scholarly journals A novel protein complex that regulates active DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Liu ◽  
Wen-Feng Nie ◽  
Xiansong Xiong ◽  
Yuhua Wang ◽  
Yuwei Jiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Protein Complex ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Active Dna Demethylation ◽  
Domain Protein ◽  
Genomic Regions

SUMMARYActive DNA demethylation is critical for altering DNA methylation patterns and regulating gene expression. The 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylase/lyase ROS1 initiates a base excision repair pathway for active DNA demethylation and is required for the prevention of DNA hypermethylation at thousands of genomic regions in Arabidopsis. How ROS1 is regulated and targeted to specific genomic regions is not well understood. Here, we report the discovery of an Arabidopsis protein complex that contains ROS1, regulates ROS1 gene expression, and likely targets the ROS1 protein to specific genomic regions. ROS1 physically interacts with a WD40 domain protein (RWD40), which in turn interacts with a methyl-DNA binding protein (RMB1) as well as with a zinc finger and homeobox domain protein (RHD1). RMB1 binds to DNA that is methylated in any sequence context, and this binding is necessary for its function in vivo.Loss-of-function mutations in RWD40, RMB1, or RHD1 cause DNA hypermethylation at several tested genomic regions independently of the known ROS1 regulator IDM1. Because the hypermethylated genomic regions include the DNA methylation monitoring sequence in the ROS1 promoter, plants mutated in RWD40, RMB1, or RHD1 show increased ROS1 expression. Importantly, ROS1 binding to the ROS1 promoter requires RWD40, RMB1, and RHD1, suggesting that this complex dictates ROS1 targeting to this locus. Our results demonstrate that ROS1 forms a protein complex with RWD40, RMB1, and RHD1, and that this novel complex regulates active DNA demethylation at several endogenous loci in Arabidopsis.

scholarly journals SIZ1-mediated SUMOylation of ROS1 Enhances Its Stability and Positively Regulates Active DNA Demethylation in Arabidopsis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiangfeng Kong ◽  
Yechun Hong ◽  
Yi-Feng Hsu ◽  
Huan Huang ◽  
Xue Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Dna Glycosylase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Active Dna Demethylation ◽  
Short Summary ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Genomic Regions

AbstractThe 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylase/lyase REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 (ROS1)-mediated active DNA demethylation is critical for shaping the genomic DNA methylation landscape in Arabidopsis. Whether and how the stability of ROS1 may be regulated by post-translational modifications is unknown. Using a methylation-sensitive PCR (CHOP-PCR)-based forward genetic screen for Arabidopsis DNA hypermethylation mutants, we identified the SUMO E3 ligase SIZ1 as a critical regulator of active DNA demethylation. Dysfunction of SIZ1 leads to hyper-methylation at approximately one thousand genomic regions. SIZ1 physically interacts with ROS1 and mediates the SUMOylation of ROS1. The SUMOylation of ROS1 is reduced in siz1 mutant plants. Compared to that in wild type plants, the protein level of ROS1 is significantly decreased, even though there is an increased level of ROS1 transcripts in siz1 mutant plants. Our results suggest that SIZ1 positively regulates active DNA demethylation by promoting the stability of ROS1 protein through SUMOylation.Short SummaryThe 5-methylcytosine DNA glycosylase/lyase REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 (ROS1) is indispensable for proper DNA methylation landscape in Arabidopsis. Whether and how the stability of ROS1 may be regulated by post-translational modifications is unknown. Here, we show that SIZ1-mediated SUMOylation of ROS1 enhances its stability and positively regulates active DNA demethylation.

scholarly journals Regulatory link between DNA methylation and active demethylation in Arabidopsis

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3553-3557 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingguang Lei ◽  
Huiming Zhang ◽  
Russell Julian ◽  
Kai Tang ◽  
Shaojun Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Target Sequence ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Active Demethylation ◽  
Active Dna Demethylation ◽  
Regulatory Link

