Numerical Modeling of Coal Gasification in an Entrained-Flow Gasifier

Author(s):  
Cheng Zhang

The gasification technology has been applied in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) plants for the production of power, and polygeneration plants for the production of industrial chemicals, fuels, hydrogen, and power. The major advantages of the gasification technology are its potential for feed-stock flexibility, product flexibility, and relative simple removal of harmful emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and CO2. Entrained-flow gasifiers are the preferred gasifier design for future deployment due to their high carbon conversion, high efficiency and high syngas purity. Current entrained-flow gasifier designs still have serious problems such as injector failure, refractory failure, slag blockages, downstream fouling and poisoning, poor space efficiency, and lack of dynamic feedstock flexibility. To better understand the entrained-flow gasification process, we performed steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) modeling of the laboratory-scale gasifier developed at Brigham Young University (BYU) using ANSYS Fluent. An Eulerian approach is used to describe the gas phase, and a Lagrangian approach is used to describe the particle phase. The interactions between the gas phase and particle phase is modeled using the particle-source-in-cell approach. Turbulence is modeled using the shear-stress transport (SST) k–ω model. Turbulent particle dispersion is taken into account by using the discrete random walk model. Devolatilization is modeled using a version of the chemical percolation devolatilization (CPD) model, and char consumption is described with a shrinking core model. Turbulent combustion in the gas phase is modeled using a finite-rate/eddy-dissipation model. Radiation is considered by solving the radiative transport equation with the discrete ordinates model. Second-order upwind scheme is used to solve all gas phase equations. First, to validate the flow solver, we performed numerical modeling of a non-reacting particle-laden bluff-body flow. For the non-reacting flow, the predicted mean velocities of the gas phase and the particle phase are in good agreement with the experimental data. Next, we performed numerical modeling of the gasification process in the BYU gasifier. The predicted profiles of the mole fractions of the major species (i.e. CO, CO2, H2, and H2O) along the centerline are in reasonable agreement with the experimental data. The predicted carbon conversion at the gasifier exit agrees with the experimental data. The predicted temperature at the gasifier exit agrees with the estimated value based on water-gas shift equilibrium considerations. The numerical model was further applied to study the effects of the equivalence ratio, particle size, and swirl on the gasification process.

Author(s):  
Armin Silaen ◽  
Ting Wang

Numerical simulations of the coal gasification process inside a generic 2-stage entrained-flow gasifier fed with Indonesian coal at approximately 2000 metric ton/day are carried out. The 3D Navier–Stokes equations and eight species transport equations are solved with three heterogeneous global reactions, three homogeneous reactions, and two-step thermal cracking equation of volatiles. The chemical percolation devolatilization (CPD) model is used for the devolatilization process. This study is conducted to investigate the effects of different operation parameters on the gasification process including coal mixture (dry versus slurry), oxidant (oxygen-blown versus air-blown), and different coal distribution between two stages. In the two-stage coal-slurry feed operation, the dominant reactions are intense char combustion in the first stage and enhanced gasification reactions in the second stage. The gas temperature in the first stage for the dry-fed case is about 800 K higher than the slurry-fed case. This calls for attention of additional refractory maintenance in the dry-fed case. One-stage operation yields higher H2, CO and CH4 combined than if a two-stage operation is used, but with a lower syngas heating value. The higher heating value (HHV) of syngas for the one-stage operation is 7.68 MJ/kg, compared with 8.24 MJ/kg for two-stage operation with 75%–25% fuel distribution and 9.03 MJ/kg for two-stage operation with 50%–50% fuel distribution. Carbon conversion efficiency of the air-blown case is 77.3%, which is much lower than that of the oxygen-blown case (99.4%). The syngas heating value for the air-blown case is 4.40 MJ/kg, which is almost half of the heating value of the oxygen-blown case (8.24 MJ/kg).


