Healthcare Facility Variables Important to Biomedical Staffing in Line with 2030 Saudi Vision

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulhameed F. Alkhateeb ◽  
Jumaan M. AlAmri ◽  
Mohammad A. Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Facility

MEASLES OUTBREAK IN A RURAL AREA OF A DEVELOPING COUNTRY: A CASE CONTROL STUDY

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 197-201
Author(s):  
Mir M Hassan Bullo ◽  
Mirza Amir Baig ◽  
Jawad Faisal Malik ◽  
Ejaz Ahmad Khan ◽  
Muazam Abbas Ranjha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Vaccine Coverage ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Maculopapular Rash ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Major Public Health Problem ◽  
District Health ◽  
Active Case

Background: Measles is highly contagious vaccine preventable disease (VPD), and a major public health problem considered as leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries like Pakistan. An outbreak of measles was reported in Sharifabad Islamabad on 15th of April 2017, and an investigation was launched to assess the magnitude of outbreak, evaluate risk factors and recommend control measures. Methods: A comprehensive house to house active case search along with vaccine coverage survey was conducted from April 19-22, 2017. A case was defined as "onset of maculopapular rash with fever in a resident of Sharifabad with at least one of the following signs/ symptoms, Coryza, Conjunctivitis, Cough, Otitis media or Pneumonia present in between 19 March to 22nd April 2017". Four age & sex matched controls were selected from the neighborhood. Data was collected through interview method using structured questionnaire and vaccination coverage was determined by using Epi survey form. Blood samples were sent for laboratory confirmation. Results: A total of eight cases were identified through active case finding while three were reported by local practitioner. Mean age of cases were 20 months (range 8-36 months). Severely affected age-group was 1-2 years with attack rate of 46%. Around two-third (64%) of cases and a few (16%) of controls were unvaccinated against measles. Contact with measles patient [OR 25.2, CI 3.9-160.1, P=0.00], unvaccinated children [OR 9.2 CI 2.12-40.4, P=0.000], social misconception regarding vaccination [OR 7.8 CI 1.42-42.6, P=0.00], and distance from healthcare facility [OR 5.7 CI 1.15-28.35, P=0.02] were significant risk factors. Vaccine efficacy was 90%. Conclusion: Main reasons of the outbreak were contact with the cases, and low vaccination status. We recommended comprehensive measles vaccination and community awareness sessions. On our recommendations district health authority Islamabad carried out mop up of whole area.

scholarly journals Investigations, actions and learning from an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom

2020 ◽  
pp. 175717742097679
Author(s):  
Kordo Saeed ◽  
Emanuela Pelosi ◽  
Nitin Mahobia ◽  
Nicola White ◽  
Christopher Labdon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Current Infection ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
A Current

Background: We report an outbreak of SARS coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection among healthcare workers (HCW) in an NHS elective healthcare facility. Methodology: A narrative chronological account of events after declaring an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 among HCWs. As part of the investigations, HCWs were offered testing during the outbreak. These were: (1) screening by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT- PCR) to detect a current infection; and (2) serum samples to determine seroprevalence. Results: Over 180 HCWs were tested by real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 infection. The rate of infection was 15.2% (23.7% for clinical or directly patient-facing HCWs vs. 4.8% in non-clinical non-patient-facing HCWs). Of the infected HCWs, 57% were asymptomatic. Seroprevalence (SARS-CoV-2 IgG) among HCWs was 13%. It was challenging to establish an exact source for the outbreak. The importance of education, training, social distancing and infection prevention practices were emphasised. Additionally, avoidance of unnecessary transfer of patients and minimising cross-site working for staff and early escalation were highlighted. Establishing mass and regular screening for HCWs are also crucial to enabling the best care for patients while maintaining the wellbeing of staff. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first UK outbreak report among HCWs and we hope to have highlighted some key issues and learnings that can be considered by other NHS staff and HCWs globally when dealing with such a task in future.

scholarly journals Analysis of National Healthcare Safety Network Clostridioides difficile Infection Standardized Infection Ratio by Test Type

