. Laški Rizling. Symptoms appeared as curved line patterns and yellowing of the leaves. No nepoviruses were found in symptomatic plants, but RBDV was confirmed using DAS-ELISA. RBDV infection was later confirmed in grapevine cv. Štajerska Belina with similar symptoms. RBDV was transmitted mechanically from grapevine to C. quinoa where it was detected by immunocapture-reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (IC-RT-PCR). IC-RT-PCR was used to amplify a part of the coat protein gene of the virus from raspberry and grapevine, and the amplification products were sequenced (1). The obtained sequence shared at least 93% nucleotide sequence identity with other known RBDV sequences, which confirmed the serological results. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the natural occurrence of RBDV in grapevine and also of RBDV infection of red raspberry in Slovenia. Reference: (1) H. I. Kokko et al. Biotechniques 20:842, 1996.

Plant Disease ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 88 (11) ◽  
pp. 1285-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Phibbs ◽  
A. Barta ◽  
L. L. Domier

Soybean dwarf virus (SbDV) causes widespread economic losses on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) in Japan (4), and has been reported on soybean in Virginia (2), in various legumes in the southeastern United States (1), and in peas in California (3). During late July and early August of 2003, soybean plants in Wisconsin were surveyed for SbDV. In 286 soybean fields at the R2-R4 growth stage, the uppermost fully unfurled leaf was collected from 10 plants at each of five sites. Samples were collected at random without regard to symptoms. SbDV symptom information was not recorded. Samples were stored on ice until frozen at -80°C. Five fields in four Wisconsin counties (Columbia, Lafayette, Sauk, and Waushara) tested positive for SbDV using double antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA). DAS-ELISA testing was conducted with reagents from Agdia, Inc (Elkhart, IN) following the manufacturer's protocol. Absorbance was read at 405 nm with a Stat Fax 2100 microplate reader (Awareness Technology, Inc., Palm City, FL) or visually evaluated. DAS-ELISA did not discriminate between strains of SbDV. The presence of SbDV was confirmed, and strain identity was inferred as dwarfing strain using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Total RNA was extracted from homogenized leaf tissue, reverse transcribed, and amplified with the SuperScript One Step RT-PCR System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and SbDV-specific primers (5′-CTGCTTCTGGTGATTACACTGCCG-3′ and 5′-CGCTTTCATTTAACGYCATCAAAGGG-3′). Size of the RT-PCR products (110 bp) was consistent with the dwarfing strain, SbDV-D. All locations that tested positive for SbDV showed soybean aphids, Aphis glycines Matsumura (Homoptera: Aphididae), on 100% of soybean plants. Several aphid species have been reported to vector SbDV, but at this time, vector relations in the Wisconsin infections are unknown. To our knowledge, this is the first report of SbDV infecting soybean in Wisconsin. References: (1) V. D. Damsteegt et al. Plant Dis. 79:48, 1995. (2) A. Fayad et al. Phytopathology (Abstr.) 90(Suppl.):S132, 2000. (3) G. R. Johnstone et al. Phytopathology (Abstr.) 74:795(A43), 1984. (4) T. Tamada et al. Ann. Phytopathol. Soc. Jpn. 35:282, 1969.


Plant Disease ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 603-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Chamberlain ◽  
J. Kraus ◽  
P. D. Kohnen ◽  
C. E. Finn ◽  
R. R. Martin

Raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV), genus Idaeovirus, has been reported in commercial Rubus spp. from North and South America, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa. Infection can cause reduced vigor and drupelet abortion leading to crumbly fruit and reduced yields (3,4). In recent years, Rubus germplasm in the form of seed, was obtained on several collection trips to The People's Republic of China to increase the diversity of Rubus spp. in the USDA-ARS National Clonal Germplasm Repository, (Corvallis, OR). Before planting in the field, seedlings were tested for the presence of RBDV, Tomato ringspot virus, and Tobacco streak virus using triple-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (TAS-ELISA) (antiserum produced by R. R. Martin). One symptomless plant of R. multibracteatus H. Lev. & Vaniot (PI 618457 in USDA-ARS GRIN database), from Guizhou province in China, tested positive for RBDV (RBDV-China). After mechanical transmission on Chenopodium quinoa Willd., this isolate produced typical symptoms of RBDV (3). To determine if RBDV-China was a contaminant during the handling of the plants, or if the source was a seedborne virus, the coat protein gene was sequenced and compared to published sequences of RBDV. RNA was extracted from leaves of R. multibracteatus and subjected to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using primers that flank the coat protein gene. Products from four separate PCR reactions were sequenced directly or were cloned into the plasmid vector pCR 2.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and then sequenced. The coding sequence of the coat protein gene of RBDV-China was 87.5% (722/825) identical to that isolated from black raspberry (Genbank Accession No. s55890). The predicted amino acid sequences were 91.6% (251/274) identical. Previously, a maximum of five amino acid differences had been observed in the coat proteins of different RBDV strains (1). The 23 differences observed between RBDV-China and the isolate from black raspberry (s55890) confirm that the RBDV in R. multibracteatus is not a greenhouse contaminant but is indeed a unique strain of RBDV. In addition, monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to RBDV (2) were tested against RBDV-China. In these tests, MAb D1 did not detect RBDV-China, whereas MAb R2 and R5 were able to detect the strain. This is the first strain of RBDV that has been clearly differentiated by MAbs using standard TAS-ELISA tests. Although RBDV is common in commercial Rubus spp. worldwide, to our knowledge, this is the first report of RBDV in R. multibracteatus, and the first report of RBDV from China. The effects of this new strain of RBDV could be more or less severe, or have a different host range than previously studied strains. It is more divergent from the type isolate than any other strain that has been studied to date. Phylogenetic analysis of coat protein genes of RBDV may be useful in understanding the evolution and spread of this virus. References: (1) A. T. Jones et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 106:623, 2000. (2) R. R. Martin. Can. J. Plant. Pathol. 6:264, 1984. (3) A. F. Murant. Raspberry Bushy Dwarf. Page 229 in: Virus Diseases of Small Fruits. R. H. Converse, ed. U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. 631, 1987. (4) B. Strik and R. R. Martin. Plant Dis. 87:294, 2003.


Plant Disease ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 96 (10) ◽  
pp. 1582-1582 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Mavrič Pleško ◽  
M. Viršček Marn ◽  
K. Nyerges ◽  
J. Lázár

Raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV) is the sole member of genus Idaeovirus and naturally infects Rubus species worldwide. It can be experimentally transmitted to many dicotyledonous plant species from different families. In Slovenia it has been reported to naturally infect grapevine, the first known non-Rubus natural host (3). However, RBDV from red raspberry and grapevine were found to be different in biological, serological, and molecular characteristics (4). From 2007 to 2010, grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) vineyards were sampled in different parts of Hungary and tested for RBDV infection by double antibody sandwich (DAS)-ELISA using commercial reagents (Bioreba, Reinach, Switzerland). Overall, 181 samples were collected from 10 vineyards around Csörnyeföld, Badacsony, Eger, Tolcsva (Orémus), and Nagyréde. Samples were taken randomly unless plants showing virus-like symptoms were present, which were preferentially included in the survey. Two samples collected in 2010, each consisting of five leaves from five individual plants, tested positive by DAS-ELISA. They originated from a small private vineyard of Italian Riesling, Pinot Gris, and Rhein Riesling in the southwestern part of Hungary near Csörnyeföld where 29 samples were collected. All leaves were asymptomatic. Total RNA was extracted from positive samples using a RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). cDNA was synthesized using primer RNA12 as described (4) and further amplified by PCR using primers RBDVUP1/RBDVLO4 that amplified an 872-bp fragment of RBDV coat protein and 3′ non-translated region (2). Amplification products from both samples were directly sequenced (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea). The sequences showed 98.6% identity between each other and were deposited in GenBank (Accession Nos. JQ928628 and JQ928629). Sequences were also compared with RBDV sequences deposited in GenBank. They showed 97.7 to 99.3% identity with RBDV sequences from grapevine from Slovenia and 94.2 to 96.1% with RBDV sequences from Rubus sp. Natural infection of grapevine with RBDV was first reported from Slovenia in 2003 (3) and was recently reported also from Serbia (1). To our knowledge, this is the first report of RBDV infection of grapevine in Hungary and suggests a wider presence of the virus in the region. References: (1) D. Jevremovic and S. Paunovic. Pestic. Phytomed. (Belgrade) 26:55, 2011. (2) H. I. Kokko et al. BioTechniques 20:842, 1996. (3) I. Mavric Pleško et al. Plant Dis. 87:1148, 2003. (4) I. Mavric Pleško et al. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 123:261, 2009.


Plant Disease ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 526-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Bananej ◽  
C. Desbiez ◽  
C. Wipf-Scheibel ◽  
I. Vahdat ◽  
A. Kheyr-Pour ◽  
...  

