scholarly journals DNA extraction and host depletion methods significantly impact and potentially bias bacterial detection in a biological fluid

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Ganda ◽  
Kristen L. Beck ◽  
Niina Haiminen ◽  
Ban Kawas ◽  
Brittany Cronk ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAbstractUntargeted sequencing of nucleic acids present in food can inform the detection of food safety and origin, as well as product tampering and mislabeling issues. The application of such technologies to food analysis could reveal valuable insights that are simply unobtainable by targeted testing, leading to the efforts of applying such technologies in the food industry. However, before these approaches can be applied, it is imperative to verify that the most appropriate methods are used at every step of the process: gathering primary material, laboratory methods, data analysis, and interpretation.The focus of this study is in gathering the primary material, in this case, DNA. We used bovine milk as a model to 1) evaluate commercially available kits for their ability to extract nucleic acids from inoculated bovine milk; 2) evaluate host DNA depletion methods for use with milk, and 3) develop and evaluate a selective lysis-PMA based protocol for host DNA depletion in milk.Our results suggest that magnetic-based nucleic acid extraction methods are best for nucleic acid isolation of bovine milk. Removal of host DNA remains a challenge for untargeted sequencing of milk, highlighting that the individual matrix characteristics should always be considered in food testing. Some reported methods introduce bias against specific types of microbes, which may be particularly problematic in food safety where the detection of Gram-negative pathogens and indicators is essential. Continuous efforts are needed to develop and validate new approaches for untargeted metagenomics in samples with large amounts of DNA from a single host.ImportanceTracking the bacterial communities present in our food has the potential to inform food safety and product origin. To do so, the entire genetic material present in a sample is extracted using chemical methods or commercially available kits and sequenced using next-generation platforms to provide a snapshot of what the relative composition looks like. Because the genetic material of higher organisms present in food (e.g., cow in milk or beef, wheat in flour) is around one thousand times larger than the bacterial content, challenges exist in gathering the information of interest. Additionally, specific bacterial characteristics can make them easier or harder to detect, adding another layer of complexity to this issue. In this study, we demonstrate the impact of using different methods in the ability of detecting specific bacteria and highlight the need to ensure that the most appropriate methods are being used for each particular sample.

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 ◽  
pp. 104519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen Wing-Ho Chu ◽  
Wan-Mui Chan ◽  
Jonathan Daniel Ip ◽  
Cyril Chik-Yan Yip ◽  
Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan ◽  
...  

Viruses ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siemon Ng ◽  
Cassandra Braxton ◽  
Marc Eloit ◽  
Szi Feng ◽  
Romain Fragnoud ◽  
...  

A key step for broad viral detection using high-throughput sequencing (HTS) is optimizing the sample preparation strategy for extracting viral-specific nucleic acids since viral genomes are diverse: They can be single-stranded or double-stranded RNA or DNA, and can vary from a few thousand bases to over millions of bases, which might introduce biases during nucleic acid extraction. In addition, viral particles can be enveloped or non-enveloped with variable resistance to pre-treatment, which may influence their susceptibility to extraction procedures. Since the identity of the potential adventitious agents is unknown prior to their detection, efficient sample preparation should be unbiased toward all different viral types in order to maximize the probability of detecting any potential adventitious viruses using HTS. Furthermore, the quality assessment of each step for sample processing is also a critical but challenging aspect. This paper presents our current perspectives for optimizing upstream sample processing and library preparation as part of the discussion in the Advanced Virus Detection Technologies Interest group (AVDTIG). The topics include: Use of nuclease treatment to enrich for encapsidated nucleic acids, techniques for amplifying low amounts of virus nucleic acids, selection of different extraction methods, relevant controls, the use of spike recovery experiments, and quality control measures during library preparation.


mSystems ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Ganda ◽  
Kristen L. Beck ◽  
Niina Haiminen ◽  
Justin D. Silverman ◽  
Ban Kawas ◽  
...  

