scholarly journals Sensitizing solid tumors to CAR-mediated cytotoxicity using synthetic antigens

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Gamboa ◽  
Ali H Zamat ◽  
Daryll Vanover ◽  
Chloé A Thiveaud ◽  
Hannah E Peck ◽  
...  

CAR T cell immunotherapy relies on CAR targeting of tumor-associated antigens, yet heterogenous antigen expression, interpatient variation, and off-tumor expression by healthy cells remain barriers. Here, we develop synthetic antigens to sensitize solid tumors for recognition and elimination by CAR T cells. Unlike tumor-associated antigens, we design synthetic antigens that are orthogonal to endogenous proteins to eliminate off-tumor targeting and that have a small genetic footprint to facilitate efficient tumor delivery to tumors by viral vectors. Using the RSV-F camelid single-domain antibody (VHH) as a synthetic antigen, we show that adoptive transfer of αVHH CAR T cells to mice bearing VHH expressing tumors reduced tumor burden in multiple syngeneic mouse models of cancer, improved survival, induced epitope spread, and protected against tumor rechallenge. Our work supports in situ delivery of synthetic antigens to treat antigen low or negative tumors with CAR T cells.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. e002173
Author(s):  
Guanmeng Wang ◽  
Xin Zhou ◽  
Giovanni Fucà ◽  
Elena Dukhovlinova ◽  
Peishun Shou ◽  
...  

BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are effective in B-cell malignancies. However, heterogeneous antigen expression and antigen loss remain important limitations of targeted immunotherapy in solid tumors. Therefore, targeting multiple tumor-associated antigens simultaneously is expected to improve the outcome of CAR-T cell therapies. Due to the instability of single-chain variable fragments, it remains challenging to develop the simultaneous targeting of multiple antigens using traditional single-chain fragment variable (scFv)-based CARs.MethodsWe used Humabody VH domains derived from a transgenic mouse to obtain fully human prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) VH and mesothelin (MSLN) VH sequences and redirect T cell with VH based-CAR. The antitumor activity and mode of action of PSMA VH and MSLN VH were evaluated in vitro and in vivo compared with the traditional scFv-based CARs.ResultsHuman VH domain-based CAR targeting PSMA and MSLN are stable and functional both in vitro and in vivo. VH modules in the bispecific format are capable of binding their specific target with similar affinity as their monovalent counterparts. Bispecific CARs generated by joining two human antibody VH domains can prevent tumor escape in tumor with heterogeneous antigen expression.ConclusionsFully human antibody VH domains can be used to generate functional CAR molecules, and redirected T cells elicit antitumoral responses in solid tumors at least as well as conventional scFv-based CARs. In addition, VH domains can be used to generate bispecific CAR-T cells to simultaneously target two different antigens expressed by tumor cells, and therefore, achieve better tumor control in solid tumors.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2059-2059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Schmidts ◽  
Maria Ormhoj ◽  
Allison O. Taylor ◽  
Selena J. Lorrey ◽  
Irene Scarfò ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Targeting BCMA (B-cell maturation factor) with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has shown great success in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), but is limited by heterogeneous antigen expression and imminent antigen escape of tumor cells. Combinatorial antigen targeting may help address these challenges. Taking the naturally occurring receptor-ligand pairs as a model, we designed monomeric and trimeric APRIL- (A proliferation-inducing ligand) based CARs targeting BCMA and TACI (transmembrane activator and CAML interactor) simultaneously. Methods: The following 2nd generation CARs were designed to target BCMA and TACI concurrently: membrane-tethered truncated APRIL monomer ("APRIL-CAR") and three truncated and fused APRIL monomers ("TriPRIL-CAR"). A single chain variable fragment-based anti(α)-BCMA CAR served as control. CAR multimerization and binding affinity to BCMA and TACI were characterized. In vitro effector function was compared by cytotoxic potency, activation (CD69), degranulation (CD107a), cytokine production and proliferation in response to target antigens. In vivo anti-tumor efficiency was assessed in a xenograft mouse model of MM. Results: CAR T cell manufacturing of all three constructs was accomplished successfully (transduction efficiency 46-78%) from three different donors. Western blot analysis of CARs showed multimerized forms of the TriPRIL and α-BCMA CAR, while only the monomeric form of the APRIL CAR was detected. Binding affinity to soluble BCMA and TACI was higher for the TriPRIL CAR compared to the APRIL CAR. Evaluating the cytotoxic potential, activation and degranulation kinetics as well as long-term proliferation against a panel of BCMA and/or TACI positive target cells, the TriPRIL CAR T cells outperformed the APRIL CAR T cells. All three CAR constructs demonstrated robust antigen-specific production of Th1-type cytokines, like Il-2, IFNƔ, GM-CSF and TNFα. Next, we performed an in vivo stress test, engrafting NSG mice with high tumor burden of MM.1s myeloma cells. The TriPRIL and α-BCMA CAR T cells were able to eradicate the tumors while the APRIL CAR T cells only led to a stabilization of tumor burden. In vivo studies with a mixed antigen population aiming at modeling heterogeneous antigen expression and antigen escape are ongoing. Conclusion: Our APRIL-based chimeric antigen receptors were able to redirect T cell cytotoxicity to both BCMA and TACI positive tumor cells. Since both these receptors are consistently up-regulated on malignant plasma cells this is an attractive method to target MM. Furthermore, we found that using a trimeric form of APRIL rather than monomeric form as the CAR binding domain increased recognition of MM antigens in vitro and in vivo. Disclosures Maus: crispr therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; adaptimmune: Consultancy; novartis: Consultancy; kite therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; windmil therapeutics: Consultancy; agentus: Consultancy, Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Edeline ◽  
Roch Houot ◽  
Aurélien Marabelle ◽  
Marion Alcantara

AbstractChimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells and BiTEs are both immunotherapies which redirect T cell specificity against a tumor-specific antigen through the use of antibody fragments. They demonstrated remarkable efficacy in B cell hematologic malignancies, thus paving the way for their development in solid tumors. Nonetheless, the use of such new drugs to treat solid tumors is not straightforward. So far, the results from early phase clinical trials are not as impressive as expected but many improvements are under way. In this review we present an overview of the clinical development of CAR-T cells and BiTEs targeting the main antigens expressed by solid tumors. We emphasize the most frequent hurdles encountered by either CAR-T cells or BiTEs, or both, and summarize the strategies that have been proposed to overcome these obstacles.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 743
Author(s):  
Aleksei Titov ◽  
Ekaterina Zmievskaya ◽  
Irina Ganeeva ◽  
Aygul Valiullina ◽  
Alexey Petukhov ◽  
...  

Adoptive cell immunotherapy (ACT) is a vibrant field of cancer treatment that began progressive development in the 1980s. One of the most prominent and promising examples is chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy for the treatment of B-cell hematologic malignancies. Despite success in the treatment of B-cell lymphomas and leukemia, CAR T-cell therapy remains mostly ineffective for solid tumors. This is due to several reasons, such as the heterogeneity of the cellular composition in solid tumors, the need for directed migration and penetration of CAR T-cells against the pressure gradient in the tumor stroma, and the immunosuppressive microenvironment. To substantially improve the clinical efficacy of ACT against solid tumors, researchers might need to look closer into recent developments in the other branches of adoptive immunotherapy, both traditional and innovative. In this review, we describe the variety of adoptive cell therapies beyond CAR T-cell technology, i.e., exploitation of alternative cell sources with a high therapeutic potential against solid tumors (e.g., CAR M-cells) or aiming to be universal allogeneic (e.g., CAR NK-cells, γδ T-cells), tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and transgenic T-cell receptor (TCR) T-cell immunotherapies. In addition, we discuss the strategies for selection and validation of neoantigens to achieve efficiency and safety. We provide an overview of non-conventional TCRs and CARs, and address the problem of mispairing between the cognate and transgenic TCRs. Finally, we summarize existing and emerging approaches for manufacturing of the therapeutic cell products in traditional, semi-automated and fully automated Point-of-Care (PoC) systems.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A361-A361
Author(s):  
Song Li ◽  
Chengfei Pu ◽  
Zhiyuan Cao ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Xinyi Yang ◽  
...  

BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has made significant progress in the treatment of blood cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma. However, the therapy faces many challenges in treating solid tumors. These challenges include physical barriers, tumor microenvironment immunosuppression, tumor heterogeneity, target specificity, and limited reactive cell expansion in vivo.Conventional CAR T cell therapy has thus far shown weak cell expansion in solid tumor patients and achieved little or no therapeutic responses. Here, we developed CAR T cells based on a novel CoupledCAR® technology to treat solid tumors. In contrast to conventional CAR T cells, CoupledCAR T cells significantly improved the expansion of the CAR T cells in vivo and enhanced the CAR T cells’ migration ability and resistance to immunosuppression by the tumor microenvironment. The enhanced migration ability and resistance allow the CAR T cells to infiltrate to tumor tissue sites and increase anti-tumor activities.MethodsWe designed a ‘CoupledCAR’ lentivirus vector containing a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) targeting human TSHR. The lentivirus was produced by transfecting HEK-293T cells with ‘CoupledCAR’ lentiviral vectors and viral packaging plasmids. Patient‘s CD3 T cells were cultured in X-VIVO medium containing 125U/mL 1interleukin-2 (IL-2), and transduced with ‘CoupledCAR’ lentivirus at certain MOI. Transduction efficiency and was evaluated at 7 to 9 days after ‘CoupledCAR’ lentivirus transduction, and quality controls for fungi, bacteria, mycoplasma, chlamydia, and endotoxin were performed. After infusion, serial peripheral blood samples were collected, and the expansion and the cytokine release of CART cells were detected by FACS and QPCR. The evaluation of response level for patients were performed at month 1,month 3,and month 6 by PET/CT.ResultsSpecifically, we engineered CoupledCAR T cells with lentiviral vectors encoding an anti-GCC (guanylate cyclase 2C) CAR molecule. Furthermore, anti-GCC CAR T cells showed anti-tumor activities in vitro and in vivo experiments.To verify the safety and efficacy of CoupledCAR T cells for treating solid tumors, we conducted several clinical trials for different solid tumors, including seven patients with colorectal cancer. These seven patients failed multiple rounds of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In the clinical trial, the patients were infused with autologous anti-GCC CoupledCAR T cells range from 4.9×105/kg to 2.9×106/kg. All patients using anti-GCC CoupledCAR T cells showed rapid expansion of CoupledCAR T cells and killing of tumor cells. Specifically, we observed that CoupledCAR T cells expanded significantly in the patients and infiltrated tumor tissue sites, demonstrating enhanced anti-tumor activities. PET/CT showed significant tumor shrinkage and SUV max declined, and the ongoing responses were monitored. Patient 3 achieved complete response and the best overall response rate (ORR, include complete remission, complete metabolic response, partial response, and partial metabolic response.) was 71.4% (5/7), complete remission (CR) rate was 14.3% (1/7).ConclusionsThe clinical data demonstrated that CoupledCAR T cells effectively expanded, infiltrated tumor tissue sites, and kill tumor cells in patients with colorectal cancer. We used immunotherapy to achieve complete remission in patients with advanced colorectal cancer for the first time. We are recruiting more colorectal cancer patients to further test the safety and efficacy of anti-GCC CoupledCAR T cells. Since our CoupledCAR® technology is a platform technology, we are expanding it to treat other solid tumors using different target tumor markers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A234-A234
Author(s):  
Rebecca Larson ◽  
Michael Kann ◽  
Stefanie Bailey ◽  
Nicholas Haradhvala ◽  
Kai Stewart ◽  
...  

BackgroundChimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) therapy has had a transformative impact on the treatment of hematologic malignancies1–6 but success in solid tumors remains elusive. We hypothesized solid tumors have cell-intrinsic resistance mechanisms to CAR T-cell cytotoxicity.MethodsTo systematically identify resistance pathways, we conducted a genome-wide CRISPR knockout screen in glioblastoma cells, a disease where CAR T-cells have had limited efficacy.7 8 We utilized the glioblastoma cell line U87 and targeted endogenously expressed EGFR with CAR T-cells generated from 6 normal donors for the screen. We validated findings in vitro and in vivo across a variety of human tumors and CAR T-cell antigens.ResultsLoss of genes in the interferon gamma receptor (IFNγR) signaling pathway (IFNγR1, JAK1, JAK2) rendered U87 cells resistant to CAR T-cell killing in vitro. IFNγR1 knockout tumors also showed resistance to CAR T cell treatment in vivo in a second glioblastoma line U251 in an orthotopic model. This phenomenon was irrespective of CAR target as we also observed resistance with IL13Ralpha2 CAR T-cells. In addition, resistance to CAR T-cell cytotoxicity through loss of IFNγR1 applied more broadly to solid tumors as pancreatic cell lines targeted with either Mesothelin or EGFR CAR T-cells also showed resistance. However, loss of IFNγR signaling did not impact sensitivity of liquid tumor lines (leukemia, lymphoma or multiple myeloma) to CAR T-cells in vitro or in an orthotopic model of leukemia treated with CD19 CAR. We isolated the effects of decreased cytotoxicity of IFNγR1 knockout glioblastoma tumors to be cancer-cell intrinsic because CAR T-cells had no observable differences in proliferation, activation (CD69 and LFA-1), or degranulation (CD107a) when exposed to wildtype versus knockout tumors. Using transcriptional profiling, we determined that glioblastoma cells lacking IFNγR1 had lower upregulation of cell adhesion pathways compared to wildtype glioblastoma cells after exposure to CAR T-cells. We found that loss of IFNγR1 reduced CAR T-cell binding avidity to glioblastoma.ConclusionsThe critical role of IFNγR signaling for susceptibility of solid tumors to CAR T-cells is surprising given that CAR T-cells do not require traditional antigen-presentation pathways. Instead, in glioblastoma tumors, IFNγR signaling was required for sufficient adhesion of CAR T-cells to mediate productive cytotoxicity. Our work demonstrates that liquid and solid tumors differ in their interactions with CAR T-cells and suggests that enhancing T-cell/tumor interactions may yield improved responses in solid tumors.AcknowledgementsRCL was supported by T32 GM007306, T32 AI007529, and the Richard N. Cross Fund. ML was supported by T32 2T32CA071345-21A1. SRB was supported by T32CA009216-38. NJH was supported by the Landry Cancer Biology Fellowship. JJ is supported by a NIH F31 fellowship (1F31-MH117886). GG was partially funded by the Paul C. Zamecnik Chair in Oncology at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and NIH R01CA 252940. MVM and this work is supported by the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation, Stand Up to Cancer, NIH R01CA 252940, R01CA238268, and R01CA249062.ReferencesMaude SL, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018;378:439–448.Neelapu SS, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2531–2544.Locke FL, et al. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1–2 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2019;20:31–42.Schuster SJ, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells in refractory B-cell lymphomas. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2545–2554.Wang M, et al. KTE-X19 CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory mantle-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1331–1342.Cohen AD, et al. B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J Clin Invest 2019;129:2210–2221.Bagley SJ, et al. CAR T-cell therapy for glioblastoma: recent clinical advances and future challenges. Neuro-oncology 2018;20:1429–1438.Choi BD, et al. Engineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells to treat glioblastoma. J Target Ther Cancer 2017;6:22–25.Ethics ApprovalAll human samples were obtained with informed consent and following institutional guidelines under protocols approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at the Massachusetts General Hospital (2016P001219). Animal work was performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (2015N000218 and 2020N000114).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document