Sound localization in world and head-centered space in ferrets

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Michael Town ◽  
Jennifer Kim Bizley

The location of sounds can be described in multiple coordinate systems that are defined relative to ourselves, or the world around us. World-centered hearing is critical for stable understanding of sound scenes, yet it is unclear whether this ability is unique to human listeners or generalizes to other species. Here, we establish novel behavioral tests to determine the coordinate systems in which non-human listeners (ferrets) can localize sounds. We found that ferrets could learn to discriminate sounds using either world-centered or head-centered sound location, as evidenced by their ability to discriminate locations in one space across wide variations in sound location in the alternative coordinate system. Using infrequent probe sounds to assess broader generalization of spatial hearing, we demonstrated that in both head and world-centered localization, animals used continuous maps of auditory space to guide behavior. Single trial responses of individual animals were sufficiently informative that we could then model sound localization using speaker position in specific coordinate systems and accurately predict ferrets' actions in held-out data. Our results demonstrate that non-human listeners can thus localize sounds in multiple spaces, including those defined by the world that require abstraction across traditional, head-centered sound localization cues.

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (03) ◽  
pp. 195-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica E. Bennett ◽  
Ruth Y. Litovsky

AbstractSpatial hearing abilities in children with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) are typically improved when two implants are used compared with a single implant. However, even with BiCIs, spatial hearing is still worse compared to normal-hearing (NH) age-matched children. Here, we focused on children who were younger than three years, hence in their toddler years. Prior research with this age focused on measuring discrimination of sounds from the right versus left.This study measured both discrimination and sound location identification in a nine-alternative forced-choice paradigm using the “reaching for sound” method, whereby children reached for sounding objects as a means of capturing their spatial hearing abilities.Discrimination was measured with sounds randomly presented to the left versus right, and loudspeakers at fixed angles ranging from ±60° to ±15°. On a separate task, sound location identification was measured for locations ranging from ±60° in 15° increments.Thirteen children with BiCIs (27–42 months old) and fifteen age-matched (NH).Discrimination and sound localization were completed for all subjects. For the left–right discrimination task, participants were required to reach a criterion of 4/5 correct trials (80%) at each angular separation prior to beginning the localization task. For sound localization, data was analyzed in two ways. First, percent correct scores were tallied for each participant. Second, for each participant, the root-mean-square-error was calculated to determine the average distance between the response and stimulus, indicative of localization accuracy.All BiCI users were able to discriminate left versus right at angles as small as ±15° when listening with two implants; however, performance was significantly worse when listening with a single implant. All NH toddlers also had >80% correct at ±15°. Sound localization results revealed root-mean-square errors averaging 11.15° in NH toddlers. Children in the BiCI group were generally unable to identify source location on this complex task (average error 37.03°).Although some toddlers with BiCIs are able to localize sound in a manner consistent with NH toddlers, for the majority of toddlers with BiCIs, sound localization abilities are still emerging.


2012 ◽  
Vol 157-158 ◽  
pp. 762-767
Author(s):  
Sheng Yi Yang ◽  
An Gu ◽  
Meng Li ◽  
Chang Jian Lu

In robot-assisted surgery system, the method of compensating the relative motion between the surgical site on the heart and the surgical instruments was introduced by using tactile sensor in this paper. Three-dimensional space coordinate systems were established, including the world coordinate system, surgical instruments and tactile sensor coordinate system. Space coordinate was transformed between the three coordinate systems through the way of mathematical theory. Compensation algorithm theory formulas about the beating heart were derived, including the rotation matrixes of the coordinate system, the equations, etc. According the data of the tactile sensor, the relative displacement of the surgical instruments coordinate system was calculated compared with the world coordinate system. Finally, Conclusion is obtained by compensation example analysis.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 87-92
Author(s):  
P. L. Bender

