Climate-driven benthic invertebrate activity and biogeochemical functioning across the Barents Sea polar front

Arctic marine ecosystems are undergoing rapid correction in response to multiple expressions of climate change, but the consequences of altered biodiversity for the sequestration, transformation and storage of nutrients are poorly constrained. Here, we determine the bioturbation activity of sediment-dwelling invertebrate communities over two consecutive summers that contrasted in sea-ice extent along a transect intersecting the polar front. We find a clear separation in community composition at the polar front that marks a transition in the type and amount of bioturbation activity, and associated nutrient concentrations, sufficient to distinguish a southern high from a northern low. While patterns in community structure reflect proximity to arctic versus boreal conditions, our observations strongly suggest that faunal activity is moderated by seasonal variations in sea ice extent that influence food supply to the benthos. Our observations help visualize how a climate-driven reorganization of the Barents Sea benthic ecosystem may be expressed, and emphasize the rapidity with which an entire region could experience a functional transformation. As strong benthic-pelagic coupling is typical across most parts of the Arctic shelf, the response of these ecosystems to a changing climate will have important ramifications for ecosystem functioning and the trophic structure of the entire food web. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The changing Arctic Ocean: consequences for biological communities, biogeochemical processes and ecosystem functioning'.

Download Full-text

Seasonal and Regional Manifestation of Arctic Sea Ice Loss

Journal of Climate ◽

10.1175/jcli-d-17-0427.1 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 31 (12) ◽

pp. 4917-4932 ◽

Cited By ~ 76

Author(s):

Ingrid H. Onarheim ◽

Tor Eldevik ◽

Lars H. Smedsrud ◽

Julienne C. Stroeve

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Barents Sea ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Sea Ice Concentration ◽

Sea Ice Extent ◽

The Barents Sea ◽

East Siberian Sea ◽

Shelf Seas ◽

Perennial Ice

The Arctic Ocean is currently on a fast track toward seasonally ice-free conditions. Although most attention has been on the accelerating summer sea ice decline, large changes are also occurring in winter. This study assesses past, present, and possible future change in regional Northern Hemisphere sea ice extent throughout the year by examining sea ice concentration based on observations back to 1950, including the satellite record since 1979. At present, summer sea ice variability and change dominate in the perennial ice-covered Beaufort, Chukchi, East Siberian, Laptev, and Kara Seas, with the East Siberian Sea explaining the largest fraction of September ice loss (22%). Winter variability and change occur in the seasonally ice-covered seas farther south: the Barents Sea, Sea of Okhotsk, Greenland Sea, and Baffin Bay, with the Barents Sea carrying the largest fraction of loss in March (27%). The distinct regions of summer and winter sea ice variability and loss have generally been consistent since 1950, but appear at present to be in transformation as a result of the rapid ice loss in all seasons. As regions become seasonally ice free, future ice loss will be dominated by winter. The Kara Sea appears as the first currently perennial ice-covered sea to become ice free in September. Remaining on currently observed trends, the Arctic shelf seas are estimated to become seasonally ice free in the 2020s, and the seasonally ice-covered seas farther south to become ice free year-round from the 2050s.

Download Full-text

Assessing trends in Arctic sea-ice distribution in the Barents and Kara seas using the Kosmos–Okean satellite series

Polar Record ◽

10.1017/s0032247400013620 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 31 (177) ◽

pp. 129-134 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Gennady I. Belchansky ◽