De novo DNA methylation through the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway and active DNA demethylation play important roles in controlling genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in plants. Little is known about how cells manage the balance between DNA methylation and active demethylation activities. Here, we report the identification of a unique RdDM target sequence, where DNA methylation is required for maintaining proper active DNA demethylation of the Arabidopsis genome. In a genetic screen for cellular antisilencing factors, we isolated several REPRESSOR OF SILENCING 1 (ros1) mutant alleles, as well as many RdDM mutants, which showed drastically reduced ROS1 gene expression and, consequently, transcriptional silencing of two reporter genes. A helitron transposon element (TE) in the ROS1 gene promoter negatively controls ROS1 expression, whereas DNA methylation of an RdDM target sequence between ROS1 5′ UTR and the promoter TE region antagonizes this helitron TE in regulating ROS1 expression. This RdDM target sequence is also targeted by ROS1, and defective DNA demethylation in loss-of-function ros1 mutant alleles causes DNA hypermethylation of this sequence and concomitantly causes increased ROS1 expression. Our results suggest that this sequence in the ROS1 promoter region serves as a DNA methylation monitoring sequence (MEMS) that senses DNA methylation and active DNA demethylation activities. Therefore, the ROS1 promoter functions like a thermostat (i.e., methylstat) to sense DNA methylation levels and regulates DNA methylation by controlling ROS1 expression.

scholarly journals Global increase in DNA methylation during orange fruit development and ripening

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 1430-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huan Huang ◽  
Ruie Liu ◽  
Qingfeng Niu ◽  
Kai Tang ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Fruit Ripening ◽  
Tomato Fruit ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Epigenetic Mark ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Active Dna Demethylation ◽  
Orange Fruit ◽  
Global Increase ◽  
Genomic Regions

DNA methylation is an important epigenetic mark involved in many biological processes. The genome of the climacteric tomato fruit undergoes a global loss of DNA methylation due to active DNA demethylation during the ripening process. It is unclear whether the ripening of other fruits is also associated with global DNA demethylation. We characterized the single-base resolution DNA methylomes of sweet orange fruits. Compared with immature orange fruits, ripe orange fruits gained DNA methylation at over 30,000 genomic regions and lost DNA methylation at about 1,000 genomic regions, suggesting a global increase in DNA methylation during orange fruit ripening. This increase in DNA methylation was correlated with decreased expression of DNA demethylase genes. The application of a DNA methylation inhibitor interfered with ripening, indicating that the DNA hypermethylation is critical for the proper ripening of orange fruits. We found that ripening-associated DNA hypermethylation was associated with the repression of several hundred genes, such as photosynthesis genes, and with the activation of hundreds of genes, including genes involved in abscisic acid responses. Our results suggest important roles of DNA methylation in orange fruit ripening.

scholarly journals Epigenetic Regulation of Genomic Stability by Vitamin C

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
John P. Brabson ◽  
Tiffany Leesang ◽  
Sofia Mohammad ◽  
Luisa Cimmino
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Antioxidant Properties ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Active Dna Demethylation ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Tet Enzymes

DNA methylation plays an important role in the maintenance of genomic stability. Ten-eleven translocation proteins (TETs) are a family of iron (Fe2+) and α-KG -dependent dioxygenases that regulate DNA methylation levels by oxidizing 5-methylcystosine (5mC) to generate 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC), and 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC). These oxidized methylcytosines promote passive demethylation upon DNA replication, or active DNA demethylation, by triggering base excision repair and replacement of 5fC and 5caC with an unmethylated cytosine. Several studies over the last decade have shown that loss of TET function leads to DNA hypermethylation and increased genomic instability. Vitamin C, a cofactor of TET enzymes, increases 5hmC formation and promotes DNA demethylation, suggesting that this essential vitamin, in addition to its antioxidant properties, can also directly influence genomic stability. This review will highlight the functional role of DNA methylation, TET activity and vitamin C, in the crosstalk between DNA methylation and DNA repair.

scholarly journals Histone acetylation recruits the SWR1 complex to regulate active DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (33) ◽  
pp. 16641-16650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Feng Nie ◽  
Mingguang Lei ◽  
Mingxuan Zhang ◽  
Kai Tang ◽  
Huan Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Nuclear Protein ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Specific Target ◽  
Active Dna Demethylation ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling Complex ◽  
Genomic Regions

