scholarly journals Gds1 interacts with NuA4 to promote H4 acetylation at ribosomal protein genes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoo Jin Joo ◽  
Stephen Buratowski
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Gene ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Genes ◽  
Uncharacterized Protein ◽  
Nuclear Extracts

In our previously published studies, RNA polymerase II transcription initiation complexes were assembled from yeast nuclear extracts onto immobilized transcription templates and analyzed by quantitative mass spectrometry. In addition to the expected basal factors and coactivators, we discovered that the uncharacterized protein Gds1 showed activator- stimulated association with promoter DNA. Gds1 co-precipitated with the histone H4 acetyltransferase NuA4, and its levels often tracked with NuA4 in immobilized template experiments. GDS1 deletion led to reduction in H4 acetylation in vivo and other phenotypes consistent with partial loss of NuA4 activity. Genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed that the reduction in H4 acetylation was strongest at ribosomal protein gene promoters and other genes with high NuA4 occupancy. Therefore, while Gds1 is not a stoichiometric subunit of NuA4, we propose that it interacts with and modulates NuA4 in specific promoter contexts. Gds1 has no obvious metazoan homolog, but structural predictions suggest it may be distantly related to the DEK protein.

scholarly journals Fine-Structure Analysis of Ribosomal Protein Gene Transcription

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (13) ◽  
pp. 4853-4862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhao ◽  
Kerri B. McIntosh ◽  
Dipayan Rudra ◽  
Stephan Schawalder ◽  
David Shore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fine Structure ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Tight Binding ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Gene ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Glycolytic Enzyme ◽  
Yeast Genome ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Genes ◽  
Active Transcription

ABSTRACT The ribosomal protein genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, responsible for nearly 40% of the polymerase II transcription initiation events, are characterized by the constitutive tight binding of the transcription factor Rap1. Rap1 binds at many places in the yeast genome, including glycolytic enzyme genes, the silent MAT loci, and telomeres, its specificity arising from specific cofactors recruited at the appropriate genes. At the ribosomal protein genes two such cofactors have recently been identified as Fhl1 and Ifh1. We have now characterized the interaction of these factors at a bidirectional ribosomal protein promoter by replacing the Rap1 sites with LexA operator sites. LexA-Gal4(AD) drives active transcription at this modified promoter, although not always at the correct initiation site. Tethering Rap1 to the promoter neither drives transcription nor recruits Fhl1 or Ifh1, showing that Rap1 function requires direct DNA binding. Tethering Fhl1 also fails to activate transcription, even though it does recruit Ifh1, suggesting that Fhl1 does more than simply provide a platform for Ifh1. Tethering Ifh1 to the promoter leads to low-level transcription, at the correct initiation sites. Remarkably, activation by tethered LexA-Gal4(AD) is strongly reduced when TOR kinase is inhibited by rapamycin. Thus, TOR can act independently of Fhl1/Ifh1 at ribosomal protein promoters. We also show that, in our strain background, the response of ribosomal protein promoters to TOR inhibition is independent of the Ifh1-related protein Crf1, indicating that the role of this corepressor is strain specific. Fine-structure chromatin mapping of several ribosomal protein promoters revealed that histones are essentially absent from the Rap1 sites, while Fhl1 and Ifh1 are coincident with each other but distinct from Rap1.

scholarly journals Eaf1p Is Required for Recruitment of NuA4 in Targeting TFIID to the Promoters of the Ribosomal Protein Genes for Transcriptional InitiationIn Vivo

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (17) ◽  
pp. 2947-2964 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhawana Uprety ◽  
Rwik Sen ◽  
Sukesh R. Bhaumik
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Ribosome Biogenesis ◽  
Protein Gene ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Gene ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Genes ◽  
Transcriptional Initiation ◽  
Independent Form ◽  
Dependent Form ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferase Activity

NuA4 (nucleosome acetyltransferase of H4) promotes transcriptional initiation of TFIID (a complex of TBP and TBP-associated factors [TAFs])-dependent ribosomal protein genes involved in ribosome biogenesis. However, it is not clearly understood how NuA4 regulates the transcription of ribosomal protein genes. Here, we show that NuA4 is recruited to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes, such asRPS5,RPL2B, andRPS11B, for TFIID recruitment to initiate transcription, and the recruitment of NuA4 to these promoters is impaired in the absence of its Eaf1p component. Intriguingly, impaired NuA4 recruitment in aΔeaf1strain depletes recruitment of TFIID (a TAF-dependent form of TBP) but not the TAF-independent form of TBP to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes. However, in the absence of NuA4, SAGA (Spt-Ada-Gcn5-acetyltransferase) is involved in targeting the TAF-independent form of TBP to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes for transcriptional initiation. Thus, NuA4 plays an important role in targeting TFIID to the promoters of ribosomal protein genes for transcriptional initiationin vivo. Such a function is mediated via its targeted histone acetyltransferase activity. In the absence of NuA4, ribosomal protein genes lose TFIID dependency and become SAGA dependent for transcriptional initiation. Collectively, these results provide significant insights into the regulation of ribosomal protein gene expression and, hence, ribosome biogenesis and functions.