Ilia N. Mordvintsev ◽

Gregory K. Ovchinnikov ◽

David C. Douglas

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Barents Sea ◽

Satellite Image ◽

Kara Sea ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Published Data ◽

Sea Ice Extent ◽

The Barents Sea ◽

Barents And Kara Seas

AbstractTrends in the annual minimum sea-ice extent, determined by three criteria (absolute annual minimum, minimum monthly mean, and the extent at the end of August), were investigated for the Barents and western Kara seas and adjacent parts of the Arctic Ocean during 1984–1993. Four definitions of ice extent were examined, based on thresholds of ice concentration: >90%, >70%, >40%, and >10% (El, E2, E3, and E4, respectively). Trends were studied using ice maps produced by the Russian Hydro-Meteorological Service, Kosmos and Okean satellite imagery, and data extracted from published literature. During 1984–1993, an increasing trend in the extent of minimum sea-ice cover was observed in the Barents, Kara, and combined Barents–Kara seas, for all ice-extent definitions. Root-mean-square differences between hydro-meteorological ice maps and satellite-image ice classifications for coincident areas and dates were 15.5%, 19.3%, 18.8%, and 11.5%, for ice extensions El–E4, respectively. The differences were subjected to Monte Carlo analyses to construct confidence intervals for the 10-year ice-map trends. With probability p = 0.8, the average 10-year increase in the minimum monthly mean sea-ice extent (followed in brackets by the average increase in the absolute annual minimum ice extent) was 12–46% [26–96%], 31–71% [55–140%], 30–69% [26–94%], and 48–94% [35–108%] in the Barents Sea; 20–60% [32–120%], 10–45% [20–92%], 2–36% [13–78%], and 10–47% [8–69%] in the Kara Sea; and 9–43% [26–59%], 9–41% [30–63%], 8–41% [22–52%] and 15–51% [21–51%] in the combined Barents–Kara seas, for ice concentrations El–E4, respectively. Including published data from 1966–1983, the trend in minimum monthly mean sea-ice extent for the combined 28-year period showed an average reduction of 8% in the Barents Sea and a 55% reduction in the western Kara Sea; ice extent at the end of August showed an average reduction of 33% in the Barents Sea.

Download Full-text

Atmospheric Forcing on the Barents Sea Winter Ice Extent

Journal of Climate ◽

10.1175/jcli3885.1 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 19 (19) ◽

pp. 4772-4784 ◽

Cited By ~ 96

Author(s):

Asgeir Sorteberg ◽

Børge Kvingedal

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Barents Sea ◽

The Arctic ◽

Atmospheric Forcing ◽

Mean Flow ◽

Cyclone Activity ◽

Sea Ice Extent ◽

Nordic Seas ◽

The Barents Sea ◽

The Mean

Abstract The atmospheric forcing on the Barents Sea ice extent during winter [December–February (DJF)] has been investigated for the period 1967–2002. The time series for the sea ice extent is updated and includes the winter of 2005, which marks a new record low in the wintertime Barents Sea ice extent, and a linear trend of −3.5% decade−1 in the ice extent was found. Covariability between the Barents Sea ice extent and the atmospheric mean seasonal flow and the synoptic cyclones has been discussed separately. For the mean flow, linear correlations and regression analysis reveal that anomalous northerly (southerly) winds prevail in the Nordic Seas during winters with extensive (sparse) Barents Sea ice extent. Some of the variability in the mean flow is captured by the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO); however, the wintertime link between the Barents Sea ice extent and the NAO is moderate. By studying the cyclone activity in the high-latitude Northern Hemisphere using a dataset of individual cyclones, two regions that influence the wintertime Barents Sea ice extent were identified. The variability in the northward-moving cyclones traveling into the Arctic over East Siberia was found to covary strongly with the Barents Sea ice extent. The main mechanism is believed to be the change in the Arctic winds and in ice advection connected to the cyclones. In addition, cyclone activity of northward-moving cyclones over the western Nordic Seas was identified to strongly influence the Barents Sea ice extent. This relationship was particularly strong on decadal time scales and when the ice extent lagged the cyclone variability by 1–2 yr. The lag indicates that the mechanism is related to the cyclones’ ability to modulate the inflow of Atlantic water into the Nordic Seas and the transport time of oceanic heat anomalies from the Nordic Seas into the Barents Sea. Multiple regression indicates that the two mechanisms may explain (or at least covary with) 46% of the wintertime Barents Sea variance over the 1967–2002 period and that 79% of the decadal part of the ice variability may be predicted 2 yr ahead using information about the decadal cyclone variability in the Nordic Seas.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Stratospheric Circulation Extremes on Minimum Arctic Sea Ice Extent

Journal of Climate ◽

10.1175/jcli-d-17-0495.1 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 31 (18) ◽

pp. 7169-7183 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Karen L. Smith ◽