Active DNA demethylation is critical for controlling the DNA methylomes in plants and mammals. However, little is known about how DNA demethylases are recruited to target loci, and the involvement of chromatin marks in this process. Here, we identify 2 components of the SWR1 chromatin-remodeling complex, PIE1 and ARP6, as required for ROS1-mediated DNA demethylation, and discover 2 SWR1-associated bromodomain-containing proteins, AtMBD9 and nuclear protein X1 (NPX1). AtMBD9 and NPX1 recognize histone acetylation marks established by increased DNA methylation 1 (IDM1), a known regulator of DNA demethylation, redundantly facilitating H2A.Z deposition at IDM1 target loci. We show that at some genomic regions, H2A.Z and DNA methylation marks coexist, and H2A.Z physically interacts with ROS1 to regulate DNA demethylation and antisilencing. Our results unveil a mechanism through which DNA demethylases can be recruited to specific target loci exhibiting particular histone marks, providing a conceptual framework to understand how chromatin marks regulate DNA demethylation.

scholarly journals Deletion of Tet proteins results in quantitative disparities during ESC differentiation partially attributable to alterations in gene expression

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Reimer ◽  
Kirthi Pulakanti ◽  
Linzheng Shi ◽  
Alex Abel ◽  
Mingyu Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Intermediate Phenotype ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Tet Proteins ◽  
Tet Protein

Abstract Background: The Tet protein family (Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3) regulate DNA methylation through conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which can ultimately result in DNA demethylation and play a critical role during early mammalian development and pluripotency¬. While multiple groups have generated knockouts combining loss of different Tet proteins in murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), differences in genetic background and approaches has made it difficult to directly compare results and discern the direct mechanism by which Tet proteins regulate the transcriptome. To address this concern, we utilized genomic editing in an isogenic pluripotent background which permitted a quantitative, flow-cytometry based measurement of pluripotency in combination with genome-wide assessment of gene expression and DNA methylation changes. Our ultimate goal was to generate a resource of large-scale datasets to permit hypothesis-generating experiments. Results: We demonstrate a quantitative disparity in the differentiation ability among Tet protein deletions, with Tet2 single knockout exhibiting the most severe defect, while loss of Tet1 ¬alone or combinations of Tet genes showed a quantitatively intermediate phenotype. Using a combination of transcriptomic and epigenomic approaches we demonstrate an increase in DNA hypermethylation and a divergence of transcriptional profiles in pluripotency among Tet deletions, with loss of Tet2 having the most profound effect in undifferentiated ESCs. Conclusions: We conclude that loss of Tet2 has the most dramatic effect both on the phenotype of ESCs and the transcriptome compared to other genotypes. While loss of Tet proteins increased DNA hypermethylation, especially in gene promoters, these changes in DNA methylation did not correlate with gene expression changes. Thus, while loss of different Tet proteins alters DNA methylation, this change does not appear to be directly responsible for transcriptome changes. Thus, loss of Tet proteins likely regulates the transcriptome epigenetically both through altering 5mC but also through additional mechanisms. Nonetheless, the transcriptome changes in pluripotent Tet2-/- ESCs compared to wild-type implies that the disparities in differentiation can be partially attributed to baseline alterations in gene expression.

scholarly journals Paradoxical association of TET loss of function with genome-wide DNA hypomethylation

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (34) ◽  
pp. 16933-16942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaac F. López-Moyado ◽  
Ageliki Tsagaratou ◽  
Hiroshi Yuita ◽  
Hyungseok Seo ◽  
Benjamin Delatte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Genomic Analysis ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Potential Contribution ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Dna Hypomethylation ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Cancer Genomes

