scholarly journals The S-phase Cyclin Clb5 Promotes rDNA Stability by Maintaining Replication Initiation Efficiency in rDNA

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayuko Goto ◽  
Mariko Sasaki ◽  
Takehiko Kobayashi
Keyword(s):  
Cellular Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Replication Origins ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Replication Fork Arrest

ABSTRACTRegulation of replication origins is important for complete duplication of the genome, but the effect of origin activation on the cellular response to replication stress is poorly understood. The budding yeast ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) forms tandem repeats and undergoes replication fork arrest at the replication fork barrier (RFB), inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and genome instability accompanied by copy number alterations. Here we demonstrate that the S-phase cyclin Clb5 promotes rDNA stability. Absence of Clb5 led to reduced efficiency of replication initiation in rDNA but had little effect on the amount of replication forks arrested at the RFB, suggesting that arrival of the converging fork is delayed and forks are more stably arrested at the RFB. Deletion of CLB5 affected neither DSB formation nor its repair at the RFB, but led to an accumulation of recombination intermediates. Therefore, arrested forks at the RFB may be subject to DSB-independent, recombination-dependent rDNA instability. The rDNA instability in clb5Δ was not completely suppressed by the absence of Fob1, which is responsible for fork arrest at the RFB. Thus, Clb5 establishes the proper interval for active replication origins and shortens the travel distance for DNA polymerases, which may reduce Fob1-independent DNA damage.

scholarly journals The S-Phase Cyclin Clb5 Promotes rRNA Gene (rDNA) Stability by Maintaining Replication Initiation Efficiency in rDNA

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayuko Goto ◽  
Mariko Sasaki ◽  
Takehiko Kobayashi
Keyword(s):  
Cellular Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Tandem Repeats ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Rrna Gene ◽  
Replication Origins ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Replication Fork Arrest

ABSTRACT Regulation of replication origins is important for complete duplication of the genome, but the effect of origin activation on the cellular response to replication stress is poorly understood. The budding yeast rRNA gene (rDNA) forms tandem repeats and undergoes replication fork arrest at the replication fork barrier (RFB), inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and genome instability accompanied by copy number alterations. Here, we demonstrate that the S-phase cyclin Clb5 promotes rDNA stability. Absence of Clb5 led to reduced efficiency of replication initiation in rDNA but had little effect on the number of replication forks arrested at the RFB, suggesting that arrival of the converging fork is delayed and forks are more stably arrested at the RFB. Deletion of CLB5 affected neither DSB formation nor its repair at the RFB but led to homologous recombination-dependent rDNA instability. Therefore, arrested forks at the RFB may be subject to DSB-independent, recombination-dependent rDNA instability. The rDNA instability in clb5Δ was not completely suppressed by the absence of Fob1, which is responsible for fork arrest at the RFB. Thus, Clb5 establishes the proper interval for active replication origins and shortens the travel distance for DNA polymerases, which may reduce Fob1-independent DNA damage.

scholarly journals Managing Single-Stranded DNA during Replication Stress in Fission Yeast

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Sabatinos ◽  
Susan L. Forsburg
Keyword(s):  
Cellular Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Single Stranded Dna ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Primary Signal ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
Chromosome Integrity

Replication fork stalling generates a variety of responses, most of which cause an increase in single-stranded DNA. ssDNA is a primary signal of replication distress that activates cellular checkpoints. It is also a potential source of genome instability and a substrate for mutation and recombination. Therefore, managing ssDNA levels is crucial to chromosome integrity. Limited ssDNA accumulation occurs in wild-type cells under stress. In contrast, cells lacking the replication checkpoint cannot arrest forks properly and accumulate large amounts of ssDNA. This likely occurs when the replication fork polymerase and helicase units are uncoupled. Some cells with mutations in the replication helicase (mcm-ts) mimic checkpoint-deficient cells, and accumulate extensive areas of ssDNA to trigger the G2-checkpoint. Another category of helicase mutant (mcm4-degron) causes fork stalling in early S-phase due to immediate loss of helicase function. Intriguingly, cells realize that ssDNA is present, but fail to detect that they accumulate ssDNA, and continue to divide. Thus, the cellular response to replication stalling depends on checkpoint activity and the time that replication stress occurs in S-phase. In this review we describe the signs, signals, and symptoms of replication arrest from an ssDNA perspective. We explore the possible mechanisms for these effects. We also advise the need for caution when detecting and interpreting data related to the accumulation of ssDNA.

