scholarly journals Patterns of Structural Variation Define Prostate Cancer Across Disease States

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Zhou ◽  
Minjeong Ko ◽  
Anna C Hoge ◽  
Kelsey Luu ◽  
Yuzhen Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Structural Variation ◽  
Whole Genome ◽  
Noncoding Regions ◽  
Disease States ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Genomic Landscape ◽  
Genetic Features ◽  
Prostate Cancers ◽  
Therapeutic Pressure

The complex genomic landscape of prostate cancer evolves across disease states under therapeutic pressure directed toward inhibiting androgen receptor (AR) signaling. While significantly altered genes in prostate cancer have been extensively defined, there have been fewer systematic analyses of how structural variation reflects the genomic landscape of this disease. We comprehensively characterized structural alterations across 278 localized and 143 metastatic prostate cancers profiled by whole genome and transcriptome sequencing. We observed distinct significantly recurrent breakpoints in localized and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers (mCRPC), with pervasive alterations in noncoding regions flanking the AR, MYC, FOXA1, and LSAMP genes in mCRPC. We defined nine subclasses of mCRPC based on signatures of structural variation, each associated with distinct genetic features and clinical outcomes. Our results comprehensively define patterns of structural variation in prostate cancer and identify clinically actionable subgroups based on whole genome profiling.

Sex Hormones and Prostate Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Auchus ◽  
Nima Sharifi
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Current Treatment ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
History Of ◽  
Prostate Cancer Research ◽  
Prostate Cancers ◽  
Androgen Independent ◽  
Transition Studies

The prostate is an androgen-dependent organ that develops only in male mammals. Prostate cancer is the most common nonskin malignancy in men and the second leading cause of cancer deaths. Metastatic prostate cancer initially retains its androgen dependence, and androgen-deprivation therapy often leads to disease control; however, the cancer inevitably progresses despite treatment as castration-resistant prostate cancer, the lethal form of the disease. Although it was assumed that the cancer became androgen independent during this transition, studies over the last two decades have shown that these tumors evade treatment via mechanisms that augment acquisition of androgens from circulating precursors, increase sensitivity to androgens and androgen precursors, bypass the androgen receptor, or a combination of these mechanisms. This review summarizes the history of prostate cancer research leading to the contemporary view of androgen dependence for prostate cancers and the current treatment approaches based on this modern paradigm.

Identification of a small-molecule inhibitor of Stat5a/b through structure-based screen for therapy development for prostate cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17-17
Author(s):  
Z. Liao ◽  
L. Gu ◽  
F. Shen ◽  
A. Dagvadorj ◽  
S. Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Nuclear Translocation ◽  
Human Prostate ◽  
Prostate Cancer Cells ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Molecule Inhibitor ◽  
Prostate Cancers

17 Background: There are no effective treatments for metastatic or castration resistant prostate cancer. We have shown that transcription factor Stat5a/b is constitutively active in high-grade prostate cancer, but not in normal human prostate epithelium. Stat5a/b is active in 95% of clinical castration resistant prostate cancers, and the expression of active Stat5a/b in primary prostate cancer predicts early disease recurrence. Stat5a/b is critical for the viability of prostate cancer cells in vitro and for growth of prostate xenograft tumors in nude mice. Stat5a/b synergizes with androgen receptor (AR) and Stat5a/b promotes metastatic behavior of human prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Here, we hypothesize that Stat5a/b is a molecular target for rational drug design for prostate cancer. Methods: We identified a small- molecule inhibitor of Stat5a/b dimerization by structure-based virtual screen from a database of 30 million chemical structures. The efficacy of the Stat5a/b inhibitor was determined by reporter gene assays, dimerization by co-immunoprecipitations, nuclear translocation by cytochemistry and binding to DNA by EMSA. Cell viability was analyzed by MTT assay. Results: The novel Stat5a/b inhibitor IST5-002 inhibited transcriptional activity of Stat5a/b at IC50 of 1.5 μ M for Stat5a and 3.5 μ M for Stat5b, but not of Stat3 in prostate cancer cells. IST5-002 inhibited dimerization, nuclear translocation, and binding of Stat5a/b to the Stat5 DNA consensus sequence. Furthermore, IST5-002 inhibited expression of Stat5a/b target gene cyclin D1, and induced massive apoptosis of DU145, CWR22Rv1 and LNCaP human prostate cancer cells. IST5-002 blocked prostate cancer xenograft tumor growth in nude mice and induced death in clinical prostate cancers ex vivo in 3D organ cultures. Conclusions: We have identified a small molecule Stat5a/b inhibitor IST5-002 for therapy development for prostate cancer. Future work will focus on chemical modifications of IST5-002 to achieve IC50 below 1 μ M and oral administration. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Extracellular Microenvironment in Patient-derived Hydrogel Organoids of Prostate Cancer Regulates Therapeutic Response