Cancer genomes are characterized by focal increases in DNA methylation, co-occurring with widespread hypomethylation. Here, we show that TET loss of function results in a similar genomic footprint. Both 5hmC in wild-type (WT) genomes and DNA hypermethylation in TET-deficient genomes are largely confined to the active euchromatic compartment, consistent with the known functions of TET proteins in DNA demethylation and the known distribution of 5hmC at transcribed genes and active enhancers. In contrast, an unexpected DNA hypomethylation noted in multiple TET-deficient genomes is primarily observed in the heterochromatin compartment. In a mouse model of T cell lymphoma driven by TET deficiency (Tet2/3 DKO T cells), genomic analysis of malignant T cells revealed DNA hypomethylation in the heterochromatic genomic compartment, as well as reactivation of repeat elements and enrichment for single-nucleotide alterations, primarily in heterochromatic regions of the genome. Moreover, hematopoietic stem/precursor cells (HSPCs) doubly deficient for Tet2 and Dnmt3a displayed greater losses of DNA methylation than HSPCs singly deficient for Tet2 or Dnmt3a alone, potentially explaining the unexpected synergy between DNMT3A and TET2 mutations in myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. Tet1-deficient cells showed decreased localization of DNMT3A in the heterochromatin compartment compared with WT cells, pointing to a functional interaction between TET and DNMT proteins and providing a potential explanation for the hypomethylation observed in TET-deficient genomes. Our data suggest that TET loss of function may at least partially underlie the characteristic pattern of global hypomethylation coupled to regional hypermethylation observed in diverse cancer genomes, and highlight the potential contribution of heterochromatin hypomethylation to oncogenesis.

scholarly journals Deletion of Tet proteins results in quantitative disparities during ESC differentiation partially attributable to differences in gene expression

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Reimer ◽  
Kirthi Pulakanti ◽  
Linzheng Shi ◽  
Alex Abel ◽  
Mingyu Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Intermediate Phenotype ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Tet Proteins ◽  
Tet Protein

Abstract Background: The Tet protein family (Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3) regulate DNA methylation through conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which can ultimately result in DNA demethylation and play a critical role during early mammalian development and pluripotency¬. While multiple groups have generated knockouts combining loss of different Tet proteins in murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), differences in genetic background and approaches has made it difficult to directly compare results and discern the direct mechanism by which Tet proteins regulate the transcriptome. To address this concern, we utilized genomic editing in an isogenic pluripotent background which permitted a quantitative, flow-cytometry based measurement of pluripotency in combination with genome-wide assessment of gene expression and DNA methylation changes. Our ultimate goal was to generate a resource of large-scale datasets to permit hypothesis-generating experiments. Results: We demonstrate a quantitative disparity in the differentiation ability among Tet protein deletions, with Tet2 single knockout exhibiting the most severe defect, while loss of Tet1 ¬alone or combinations of Tet genes showed a quantitatively intermediate phenotype. Using a combination of transcriptomic and epigenomic approaches we demonstrate an increase in DNA hypermethylation and a divergence of transcriptional profiles in pluripotency among Tet deletions, with loss of Tet2 having the most profound effect in undifferentiated ESCs. Conclusions: We conclude that loss of Tet2 has the most dramatic effect both on the phenotype of ESCs and the transcriptome compared to other genotypes. While loss of Tet proteins increased DNA hypermethylation, especially in gene promoters, these changes in DNA methylation did not correlate with gene expression changes. Thus, while loss of different Tet proteins alters DNA methylation, this change does not appear to be directly responsible for transcriptome changes. Thus, loss of Tet proteins likely regulates the transcriptome epigenetically both through altering 5mC but also through additional mechanisms. Nonetheless, the transcriptome changes in pluripotent Tet2-/- ESCs compared to wild-type implies that the disparities in differentiation can be partially attributed to baseline alterations in gene expression.

scholarly journals Deletion of Tet proteins results in quantitative disparities during ESC differentiation partially attributable to alterations in gene expression

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Reimer ◽  
Kirthi Pulakanti ◽  
Linzheng Shi ◽  
Alex Abel ◽  
Mingyu Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Intermediate Phenotype ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Tet Proteins ◽  
Tet Protein