Author(s):  
Xijia Lu ◽  
Ting Wang

In this paper, the coal-to-synthetic natural gas (SNG) technologies have been reviewed. Steam-oxygen gasification, hydrogasification, and catalytic steam gasification are the three major gasification processes used in coal-to-SNG production. So far, only the steam-oxygen gasification process is commercially proven by installing a catalytic methanation reactor downstream of the gasification process after syngas is produced, cleaned, and shifted to achieve an appropriate H2/CO ratio for methanation reaction. This process is expensive, less efficient, and time consuming. Ideally, it will be more effective and economic if methanation could be completed in an once-through entrained-flow gasifier. Technically, this idea is challenging because an effective gasification process is typically operated in a high-pressure and high-temperature condition, which is not favorable for methanation reaction, which is exothermic. To investigate this idea, a computational model is established and a sensitivity study of methanation reactions with and without catalysts are conducted in this study. In modeling the methanation process in a gasifier, correct information of the reaction rates is extremely important. Most of known methanation reaction rates are tightly linked to the catalysts used. Since the non-catalytic reaction rates for methanation are not known in a gasifer and the issues are compounded by the fact that inherent minerals in coal ashes can also affect the methanation kinetics, modeling of methanation in an entrained-flow gasifier becomes very challenging. Considering these issues, instead of trying to obtain the correct methnation reaction rate, this study attempts to use computational model as a convenient tool to investigate the sensitivity of methane production under a wide range methanation reaction rates with and without catalysts. From this sensitivity study, it can be learned that the concept of implementing direct methanation in a once-through entrained-flow gasifier may not be attractive due to competitions of other reactions in a high-temperature environment. The production of SNG is limited to about 18% (vol) with catalytic reaction with a pre-exponential factor A in the order of 107. A further increase of the value of A to 1011 doesn’t result in more production of SNG. This SNG production limit could be caused by the high-temperature and short residence time (3–4 seconds) in the entraind-flow gasifier.


Author(s):  
Arnab Roy ◽  
Srinath V. Ekkad ◽  
Uri Vandsburger

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of a single stage, dry-feed entrained flow gasifier is carried out to predict several physical and chemical processes within the gasifier. The model is developed using a commercial software package FLUENT. The CFD model is based on an Eulerian-Lagrangian framework, where the continuous fluid phase is modeled in Eulerian approach and the particle flow trajectory is simulated in Lagrangian frame. The two phases are coupled by appropriate source terms in the conservation equations. The gasification process can be divided into the following sub-processes, which are inert heating, moisture release, coal devolatilization, char gasification and gas phase reactions. Discrete Phase Model (DPM) is used to model the coal particles and coupled with heterogeneous particle surface reactions in Species Transport module. The interaction between reaction chemistry and turbulence is described by Finite-rate/Eddy dissipation model. The simulation provides detailed information of temperature field and species concentration profile inside the gasifier. The temperature distribution clearly indicates the three different reaction zones for devolatilization, gasification and reduction. Steady state model predictions are compared with benchmark experimental data from literature. The trend of the predicted species mole fraction distribution is in good agreement within error bound of the experiment. The model thus provides a validated set of model parameters along with an insight to the underlying flow physics and chemical reactions of gasification process that can be employed to improve design of experiments. This study also develops the basis to achieve further accuracy incorporating complex effects such as detailed reaction kinetic mechanisms, proper devolatilization models, effect of ash-slag transition and particle deposition.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Zhang ◽  
Kiel Schultheiss ◽  
Aniruddha Mitra ◽  
Mosfequr Rahman