Sequence requirements for premature transcription arrest within the first intron of the mouse c-fos gene

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2832-2841
Author(s):  
N Mechti ◽  
M Piechaczyk ◽  
J M Blanchard ◽  
P Jeanteur ◽  
B Lebleu
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Rna Transcripts ◽  
First Intron ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Intron 1 ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Sequence Requirements

A strong block to the elongation of nascent RNA transcripts by RNA polymerase II occurs in the 5' part of the mammalian c-fos proto-oncogene. In addition to the control of initiation, this mechanism contributes to transcriptional regulation of the gene. In vitro transcription experiments using nuclear extracts and purified transcription templates allowed us to map a unique arrest site within the mouse first intron 385 nucleotides downstream from the promoter. This position is in keeping with that estimated from nuclear run-on assays performed with short DNA probes and thus suggests that it corresponds to the actual block in vivo. Moreover, we have shown that neither the c-fos promoter nor upstream sequences are absolute requirements for an efficient transcription arrest both in vivo and in vitro. Finally, we have characterized a 103-nucleotide-long intron 1 motif comprising the arrest site and sufficient for obtaining the block in a cell-free transcription assay.

Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 transcription in vitro: biochemical support for multiple mechanisms of transcription

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 2832-2839
Author(s):  
A S Ponticelli ◽  
K Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Activator Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Transcription In Vitro

The promoter region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae his3 gene contains two TATA elements, TC and TR, that direct transcription initiation to two sites designated +1 and +13. On the basis of differences between their nucleotide sequences and their responsiveness to upstream promoter elements, it has previously been proposed that TC and TR promote transcription by different molecular mechanisms. To begin a study of his3 transcription in vitro, we used S. cerevisiae nuclear extracts together with various DNA templates and transcriptional activator proteins that have been characterized in vivo. We demonstrated accurate transcription initiation in vitro at the sites used in vivo, transcriptional activation by GCN4, and activation by a GAL4 derivative on various gal-his3 hybrid promoters. In all cases, transcription stimulation was dependent on the presence of an acidic activation region in the activator protein. In addition, analysis of promoters containing a variety of TR derivatives indicated that the level of transcription in vitro was directly related to the level achieved in vivo. The results demonstrated that the in vitro system accurately reproduced all known aspects of in vivo his3 transcription that depend on the TR element. However, in striking contrast to his3 transcription in vivo, transcription in vitro yielded approximately 20 times more of the +13 transcript than the +1 transcript. This result was not due to inability of the +1 initiation site to be efficiently utilized in vitro, but rather it reflects the lack of TC function in vitro. The results support the idea that TC and TR mediate transcription from the wild-type promoter by distinct mechanisms.

scholarly journals Amino Acid Substitutions in Yeast TFIIF Confer Upstream Shifts in Transcription Initiation and Altered Interaction with RNA Polymerase II

2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 10975-10985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed A. Ghazy ◽  
Seth A. Brodie ◽  
Michelle L. Ammerman ◽  
Lynn M. Ziegler ◽  
Alfred S. Ponticelli
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Primer Extension ◽  
Site Directed Mutagenesis ◽  
Protein Encoding ◽  
Transcription Factor Iif ◽  
Growth Properties ◽  
Encoding Genes

ABSTRACT Transcription factor IIF (TFIIF) is required for transcription of protein-encoding genes by eukaryotic RNA polymerase II. In contrast to numerous studies establishing a role for higher eukaryotic TFIIF in multiple steps of the transcription cycle, relatively little has been reported regarding the functions of TFIIF in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In this study, site-directed mutagenesis, plasmid shuffle complementation assays, and primer extension analyses were employed to probe the functional domains of the S. cerevisiae TFIIF subunits Tfg1 and Tfg2. Analyses of 35 Tfg1 alanine substitution mutants and 19 Tfg2 substitution mutants identified 5 mutants exhibiting altered properties in vivo. Primer extension analyses revealed that the conditional growth properties exhibited by the tfg1-E346A, tfg1-W350A, and tfg2-L59K mutants were associated with pronounced upstream shifts in transcription initiation in vivo. Analyses of double mutant strains demonstrated functional interactions between the Tfg1 mutations and mutations in Tfg2, TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II. Importantly, biochemical results demonstrated an altered interaction between mutant TFIIF protein and RNA polymerase II. These results provide direct evidence for the involvement of S. cerevisiae TFIIF in the mechanism of transcription start site utilization and support the view that a TFIIF-RNA polymerase II interaction is a determinant in this process.