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s116-s118
Author(s):  
Qunna Li ◽  
Andrea Benin ◽  
Alice Guh ◽  
Margaret A. Dudeck ◽  
Katherine Allen-Bridson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Adjustment ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Directional Pattern ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Nucleic Acid Amplification ◽  
Test Type ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile Infection ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Background: The NHSN has used positive laboratory tests for surveillance of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) LabID events since 2009. Typically, CDIs are detected using enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), or various test combinations. The NHSN uses a risk-adjusted, standardized infection ratio (SIR) to assess healthcare facility-onset (HO) CDI. Despite including test type in the risk adjustment, some hospital personnel and other stakeholders are concerned that NAAT use is associated with higher SIRs than are EIAs. To investigate this issue, we analyzed NHSN data from acute-care hospitals for July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2018. Methods: Calendar quarters for which CDI test type was reported as NAAT (includes NAAT, glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH)+NAAT and GDH+EIA followed by NAAT if discrepant) or EIA (includes EIA and GDH+EIA) were selected. HO CDI SIRs were calculated for facility-wide inpatient locations. We conducted the following analyses: (1) Among hospitals that did not switch their test type, we compared the distribution of HO incident rates and SIRs by those reporting NAAT vs EIA. (2) Among hospitals that switched their test type, we selected quarters with a stable switch pattern of 2 consecutive quarters of each of EIA and NAAT (categorized as pattern EIA-to-NAAT or NAAT-to-EIA). Pooled semiannual SIRs for EIA and NAAT were calculated, and a paired t test was used to evaluate the difference of SIRs by switch pattern. Results: Most hospitals did not switch test types (3,242, 89%), and 2,872 (89%) reported sufficient data to calculate SIRs, with 2,444 (85%) using NAAT. The crude pooled HO CDI incidence rates for hospitals using EIA clustered at the lower end of the histogram versus rates for NAAT (Fig. 1). The SIR distributions of both NAAT and EIA overlapped substantially and covered a similar range of SIR values (Fig. 1). Among hospitals with a switch pattern, hospitals were equally likely to have an increase or decrease in their SIR (Fig. 2). The mean SIR difference for the 42 hospitals switching from EIA to NAAT was 0.048 (95% CI, −0.189 to 0.284; P = .688). The mean SIR difference for the 26 hospitals switching from NAAT to EIA was 0.162 (95% CI, −0.048 to 0.371; P = .124). Conclusions: The pattern of SIR distributions of both NAAT and EIA substantiate the soundness of NHSN risk adjustment for CDI test types. Switching test type did not produce a consistent directional pattern in SIR that was statistically significant.Disclosures: NoneFunding: None

scholarly journals DEEP SCOPE: A Framework for Safe Healthcare Design

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (15) ◽  
pp. 7780
Author(s):  
Ellen Taylor ◽  
Sue Hignett
Keyword(s):  
Human Factor ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Built Environments ◽  
Facility Design ◽  
Healthcare Facilities ◽  
Healthcare Design ◽  
Accident Causation ◽  
Healthcare Facility Design

Thinking in patient safety has evolved over time from more simplistic accident causation models to more robust frameworks of work system design. Throughout this evolution, less consideration has been given to the role of the built environment in supporting safety. The aim of this paper is to theoretically explore how we think about harm as a systems problem by mitigating the risk of adverse events through proactive healthcare facility design. We review the evolution of thinking in safety as a safety science. Using falls as a case study topic, we use a previously published model (SCOPE: Safety as Complexity of the Organization, People, and Environment) to develop an expanded framework. The resulting theoretical model and matrix, DEEP SCOPE (DEsigning with Ergonomic Principles), provide a way to synthesize design interventions into a systems-based model for healthcare facility design using human factors/ergonomics (HF/E) design principles. The DEEP SCOPE matrix is proposed to highlight the design of safe healthcare facilities as an ergonomic problem of design that fits the environment to the user by understanding built environments that support the “human” factor.

scholarly journals Comparison of Two Novel Methods for Sink Drain Disinfection

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s180-s180
Author(s):  
Muhammed Fawwaz Haq ◽  
Lucas Jones ◽  
Natalia Pinto Herrera ◽  
Jennifer Cadnum ◽  
Philip Carling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Contact Time ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Disinfection Methods ◽  
Initial Reduction ◽  
Repeated Measures Analysis ◽  
Potential Reservoir ◽  
Cleaning And Disinfection