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J Mosquera ◽  
Rohan Bareja ◽  
Jacob M Bernheim ◽  
Muhammad Asad ◽  
Cynthia Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Inflammatory Cells ◽  
Cellular Reprogramming ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Prostate Cells ◽  
Synthetic Hydrogel ◽  
Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancers ◽  
Novel Target

Following treatment with androgen receptor (AR) pathway inhibitors, ~20% of prostate cancer patients progress by shedding their dependence on AR. These tumors undergo epigenetic reprogramming turning castration-resistant prostate cancer adenocarcinoma (CRPC-Adeno) into neuroendocrine prostate cancer (CRPC-NEPC). Currently, no targeted therapies are available for CRPC-NEPCs. A major hurdle in the development of new therapies and treatment of CRPC-NEPC is the lack of accurate models to test candidate treatments. Such models would ideally capture components of the tumor microenvironment (TME) factors, which likely regulate the phenotypic, genetic, and epigenetic underpinnings of this aggressive subset. The TME is a complex system comprised not only of malignant prostate cells but also stromal and inflammatory cells and a scaffold of extracellular matrix (ECM). ECM proteins are implicated in the survival and progression of cancer and development of chemoresistance, while are equally integral to the development of prostate cancer organoids. Here, using a combination of patient tumor proteomics and RNA sequencing, we define putative ECM cues that may guide the growth of prostate tumors in patients. Using this molecular information, we developed synthetic hydrogels that recapitulate the tumor ECM. Organoids cultured in the synthetic hydrogel niches demonstrate that ECM subtypes regulate the morphology, transcriptome, and epigenetics hallmarks of CRPC-Adeno and CRPC-NEPC. CRPC-NEPC organoid showed a differential response to small molecule inhibitors of epigenetic repressor EZH2 and Dopamine Receptor D2 (DRD2), the latter being a novel target in CRPC-NEPC when grown in tumor-specific ECM. Finally, in those synthetic ECM niches where drug resistance was observed in CRPC-NEPCs, cellular reprogramming by a synergistic combination of EZH2 inhibitors with DRD2 antagonists inhibited tumor growth. The synthetic platform can provide a more realistic prostate-specific microenvironment and subsequently enable the development of effective targeted therapeutics for prostate cancers.

scholarly journals Prospective Genomic Profiling of Prostate Cancer Across Disease States Reveals Germline and Somatic Alterations That May Affect Clinical Decision Making

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wassim Abida ◽  
Joshua Armenia ◽  
Anuradha Gopalan ◽  
Ryan Brennan ◽  
Michael Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Genomic Profiling ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Disease States ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Increased Risk

Purpose A long natural history and a predominant osseous pattern of metastatic spread are impediments to the adoption of precision medicine in patients with prostate cancer. To establish the feasibility of clinical genomic profiling in this disease, we performed targeted deep sequencing of tumor and normal DNA from patients with locoregional, metastatic noncastrate, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Patients and Methods Patients consented to genomic analysis of their tumor and germline DNA. A hybridization capture-based clinical assay was used to identify single-nucleotide variations, small insertions and deletions, copy number alterations, and structural rearrangements in more than 300 cancer-related genes in tumors and matched normal blood. Results We successfully sequenced 504 tumors from 451 patients with prostate cancer. Potentially actionable alterations were identified in DNA damage repair, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Twenty-seven percent of patients harbored a germline or a somatic alteration in a DNA damage repair gene that may predict for response to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Profiling of matched tumors from individual patients revealed that somatic TP53 and BRCA2 alterations arose early in tumors from patients who eventually developed metastatic disease. In contrast, comparative analysis across disease states revealed that APC alterations were enriched in metastatic tumors, whereas ATM alterations were specifically enriched in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Conclusion Through genomic profiling of prostate tumors that represent the disease clinical spectrum, we identified a high frequency of potentially actionable alterations and possible drivers of disease initiation, metastasis, and castration resistance. Our findings support the routine use of tumor and germline DNA profiling for patients with advanced prostate cancer for the purpose of guiding enrollment in targeted clinical trials and counseling families at increased risk of malignancy.