Tracking the bacterial communities present in our food has the potential to inform food safety and product origin. To do so, the entire genetic material present in a sample is extracted using chemical methods or commercially available kits and sequenced using next-generation platforms to provide a snapshot of the microbial composition.


Revista Vitae ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Carvajal Barbosa ◽  
Diego Insuasty Cepeda ◽  
Andrés Felipe León Torres ◽  
Maria Mercedes Arias Cortes ◽  
Zuly Jenny Rivera Monroy ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND : Biosensing techniques have been the subject of exponentially increasing interest due to their performance advantages such as high selectivity and sensitivity, easy operation, low cost, short analysis time, simple sample preparation, and real-time detection. Biosensors have been developed by integrating the unique specificity of biological reactions and the high sensitivity of physical sensors. Therefore, there has been a broad scope of applications for biosensing techniques, and nowadays, they are ubiquitous in different areas of environmental, healthcare, and food safety. Biosensors have been used for environmental studies, detecting and quantifying pollutants in water, air, and soil. Biosensors also showed great potential for developing analytical tools with countless applications in diagnosing, preventing, and treating diseases, mainly by detecting biomarkers. Biosensors as a medical device can identify nucleic acids, proteins, peptides, metabolites, etc.; these analytes may be biomarkers associated with the disease status. Bacterial food contamination is considered a worldwide public health issue; biosensor-based analytical techniques can identify the presence or absence of pathogenic agents in food. OBJECTIVES: The present review aims to establish state-of-the-art, comprising the recent advances in the use of nucleic acid-based biosensors and their novel application for the detection of nucleic acids. Emphasis will be given to the performance characteristics, advantages, and challenges. Additionally, food safety applications of nucleic acid-based biosensors will be discussed. METHODS: Recent research articles related to nucleic acid-based biosensors, biosensors for detecting nucleic acids, biosensors and food safety, and biosensors in environmental monitoring were reviewed. Also, biosensing platforms associated with the clinical diagnosis and food industry were included. RESULTS: It is possible to appreciate that multiple applications of nucleic acid-based biosensors have been reported in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of diseases, as well as to identify foodborne pathogenic bacteria. The use of PNA and aptamers opens the possibility of developing new biometric tools with better analytical properties. CONCLUSIONS: Biosensors could be considered the most important tool for preventing, treating, and monitoring diseases that significantly impact human health. The aptamers have advantages as biorecognition elements due to the structural conformation, hybridization capacity, robustness, stability, and lower costs. It is necessary to implement biosensors in situ to identify analytes with high selectivity and lower detection limits.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoonjung Kim ◽  
Mi-Soon Han ◽  
Juwon Kim ◽  
Aerin Kwon ◽  
Kyung-A Lee

A total of 84 nasopharyngeal swab specimens were collected from 84 patients. Viral nucleic acid was extracted by three automated extraction systems: QIAcube (Qiagen, Germany), EZ1 Advanced XL (Qiagen), and MICROLAB Nimbus IVD (Hamilton, USA). Fourteen RNA viruses and two DNA viruses were detected using the Anyplex II RV16 Detection kit (Seegene, Republic of Korea). The EZ1 Advanced XL system demonstrated the best analytical sensitivity for all the three viral strains. The nucleic acids extracted by EZ1 Advanced XL showed higher positive rates for virus detection than the others. Meanwhile, the MICROLAB Nimbus IVD system was comprised of fully automated steps from nucleic extraction to PCR setup function that could reduce human errors. For the nucleic acids recovered from nasopharyngeal swab specimens, the QIAcube system showed the fewest false negative results and the best concordance rate, and it may be more suitable for detecting various viruses including RNA and DNA virus strains. Each system showed different sensitivity and specificity for detection of certain viral pathogens and demonstrated different characteristics such as turnaround time and sample capacity. Therefore, these factors should be considered when new nucleic acid extraction systems are introduced to the laboratory.


2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Dundas ◽  
N. Kristine Leos ◽  
Midori Mitui ◽  
Paula Revell ◽  
Beverly Barton Rogers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document