scholarly journals Trophic Factor-Induced Plasticity of Synaptic Connections Between Identified Lymnaea Neurons

1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie A. Woodin ◽  
Toshiro Hamakawa ◽  
Mayumi Takasaki ◽  
Ken Lukowiak ◽  
Naweed I. Syed
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Initial Period ◽  
Defined Medium ◽  
Inhibitory Synapse ◽  
Trophic Factors ◽  
Trophic Factor ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Excitatory Synapses ◽  
Synaptic Connections

Neurotrophic factors participate in both developmental and adult synaptic plasticity; however, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Using soma–soma synapses between the identified Lymnaea neurons, we demonstrate that the brain conditioned medium (CM)-derived trophic factors are required for the formation of excitatory but not the inhibitory synapse. Specifically, identified presynaptic [right pedal dorsal 1 (RPeD1) and visceral dorsal 4 (VD4)] and postsynaptic [visceral dorsal 2/3 (VD2/3) and left pedal dorsal 1 (LPeD1)] neurons were soma–soma paired either in the absence or presence of CM. We show that in defined medium (DM—does not contain extrinsic trophic factors), appropriate excitatory synapses failed to develop between RPeD1 and VD2/3. Instead, inappropriate inhibitory synapses formed between VD2/3 and RPeD1. Similarly, mutual inhibitory synapses developed between VD4 and LPeD1 in DM. These inhibitory synapses were termed novel because they do not exist in the intact brain. To test whether DM-induced, inappropriate inhibitory synapses could be corrected by the addition of CM, cells were first paired in DM for an initial period of 12 hr. DM was then replaced with CM, and simultaneous intracellular recordings were made from paired cells after 6–12 hr of CM substitution. Not only did CM induce the formation of appropriate excitatory synapses between both cell pairs, but it also reduced the incidence of inappropriate inhibitory synapse formation. The CM-induced plasticity of synaptic connections involved new protein synthesis and transcription and was mediated via receptor tyrosine kinases. Taken together, our data provide the first direct insight into the cellular mechanism underlying trophic factor-induced specificity and plasticity of synaptic connections between soma–soma paired Lymnaea neurons.

Synapse Formation Between Isolated Axons Requires Presynaptic Soma and Redistribution of Postsynaptic AChRs

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (5) ◽  
pp. 2611-2619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryanne Meems ◽  
David Munno ◽  
Jan van Minnen ◽  
Naweed I. Syed
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Defined Medium ◽  
Trophic Factors ◽  
Presynaptic Neuron ◽  
Neuronal Protein ◽  
Cholinergic Synapses ◽  
Lymnaea Neurons ◽  
New Protein

The involvement of neuronal protein synthetic machinery and extrinsic trophic factors during synapse formation is poorly understood. Here we determine the roles of these processes by reconstructing synapses between the axons severed from identified Lymnaea neurons in cell culture, either in the presence or absence of trophic factors. We demonstrate that, although synapses are maintained between isolated pre- and postsynaptic axons for several days, the presynaptic, but not the postsynaptic, cell body, however, is required for new synapse formation between soma–axon pairs. The formation of cholinergic synapses between presynaptic soma and postsynaptic axon requires gene transcription and protein synthesis solely in the presynaptic neuron. We show that this synaptogenesis is contingent on extrinsic trophic factors present in brain conditioned medium (CM). The CM-induced excitatory synapse formation is mediated through receptor tyrosine kinases. We further demonstrate that, although the postsynaptic axon does not require new protein synthesis for synapse formation, its contact with the presynaptic cell in CM, but not in defined medium (no trophic factors), differentially alters its responsiveness to exogenously applied acetylcholine at synaptic compared with extrasynaptic sites. Together, these data suggest a synergetic action of cell–cell signaling and trophic factors to bring about specific changes in both pre- and postsynaptic neurons during synapse formation.

scholarly journals Interaction between autism-linked MDGAs and neuroligins suppresses inhibitory synapse development