Background: Sink drainage systems are a potential reservoir for the dissemination of gram-negative bacilli but are not amenable to standard methods of cleaning and disinfection. Pouring liquid disinfectants down drains has only a limited and transient effect on drain colonization, presumably due to inadequate disinfectant contact time and suboptimal penetration into areas harboring biofilm-associated organisms. Methods: We compared the antimicrobial efficacy of 2 novel sink disinfection methods intended to enhance disinfectant contact time and penetration. Healthcare facility sinks were randomly assigned to disinfection with 300 mL hydrogen peroxide-based disinfectant applied either as a foam (N = 13 sinks) or instilled for 30 minutes behind a temporary obstruction created by an inflated urinary catheter balloon (N = 12 sinks). Swabs were used to collect quantitative cultures from the proximal sink drain to depth of 2.5 cm (1 inch) below the strainer before treatment and at 15 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 days after treatment. Repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to compare the efficacy of the 2 treatments. Results: As shown in Fig. 1, both methods yielded an initial reduction of >3 log10 CFU of gram-negative bacilli. Over the 7-day follow-up period, disinfectant instillation resulted in significantly greater reduction than the foam application (P < .01). Recovery of sink colonization to >2 log per swab occurred at day 3 for both treatments, whereas recovery to >3 log per swab occurred on day 3 for the foam treatment versus day 7 for disinfectant instillation. Conclusions: Two novel disinfection methods were effective in reducing sink drain colonization for several days. The instillation method was more effective than the foam method in maintaining reductions over 7 days.Funding: NoneDisclosures: NoneDisclosures: NoneFunding: None

scholarly journals 304. Predictors of mortality in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales bacteremia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S150-S150
Author(s):  
Michael R Hovan ◽  
Vanessa Cedarbaum ◽  
Thomas Kirn ◽  
Thomas Kirn
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
The United States ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Threat Level ◽  
Infection Source ◽  
Microbiological Data

Abstract Background Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE) bacteremia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. CRE were assigned a threat level of “urgent” in the 2019 CDC report on antibiotic resistance in the United States. We attempted to identify predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with CRE bacteremia. Methods We performed a chart review of 146 patients with CRE bacteremia from January 2010 - July 2019. CRE was defined using the current CDC definition. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain clinical characteristics and outcomes including prior antibiotic use, comorbidities, prior location, treatment, hospital course, microbiological data and outcomes including in-hospital mortality. Results Of 146 patients included for analysis, the overall 30-day mortality rate was 36.3%. Patients admitted from a healthcare facility including outside hospitals, rehab, nursing homes, and LTACs had a 49.1% (29/59) 30-day mortality rate compared to 27.5% (24/87) for those admitted from home (RR=1.78, 95% CI 1.16–2.73, p=.0082). Patients with a Pitt bacteremia score ≥ 4 had a greater 30-day mortality rate (42.6%, 26/61) compared to those with a Pitt bacteremia score &lt; 4 (17.6%, 15/85) (RR=2.92, 95% CI 1.40–4.16, p=.0015). Patients that received inactive empiric therapy had a 30-day mortality rate of 36% (36/100) compared to 36.9% (17/46) in those that received active empiric therapy (RR=.9741, 95% CI .6155-1.59, p=.9109). Patients with isolates determined to have a meropenem MIC ≥ 4 had a 30-day mortality rate of 40.2% (37/92) while those with an MIC &lt; 4 had a 30-day mortality rate of 30.2% (16/53) (RR=1.33, 95% CI .8250–2.1513, p=.2408). A pulmonary source of bacteremia was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality (64.3%, 9/14) compared to all other sources of bacteremia (34.8%, 31/89) (RR=1.85, 95% CI 1.39–2.99, p=.0129). No other infection source was associated with an increased 30-day mortality rate. Conclusion Admission from a healthcare facility, Pitt bacteremia score ≥ 4, and pulmonary source of bacteremia were associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. Interestingly, administration of active empiric therapy was not associated with a decreased mortality risk. Meropenem MIC was not predictive of 30-day mortality. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 877. Use of Statistical Process Control Charts for Early Detection of Healthcare Facility-Associated Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Outbreaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S475-S476
Author(s):  
Arthur W Baker ◽  
Ahmed Maged ◽  
Salah Haridy ◽  
Jason E Stout ◽  
Jessica L Seidelman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Detection ◽  
Process Control ◽  
Statistical Process Control ◽  
Moving Average ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Mycobacterium Abscessus ◽  
Control Limit ◽  
Outbreak Detection ◽  
Statistical Process ◽  
Traditional Surveillance

