scholarly journals Evaluating the Sensitivity of Sporadic Pancreatic Cancer to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) Inhibition (Velaparib, Olaparib, AG14361) as Single Agents and as Chemo-sensitizers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Angel de Soto
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cell ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
Ic50 Values

AbstractAfter resection of pancreatic cancer local recurrence occurs in 50%-80% of the cases while metastasis develops 75% of the time. Current, adjuvant therapy often consists of gemcitabine, cisplatin and/or 5-fluorouracil which add a modest increase in median survival by 4-5 months. In this study, we treated human pancreatic cancer cells with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors (AG14361, Veliparib and Olaparib) alone or with gemcitabine, cisplatin or 5 – fluorouracil. Methods: CFPAC-1 and BXPC-3, HPAC human pancreatic cancer cell lines were treated for 72 hours with PARP inhibitors alone or in combination with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or 5 – fluorouracil. Validated MTT assays were used to form dose response curves from which the IC50 values were calculated. Results: The PARP1 IC50 values for CFPAC-1, BXPC-3 and HPAC pancreatic cancer cell lines were AG14361 (14.3 μM, 12.7 μM, 38.3 μM), Veliparib (52.6 μM, 100.9 μM 102.0 μM) and Olaparib (79.5 μM, 184.8 μM, 200.2 μM). The IC50 values of cisplatin, were decreased up to 60 fold in the presence of clinically relevant amounts of PARP inhibitor while 5-flourouracil IC50 values were decreased up to 6000 fold in the presence of clinically relevant amounts of PARP inhibitor. Gemcitabine was inhibited up to 73% by PARP inhibitors. Conclusions: Sporadic human pancreatic cancer cells are sensitive to PARP inhibition. PARP inhibitors significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil while inhibiting gemcitabine. There is little correlation between endogenous PARP activity and the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors.

scholarly journals Evaluating the Sensitivity of Sporadic Pancreatic Cancer to Poly(ADPribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibition (Velaparib, Olaparib, AG14361) as Single Agents and as Chemo-sensitizers

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Joseph Angel de Soto ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cell ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Parp Inhibition ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
Ic50 Values

After resection of pancreatic cancer local recurrence occurs in 50%-80% of the cases while metastasis develops 75% of the time. Current, adjuvant therapy often consists of gemcitabine, cisplatin and/or 5-fluorouracil which add a modest increase in median survival by 4-5 months. In this study, we treated human pancreatic cancer cells with poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors (AG14361, Veliparib and Olaparib) alone or with gemcitabine, cisplatin or 5-fluorouracil. Methods: CFPAC-1 and BXPC-3, HPAC human pancreatic cancer cell lines were treated for 72 hours with PARP inhibitors alone or in combination with gemcitabine, cisplatin, or 5 – fluorouracil. Validated MTT assays were used to form dose response curves from which the IC50 values were calculated. Results: The PARP1 IC50 values for CFPAC-1, BXPC-3 and HPAC pancreatic cancer cell lines were AG14361 (14.3 µM, 12.7 µM, 38.3 µM), Veliparib (52.6 µM, 100.9 µM 102.0 µM) and Olaparib (79.5 µM, 184.8 µM, 200.2 µM). The IC50 values of cisplatin, were decreased up to 60 fold in the presence of clinically relevant amounts of PARP inhibitor while 5-flourouracil IC50 values were decreased up to 6000 fold in the presence of clinically relevant amounts of PARP inhibitor. Gemcitabine was inhibited up to 73% by PARP inhibitors. Conclusions: Sporadic human pancreatic cancer cells are sensitive to PARP inhibition. PARP inhibitors significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil while inhibiting gemcitabine. There is little correlation between endogenous PARP activity and the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors.