2013 ◽  
Vol 200 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine L. Pettem ◽  
Daisaku Yokomaku ◽  
Hideto Takahashi ◽  
Yuan Ge ◽  
Ann Marie Craig
Keyword(s):  
Neurodevelopmental Disorders ◽  
Hippocampal Neurons ◽  
Rare Variants ◽  
Inhibitory Synapse ◽  
Excitatory Synapse ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Excitatory Synapses ◽  
Synapse Development ◽  
Multiple Protein ◽  
Synapse Density

Rare variants in MDGAs (MAM domain–containing glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors), including multiple protein-truncating deletions, are linked to autism and schizophrenia, but the function of these genes is poorly understood. Here, we show that MDGA1 and MDGA2 bound to neuroligin-2 inhibitory synapse–organizing protein, also implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders. MDGA1 inhibited the synapse-promoting activity of neuroligin-2, without altering neuroligin-2 surface trafficking, by inhibiting interaction of neuroligin-2 with neurexin. MDGA binding and suppression of synaptogenic activity was selective for neuroligin-2 and not neuroligin-1 excitatory synapse organizer. Overexpression of MDGA1 in cultured rat hippocampal neurons reduced inhibitory synapse density without altering excitatory synapse density. Furthermore, RNAi-mediated knockdown of MDGA1 selectively increased inhibitory but not excitatory synapse density. These results identify MDGA1 as one of few identified negative regulators of synapse development with a unique selectivity for inhibitory synapses. These results also place MDGAs in the neurexin–neuroligin synaptic pathway implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders and support the idea that an imbalance between inhibitory and excitatory synapses may contribute to these disorders.

scholarly journals Hyaluronan regulates synapse formation and function in developing neural networks

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Wilson ◽  
Warren Knudson ◽  
Karen Newell-Litwa
Keyword(s):  
Extracellular Matrix ◽  
Brain Development ◽  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Inhibitory Synapse ◽  
Synaptic Function ◽  
Excitatory Synapse ◽  
Network Activity ◽  
Excitatory Synapses ◽  
Inhibitory Signaling

Abstract Neurodevelopmental disorders present with synaptic alterations that disrupt the balance between excitatory and inhibitory signaling. For example, hyperexcitability of cortical neurons is associated with both epilepsy and autism spectrum disorders. However, the mechanisms that initially establish the balance between excitatory and inhibitory signaling in brain development are not well understood. Here, we sought to determine how the extracellular matrix directs synapse formation and regulates synaptic function in a model of human cortical brain development. The extracellular matrix, making up twenty percent of brain volume, is largely comprised of hyaluronan. Hyaluronan acts as both a scaffold of the extracellular matrix and a space-filling molecule. Hyaluronan is present from the onset of brain development, beginning with neural crest cell migration. Through acute perturbation of hyaluronan levels during synaptogenesis, we sought to determine how hyaluronan impacts the ratio of excitatory to inhibitory synapse formation and the resulting neural activity. We used 3-D cortical spheroids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells to replicate this neurodevelopmental window. Our results demonstrate that hyaluronan preferentially surrounds nascent excitatory synapses. Removal of hyaluronan increases the expression of excitatory synapse markers and results in a corresponding increase in the formation of excitatory synapses, while also decreasing inhibitory synapse formation. This increased excitatory synapse formation elevates network activity, as demonstrated by microelectrode array analysis. In contrast, the addition of purified hyaluronan suppresses excitatory synapse formation. These results establish that the hyaluronan extracellular matrix surrounds developing excitatory synapses, where it critically regulates synapse formation and the resulting balance between excitatory to inhibitory signaling.

scholarly journals Semaphorin4D induces inhibitory synapse formation by rapid stabilization of presynaptic boutons via MET co-activation

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cátia P. Frias ◽  
Tom Bresser ◽  
Lisa Scheefhals ◽  
Hai Yin Hu ◽  
Paul M. P. van Bergen en Henegouwen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracellular Signaling ◽  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Inhibitory Synapse ◽  
Network Activity ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Signaling Cascade ◽  
Molecular Processes ◽  
Intracellular Signaling Cascade ◽  
Gabaergic Synapses ◽  
Presynaptic Boutons

