scholarly journals A multi-enhancer RET regulatory code is disrupted in Hirschsprung disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumantra Chatterjee ◽  
Kameko M. Karasaki ◽  
Lauren E. Fries ◽  
Ashish Kapoor ◽  
Aravinda Chakravarti
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Hirschsprung Disease ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Kinase Gene ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Risk Variants

The major genetic risk factors for Hirschsprung disease (HSCR) are three common polymorphisms within cis-regulatory elements (CREs) of the receptor tyrosine kinase gene RET, which reduce its expression during enteric nervous system (ENS) development. These risk variants attenuate binding of the transcription factors RARB, GATA2, and SOX10 to their cognate CREs, reduce RET gene expression, and dysregulate other ENS and HSCR genes in the RET–EDNRB gene regulatory network (GRN). Here, we use siRNA, ChIP, and CRISPR-Cas9 deletion analyses in the SK-N-SH cell line to ask how many additional HSCR-associated risk variants reside in RET CREs that affect its gene expression. We identify 22 HSCR-associated variants in candidate RET CREs, of which seven have differential allele-specific in vitro enhancer activity, and four of these seven affect RET gene expression; of these, two enhancers are bound by the transcription factor PAX3. We also show that deleting multiple variant-containing enhancers leads to synergistic effects on RET gene expression. These, coupled with our prior results, show that common sequence variants in at least 10 RET enhancers affect HSCR risk, seven with experimental evidence of affecting RET gene expression, extending the known RET–EDNRB GRN to reveal an extensive regulatory code modulating disease risk at a single gene.

scholarly journals A multi-enhancer RET regulatory code is disrupted in Hirschsprung disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sumantra Chatterjee ◽  
Kameko M Karasaki ◽  
Ashish Kapoor ◽  
Aravinda Chakravarti
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Hirschsprung Disease ◽  
Kinase Gene ◽  
Risk Variants ◽  
Its Gene ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Gene ◽  
Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Gene ◽  
Gene Regulatory

AbstractIn Hirschsprung disease (HSCR; congenital colonic aganglionosis), three GWAS-identified common variants residing in three distinct enhancers of the RET receptor tyrosine kinase gene reduce its gene expression and are causal disease risk variants. Further, their combined effects significantly dysregulate the expression of other functionally-related genes defining the RET gene regulatory network (GRN). In this study, we asked how many variants in how many distinct RET enhancers affect HSCR risk by reducing RET gene expression? We demonstrate that 22 additional HSCR-associated polymorphisms, both independent and associated, reside within multiple candidate RET enhancers and among which 7 display differential allelic enhancer activities. Of these 7 RET enhancers, two bind PAX3 and extend the known RET-EDNRB GRN. Therefore, sequence variants within a minimum of 10 RET enhancers affect HSCR risk, revealing a diverse regulatory code modulating complex disease risk even at a single locus.

scholarly journals Genetic determinants of growth phase-dependent and adenovirus 5-responsive expression of the Chinese hamster thymidine kinase gene are contained within thymidine kinase mRNA sequences.

1986 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 2262-2266 ◽  
Author(s):  
J A Lewis ◽  
D A Matkovich
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Culture ◽  
Thymidine Kinase ◽  
Growth Phase ◽  
Chinese Hamster ◽  
Culture Conditions ◽  
Kinase Gene ◽  
Simplex Virus ◽  
Adenovirus 5

We have constructed a chimeric thymidine kinase (TK) minigene, pHe delta 6Ha, which combines the complete coding and 3' noncoding regions of a Chinese hamster TK cDNA with the promoter region and 5' untranslated region of the TK gene of herpes simplex virus type 1. We have transformed rat 4 cells to Tk+ with this gene and analyzed the pattern of TK gene expression in these transformants under various conditions of in vitro cell culture. We find that TK gene expression in these Tk+ transformants is growth phase dependent, responsive to adenovirus 5 infection, and indistinguishable in character under a variety of cell culture conditions from the pattern of TK gene expression in rat 4 cells transformed to Tk+ with the genomic Chinese hamster TK gene clone lambda HaTK.5. We are led to the conclusion that the genetic elements which mediate growth phase-dependent TK gene expression are contained entirely within the sequences of the mature cytoplasmic hamster TK mRNA.

scholarly journals Regulation of protamine gene expression in an in vitro homologous system.