Identification and characterization of CCK-B/gastrin receptors in human pancreatic cancer cell lines

1994 ◽  
Vol 266 (1) ◽  
pp. R277-R283 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Smith ◽  
G. Liu ◽  
V. Soundararajan ◽  
P. J. McLaughlin ◽  
I. S. Zagon
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cell ◽  
Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells

The gastrointestinal peptide cholecystokinin (CCK) is known to stimulate growth of human pancreatic cancer in a receptor-mediated fashion. The purpose of this study was to characterize the receptor responsible for the trophic effects of CCK in cancer cells. With the use of homogenates of PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells grown in vitro, the binding characteristics and optimal conditions of radiolabeled selective CCK-receptor antagonists ([3H]L-365,260 and [3H]L-364,718) were examined. Specific and saturable binding was detected with [3H]L-365,260, and Scatchard analysis revealed that the data were consistent for a single site of binding with a binding affinity of 4.3 +/- 0.6 nM and a binding capacity (Bmax) of 283 +/- 68 fmol/mg protein in log phase cells. Binding was dependent on protein concentration, time, temperature, and pH and was sensitive to Na+, K+, Mg2+, and ethylene glycol-bis(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid. In contrast to log phase cells, Bmax decreased by 80 and 92% in confluent and postconfluent cultures, respectively. Subcellular fractionation studies revealed that binding was in the membrane fraction. Competition experiments indicated that L-365,260 and gastrin were more effective at displacing the radiolabeled L-365,260 than CCK. No binding was detected with the CCK-A antagonist [3H]L-364,718. Assays performed with [3H]L-365,260 on five additional human pancreatic cancer cell lines in vitro and tumor tissue from xenografts in nude mice also revealed specific and saturable binding. These results provide the first identification of a CCK-B/gastrin receptor in human pancreatic cancer cells and tumors and explain the effects of CCK on the growth of this malignancy.

scholarly journals The Effects of 2′,4′-Dihydroxy-6′-methoxy-3′,5′- dimethylchalcone from Cleistocalyx operculatus Buds on Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines

Molecules ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (14) ◽  
pp. 2538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huynh Tuan ◽  
Bui Minh ◽  
Phuong Tran ◽  
Jeong Lee ◽  
Ha Oanh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Caspase 3 ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cell ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell ◽  
Cleistocalyx Operculatus ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells

2′,4′-Dihydroxy-6’-methoxy-3′,5′-dimethylchalcone (DMC), a principal natural chalcone of Cleistocalyx operculatus buds, suppresses the growth of many types of cancer cells. However, the effects of this compound on pancreatic cancer cells have not been evaluated. In our experiments, we explored the effects of this chalcone on two human pancreatic cancer cell lines. A cell proliferation assay revealed that DMC exhibited concentration-dependent cytotoxicity against PANC-1 and MIA PACA2 cells, with IC50 values of 10.5 ± 0.8 and 12.2 ± 0.9 µM, respectively. Treatment of DMC led to the apoptosis of PANC-1 by caspase-3 activation as revealed by annexin-V/propidium iodide double-staining. Western blotting indicated that DMC induced proteolytic activation of caspase-3 and -9, degradation of caspase-3 substrate proteins (including poly[ADP-ribose] polymerase [PARP]), augmented bak protein level, while attenuating the expression of bcl-2 in PANC-1 cells. Taken together, our results provide experimental evidence to support that DMC may serve as a useful chemotherapeutic agent for control of human pancreatic cancer cells.

scholarly journals Light Stability, Pro-Apoptotic and Genotoxic Properties of Silver (I) Complexes of Metronidazole and 4-Hydroxymethylpyridine against Pancreatic Cancer Cells In Vitro

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3848
Author(s):  
Dominik Żyro ◽  
Agnieszka Śliwińska ◽  
Izabela Szymczak-Pajor ◽  
Małgorzata Stręk ◽  
Justyn Ochocki
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Silver Nitrate ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cell ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells

Antimicrobial properties of silver (I) ion and its complexes are well recognized. However, recent studies suggest that both silver (I) ion and its complexes possess anticancer activity associated with oxidative stress-induced apoptosis of various cancer cells. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether silver nitrate and its complexes with metronidazole and 4-hydroxymethylpyridine exert anticancer action against human pancreatic cancer cell lines (PANC-1 and 1.2B4). In the study, we compared decomposition speed for silver complexes under the influence of daylight and UV-A (ultraviolet-A) rays. We employed the MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazonium bromide) assay to evaluate the cytotoxicity and the alkaline comet assay to determine genotoxicity of silver nitrate and its complexes. Flow cytometry and the Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit were used to detect the apoptosis of human pancreatic cancer cells. We found a dose dependent decrease of both pancreatic cancer cell line viability after exposure to silver nitrate and its complexes. The flow cytometry analysis confirmed that cell death occurred mainly via apoptosis. We also documented that the studied compounds induced DNA damage. Metronidazole and 4-hydroxymethylpyridine alone did not significantly affect viability and level of DNA damage of pancreatic cancer cell lines. Complex compounds showed better stability than AgNO3, which decomposed slower than when exposed to light. UV-A significantly influences the speed of silver salt decomposition reaction. To conclude, obtained data demonstrated that silver nitrate and its complexes exerted anticancer action against human pancreatic cancer cells.

scholarly journals Differential mucin gene expression in human pancreatic and colon cancer cells

1991 ◽  
Vol 276 (3) ◽  
pp. 599-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Yonezawa ◽  
J C Byrd ◽  
R Dahiya ◽  
J J L Ho ◽  
J R Gum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Northern Blots ◽  
Western Blots ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells

The purpose of this study was to determine the quantity and nature of the mucins synthesized and secreted by four different pancreatic cancer cell lines. Well- to moderately-differentiated SW1990 and CAPAN-2 human pancreatic cancer cells were found to produce more high-Mr glycoprotein (HMG) than less-differentiated MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells. Most of the labelled HMG was secreted within 24 h. The results of chemical and enzymic degradation, ion-exchange chromatography and density-gradient centrifugation indicated that the HMG in SW1990 and CAPAN-2 cells has the properties expected for mucins, whereas much of the HMG in MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells may not be mucin, but proteoglycan. These results are consistent with immunoblots and Northern blots showing the presence of apomucin and apomucin mRNA in SW1990 and CAPAN-2 cells, but not in MIA PaCa-2 and PANC-1 cells. The Western blots and Northern blots also show that SW1990 and CAPAN-2 cells, like breast cancer cells, have the mammary-type apomucin and mRNA coded by the MUC1 gene, but lack the intestinal type apomucin and mRNA coded by the MUC2 gene. In contrast, the colon cancer cell lines tested in culture express apomucin and mRNA coded by MUC2 but not by MUC1.

scholarly journals Blocking IL-6/GP130 Signaling Inhibits Cell Viability/Proliferation, Glycolysis, and Colony Forming Activity in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 417-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiang Chen ◽  
Jilai Tian ◽  
Gloria H. Su ◽  
Jiayuh Lin
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Viability ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cell ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Multiple Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
Stat3 Phosphorylation

Background:Elevated production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6) and dysfunction of IL-6 signaling promotes tumorigenesis and are associated with poor survival outcomes in multiple cancer types. Recent studies showed that the IL-6/GP130/STAT3 signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in pancreatic cancer development and maintenance.Objective:We aim to develop effective treatments through inhibition of IL-6/GP130 signaling in pancreatic cancer.Methods:The effects on cell viability and cell proliferation were measured by MTT and BrdU assays, respectively. The effects on glycolysis was determined by cell-based assays to measure lactate levels. Protein expression changes were evaluated by western blotting and immunoprecipitation. siRNA transfection was used to knock down estrogen receptor α gene expression. Colony forming ability was determined by colony forming cell assay.Results:We demonstrated that IL-6 can induce pancreatic cancer cell viability/proliferation and glycolysis. We also showed that a repurposing FDA-approved drug bazedoxifene could inhibit the IL-6/IL-6R/GP130 complexes. Bazedoxifene also inhibited JAK1 binding to IL-6/IL-6R/GP130 complexes and STAT3 phosphorylation. In addition, bazedoxifene impeded IL-6 mediated cell viability/ proliferation and glycolysis in pancreatic cancer cells. Consistently, other IL-6/GP130 inhibitors SC144 and evista showed similar inhibition of IL-6 stimulated cell viability, cell proliferation and glycolysis. Furthermore, all three IL-6/GP130 inhibitors reduced the colony forming ability in pancreatic cancer cells.Conclusion:Our findings demonstrated that IL-6 stimulates pancreatic cancer cell proliferation, survival and glycolysis, and supported persistent IL-6 signaling is a viable therapeutic target for pancreatic cancer using IL-6/GP130 inhibitors.