scholarly journals Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint

2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (4) ◽  
pp. 537-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Meister ◽  
Angela Taddei ◽  
Laurence Vernis ◽  
Mickaël Poidevin ◽  
Susan M. Gasser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Temporal Separation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Recombination Proteins ◽  
Hydroxyurea Treatment ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
Replication Fork Arrest ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

In response to DNA damage and replication pausing, eukaryotes activate checkpoint pathways that prevent genomic instability by coordinating cell cycle progression with DNA repair. The intra-S-phase checkpoint has been proposed to protect stalled replication forks from pathological rearrangements that could result from unscheduled recombination. On the other hand, recombination may be needed to cope with either stalled forks or double-strand breaks resulting from hydroxyurea treatment. We have exploited fission yeast to elucidate the relationship between replication fork stalling, loading of replication and recombination proteins onto DNA, and the intra-S checkpoint. Here, we show that a functional recombination machinery is not essential for recovery from replication fork arrest and instead can lead to nonfunctional fork structures. We find that Rad22-containing foci are rare in S-phase cells, but peak in G2 phase cells after a perturbed S phase. Importantly, we find that the intra-S checkpoint is necessary to avoid aberrant strand-exchange events during a hydroxyurea block.

scholarly journals Managing Single-Stranded DNA during Replication Stress in Fission Yeast

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Sabatinos ◽  
Susan L. Forsburg
Keyword(s):  
Cellular Response ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Single Stranded Dna ◽  
Replication Checkpoint ◽  
Primary Signal ◽  
Fork Stalling ◽  
Chromosome Integrity

Replication fork stalling generates a variety of responses, most of which cause an increase in single-stranded DNA. ssDNA is a primary signal of replication distress that activates cellular checkpoints. It is also a potential source of genome instability and a substrate for mutation and recombination. Therefore, managing ssDNA levels is crucial to chromosome integrity. Limited ssDNA accumulation occurs in wild-type cells under stress. In contrast, cells lacking the replication checkpoint cannot arrest forks properly and accumulate large amounts of ssDNA. This likely occurs when the replication fork polymerase and helicase units are uncoupled. Some cells with mutations in the replication helicase (mcm-ts) mimic checkpoint-deficient cells, and accumulate extensive areas of ssDNA to trigger the G2-checkpoint. Another category of helicase mutant (mcm4-degron) causes fork stalling in early S-phase due to immediate loss of helicase function. Intriguingly, cells realize that ssDNA is present, but fail to detect that they accumulate ssDNA, and continue to divide. Thus, the cellular response to replication stalling depends on checkpoint activity and the time that replication stress occurs in S-phase. In this review we describe the signs, signals, and symptoms of replication arrest from an ssDNA perspective. We explore the possible mechanisms for these effects. We also advise the need for caution when detecting and interpreting data related to the accumulation of ssDNA.

scholarly journals Unscheduled DNA replication in G1 causes genome instability through head-to-tail replication fork collisions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl-Uwe Reusswig ◽  
Julia Bittmann ◽  
Martina Peritore ◽  
Michael Wierer ◽  
Matthias Mann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Dna Replication Initiation ◽  
Chromosome Breaks ◽  
Naturally Occurring ◽  
Identical Response

DNA replicates once per cell cycle. Interfering with the regulation of DNA replication initiation generates genome instability through over-replication and has been linked to early stages of cancer development. Here, we engineered genetic systems in budding yeast to induce unscheduled replication in the G1-phase of the cell cycle. Unscheduled G1 replication initiated at canonical S-phase origins across the genome. We quantified differences in replisomes in G1- and S-phase and identified firing factors, polymerase α, and histone supply as factors that limit replication outside S-phase. G1 replication per se did not trigger cellular checkpoints. Subsequent replication during S-phase, however, resulted in over-replication and led to chromosome breaks via head-to-tail replication fork collisions that are marked by chromosome-wide, strand-biased occurrence of RPA-bound single-stranded DNA. Low-level, sporadic induction of G1 replication induced an identical response, indicating findings from synthetic systems are applicable to naturally occurring scenarios of unscheduled replication initiation by G1/S deregulation.

scholarly journals qDSB-Seq is a general method for genome-wide quantification of DNA double-strand breaks using sequencing

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingjie Zhu ◽  
Anna Biernacka ◽  
Benjamin Pardo ◽  
Norbert Dojer ◽  
Romain Forey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Replication Fork ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Physiological Relevance ◽  
A Site ◽  
General Method

AbstractDNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most lethal types of DNA damage and frequently cause genome instability. Sequencing-based methods for mapping DSBs have been developed but they allow measurement only of relative frequencies of DSBs between loci, which limits our understanding of the physiological relevance of detected DSBs. Here we propose quantitative DSB sequencing (qDSB-Seq), a method providing both DSB frequencies per cell and their precise genomic coordinates. We induce spike-in DSBs by a site-specific endonuclease and use them to quantify detected DSBs (labeled, e.g., using i-BLESS). Utilizing qDSB-Seq, we determine numbers of DSBs induced by a radiomimetic drug and replication stress, and reveal two orders of magnitude differences in DSB frequencies. We also measure absolute frequencies of Top1-dependent DSBs at natural replication fork barriers. qDSB-Seq is compatible with various DSB labeling methods in different organisms and allows accurate comparisons of absolute DSB frequencies across samples.

scholarly journals Repair Kinetics of Genomic Interstrand DNA Cross-Links: Evidence for DNA Double-Strand Break-Dependent Activation of the Fanconi Anemia/BRCA Pathway

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Rothfuss ◽  
Markus Grompe
Keyword(s):  
Fanconi Anemia ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Subsequent Formation ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Cross Links ◽  
Kinetics Of

ABSTRACT The detailed mechanisms of DNA interstrand cross-link (ICL) repair and the involvement of the Fanconi anemia (FA)/BRCA pathway in this process are not known. Present models suggest that recognition and repair of ICL in human cells occur primarily during the S phase. Here we provide evidence for a refined model in which ICLs are recognized and are rapidly incised by ERCC1/XPF independent of DNA replication. However, the incised ICLs are then processed further and DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) form exclusively in the S phase. FA cells are fully proficient in the sensing and incision of ICL as well as in the subsequent formation of DSB, suggesting a role of the FA/BRCA pathway downstream in ICL repair. In fact, activation of FANCD2 occurs slowly after ICL treatment and correlates with the appearance of DSB in the S phase. In contrast, activation is rapid after ionizing radiation, indicating that the FA/BRCA pathway is specifically activated upon DSB formation. Furthermore, the formation of FANCD2 foci is restricted to a subpopulation of cells, which can be labeled by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation. We therefore conclude that the FA/BRCA pathway, while being dispensable for the early events in ICL repair, is activated in S-phase cells after DSB have formed.

scholarly journals Emerging Technologies for Genome-Wide Profiling of DNA Breakage

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Rybin ◽  
Melina Ramic ◽  
Natalie R. Ricciardi ◽  
Philipp Kapranov ◽  
Claes Wahlestedt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Instability ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Nucleotide ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Wide Scale ◽  
Nucleotide Resolution ◽  
Genomic Regions

Genome instability is associated with myriad human diseases and is a well-known feature of both cancer and neurodegenerative disease. Until recently, the ability to assess DNA damage—the principal driver of genome instability—was limited to relatively imprecise methods or restricted to studying predefined genomic regions. Recently, new techniques for detecting DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) and single strand breaks (SSBs) with next-generation sequencing on a genome-wide scale with single nucleotide resolution have emerged. With these new tools, efforts are underway to define the “breakome” in normal aging and disease. Here, we compare the relative strengths and weaknesses of these technologies and their potential application to studying neurodegenerative diseases.

The regulation of the DNA damage response at telomeres: focus on kinases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Galli ◽  
Chiara Frigerio ◽  
Maria Pia Longhese ◽  
Michela Clerici
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Replicative Senescence ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Linear Chromosomes

The natural ends of linear chromosomes resemble those of accidental double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs induce a multifaceted cellular response that promotes the repair of lesions and slows down cell cycle progression. This response is not elicited at chromosome ends, which are organized in nucleoprotein structures called telomeres. Besides counteracting DSB response through specialized telomere-binding proteins, telomeres also prevent chromosome shortening. Despite of the different fate of telomeres and DSBs, many proteins involved in the DSB response also localize at telomeres and participate in telomere homeostasis. In particular, the DSB master regulators Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR contribute to telomere length maintenance and arrest cell cycle progression when chromosome ends shorten, thus promoting a tumor-suppressive process known as replicative senescence. During senescence, the actions of both these apical kinases and telomere-binding proteins allow checkpoint activation while bulk DNA repair activities at telomeres are still inhibited. Checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest also prevents further telomere erosion and deprotection that would favor chromosome rearrangements, which are known to increase cancer-associated genome instability. This review summarizes recent insights into functions and regulation of Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR at telomeres both in the presence and in the absence of telomerase, focusing mainly on discoveries in budding yeast.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document