Although alternative energy sources, such as nuclear, wind, and solar, are showing great potential, hydrocarbon fuels are expected to continue to play an important role in the near future. There is an increasing interest in developing technologies to use hydrocarbon fuels cleanly and efficiently. The gasification technology that converts hydrocarbon fuels into syngas is one of these promising technologies. Entrained-flow gasifiers are the preferred gasifier design for future deployment due to their high carbon conversion, high efficiency and high syngas purity. Current designs of entrained-flow gasifiers still have serious problems such as injector failure, refractory failure, slag blockages, downstream fouling and poisoning, poor space efficiency, and lack of dynamic feedstock flexibility. To better understand the entrained-flow gasification process, we performed parametric studies of coal gasification in the laboratory-scale gasifier developed at Brigham Young University (BYU) using ANSYS FLUENT. An Eulerian approach was used to describe the gas phase, and a Lagrangian approach was used to describe the particle phase. The interactions between the gas phase and particle phase was modeled using the particle-source-in-cell approach. Turbulence was modeled using the standard k-ε model. Turbulent particle dispersion was taken into account by using the discrete random walk model. Devolatilization was modeled using a version of the chemical percolation devolatilization (CPD) model, and char consumption was described with a shrinking core model. Turbulent combustion in the gas phase was modeled using a finite-rate/eddy-dissipation model. Radiation was considered by solving the radiative transport equation with the discrete ordinates model. Second-order upwind scheme was used to solve all gas phase equations. First, the numerical model was validated by using experimental data for the mole fractions of the major species (CO, CO2, H2, and H2O) along the gasifier centerline. Then, the effects of concentrations of steam and oxygen at the inlets, and steam preheat temperature were studied. Model predictions found that increasing the steam concentration or steam preheat temperature in the secondary inlet generally decreases CO concentration, while increasing CO2 and H2 concentrations. Increasing the steam concentration in the secondary inlet showed no significant effects on predicted gas temperature in the gasifier. Increasing the oxygen concentration in the primary inlet generally increases gas temperature, CO and CO2 concentrations, while decreasing H2 concentration.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 1073-1097 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghulamullah Maitlo ◽  
Imran Nazir Unar ◽  
Rasool Bux Mahar ◽  
Khan Mohammad Brohi

Thermochemical conversion of biomass is an encouraging way for the production of syngas. In the present research, four different biomass materials were used for gasification which includes rice husk, cotton stalks, sugarcane bagasse, and sawdust. These biomass sources were selected because they are common Pakistani feedstocks. Gasification of selected biomasses was performed using concentric tube entrained flow gasifier. Three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model was used to investigate the impacts of kinetic rate and diffusion rate on the gasification performance. The Euler–Lagrange method was used for the development of entrained flow biomass gasifier using commercial computational fluid dynamics code ANSYS FLUENT®14. Discrete phase model was used to predict the movement of particles, whereas the gas phase was treated as the continuous phase with a standard k–ε turbulent model to predict the behavior of gas phase flow. Finite rate/Eddy dissipation model was applied for the calculation of homogenous and heterogeneous reaction rates. Oxygen was used as a gasifying agent. Cotton stalks and sugarcane bagasse produced higher mole fractions of hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO) than sawdust and rice husk. Regarding carbon conversion efficiency, cold gas efficiency, and higher heating value cotton stalks and sugarcane bagasse produced better syngas quality as compared to sawdust and rice husk. The oxygen/fuel (O/F) ratio is a key operating parameter in the field of gasification and combustion. The O/F ratio above 0.42 favored combustion reactions and increased mole fraction of water vapor (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in syngas composition, whereas gasification reactions dominated below 0.42 O/F ratio, resulting increased mole fraction of H2 and CO in syngas composition.


Author(s):  
M. A. Paisley ◽  
J. M. Irving ◽  
R. P. Overend

The Burlington Vermont gasifier is the first commercial scale demonstration of the FERCO indirectly heated biomass gasification process. The gasification plant is the largest operation of its type in the US and was the first process to integrate a biomass gasifier with a gas turbine during pilot operations at Battelle’s Columbus, OH facilities. The Burlington plant is coupled to the McNeil station of the Burlington Electric Department and is being used to evaluate and demonstrate the gasification technology both as a producer of fuel gas and in a combined cycle with a gas turbine power generation system. This paper discusses operating results at the Burlington site including gas cleanup / conditioning observations. Future Energy Resources, the owner of the gasification technology, is developing projects worldwide.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document