A survey was conducted from 2001 to 2004 in the major cucurbit-growing areas in Iran to reassess the relative incidence of cucurbit viruses. Severe yellowing symptoms were observed frequently on older leaves of cucurbit plants in various regions in outdoor crops, suggesting the presence of Cucurbit aphid-borne yellows virus (CABYV, genus Polerovirus, family Luteoviridae) (1,2). Leaf samples (n = 1019) were collected from plants of melon (Cucumis melo L.), cucumber (C. sativus L.), squash (Cucurbita sp.), and watermelon (Citrullus lanatus L.) showing various virus-like symptoms (mosaic, leaf deformation, yellowing). All samples, collected from 15 provinces, were screened for the presence of CABYV by double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with IgGs and alkaline phosphatase-conjugated IgGs against a CABYV reference isolate (1). Of the 1,019 samples tested, 471 were positive for CABYV using DAS-ELISA. Some of the positive samples had typical severe yellowing symptoms while symptoms in other samples were masked by mosaic or leaf deformations caused by other viruses frequently found in mixed infections (data not shown). During the entire survey, CABYV was detected by DAS-ELISA in 201 of 503 melon samples, 72 of 129 cucumber samples, 158 of 249 squash samples, and 40 of 138 watermelon samples. These results indicate that CABYV is widely distributed on four cucurbit species in the major growing areas of Iran. In order to confirm CABYV identification, total RNA extracts (TRI-Reagent, Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO) were obtained from 25 samples that were positive using DAS-ELISA originating from Khorasan (n = 4), Esfahan (n = 6), Teheran (n = 3), Hormozgan (n = 4), Azerbaiejan-E-Sharqi (n = 4), and Kerman (n = 4). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) were carried out using forward (5′-CGCGTGGTTGTGG-TCAACCC-3′) and reverse (5′-CCYGCAACCGAGGAAGATCC-3′) primers designed in conserved regions of the coat protein gene according to the sequence of a CABYV reference isolate (3) and three other unpublished CABYV sequences. RT-PCR experiments yielded an expected 479-bp product similar to the fragment amplified with extracts from the reference isolate. No amplification of the product occurred from healthy plant extracts. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the occurrence of CABYV in Iran on various cucurbit species. The high frequency (46.2%) with which CABYV was detected in the samples assayed indicates that this virus is one of the most common virus infecting cucurbits in Iran. References: (1) H. Lecoq et al. Plant Pathol. 41:749, 1992 (2) M. A. Mayo and C. J. D'Arcy. Page 15 in: The Luteoviridae. H. G. Smith and H. Barker, eds. CAB International Mycological Institute, Wallingford, UK, 1999. (3) H. Guilley et al. Virology 202:1012, 1994.


Plant Disease ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego F. Quito-Avila ◽  
Danielle Lightle ◽  
Robert R. Martin

Raspberry crumbly fruit in red raspberry (Rubus idaeus), widespread in the Pacific Northwest of the United States and British Columbia, Canada, is most commonly caused by a virus infection. Raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV) has long been attributed as the causal agent of the disease. Recently, the identification of two additional viruses, Raspberry leaf mottle virus (RLMV) and Raspberry latent virus (RpLV), in northern Washington and British Columbia, suggested the existence of a possible new virus complex responsible for the increased severity of the disease. Virus testing of crumbly fruited plants from five fields in northern Washington revealed the presence of RLMV and RpLV, in addition to RBDV. Plants with less severe crumbly fruit symptoms had a much lower incidence of RLMV or RpLV. Field trials using replicated plots of ‘Meeker’ plants containing single and mixed infections of RBDV, RLMV, or RpLV, along with a virus-free control, were developed to determine the role of RLMV and RpLV in crumbly fruit. Field evaluations during establishment and two fruiting years revealed that plants infected with the three viruses or the combinations RBDV+RLMV and RBDV+RpLV had the greatest reduction in cane growth, or fruit firmness and fruit weight, respectively. Quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) showed that the titer of RBDV was increased ~400-fold when it occurred in mixed infections with RLMV compared to RBDV in single infections. In addition, a virus survey revealed that RLMV and RpLV are present at high incidence in northern Washington; whereas the incidence in southern Washington and Oregon, where crumbly fruit is not as serious a problem, was considerably lower.