Identification of promoter elements necessary for transcriptional regulation of a human histone H4 gene in vitro

1985 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 380-389
Author(s):  
S M Hanly ◽  
G C Bleecker ◽  
N Heintz
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Nuclear Extracts ◽  
Distal Promoter ◽  
Histone H4 Gene

We have examined the nucleotide sequences necessary for transcription of a human histone H4 gene in vitro. Maximal transcription of the H4 promoter requires, in addition to the TATA box and cap site, promoter elements between 70 and 110 nucleotides upstream from the transcription initiation site. These distal promoter elements are recognized preferentially in extracts from synchronized S-phase HeLa cells. The inability of non-S-phase nuclear extracts to recognize the H4 upstream sequences reflects a specific lack of a transcription factor which interacts with those sequences. These results indicate that the cell cycle regulation of human histone gene expression involves both a specific transcription factor and distal transcription signals in the H4 promoter.

Association of RAP1 binding sites with stringent control of ribosomal protein gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2723-2735 ◽  
Author(s):  
C M Moehle ◽  
A G Hinnebusch
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Protein Gene ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Gene ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Genes ◽  
Biosynthetic Genes ◽  
Stringent Control

An amino acid limitation in bacteria elicits a global response, called stringent control, that leads to reduced synthesis of rRNA and ribosomal proteins and increased expression of amino acid biosynthetic operons. We have used the antimetabolite 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole to cause histidine limitation as a means to elicit the stringent response in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fusions of the yeast ribosomal protein genes RPL16A, CRY1, RPS16A, and RPL25 with the Escherichia coli lacZ gene were used to show that the expression of these genes is reduced by a factor of 2 to 5 during histidine-limited exponential growth and that this regulation occurs at the level of transcription. Stringent regulation of the four yeast ribosomal protein genes was shown to be associated with a nucleotide sequence, known as the UASrpg (upstream activating sequence for ribosomal protein genes), that binds the transcriptional regulatory protein RAP1. The RAP1 binding sites also appeared to mediate the greater ribosomal protein gene expression observed in cells growing exponentially than in cells in stationary phase. Although expression of the ribosomal protein genes was reduced in response to histidine limitation, the level of RAP1 DNA-binding activity in cell extracts was unaffected. Yeast strains bearing a mutation in any one of the genes GCN1 to GCN4 are defective in derepression of amino acid biosynthetic genes in 10 different pathways under conditions of histidine limitation. These Gcn- mutants showed wild-type regulation of ribosomal protein gene expression, which suggests that separate regulatory pathways exist in S. cerevisiae for the derepression of amino acid biosynthetic genes and the repression of ribosomal protein genes in response to amino acid starvation.

The bidirectional promoter of the divergently transcribed mouse Surf-1 and Surf-2 genes

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1281-1294
Author(s):  
A C Lennard ◽  
M Fried
Keyword(s):  
Binding Site ◽  
Dimethyl Sulfate ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Gene ◽  
Bidirectional Promoter ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Accurate Expression ◽  
Bona Fide ◽  
Efficient Expression

The ubiquitously expressed mouse Surf-1 and Surf-2 genes are divergently transcribed, and their heterogeneous start sites are separated by up to a maximum of only 73 bp. By using in vitro DNase I, dimethyl sulfate methylation, and gel retardation assays, we have identified five putative promoter control elements between and around the Surf-1 and Surf-2 start sites. The effects of each site on the regulation of Surf-1 and Surf-2 transcription have been studied in vivo, and four sites were found to be functional promoter elements. A novel binding site is required for efficient use of the intermediate but not the major start site of Surf-1. Three elements function in a bidirectional manner and are shared for efficient and accurate expression of both Surf-1 and Surf-2. One is an UEF (USF, MLTF) binding site which had a small effect on the use of the intermediate start sites of Surf-1 and also affected the major start sites of Surf-2. Another has sequence homology to the RPG alpha binding site associated with some ribosomal protein gene promoters and is required for efficient expression of the major but not intermediate start sites of Surf-1 and all start sites of Surf-2. The third, an RPG alpha-like site, is used for all start sites of both Surf-1 and Surf-2. Dissection of this cellular promoter region showed that different binding sites affect the use of different start sites and revealed a complex interaction between multiple elements that constitute a bona fide bidirectional promoter.

scholarly journals Three functional classes of transcriptional activation domain.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 2044-2055 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Blau ◽  
H Xiao ◽  
S McCracken ◽  
P O'Hare ◽  
J Greenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Type I ◽  
Rnase Protection ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Transactivation Domains ◽  
Functional Classes

We have studied the abilities of different transactivation domains to stimulate the initiation and elongation (postinitiation) steps of RNA polymerase II transcription in vivo. Nuclear run-on and RNase protection analyses revealed three classes of activation domains: Sp1 and CTF stimulated initiation (type I); human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat fused to a DNA binding domain stimulated predominantly elongation (type IIA); and VP16, p53, and E2F1 stimulated both initiation and elongation (type IIB). A quadruple point mutation of VP16 converted it from a type IIB to a type I activator. Type I and type IIA activators synergized with one another but not with type IIB activators. This observation implies that synergy can result from the concerted action of factors stimulating two different steps in transcription: initiation and elongation. The functional differences between activators may be explained by the different contacts they make with general transcription factors. In support of this idea, we found a correlation between the abilities of activators, including Tat, to stimulate elongation and their abilities to bind TFIIH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document