Abstract Background Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are increasingly implicated in healthcare facility-associated (HCFA) outbreaks. However, systematic methods for NTM surveillance and outbreak detection are lacking and represent an emerging need. We examined how statistical process control (SPC) might perform in NTM outbreak detection. Methods SPC charts were optimized for surgical site infection surveillance and adapted to analyze 3 NTM outbreaks that occurred from 2013-2016 at a single hospital. The first 2 outbreaks occurred contemporaneously and consisted of pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) acquisition and cardiac surgery-associated extrapulmonary MABC infection, respectively. The third outbreak was a pseudo-outbreak of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) at a bronchoscopy suite. We retrospectively analyzed monthly rates of unique patients who had: 1) positive respiratory cultures for MABC obtained on hospital day 3 or later; 2) positive non-respiratory cultures for MABC; and 3) positive bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cultures for MAC collected at the bronchoscopy suite. For each outbreak, we used these rates to construct a standardized moving average (MA) SPC chart with MA span of 3 months. Rolling baselines were estimated from average rates for months 7 through 12 prior to each monthly data point. SPC detection was indicated by the first data point above the upper control limit (UCL) of 3 standard deviations. Traditional surveillance detection was defined as the time of outbreak detection by routine infection control procedures. Results SPC detection occurred 5, 4, and 9 months prior to traditional surveillance outbreak detection for the three outbreaks, respectively (Figures 1 and 2). Prospective NTM surveillance using the MA chart potentially would have prevented an estimated 19 cases of pulmonary MABC, 9 cases of extrapulmonary MABC, and 80 cases of BAL MAC isolation (Table). No data points exceeded the UCL during 95 cumulative months of post-outbreak surveillance, suggesting low burden of false positive SPC signals. Figure 1. Use of a moving average statistical process control (SPC) chart for early detection of hospital-associated outbreaks of pulmonary Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABC) and cardiac surgery-associated extrapulmonary MABC infection. The pulmonary chart analyzes cases of hospital-onset respiratory isolation of MABC. The extrapulmonary chart analyzes cases of positive non-respiratory cultures for MABC. CL, center line; LCL, lower control limit; UCL, upper control limit. Figure 2. Use of a moving average statistical process control (SPC) chart for early detection of a pseudo-outbreak of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) that occurred at a bronchoscopy suite. The chart analyzes cases of MAC isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage cultures. CL, center line; LCL, lower control limit; UCL, upper control limit. Table. Estimated cases of hospital-associated nontuberculous mycobacteria that would have been prevented by prospective surveillance with a moving average statistical process control (SPC) chart. Conclusion A single MA SPC chart detected 3 HCFA NTM outbreaks an average of 6 months earlier than traditional surveillance. SPC has potential to improve NTM surveillance, promoting early cluster detection and prevention of HCFA NTM. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Mothers’ Experiences and Perceptions of Facility-based Delivery Care in Rural Ethiopia

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117863292110176
Author(s):  
Elin Mordal ◽  
Ingrid Hanssen ◽  
Andargachew Kassa ◽  
Solfrid Vatne
Keyword(s):  
Family Involvement ◽  
Healthcare Facility ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Skilled Birth Attendants ◽  
Adequate Treatment ◽  
Rural Ethiopia ◽  
Birth Attendants ◽  
Southern District ◽  
Depth Interviews ◽  
Respectful Care

In Ethiopia, delivery wards are a part of primary healthcare services. However, although the maternal mortality rate is very high, approximately 50% of mothers use skilled birth attendants. This study focused on how women in a rural southern district of Ethiopia experience maternity care offered at the local delivery wards. In this qualitative, exploratory study, 19 women who had given birth in a healthcare facility were interviewed in 2019. Individual in-depth interviews were supplemented with observations conducted at 2 different delivery wards in the same district in 2020. Two main themes emerged from the thematic content analysis: increased awareness and safety were the primary reasons for giving birth at a healthcare facility, and traditions and norms affected women’s birth experiences in public maternity wards. The main shortcomings were a shortage of medicine, ambulance not arriving in time, and lack of care at night. For some women, being assisted by a male midwife could be challenging, and the inability to afford necessary medicine made adequate treatment inaccessible. Providing continuous information gave the women a certain feeling of control. Strong family involvement indicated that collectivistic expectations were key to rural delivery wards. The healthcare system must be structured to meet women’s needs. Moreover, managers and midwives should ensure that birthing women receive high-quality, safe, timely, and respectful care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document