scholarly journals Differential Gemcitabine Sensitivity in Primary Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells and Paired Stellate Cells Is Driven by Heterogenous Drug Uptake and Processing

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3628
Author(s):  
Manoj Amrutkar ◽  
Nils Tore Vethe ◽  
Caroline S. Verbeke ◽  
Monica Aasrum ◽  
Anette Vefferstad Finstadsveen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Stellate Cells ◽  
Drug Uptake ◽  
Pancreatic Stellate Cells ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
The Impact

Gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is attributed to cancer cell-intrinsic drug processing and the impact of the tumor microenvironment, especially pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs). This study uses human PDAC-derived paired primary cancer cells (PCCs) and PSCs from four different tumors, and the PDAC cell lines BxPC-3, Mia PaCa-2, and Panc-1, to assess the fate of gemcitabine by measuring its cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and LC-MS/MS-based metabolite analysis. Expression analysis and siRNA-mediated knockdown of key regulators of gemcitabine (hENT1, CDA, DCK, NT5C1A) was performed. Compared to PSCs, both the paired primary PCCs and cancer cell lines showed gemcitabine-induced dose-dependent cytotoxicity, high uptake, as well as high and variable intracellular levels of gemcitabine metabolites. PSCs were gemcitabine-resistant and demonstrated significantly lower drug uptake, which was not influenced by co-culturing with their paired PCCs. Expression of key gemcitabine regulators was variable, but overall strong in the cancer cells and significantly lower or undetectable in PSCs. In cancer cells, hENT1 inhibition significantly downregulated gemcitabine uptake and cytotoxicity, whereas DCK knockdown reduced cytotoxicity. In conclusion, heterogeneity in gemcitabine processing among different pancreatic cancer cells and stellate cells results from the differential expression of molecular regulators which determines the effect of gemcitabine.

Pancreatic Cancer Cells Invasiveness is Mainly Affected by Interleukin-1β not by Transforming Growth Factor-β1

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 235-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Greco ◽  
D. Basso ◽  
P. Fogar ◽  
S. Mazza ◽  
F. Navaglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Extracellular Matrix ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cell ◽  
Matrigel Invasion ◽  
Matrix Adhesion ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
Tgf Β1

Background We investigated in vitro whether IL-1β and TGF-β1 affect pancreatic cancer cell growth, adhesion to the extracellular matrix and Matrigel invasion. Materials and methods Adhesion to fibronectin, laminin and type I collagen, and Matrigel invasion after stimulation with saline, IL-1β and TGF-β1 were evaluated using three primary and three metastatic pancreatic cancer cell lines. Results Extracellular matrix adhesion of control cells varied independently of the metastatic characteristics of the studied cell lines, whereas Matrigel invasion of control cells was partly correlated with the in vivo metastatic potential. IL-1β did not influence extracellular matrix adhesion, whereas it significantly enhanced the invasiveness of three of the six cell lines. TGF-β1 affected the adhesion of one cell line, and exerted contrasting effects on Matrigel invasion of different cell lines. Conclusions IL-1β enhances the invasive capacity of pancreatic cancer cells, whereas TGF-β1 has paradoxical effects on pancreatic cancer cells; this makes it difficult to interfere with TGF-β1 signaling in pancreatic cancer treatment.