1996 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Jankowski ◽  
P D Cannon ◽  
F Van der Hoorn ◽  
L D Wasilewska ◽  
N C Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Transcription System ◽  
Proposed Model ◽  
Binding Factor ◽  
Gc Box ◽  
Responsive Element

An in vitro transcription system from the trout testis nuclei was developed to study trout protamine gene expression. The protamine promoter contains, among others, two regulatory elements: 1) a cAMP-responsive element or CRE element (TGACGTCA) which is present in position 5' to TATA box, and 2) GC box (CCGCCC) which is present in position 3' to TATA box. The removal of the CRE-binding protein by titration (by the addition of appropriate oligonucleotides to the incubation mixture) resulted in a decrease in transcription of the protamine gene. These results were confirmed by experiments in which the pure CRE-binding factor (TPBP1) was used, as well as by those where a stimulatory effect of cAMP on protamine promoter transcription was observed. On the other hand, addition of oligonucleotides containing the GC-box sequence enhanced the protamine gene transcription indicating that the protein (Sp1 like) which binds to this sequence acts as a repressor of protamine gene expression. These results confirm the previously proposed model which suggested that the GC box played a role in negative regulation of the protamine gene expression. Involvement of some other factors in this process was also discussed.

scholarly journals Genetic influences on cell type specific gene expression and splicing during neurogenesis elucidate regulatory mechanisms of brain traits

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nil Aygün ◽  
Angela L. Elwell ◽  
Dan Liang ◽  
Michael J. Lafferty ◽  
Kerry E. Cheek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Regulatory Mechanisms ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Risk Variants ◽  
Allele Specific ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Regulatory Effects

SummaryInterpretation of the function of non-coding risk loci for neuropsychiatric disorders and brain-relevant traits via gene expression and alternative splicing is mainly performed in bulk post-mortem adult tissue. However, genetic risk loci are enriched in regulatory elements of cells present during neocortical differentiation, and regulatory effects of risk variants may be masked by heterogeneity in bulk tissue. Here, we map e/sQTLs and allele specific expression in primary human neural progenitors (n=85) and their sorted neuronal progeny (n=74). Using colocalization and TWAS, we uncover cell-type specific regulatory mechanisms underlying risk for these traits.

scholarly journals Synthetic gene regulatory networks in the opportunistic human pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin A. Sorg ◽  
Clement Gallay ◽  
Jan-Willem Veening
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Combinatorial Libraries ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Expression Control ◽  
Gene Expression Control

AbstractStreptococcus pneumoniae can cause disease in various human tissues and organs, including the ear, the brain, the blood and the lung, and thus in highly diverse and dynamic environments. It is challenging to study how pneumococci control virulence factor expression, because cues of natural environments and the presence of an immune system are difficult to simulate in vitro. Here, we apply synthetic biology methods to reverse-engineer gene expression control in S. pneumoniae. A selection platform is described that allows for straightforward identification of transcriptional regulatory elements out of combinatorial libraries. We present TetR- and LacI-regulated promoters that show expression ranges of four orders of magnitude. Based on these promoters, regulatory networks of higher complexity are assembled, such as logic AND and IMPLY gates. Finally, we demonstrate single-copy genome-integrated toggle switches that give rise to bimodal population distributions. The tools described here can be used to mimic complex expression patterns, such as the ones found for pneumococcal virulence factors, paving the way for in vivo investigations of the importance of gene expression control on the pathogenicity of S. pneumoniae.

scholarly journals Cardiac Cell Type-Specific Gene Regulatory Programs and Disease Risk Association

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James D. Hocker ◽  
Olivier B. Poirion ◽  
Fugui Zhu ◽  
Justin Buchanan ◽  
Kai Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Disease Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease Risk ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Cardiac Cell ◽  
Risk Variants ◽  
Gene Regulatory