AbstractFive important geodynamical quantities which are closely linked are: 1) motions of points on the Earth’s surface; 2)polar motion; 3) changes in UT1-UTC; 4) nutation; and 5) motion of the geocenter. For each of these we expect to achieve measurements in the near future which have an accuracy of 1 to 3 cm or 0.3 to 1 milliarcsec.From a metrological point of view, one can say simply: “Measure each quantity against whichever coordinate system you can make the most accurate measurements with respect to”. I believe that this statement should serve as a guiding principle for the recommendations of the colloquium. However, it also is important that the coordinate systems help to provide a clear separation between the different phenomena of interest, and correspond closely to the conceptual definitions in terms of which geophysicists think about the phenomena.In any discussion of angular motion in space, both a “body-fixed” system and a “space-fixed” system are used. Some relevant types of coordinate systems, reference directions, or reference points which have been considered are: 1) celestial systems based on optical star catalogs, distant galaxies, radio source catalogs, or the Moon and inner planets; 2) the Earth’s axis of rotation, which defines a line through the Earth as well as a celestial reference direction; 3) the geocenter; and 4) “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate systems.When a geophysicists discusses UT1 and polar motion, he usually is thinking of the angular motion of the main part of the mantle with respect to an inertial frame and to the direction of the spin axis. Since the velocities of relative motion in most of the mantle are expectd to be extremely small, even if “substantial” deep convection is occurring, the conceptual “quasi-Earth-fixed” reference frame seems well defined. Methods for realizing a close approximation to this frame fortunately exist. Hopefully, this colloquium will recommend procedures for establishing and maintaining such a system for use in geodynamics. Motion of points on the Earth’s surface and of the geocenter can be measured against such a system with the full accuracy of the new techniques.The situation with respect to celestial reference frames is different. The various measurement techniques give changes in the orientation of the Earth, relative to different systems, so that we would like to know the relative motions of the systems in order to compare the results. However, there does not appear to be a need for defining any new system. Subjective figures of merit for the various system dependon both the accuracy with which measurements can be made against them and the degree to which they can be related to inertial systems.The main coordinate system requirement related to the 5 geodynamic quantities discussed in this talk is thus for the establishment and maintenance of a “quasi-Earth-fixed” coordinate system which closely approximates the motion of the main part of the mantle. Changes in the orientation of this system with respect to the various celestial systems can be determined by both the new and the conventional techniques, provided that some knowledge of changes in the local vertical is available. Changes in the axis of rotation and in the geocenter with respect to this system also can be obtained, as well as measurements of nutation.


1975 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 21-26

An ideal definition of a reference coordinate system should meet the following general requirements:1. It should be as conceptually simple as possible, so its philosophy is well understood by the users.2. It should imply as few physical assumptions as possible. Wherever they are necessary, such assumptions should be of a very general character and, in particular, they should not be dependent upon astronomical and geophysical detailed theories.3. It should suggest a materialization that is dynamically stable and is accessible to observations with the required accuracy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 962 (8) ◽  
pp. 24-37
Author(s):  
V.E. Tereshchenko

The article suggests a technique for relation global kinematic reference system and local static realization of global reference system by regional continuously operated reference stations (CORS) network. On the example of regional CORS network located in the Novosibirsk Region (CORS NSO) the relation parameters of the global reference system WGS-84 and its local static realization by CORS NSO network at the epoch of fixing stations coordinates in catalog are calculated. With the realization of this technique, the main parameters to be determined are the speed of displacement one system center relativly to another and the speeds of rotation the coordinate axes of one system relatively to another, since the time evolution of most stations in the Russian Federation is not currently provided. The article shows the scale factor for relation determination of coordinate systems is not always necessary to consider. The technique described in the article also allows detecting the errors in determining the coordinates of CORS network in global coordinate system and compensate for them. A systematic error of determining and fixing the CORS NSO coordinates in global coordinate system was detected. It is noted that the main part of the error falls on the altitude component and reaches 12 cm. The proposed technique creates conditions for practical use of the advanced method Precise Point Positioning (PPP) in some regions of the Russian Federation. Also the technique will ensure consistent PPP method results with the results of the most commonly used in the Russian Federation other post-processing methods of high-precision positioning.


1990 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. 99-110
Author(s):  
Han Chun-Hao ◽  
Huang Tian-Yi ◽  
Xu Bang-Xin

The concept of reference system, reference frame, coordinate system and celestial sphere in a relativistic framework are given. The problems on the choice of celestial coordinate systems and the definition of the light deflection are discussed. Our suggestions are listed in Sec. 5.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-224
Author(s):  
Yu. N. Chelnokov ◽  
A. V. Molodenkov