ABSTRACTChanges in inhibitory connections are essential for experience-dependent circuit adaptations. Defects in inhibitory synapses are linked to neurodevelopmental disorders, but the molecular processes underlying inhibitory synapse formation are not well understood. Here we use high resolution two-photon microscopy in organotypic hippocampal slices to examine the signaling pathways induced by the postsynaptic signaling molecule Semaphorin4D (Sema4D) during inhibitory synapse formation. By monitoring changes in individual GFP-labeled presynaptic boutons we found that the primary action of Sema4D is to induce stabilization of presynaptic boutons within tens of minutes. Stabilizing boutons rapidly recruited synaptic vesicles, which was followed by accumulation of postsynaptic gephyrin. Newly formed inhibitory synapses were complete and functional after 24 hours, as determined by electrophysiology and immunohistochemistry. We further showed that Sema4D signaling is regulated by network activity and can induce a local increase in bouton density, suggesting a possible role in circuit adaptation. We further examined the intracellular signaling cascade triggered by Sema4D and found that bouton stabilization occurred through rapid remodeling of actin, and this could be mimicked by the actin-depolymerizing drug Latrunculin B or by reducing ROCK activity. The intracellular signaling cascade required activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase MET, which is a well-known autism risk factor. Our immunohistochemistry data suggests that MET may be localized to presynaptic inhibitory axons. Together, our data yield important insights in the molecular pathway underlying activity-dependent Sema4D-induced synapse formation and reveal a novel role for MET in inhibitory synapses.Significance StatementGABAergic synapses provide the main inhibitory control of neuronal activity in the brain. We make important steps in unraveling the molecular processes that take place when formation of inhibitory synapses is triggered by a specific signaling molecule, Sema4D. We find that this process depends on network activity and involves specific remodeling of the intracellular actin cytoskeleton. We also reveal a previously unknown role for MET in inhibitory synapses. As defects in GABAergic synapses have been implied in many brain disorders, and mutations in MET are strong risk factors for autism, our findings urge for a further investigation of the role of MET at inhibitory synapses.

scholarly journals The Interplay between Synaptic Activity and Neuroligin Function in the CNS

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoge Hu ◽  
Jian-hong Luo ◽  
Junyu Xu
Keyword(s):  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Autism Spectrum ◽  
Synaptic Activity ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Excitatory Synapses ◽  
Spectrum Disorders ◽  
Cell Adhesion Proteins ◽  
The Relationship

Neuroligins (NLs) are postsynaptic transmembrane cell-adhesion proteins that play a key role in the regulation of excitatory and inhibitory synapses. Previousin vitroandin vivostudies have suggested that NLs contribute to synapse formation and synaptic transmission. Consistent with their localization, NL1 and NL3 selectively affect excitatory synapses, whereas NL2 specifically affects inhibitory synapses. Deletions or mutations in NL genes have been found in patients with autism spectrum disorders or mental retardations, and mice harboring the reported NL deletions or mutations exhibit autism-related behaviors and synapse dysfunction. Conversely, synaptic activity can regulate the phosphorylation, expression, and cleavage of NLs, which, in turn, can influence synaptic activity. Thus, in clinical research, identifying the relationship between NLs and synapse function is critical. In this review, we primarily discuss how NLs and synaptic activity influence each other.

scholarly journals Subcellular sorting of neuregulins controls the assembly of excitatory-inhibitory cortical circuits

eLife ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Exposito-Alonso ◽  
Catarina Osório ◽  
Clémence Bernard ◽  
Sandra Pascual-García ◽  
Isabel del Pino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Cortex ◽  
Pyramidal Cells ◽  
Synaptic Proteins ◽  
Trophic Factors ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Receptor ◽  
Excitatory Synapses ◽  
Cortical Circuits ◽  
Mouse Cerebral Cortex ◽  
Novel Strategy