ABSTRACTBackgroundCis-regulatory elements such as enhancers and promoters are crucial for directing gene expression in the human heart. Dysregulation of these elements can result in many cardiovascular diseases that are major leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In addition, genetic variants associated with cardiovascular disease risk are enriched within cis-regulatory elements. However, the location and activity of these cis-regulatory elements in individual cardiac cell types remains to be fully defined.MethodsWe performed single nucleus ATAC-seq and single nucleus RNA-seq to define a comprehensive catalogue of candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs) and gene expression patterns for the distinct cell types comprising each chamber of four non-failing human hearts. We used this catalogue to computationally deconvolute dynamic enhancers in failing hearts and to assign cardiovascular disease risk variants to cCREs in individual cardiac cell types. Finally, we applied reporter assays, genome editing and electrophysiogical measurements in in vitro differentiated human cardiomyocytes to validate the molecular mechanisms of cardiovascular disease risk variants.ResultsWe defined >287,000 candidate cis-regulatory elements (cCREs) in human hearts at single-cell resolution, which notably revealed gene regulatory programs controlling specific cell types in a cardiac region/structure-dependent manner and during heart failure. We further report enrichment of cardiovascular disease risk variants in cCREs of distinct cardiac cell types, including a strong enrichment of atrial fibrillation variants in cardiomyocyte cCREs, and reveal 38 candidate causal atrial fibrillation variants localized to cardiomyocyte cCREs. Two such risk variants residing within a cardiomyocyte-specific cCRE at the KCNH2/HERG locus resulted in reduced enhancer activity compared to the non-risk allele. Finally, we found that deletion of the cCRE containing these variants decreased KCNH2 expression and prolonged action potential repolarization in an enhancer dosage-dependent manner.ConclusionsThis comprehensive atlas of human cardiac cCREs provides the foundation for not only illuminating cell type-specific gene regulatory programs controlling human hearts during health and disease, but also interpreting genetic risk loci for a wide spectrum of cardiovascular diseases.

Cloning of GT box-binding proteins: a novel Sp1 multigene family regulating T-cell receptor gene expression

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 4251-4261 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kingsley ◽  
A Winoto
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Multigene Family ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Receptor Gene ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Gene Segment ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
Regulatory Elements

Analysis of a T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) alpha promoter from a variable gene segment (V) revealed a critical GT box element which is also found in upstream regions of several V alpha genes, TCR enhancer, and regulatory elements of other genes. This element is necessary for TCR gene expression and binds several proteins. These GT box-binding proteins were identified as members of a novel Sp1 multigene family. Two of them, which we term Sp2 and Sp3, were cloned. Sp2 and Sp3 contain zinc fingers and transactivation domains similar to those of Sp1. Like Sp1, Sp2 and Sp3 are expressed ubiquitously, and their in vitro-translated products bind to the GT box in TCR V alpha promoters. Sp3, in particular, also binds to the Sp1 consensus sequence GC box and has binding activity similar to that of Sp1. As the GT box has also previously been shown to play a role in gene regulation of other genes, these newly isolated Sp2 and Sp3 proteins might regulate expression not only of the TCR gene but of other genes as well.

Regulation of the twist target gene tinman by modular cis-regulatory elements during early mesoderm development

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (24) ◽  
pp. 4971-4982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Yin ◽  
X.L. Xu ◽  
M. Frasch
Keyword(s):  
Homeobox Gene ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Bhlh Protein ◽  
Expression Domain ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Enhancer Element ◽  
Mesoderm Development ◽  
Visceral Mesoderm