Inhibition of cMET in an experimental model of pancreatic cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 185-185
Author(s):  
Sven A. Lang ◽  
Franziska Brandes ◽  
Edward K. Geissler
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cell ◽  
Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Oncogenic Signaling

185 Background: In human pancreatic cancer, expression of cMET is associated with poor survival. So far, activation/expression of cMET by hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) has been shown to induce proliferation and motility in cancer cells. Therefore, we hypothesized that inhibition of cMET in human pancreatic cancer cell lines impairs oncogenic signaling and tumor growth. Methods: Pancreatic cancer cell lines (HPAF-II, MiaPaCa2, L3.6pl, BxPC3, Panc02) and the cMET inhibitor INC280 (Novartis Oncology, Basel) were used. MiaPaCa2 and L3.6pl pancreatic cancer cells were grown with gemcitabine up to 500 and 250 nM, respectively (then called MiaPaCa2(G500) and L3.6pl(G250)). MTT and Boyden Chamber assays were used to determine effects of INC280 on growth and motility of cells in vitro. Expression of growth factor receptors, activation of signaling intermediates and expression of transcription factors were assessed by Western blotting. Finally, in vitro results were validated in an orthotopic tumor model using L3.6pl pancreatic cancer cell line. Results: All pancreatic cancer cell lines showed expression of cMET. In vitro treatment of cancer cells with INC280 led to a minor, dose-dependent inhibition of growth even when cells were supplemented with HGF. In contrast, migration assays showed a significant reduction of cancer cell motility upon INC280 when cells were stimulated with HGF (P<0.05). Regarding oncogenic signaling, INC280 led to inhibition of HGF-induced phosphorylation of AKT, ERK and FAK. In addition, c-Myc expression was diminished in cancer cells. Interestingly, gemcitabine resistant cell line MiaPaCa2(G500) showed higher cMET expression levels compared to the normal MiaPaCa2. Stimulation of MiaPaCa2(G500) with HGF led to strong induction of oncogenic signaling and tumor cell motility, an effect that was significantly diminished by INC280. Moreover, results from in vivo experiments show that therapy with INC280 (10 mg/kg/d) significantly reduces tumor growth as determined by final tumor weight (P<0.05). Conclusions: In pancreatic cancer cell lines, targeting cMET with INC280 abrogates oncogenic signaling in vitro and impairs tumor growth in vivo. Therefore, the concept of cMET inhibition warrants further preclinical evaluation.

scholarly journals Intracellular Porphyromonas gingivalis Promotes the Tumorigenic Behavior of Pancreatic Carcinoma Cells

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2331 ◽  
Author(s):  
JebaMercy Gnanasekaran ◽  
Adi Binder Gallimidi ◽  
Elias Saba ◽  
Karthikeyan Pandi ◽  
Luba Eli Berchoer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Porphyromonas Gingivalis ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
Oral Bacteria ◽  
Oral Microbiome ◽  
Human Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
Increased Risk

Porphyromonas gingivalis is a member of the dysbiotic oral microbiome associated with oral inflammation and periodontal disease. Intriguingly, epidemiological studies link P. gingivalis to an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Given that oral bacteria are detected in human pancreatic cancer, and both mouse and human pancreata harbor microbiota, we explored the involvement of P. gingivalis in pancreatic tumorigenesis using cell lines and a xenograft model. Live P. gingivalis induced proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells; however, surprisingly, this effect was independent of Toll-like receptor 2, the innate immune receptor that is engaged in response to P. gingivalis on other cancer and immune cells, and is required for P. gingivalis to induce alveolar bone resorption. Instead, we found that P. gingivalis survives inside pancreatic cancer cells, a trait that can be enhanced in vitro and is increased by hypoxia, a central characteristic of pancreatic cancer. Increased tumor cell proliferation was related to the degree of intracellular persistence, and infection of tumor cells with P. gingivalis led to enhanced growth in vivo. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate the direct effect of exposure to P. gingivalis on the tumorigenic behavior of pancreatic cancer cell lines. Our findings shed light on potential mechanisms underlying the pancreatic cancer–periodontitis link.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document