Novel biomarker of specific castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) by exploring the proteome analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 247-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroji Uemura ◽  
Noriaki Arakawa ◽  
Yusuke Itoh ◽  
Takashi Kawahara ◽  
Yasuhide Miyoshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Proteome Analysis ◽  
Human Prostate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer Cells ◽  
Prostate Hyperplasia ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Prostate Cancers

247 Background: It is well known that prostate specific antigen (PSA) level has no reliable correlation with pathological malignancy of prostate cancer and is not a predictor for the development of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). The aim of this study is to explore novel biomarkers to predict the development of CRPC by using proteomics from secreted proteins from human prostate cancer cells. Methods: The proteins secreted from 6 prostate cancers in culture medium were analyzed and compared with 8 other cancer cells including renal and urothelial cancers using LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer. With the focus on high tissue specificity, the candidate biomarker proteins were then identified through analysis of gene expressions in proteins common to human prostate cancers by real time qPCR. Next, a system to measure the identified mouse monoclonal antibodies against the focused proteins was established. Finally, serum levels of these proteins from 33 patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), 31 with untreated prostate cancer (PCa) and 35 with CRPC, were measured. Results: The proteome analysis identified 12 candidates of secreted cell membrane proteins as new biomarkers. The proteome analysis indicated that not only matured GDF15, but pro-peptide as well as fragments (GDDP) are released from prostate cancer cells. Patients’ serum was analyzed for matured and pro-peptide GDF15 using ELISA and immunoprecipitation-MRM mass spectrometry. The results showed that the serum level of GDDP-1, one of the processing forms of GDDP, was significantly higher in CRPC than those in BPH and untreated PCa (P < 0.01). ROC analysis also showed that the AUC of GDDP-1(0.86) was higher than that of matured GDF15 (0.76). When the cutoff value of GDDP-1 was set at 4.0 ng/mL, there was a significant difference of overall survival (OS) in CRPC patients between those with more than 4.0 ng/mL compared to less than 4.0 ng/mL of GDDP-1, whereas there was no significant difference of OS measurable by PSA in CRPC patients. These data suggest that GDDP-1 may be a novel biomarker for CRPC. Conclusions: GDDP-1 shows potential as a novel biomarker for CRPC.

Circulating tumor DNA-targeted sequencing to reveal germline and somatic alterations that can guide decision-making in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17556-e17556
Author(s):  
Baijun Dong ◽  
Liancheng Fan ◽  
Bin Yang ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Yonghong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Targeted Sequencing ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Genomic Landscape ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Somatic Alterations ◽  
Multiple Treatments ◽  
Tumor Dna

e17556 Background: The genomic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is dynamic with the application of multiple treatments. The circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), which reveals germline and somatic alterations, provides a mini-invasive tool for monitoring tumor evolution. Methods: We performed an exploratory analysis of 299 ctDNA samples from 8 centers through application of multiple-gene deep targeted sequencing. Results: The most common recurrent genomic alterations were in AR(34.7%), TP53(18.9%), CDK12(15.4%), BRCA2(13.3%), and the majority of these clinically actionable gene alterations were identified in somatic level (CDK12 100% in somatic). The results showed the frequency of AR amplification and TP53 defect significantly increased in post-second and later line treatment group compared with treatment-naive group. AR amplification and TP53 or RB1 defect were associated with resistance to abiraterone or docetaxel. CDK12 was more frequently altered in our cohort than those in previous reports which mainly focused on Caucasian population. The patients with CDK12 defect showed rapid resistance to abiraterone and limited efficacy of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). However, these patients seemed to benefit from chemotherapy, especially platinum-based chemotherapy. Conclusions: This multi-institutional real-world study explored the genomic landscape and captured the significant diversity of mCRPC at different treatment stages by liquid biopsy. These findings established genomic drivers associated with resistance to multiple treatments (including PARPi and platinum-based chemotherapy) in mCRPC. Hence, ctDNA targeted sequencing can help guide clinical decision making in mCRPC throughout the whole treatment process. CDK12 might be able to be a novel predictive biomarker to guide treatment selection in mCRPC.