The assembly of specific neuronal circuits relies on the expression of complementary molecular programs in presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons. In the cerebral cortex, the tyrosine kinase receptor ErbB4 is critical for the wiring of specific populations of GABAergic interneurons, in which it paradoxically regulates both the formation of inhibitory synapses as well as the development of excitatory synapses received by these cells. Here, we found that Nrg1 and Nrg3, two members of the neuregulin family of trophic factors, regulate the inhibitory outputs and excitatory inputs of interneurons in the mouse cerebral cortex, respectively. The differential role of Nrg1 and Nrg3 in this process is not due to their receptor-binding EGF-like domain, but rather to their distinctive subcellular localization within pyramidal cells. Our study reveals a novel strategy for the assembly of cortical circuits that involves the differential subcellular sorting of family-related synaptic proteins.

scholarly journals ErbB4 promotes inhibitory synapse formation by cell adhesion, independent of its kinase activity

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Luo ◽  
Ziyang Liu ◽  
Dong Lin ◽  
Wenbing Chen ◽  
Dongyan Ren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Adhesion ◽  
Hippocampal Neurons ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Pyramidal Neurons ◽  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Inhibitory Synapse ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Precise Control

AbstractThe precise control of the nervous system function under the vitality of synapses is extremely critical. Efforts have been taken to explore the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms for synapse formation. Cell adhesion molecules have been found important for synapse assembly in the brain. Many trans-adhesion complexes have been identified to modulate excitatory synapse formation. However, little is known about the synaptogenic mechanisms for inhibitory synapses. ErbB4 is a receptor tyrosine kinase enriched in interneurons. Here, we showed that overexpressing ErbB4 in HEK293T cells induced gephyrin or GABAAR α1 puncta in co-cultured primary hippocampal neurons. This induction of ErbB4 was independent of its kinase activity. K751M, a kinase-dead mutant of ErbB4, can also induce gephyrin or GABAAR α1 puncta in the co-culture system. We further constructed K751M knock-in mice and found that the homozygous were viable at birth and fertile without changes in gross brain structure. The number of interneurons and inhibitory synapses onto pyramidal neurons (PyNs) were comparable between K751M and wild-type mice but decreased in ErbB4-Null mice. Moreover, ErbB4 can interact in trans with Slitrk3, a transmembrane postsynaptic protein at inhibitory synapses, through the extracellular RLD domain of ErbB4. The deletion of RLD diminished the induction of gephyrin or GABAAR α1 puncta by ErbB4. Finally, disruption of ErbB4–Slitrk3 interaction through neutralization of Slitrk3 by secretable RLD decreased inhibitory synapses onto PyNs and impaired GABAergic transmission. These results identify that ErbB4, as a cell adhesion molecule, promotes inhibitory synapse formation onto PyNs by interacting with Slitrk3 and in a kinase-independent manner, providing an unexpected mechanism of ErbB4 in inhibitory synapse formation.

Neuroligin-2 as a central organizer of inhibitory synapses in health and disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (663) ◽  
pp. eabd8379
Author(s):  
Heba Ali ◽  
Lena Marth ◽  
Dilja Krueger-Burg
Keyword(s):  
Synaptic Transmission ◽  
Synapse Formation ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Inhibitory Synapses ◽  
Molecular Architecture ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Altered Expression ◽  
Health And Disease ◽  
Flow Of Information

Postsynaptic organizational protein complexes play central roles both in orchestrating synapse formation and in defining the functional properties of synaptic transmission that together shape the flow of information through neuronal networks. A key component of these organizational protein complexes is the family of synaptic adhesion proteins called neuroligins. Neuroligins form transsynaptic bridges with presynaptic neurexins to regulate various aspects of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission. Neuroligin-2 (NLGN2) is the only member that acts exclusively at GABAergic inhibitory synapses. Altered expression and mutations in NLGN2 and several of its interacting partners are linked to cognitive and psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, autism, and anxiety. Research on NLGN2 has fundamentally shaped our understanding of the molecular architecture of inhibitory synapses. Here, we discuss the current knowledge on the molecular and cellular functions of mammalian NLGN2 and its role in the neuronal circuitry that regulates behavior in rodents and humans.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document