Plant Disease ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (12) ◽  
pp. 1405-1405 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Staniulis ◽  
J. Stankiene ◽  
K. Sasnauskas ◽  
A. Dargeviciute

Plum pox (sharka) disease caused by plum pox potyvirus (PPV) is considered the most important virus disease of stone fruit trees in Europe and the Mediterranean region. Nearly all those countries that produce stone fruits are affected (3). The causal virus of the disease is a European Plant Protection Organization A2 quarantine pathogen. Symptoms of leaf mottling, diffuse chlorotic spots, rings, and vein banding of varied intensity characteristic for plum pox virus infection were observed in the plum (Prunus domestica) orchard tree collection of the Lithuanian Institute of Horticulture in Babtai in 1996. Presence of this virus in the diseased trees was confirmed by double antibody sandwich-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAS-ELISA) with kits from BIOREBA (Reinach, Switzerland) and by polyclonal antibodies raised against a Moldavian isolate of PPV courtesy of T. D. Verderevskaya (Institute of Horticulture, Kishinev, Moldova). ELISAs with both sources of antiserum were positive for presence of PPV. Electron microscopy revealed the presence of potyvirus-like particles averaging 770 nm in extracts of mechanically inoculated plants of Chenopodium foetidum (chlorotic LL [local lesions]) and Pisum sativum cvs. Rainiai and Citron (mottling). For molecular diagnosis and characterization of this isolate, PPV-971, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was employed. Total RNA from the leaves of infected pea was isolated as described (2). High molecular weight RNA selectively precipitated with 2 M lithium chloride was used for RT-PCR amplification of the coat protein encoding sequence by use of specific primers complementary to 5′ and 3′ parts of PPV coat protein L1 (GenBank accession no. X81081). Amino acid sequence comparison with GenBank data indicated 98.2% similarity with coat protein of PPV potyvirus isolated by E. Mais et al. (accession no. X81083) and 97.3% with PPV strain Rankovic (1).The specific DNA fragment, corresponding to predicted coat protein sequence size, was cloned into Escherichia coli pUC57 for DNA sequencing. Expression of the cloned sequence in bacteria and yeast expression systems is under investigation. The presence of PPV in plum trees in the 9-year-old collection at Babtai was confirmed by DAS-ELISA in 1997 and again in 1998. PPV was then detected in 20% of symptomatic trees of three cultivars. The Lithuanian PPV isolate reacted positively with “universal” Mab.5b and with a Mab (Mab.4DG5) specific for PPV-D. No reaction was observed with Mabs specific for PPV-M (Mab.AL), PPV-C (Mab.AC and Mab.TUV), and PPV-El Amar (Mab.EA24). PPV-971 seems to be a typical member of the less aggressive Dideron strain cluster of PPV (D. Boscia, personal communication). This is the first report of PPV in Lithuania and confirms the necessity for continuing the precautionary measures established in this country for indexing of nursery plum trees used for graft propagation. References: (1) S. Lain et al. Virus Res. 13:157, 1989. (2) J. Logemann et al. Anal. Biochem. 163:16, 1987. (3) M. Nemeth. OEPP/EPPO Bull. 24:525, 1994.


Plant Disease ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 85 (9) ◽  
pp. 985-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Chard ◽  
Susan Irvine ◽  
Adrian M. I. Roberts ◽  
Ian M. Nevison ◽  
Wendy J. McGavin ◽  
...  

A survey was done in 1998 to determine whether Raspberry bushy dwarf virus (RBDV) was established in raspberry fruiting plantations in Scotland. Raspberry-producing holdings were selected according to geographical area and size. Samples (201), each comprising 60 shoots per stock, were obtained from 77 holdings and tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ELISA-positive shoots from each infected stock were grafted onto cultivar Glen Clova, which is resistant to the Scottish-type isolate of RBDV (RBDV-S), to establish whether the virus is a resistance-breaking (RB) isolate. RBDV was detected in 22% of the stocks sampled, with 2 to 80% incidence of infection. No RBDV was in any of the 40 plantations containing cultivars resistant to RBDV-S or in Glen Clova plants, which were grafted successfully with samples from 15 infected plantations, indicating that no RB isolates were detected. The percentage of infected plantations increased with time from the planting date. In order to investigate possible sources of infection, ELISA for RBDV was made in 1999 on samples of stocks of raspberry cultivars entered for the lowest certified grade (Standard Grade) in Scotland and, in 1994 to 1997, on certified stocks planted with material originating from outside Scotland. No RBDV was detected in any of the samples. RBDV was found only rarely in samples of wild raspberry in Angus and Perthshire.


2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Ellis ◽  
J. Kraus ◽  
R. R. Martin ◽  
S. R. Wright

Over the past 10 years, several commercial producers of black raspberry in Ohio have experienced a decline in plant vigor and survival in their plantings. In 2004, a survey of several black and red raspberry plantings in Ohio was conducted to determine if viruses were present. Of the 115 samples taken in the survey, Raspberry bushy dwarf (RBDV), Tomato ringspot (ToRSV), and Tobacco ringspot virus (TRSV) were detected in 21, 5, and 2, respectively. This is the first report of RBDV in Ohio. Accepted for publication 27 April 2005. Published 10 May 2005.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document