Lorenzo M. Polvani ◽

L. Bruno Tremblay

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Barents Sea ◽

Arctic Sea Ice ◽

The Arctic ◽

Sea Ice Extent ◽

The Barents Sea ◽

Arctic Sea ◽

Stratospheric Circulation ◽

The Impact ◽

Arctic Sea Ice Extent

Given the rapidly changing Arctic climate, there is an urgent need for improved seasonal predictions of Arctic sea ice. Yet, Arctic sea ice prediction is inherently complex. Among other factors, wintertime atmospheric circulation has been shown to be predictive of summertime Arctic sea ice extent. Specifically, many studies have shown that the interannual variability of summertime Arctic sea ice extent (SIE) is anticorrelated with the leading mode of extratropical atmospheric variability, the Arctic Oscillation (AO), in the preceding winter. Given this relationship, the potential predictive role of stratospheric circulation extremes and stratosphere–troposphere coupling in linking the AO and Arctic SIE variability is examined. It is shown that extremes in the stratospheric circulation during the winter season, namely, stratospheric sudden warming (SSW) and strong polar vortex (SPV) events, are associated with significant anomalies in sea ice concentration in the Barents Sea in spring and along the Eurasian coastline in summer in both observations and a fully coupled, stratosphere-resolving general circulation model. Consistent with previous work on the AO, it is shown that SSWs, which are followed by the negative phase of the AO at the surface, result in sea ice growth, whereas SPVs, which are followed by the positive phase of the AO at the surface, result in sea ice loss, although the mechanisms in the Barents Sea and along the Eurasian coastline are different. The analysis suggests that the presence or absence of stratospheric circulation extremes in winter may play a nontrivial role in determining total September Arctic SIE when combined with other factors.

Download Full-text

Arctic Freshwater in CMIP6: Declining Sea Ice, Increasing Ocean Storage and Export

10.5194/egusphere-egu21-6391 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Hannah Zanowski ◽

Alexandra Jahn ◽

Marika Holland

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

21St Century ◽

Barents Sea ◽

The Arctic ◽

Historical Period ◽

Freshwater Flux ◽

Bering Strait ◽

The Barents Sea ◽

Late 21St Century ◽

Freshwater Export

<p>Recently, the Arctic has undergone substantial changes in sea ice cover and the hydrologic cycle, both of which strongly impact the freshwater storage in, and export from, the Arctic Ocean. Here we analyze Arctic freshwater storage and fluxes in 7 climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6) and assess their agreement over the historical period (1980-2000) and in two future emissions scenarios, SSP1-2.6 and SSP5-8.5. In the historical simulation, few models agree closely with observations over 1980-2000. In both future scenarios the models show an increase in liquid (ocean) freshwater storage in conjunction with a reduction in solid storage and fluxes through the major Arctic gateways (Bering Strait, Fram Strait, Davis Strait, and the Barents Sea Opening) that is typically larger for SSP5-8.5 than SSP1-2.6. The liquid fluxes through the gateways exhibit a more complex pattern, with models exhibiting a change in sign of the freshwater flux through the Barents Sea Opening and little change in the flux through the Bering Strait in addition to increased export from the remaining straits by the end of the 21st century. A decomposition of the liquid fluxes into their salinity and volume contributions shows that the Barents Sea flux changes are driven by salinity changes, while the Bering Strait flux changes are driven by compensating salinity and volume changes. In the straits west of Greenland (Nares, Barrow, and Davis straits), the models disagree on whether there will be a decrease, increase, or steady liquid freshwater export in the early to mid 21st century, although they mostly show increased liquid freshwater export in the late 21st century. The underlying cause of this is a difference in the magnitude and timing of a simulated decrease in the volume flux through these straits. Although the models broadly agree on the sign of late 21st century storage and flux changes, substantial differences exist between the magnitude of these changes and the models&#8217; Arctic mean states, which shows no fundamental improvement in the models compared to CMIP5.</p>

Download Full-text

Regularities and features of ice conditions of the Barents Sea in the second half of XX – early XXI century

10.29006/978-5-6045110-0-8/(15) ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 179-194

Author(s):

I.O. Dumanskaya ◽

Keyword(s):

Barents Sea ◽

Ice Cover ◽

Heat Fluxes ◽

The Arctic ◽

Cycle Period ◽

Arctic Seas ◽

Sea Ice Extent ◽

The Barents Sea ◽

Western Border ◽

Quantitative Changes

The warming of the Arctic, especially intensified at the beginning of the XXI century, is accompanied by a significant decrease in the area of ice cover in the Arctic seas. The article shows the quantitative changes in the ice parameters of the Barents Sea, as well as factors affecting the formation of ice cover in recent years. In the twenty-first century the frequency of occurrence of mild winters has increased by 17%, the frequency of severe winters has decreased by 19%. Significantly increased the temperature at the meteorological station Malye Karmakuly, water temperature at transect "Kola Meridian", atmospheric and oceanic heat fluxes, and speed of sea currents on the Western border of the Barents sea. The duration of the ice period decreased by an average of 2–3 weeks, and the rate of reduction of ice cover was 7.2% for 10 years. This is the highest speed compared to other Arctic seas. The article shows that the variability of the ice cover of the Barents Sea and other parameters of the natural environment in the region has the cyclic character. Presumably, the cycle period is close to 84 years, which corresponds to the orbital period of Uranium. The minimum sea ice extent after 1935–1945 is expected in the period 2019–2029.