Abstract Background: The Tet protein family (Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3) regulate DNA methylation through conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which can ultimately result in DNA demethylation and play a critical role during early mammalian development and pluripotency¬. While multiple groups have generated knockouts combining loss of different Tet proteins in murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), differences in genetic background and approaches has made it difficult to directly compare results and discern the direct mechanism by which Tet proteins regulate the transcriptome. To address this concern, we utilized genomic editing in an isogenic pluripotent background which permitted a quantitative, flow-cytometry based measurement of pluripotency in combination with genome-wide assessment of gene expression and DNA methylation changes. Our ultimate goal was to generate a resource of large-scale datasets to permit hypothesis-generating experiments. Results: We demonstrate a quantitative disparity in the differentiation ability among Tet protein deletions, with Tet2 single knockout exhibiting the most severe defect, while loss of Tet1 ¬alone or combinations of Tet genes showed a quantitatively intermediate phenotype. Using a combination of transcriptomic and epigenomic approaches we demonstrate an increase in DNA hypermethylation and a divergence of transcriptional profiles in pluripotency among Tet deletions, with loss of Tet2 having the most profound effect in undifferentiated ESCs. Conclusions: We conclude that loss of Tet2 has the most dramatic effect both on the phenotype of ESCs and the transcriptome compared to other genotypes. While loss of Tet proteins increased DNA hypermethylation, especially in gene promoters, these changes in DNA methylation did not correlate with gene expression changes. Thus, while loss of different Tet proteins alters DNA methylation, this change does not appear to be directly responsible for transcriptome changes. Thus, loss of Tet proteins likely regulates the transcriptome epigenetically both through altering 5mC but also through additional mechanisms. Nonetheless, the transcriptome changes in pluripotent Tet2-/- ESCs compared to wild-type implies that the disparities in differentiation can be partially attributed to baseline alterations in gene expression.

scholarly journals Coordinate Regulation of TET2 and EBNA2 Controls the DNA Methylation State of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus

2017 ◽  
Vol 91 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fang Lu ◽  
Andreas Wiedmer ◽  
Kayla A. Martin ◽  
Priyankara J. M. S. Wickramasinghe ◽  
Andrew V. Kossenkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Epstein Barr Virus ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Methylation State ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Barr Virus ◽  
Active Dna Demethylation ◽  
Epstein Barr

ABSTRACT Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latency and its associated carcinogenesis are regulated by dynamic changes in DNA methylation of both virus and host genomes. We show here that the ten-eleven translocation 2 (TET2) gene, implicated in hydroxymethylation and active DNA demethylation, is a key regulator of EBV latency type DNA methylation patterning. EBV latency types are defined by DNA methylation patterns that restrict expression of viral latency genes. We show that TET2 mRNA and protein expression correlate with the highly demethylated EBV type III latency program permissive for expression of EBNA2, EBNA3s, and LMP transcripts. We show that short hairpin RNA (shRNA) depletion of TET2 results in a decrease in latency gene expression but can also trigger a switch to lytic gene expression. TET2 depletion results in the loss of hydroxymethylated cytosine and a corresponding increase in cytosine methylation at key regulatory regions on the viral and host genomes. This also corresponded to a loss of RBP-jκ binding and decreased histone H3K4 trimethylation at these sites. Furthermore, we show that the TET2 gene itself is regulated in a fashion similar to that of the EBV genome. Chromatin immunoprecipitation high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) revealed that the TET2 gene contains EBNA2-dependent RBP-jκ and EBF1 binding sites and is subject to DNA methylation-associated transcriptional silencing similar to what is seen in EBV latency type III genomes. Finally, we provide evidence that TET2 colocalizes with EBNA2-EBF1-RBP-jκ binding sites and can interact with EBNA2 by coimmunoprecipitation. Taken together, these findings indicate that TET2 gene transcripts are regulated similarly to EBV type III latency genes and that TET2 protein is a cofactor of EBNA2 and coregulator of the EBV type III latency program and DNA methylation state. IMPORTANCE Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latency and carcinogenesis involve the selective epigenetic modification of viral and cellular genes. Here, we show that TET2, a cellular tumor suppressor involved in active DNA demethylation, plays a central role in regulating the DNA methylation state during EBV latency. TET2 is coordinately regulated and functionally interacts with the viral oncogene EBNA2. TET2 and EBNA2 function cooperatively to demethylate genes important for EBV-driven B-cell growth transformation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document