For the functioning of algorithms of inertial orientation and navigation of strapdown inertial navigation system (SINS), it is necessary to conduct a mathematical initial alignment of SINS immediately before the operation of these algorithms. An efficient method of initial alignment (not calibration!) of SINS is the method of vector matching. Its essence is to determine the relative orientation of the instrument trihedron Y (related to the unit of SINS sensors) and the reference trihedron X according to the results of measuring the projections of at least two non-collinear vectors of the axes on both trihedrons. We address the estimation of the initial orientation of the object using the method of gyrocompassing, which is a form of vector matching method. This initial alignment method is based upon using the projections of the apparent acceleration vector a and the absolute angular velocity vector ω of the object in the coordinate systems X and Y. It is assumed that the three single-axis accelerometers and the three gyroscopes (generally speaking, the three absolute angular velocity sensors of any type), which measure the projections of the vectors a and ω, are installed along the axes of the instrument coordinate system Y. If the projections of the same vectors on the axes of the base coordinate system X are known, then it is possible to estimate the mutual orientation of X and Y trihedrons. We are solving the problem of the initial alignment of SINS for the case of a fixed base, when the accelerometers measure the projection gi (i = 1, 2, 3) of the gravity acceleration vector g, and the gyroscopes measure the projections u i of the vector u of angular velocity of Earth’s rotation on the body-fixed axes. The projections of the same vectors on the axes of the normal geographic coordinate system X are also estimated using the known formulas. The correlation between the projections of the vectors u and g in X and Y coordinate system is given by known quaternion relations. In these relations the unknown variable is the orientation quaternion of the object in the X coordinate system. By separating the scalar and vector parts in the equations, we obtain an overdetermined system of linear algebraic equations (SLAE), where the unknown variable is the finite rotation vector θ, which aligns the X and Y coordinate systems (it is assumed that there is no half-turn of the X coordinate system with respect to the Y coordinate system). Thus, the mathematical formulation of the problem of SINS initial alignment by means of gyrocompassing is to find the unknown vector θ from the derived overdetermined SLAE. When finding the vector θ directly from the SLAE (algorithm 1) and data containing measurement errors, the components of the vector q are also determined with errors (especially the component of the vector θ, which is responsible for the course ψ of an object). Depending on the pre-defined in the course of numerical experiments values of heading ψ, roll ϑ, pitch γ angles of an object and errors of the input data (measurements of gyroscopes and accelerometers), the errors of estimating the heading angle Δψ of an object may in many cases differ from the errors of estimating the roll Δϑ and pitch Δγ angles by two-three (typically) or more orders. Therefore, in order to smooth out these effects, we have used the A. N. Tikhonov regularization method (algorithm 2), which consists of multiplying the left and right sides of the SLAE by the transposed matrix of coefficients for that SLAE, and adding the system regularization parameter to the elements of the main diagonal of the coefficient matrix for the newly derived SLAE (if necessary, depending on the value of the determinant of this matrix). Analysis of the results of the numerical experiments on the initial alignment shows that the errors of estimating the object’s orientation angles Δψ, Δϑ, Δγ using algorithm 2 are more comparable (more consistent) regarding their order.


Author(s):  
Jill North

How do we figure out the nature of the world from a mathematically formulated physical theory? What do we infer about the world when a physical theory can be mathematically formulated in different ways? Physics, Structure, and Reality addresses these questions, questions that get to the heart of the project of interpreting physics—of figuring out what physics is telling us about the world. North argues that there is a certain notion of structure, implicit in physics and mathematics, that we should pay careful attention to, and that doing so sheds light on these questions concerning what physics is telling us about the nature of reality. Along the way, lessons are drawn for related topics such as the use of coordinate systems in physics, the differences among various formulations of classical mechanics, the nature of spacetime structure, the equivalence of physical theories, and the importance of scientific explanation. Although the book does not explicitly defend scientific realism, instead taking this to be a background assumption, the account provides an indirect case for realism toward our best theories of physics.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginie Crollen ◽  
Tiffany Spruyt ◽  
Pierre Mahau ◽  
Roberto Bottini ◽  
Olivier Collignon

Recent studies proposed that the use of internal and external coordinate systems may be more flexible in congenitally blind when compared to sighted individuals. To investigate this hypothesis further, we asked congenitally blind and sighted people to perform, with the hands uncrossed and crossed over the body midline, a tactile TOJ and an auditory Simon task. Crucially, both tasks were carried out under task instructions either favoring the use of an internal (left vs. right hand) or an external (left vs. right hemispace) frame of reference. In the internal condition of the TOJ task, our results replicated previous findings (Röder et al., 2004) showing that hand crossing only impaired sighted participants’ performance, suggesting that blind people did not activate by default a (conflicting) external frame of reference. However, under external instructions, a decrease of performance was observed in both groups, suggesting that even blind people activated an external coordinate system in this condition. In the Simon task, and in contrast with a previous study (Roder et al., 2007), both groups responded more efficiently when the sound was presented from the same side of the response (‘‘Simon effect’’) independently of the hands position. This was true under the internal and external conditions, therefore suggesting that blind and sighted by default activated an external coordinate system in this task. All together, these data comprehensively demonstrate how visual experience shapes the default weight attributed to internal and external coordinate systems for action and perception depending on task demand.


Author(s):  
Alexander Kovalchuk ◽  
F. Akhmetova

<p class="MDPI17abstract"><span lang="EN-US">The paper presents a modified Denavit-Hartenberg coordinate system resulted from joint application of graph theory and the Denavit-Hartenberg coordinate system, which was developed to describe the kinematics of robot actuators with a linear open kinematic chain. It allows forming mathematical models of actuating mechanisms for the robots with tree-like kinematic structures. The work introduces the concept of primary and auxiliary coordinate systems. It considers an example of making the links’ reachability matrix and reachability graph for the tree-like actuating mechanism of a robotic mannequin. The use efficiency of the proposed modified Denavit-Hartenberg coordinate system is illustrated by the examples giving the mathematical description of the kinematics and dynamics of specific robots’ tree-like actuating mechanisms discussed in the previously published papers. It is shown that the proposed coordinate system can also be successfully applied to describe the actuating mechanisms of robots with a linear open kinematic chain, which is a particular case of the tree-like kinematic structure. The absence of branching joints in it does not require introducing auxiliary coordinate systems and the parameters f(i) and ns(i) are necessary only for the formal notation of equations, which have similar forms for the tree-like and linear chains. In this case, the modified and traditional coordinate systems coincide.</span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document