Download Full-text

Sea Ice Thickness Forecast Performance in the Barents Sea

Volume 7: Polar and Arctic Sciences and Technology ◽

10.1115/omae2020-18039 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Laura Hume-Wright ◽

Emma Fiedler ◽

Nicolas Fournier ◽

Joana Mendes ◽

Ed Blockley ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Barents Sea ◽

Forecast Model ◽

The Arctic ◽

Ice Thickness ◽

Sea Ice Thickness ◽

Forecast Performance ◽

In Situ Data ◽

The Barents Sea ◽

Ice Conditions

Abstract The presence of sea ice has a major impact on the safety, operability and efficiency of Arctic operations and navigation. While satellite-based sea ice charting is routinely used for tactical ice management, the marine sector does not yet make use of existing operational sea ice thickness forecasting. However, data products are now freely available from the Copernicus Marine Environment Monitoring Service (CMEMS). Arctic asset managers and vessels’ crews are generally not aware of such products, or these have so far suffered from insufficient accuracy, verification, resolution and adequate format, in order to be well integrated within their existing decision-making processes and systems. The objective of the EU H2020 project “Safe maritime operations under extreme conditions: The Arctic case” (SEDNA) is to improve the safety and efficiency of Arctic navigation. This paper presents a component focusing on the validation of an adaption of the 7-day sea ice thickness forecast from the UK Met Office Forecast Ocean Assimilation Model (FOAM). The experimental forecast model assimilates the CryoSat-2 satellite’s ice freeboard daily data. Forecast skill is evaluated against unique in-situ data from five moorings deployed between 2015 and 2018 by the Barents Sea Metocean and Ice Network (BASMIN) Joint Industry Project. The study shows that the existing FOAM forecasts produce adequate results in the Barents Sea. However, while studies have shown the assimilation of CryoSat-2 data is effective for thick sea ice conditions, this did not improve forecasts for the thinner sea ice conditions of the Barents Sea.

Download Full-text

Climate in the Barents Region

10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.655 ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Rasmus Benestad

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Barents Sea ◽

Open Water ◽

Arctic Climate ◽

The Arctic ◽

Storm Activity ◽

Svalbard Archipelago ◽

British Antarctic Survey ◽

Barents Region ◽

The Barents Sea

The Barents Sea is a region of the Arctic Ocean named after one of its first known explorers (1594–1597), Willem Barentsz from the Netherlands, although there are accounts of earlier explorations: the Norwegian seafarer Ottar rounded the northern tip of Europe and explored the Barents and White Seas between 870 and 890 ce, a journey followed by a number of Norsemen; Pomors hunted seals and walruses in the region; and Novgorodian merchants engaged in the fur trade. These seafarers were probably the first to accumulate knowledge about the nature of sea ice in the Barents region; however, scientific expeditions and the exploration of the climate of the region had to wait until the invention and employment of scientific instruments such as the thermometer and barometer. Most of the early exploration involved mapping the land and the sea ice and making geographical observations. There were also many unsuccessful attempts to use the Northeast Passage to reach the Bering Strait. The first scientific expeditions involved F. P. Litke (1821±1824), P. K. Pakhtusov (1834±1835), A. K. Tsivol’ka (1837±1839), and Henrik Mohn (1876–1878), who recorded oceanographic, ice, and meteorological conditions.The scientific study of the Barents region and its climate has been spearheaded by a number of campaigns. There were four generations of the International Polar Year (IPY): 1882–1883, 1932–1933, 1957–1958, and 2007–2008. A British polar campaign was launched in July 1945 with Antarctic operations administered by the Colonial Office, renamed as the Falkland Islands Dependencies Survey (FIDS); it included a scientific bureau by 1950. It was rebranded as the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) in 1962 (British Antarctic Survey History leaflet). While BAS had its initial emphasis on the Antarctic, it has also been involved in science projects in the Barents region. The most dedicated mission to the Arctic and the Barents region has been the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP), which has commissioned a series of reports on the Arctic climate: the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA) report, the Snow Water Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA) report, and the Adaptive Actions in a Changing Arctic (AACA) report.The climate of the Barents Sea is strongly influenced by the warm waters from the Norwegian current bringing heat from the subtropical North Atlantic. The region is 10°C–15°C warmer than the average temperature on the same latitude, and a large part of the Barents Sea is open water even in winter. It is roughly bounded by the Svalbard archipelago, northern Fennoscandia, the Kanin Peninsula, Kolguyev Island, Novaya Zemlya, and Franz Josef Land, and is a shallow ocean basin which constrains physical processes such as currents and convection. To the west, the Greenland Sea forms a buffer region with some of the strongest temperature gradients on earth between Iceland and Greenland. The combination of a strong temperature gradient and westerlies influences air pressure, wind patterns, and storm tracks. The strong temperature contrast between sea ice and open water in the northern part sets the stage for polar lows, as well as heat and moisture exchange between ocean and atmosphere. Glaciers on the Arctic islands generate icebergs, which may drift in the Barents Sea subject to wind and ocean currents.The land encircling the Barents Sea includes regions with permafrost and tundra. Precipitation comes mainly from synoptic storms and weather fronts; it falls as snow in the winter and rain in the summer. The land area is snow-covered in winter, and rivers in the region drain the rainwater and meltwater into the Barents Sea. Pronounced natural variations in the seasonal weather statistics can be linked to variations in the polar jet stream and Rossby waves, which result in a clustering of storm activity, blocking high-pressure systems. The Barents region is subject to rapid climate change due to a “polar amplification,” and observations from Svalbard suggest that the past warming trend ranks among the strongest recorded on earth. The regional change is reinforced by a number of feedback effects, such as receding sea-ice cover and influx of mild moist air from the south.