The Drosophila tinman homeobox gene has a major role in early mesoderm patterning and determines the formation of visceral mesoderm, heart progenitors, specific somatic muscle precursors and glia-like mesodermal cells. These functions of tinman are reflected in its dynamic pattern of expression, which is characterized by initial widespread expression in the trunk mesoderm, then refinement to a broad dorsal mesodermal domain, and finally restricted expression in heart progenitors. Here we show that each of these phases of expression is driven by a discrete enhancer element, the first being active in the early mesoderm, the second in the dorsal mesoderm and the third in cardioblasts. We provide evidence that the early-active enhancer element is a direct target of twist, a gene encoding a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) protein, which is necessary for tinman activation. This 180 bp enhancer includes three E-box sequences which bind Twist protein in vitro and are essential for enhancer activity in vivo. Ectodermal misexpression of twist causes ectopic activation of this enhancer in ectodermal cells, indicating that twist is the only mesoderm-specific activator of early tinman expression. We further show that the 180 bp enhancer also includes negatively acting sequences. Binding of Even-skipped to these sequences appears to reduce twist-dependent activation in a periodic fashion, thus producing a striped tinman pattern in the early mesoderm. In addition, these sequences prevent activation of tinman by twist in a defined portion of the head mesoderm that gives rise to hemocytes. We find that this repression requires the function of buttonhead, a head-patterning gene, and that buttonhead is necessary for normal activation of the hematopoietic differentiation gene serpent in the same area. Together, our results show that tinman is controlled by an array of discrete enhancer elements that are activated successively by differential genetic inputs, as well as by closely linked activator and repressor binding sites within an early-acting enhancer, which restrict twist activity to specific areas within the twist expression domain.

scholarly journals Cloning of GT box-binding proteins: a novel Sp1 multigene family regulating T-cell receptor gene expression.

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 4251-4261 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Kingsley ◽  
A Winoto
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Multigene Family ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Receptor Gene ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Gene Segment ◽  
Cell Receptor ◽  
Regulatory Elements

Analysis of a T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) alpha promoter from a variable gene segment (V) revealed a critical GT box element which is also found in upstream regions of several V alpha genes, TCR enhancer, and regulatory elements of other genes. This element is necessary for TCR gene expression and binds several proteins. These GT box-binding proteins were identified as members of a novel Sp1 multigene family. Two of them, which we term Sp2 and Sp3, were cloned. Sp2 and Sp3 contain zinc fingers and transactivation domains similar to those of Sp1. Like Sp1, Sp2 and Sp3 are expressed ubiquitously, and their in vitro-translated products bind to the GT box in TCR V alpha promoters. Sp3, in particular, also binds to the Sp1 consensus sequence GC box and has binding activity similar to that of Sp1. As the GT box has also previously been shown to play a role in gene regulation of other genes, these newly isolated Sp2 and Sp3 proteins might regulate expression not only of the TCR gene but of other genes as well.

scholarly journals Imprinted gene expression at the Dlk1-Dio3 cluster is controlled by both maternal and paternal IG-DMRs in a tissue-specific fashion

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Alexander ◽  
María J. García-García
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Enhancer Element ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
Imprinted Gene ◽  
Imprinting Control Region ◽  
Regulatory Landscape ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Different Tissues

ABSTRACTImprinting at the Dlk1-Dio3 cluster is controlled by the IG-DMR, an imprinting control region differentially methylated between maternal and paternal chromosomes. The maternal IG-DMR is essential for imprinting control, functioning as a cis enhancer element. Meanwhile, DNA methylation at the paternal IG-DMR is thought to prevent enhancer activity. To explore whether suppression of enhancer activity at the methylated IG-DMR requires the transcriptional repressor TRIM28, we analyzed Trim28chatwo embryos and performed epistatic experiments with IG-DMR deletion mutants. We found that while TRIM28 regulates the enhancer properties of the paternal IG-DMR, it also controls imprinting through other mechanisms. Additionally, we found that the paternal IG-DMR, previously deemed dispensable for imprinting, is required in certain tissues, demonstrating that imprinting is regulated in a tissue-specific manner. Using PRO-seq to analyze nascent transcription, we identified 30 novel transcribed regulatory elements, including 23 that are tissue-specific. These results demonstrate that different tissues have a distinctive regulatory landscape at the Dlk1-Dio3 cluster and provide insight into potential mechanisms of tissue-specific imprinting control. Together, our findings challenge the premise that Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting is regulated through a single mechanism and demonstrate that different tissues use distinct strategies to accomplish imprinted gene expression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document