scholarly journals Changes in Susceptibility to Oncolytic Vesicular Stomatitis Virus during Progression of Prostate Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (10) ◽  
pp. 5250-5263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanmeng Yu ◽  
Shelby Puckett ◽  
Peter A. Antinozzi ◽  
Scott D. Cramer ◽  
Douglas S. Lyles
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Vesicular Stomatitis Virus ◽  
Androgen Deprivation ◽  
Oncolytic Viruses ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Vesicular Stomatitis ◽  
Prostate Cancers ◽  
Resistant Cells

ABSTRACTA major challenge to oncolytic virus therapy is that individual cancers vary in their sensitivity to oncolytic viruses, even when these cancers arise from the same tissue type. Variability in response may arise due to differences in the initial genetic lesions leading to cancer development. Alternatively, susceptibility to viral oncolysis may change during cancer progression. These hypotheses were tested using cells from a transgenic mouse model of prostate cancer infected with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). Primary cultures from murine cancers derived from prostate-specificPtendeletion contained a mixture of cells that were susceptible and resistant to VSV. Castration-resistant cancers contained a higher percentage of susceptible cells than cancers from noncastrated mice. These results indicate both susceptible and resistant cells can evolve within the same tumor. The role ofPtendeletion was further investigated using clonal populations of murine prostate epithelial (MPE) progenitor cells and tumor-derivedPten−/−cells. Deletion ofPtenin MPE progenitor cells using a lentivirus vector resulted in cells that responded poorly to interferon and were susceptible to VSV infection. In contrast, tumor-derivedPten−/−cells expressed higher levels of the antiviral transcription factor STAT1, activated STAT1 in response to VSV, and were resistant to VSV infection. These results suggest that early in tumor development followingPtendeletion, cells are primarily sensitive to VSV, but subsequent evolution in tumors leads to development of cells that are resistant to VSV infection. Further evolution in castration-resistant tumors leads to tumors in which cells are primarily sensitive to VSV.IMPORTANCEThere has been a great deal of progress in the development of replication-competent viruses that kill cancer cells (oncolytic viruses). However, a major problem is that individual cancers vary in their sensitivity to oncolytic viruses, even when these cancers arise from the same tissue type. The experiments presented here were to determine whether both sensitive and resistant cells are present in prostate cancers originating from a single genetic lesion in transgenic mice, prostate-specific deletion of the gene for the tumor suppressor Pten. The results indicate that murine prostate cancers are composed of both cells that are sensitive and cells that are resistant to oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). Furthermore, androgen deprivation led to castration-resistant prostate cancers that were composed primarily of cells that were sensitive to VSV. These results are encouraging for the use of VSV for the treatment of prostate cancers that are resistant to androgen deprivation therapy.

scholarly journals A comprehensive review of genomic landscape, biomarkers and treatment sequencing in castration-resistant prostate cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Seisen ◽  
Morgan Rouprêt ◽  
Florie Gomez ◽  
Gabriel G. Malouf ◽  
Shahrokh F. Shariat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Comprehensive Review ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Genomic Landscape ◽  
Treatment Sequencing

scholarly journals Immunotherapy and Immunotherapy Combinations in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 334
Author(s):  
Dhruv Bansal ◽  
Melissa A. Reimers ◽  
Eric M. Knoche ◽  
Russell K. Pachynski
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Prostate Cancers ◽  
Past Experiences

Although most prostate cancers are localized, and the majority are curable, recurrences occur in approximately 35% of men. Among patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence and PSA doubling time (PSADT) less than 15 months after radical prostatectomy, prostate cancer accounted for approximately 90% of the deaths by 15 years after recurrence. An immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) and impaired cellular immunity are likely largely responsible for the limited utility of checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) in advanced prostate cancer compared with other tumor types. Thus, for immunologically “cold” malignancies such as prostate cancer, clinical trial development has pivoted towards novel approaches to enhance immune responses. Numerous clinical trials are currently evaluating combination immunomodulatory strategies incorporating vaccine-based therapies, checkpoint inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Other trials evaluate the efficacy and safety of these immunomodulatory agents’ combinations with standard approaches such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), taxane-based chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Here, we will review promising immunotherapies in development and ongoing trials for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). These novel trials will build on past experiences and promise to usher a new era to treat patients with mCRPC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document