Download Full-text

The Role of Moist Intrusions in Winter Arctic Warming and Sea Ice Decline

Journal of Climate ◽

10.1175/jcli-d-15-0773.1 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 29 (12) ◽

pp. 4473-4485 ◽

Cited By ~ 122

Author(s):

Cian Woods ◽

Rodrigo Caballero

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Barents Sea ◽

Surface Air Temperature ◽

The Arctic ◽

Positive Trend ◽

Sea Ice Concentration ◽

Local Conditions ◽

The Barents Sea ◽

Strong Inversion ◽

Ice Concentration

Abstract This paper examines the trajectories followed by intense intrusions of moist air into the Arctic polar region during autumn and winter and their impact on local temperature and sea ice concentration. It is found that the vertical structure of the warming associated with moist intrusions is bottom amplified, corresponding to a transition of local conditions from a “cold clear” state with a strong inversion to a “warm opaque” state with a weaker inversion. In the marginal sea ice zone of the Barents Sea, the passage of an intrusion also causes a retreat of the ice margin, which persists for many days after the intrusion has passed. The authors find that there is a positive trend in the number of intrusion events crossing 70°N during December and January that can explain roughly 45% of the surface air temperature and 30% of the sea ice concentration trends observed in the Barents Sea during the past two decades.

Download Full-text

Mechanisms influencing seasonal-to-interannual prediction skill of sea ice extent in the Arctic Ocean in MIROC

10.5194/tc-2017-122 ◽

2017 ◽

Author(s):

Jun Ono ◽

Hiroaki Tatebe ◽

Yoshiki Komuro ◽

Masato I. Nodzu ◽

Masayoshi Ishii

Keyword(s):

Sea Ice ◽

Arctic Ocean ◽

Barents Sea ◽

Heat Content ◽

The Arctic ◽

Subsurface Water ◽

Lead Times ◽

Sea Ice Concentration ◽

Sea Ice Extent ◽

The Arctic Ocean

Abstract. To assess the skill of predictions of the seasonal-to-interannual detrended sea ice extent in the Arctic Ocean (SIEAO) and to clarify the underlying physical processes, we conducted ensemble hindcasts, started on January 1st, April 1st, July 1st, and October 1st for each year from 1980 to 2011, for lead times of up three years, using the Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate (MIROC) version 5 initialized with the observed atmosphere and ocean anomalies and sea ice concentration. Significant skill is found for the winter months: the December SIEAO can be predicted up to 1 year ahead. This skill is attributed to the subsurface ocean heat content originating in the North Atlantic. The subsurface water flows into the Barents Sea from spring to fall and emerges at the surface in winter by vertical mixing, and eventually affects the sea ice variability there. Meanwhile, the September SIEAO predictions are skillful for lead times of up to 3 months, due to the persistence of sea ice in the Beaufort, Chukchi, and East Siberian Seas initialized in July, as suggested by previous studies.

Download Full-text