Large SA-508 Class 2 Nozzle Forging Near-Surface Fracture Toughness

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brian Hall ◽  
Benjamin E. Mays ◽  
Matthew DeVan
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Lower Bound ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Impact Test ◽  
Temperature Limit ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Fracture Toughness Test ◽  
Test Technique ◽  
Near Surface

The current approach in evaluating the Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) inlet and outlet nozzle corner regions with respect to plant heat-up and cool-down pressure-temperature limit curves contains a number of conservatisms. These conservatisms include postulation of a large ¼ thickness flaw at the nozzle corner region and use of RTNDT (reference nil-ductility temperature) or an estimation of RTNDT. The paper herein discusses generic fracture toughness of nozzle forging material SA-508 Class 2 for use with postulated smaller surface flaws in developing pressure-temperature limit curves for nozzle corners for nuclear power plant operations. ASME Appendix G uses the lower bound KIC curve, which has inherent margin since RTNDT is a conservative method for locating the KIC curve. RTNDT is based on the drop weight test, which is a crack arrest transition temperature measurement, and the Charpy impact test, which is a blunt notch impact test. These data are conservatively bounded by the KIC curve, which is a lower bound crack initiation toughness curve. In contrast, the master curve method is based on an initiation transition temperature fracture toughness test technique per ASTM E1921. The master curve index temperature (T0) provides a more accurate measure of the material fracture toughness than KIC indexed with RTNDT. Since many of the nuclear pressure vessels were fabricated to ASME Code editions prior to 1972, RTNDT was not measured for the nozzles. In many cases, RTNDT has been estimated. Therefore, for this work, the fracture toughness was generically established based on conservative T0 measurements of 22 representative forgings with a margin of two standard deviations to ensure a conservative lower bound toughness using ASME Appendix G, G-2110. The properties of a forging are better near the surface due to the faster cooling rate during heat treatment. The difference in reactor pressure vessel fracture toughness was established for forgings near the surface at the postulated flaw location as allowed by ASME Section III, NB-2223.2 relative to the traditional ¼ thickness location. The near-surface forging toughness was conservatively determined through evaluation of 31 near-surface and approximate ¼ thickness location fracture toughness measurements.

Prediction of Lower Bound Fracture Toughness in the Transition Temperature Region by T33-Stress

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Lu ◽  
Toshiyuki Meshii
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Lower Bound ◽  
Temperature Region ◽  
Failure Criterion ◽  
Large Strain ◽  
Specimen Thickness ◽  
Fracture Toughness Test ◽  
Out Of Plane ◽  
Planar Failure

It is well known that the fracture toughness Jc in the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature region depends highly on the specimen thickness (hereafter, TST). The TST effect on Jc, which Wallin [1] described as Jc (∝ KJc2) ∝ B(-1/2) (Jc was calculated from the equations outlined in ASTM E1820 [2], KJc was derived from Jc as KJc = (Jc·E′)1/2; E′ = E/(1−ν2), B: TST), has been reproduced by Anderson et al. [3] based on the weakest link model. However, as Anderson et al. [3] themselves admit, Jc does not decrease indefinitely with B. On the other hand, Meshii et al. [4–6] tried to explain this TST effect on Jc as a mechanical issue. They obtained the same relationship, Jc ∝ B(-1/2) from the fracture toughness test for a non-standard CT and 3PB specimen (non-standard on the point that planar configuration was identical and thickness to width ratio B/W was varied from 0.25 to 0.5) and the stress intensity factor (SIF) corresponding to fracture load Pc denoted as Kc (Kc was calculated from the equations outlined in ASTM E399 [7]), was almost constant for TST. They also reproduced the experimental tendency by large strain FEA under the assumption based on their experimental observation that Kc was independent of TST. In addition, they expressed the TST effect on Jc by correlating Jc with the out-of-plane elastic T-stress T33. We thought that if TST effect on Jc is a mechanical issue, the lower bound Jc for TST could be predicted by FEA under some assumption such as Kc = constant for TST, and the TST corresponding to the lower bound Jc could be predicted by T33. However, before proceeding to this prediction, we thought we have to understand the candidate assumption for prediction more deeply, i.e, understand why Kc was constant for TST. Thus in this work, we attempted to explain the reason why Kc was constant for TST. Our idea was to apply the well-known “planar” failure criterion to our out-of-plane TST issue. After demonstrating our idea was valid, the lower bound Jc of carbon S55C for non-standard 3PB specimen was predicted based on this planar failure criterion and the large strain elastic-plastic FEA. The results showed that Jc showed a lower bound for specimen of B/W ≥ 1.5. In addition, it was shown that this threshold B/W could be estimated by the elastic out-of-plane T33.

Applicability of the ASME Exemption Curve for Chinese Pressure Vessel Steel Q345R

2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingfeng Cui ◽  
Hu Hui ◽  
PeiNing Li
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Low Temperature ◽  
Impact Test ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Uniaxial Tensile ◽  
Assessment Procedure ◽  
Pressure Vessel Steel ◽  
Fracture Toughness Test ◽  
Vessel Steel ◽  
The Impact

Q345R steel is the most commonly used material in fabrication of the pressure vessels and boilers in China, due to its excellent properties. In 2010, ASME code case 2642 accepted Q345R steel for use in construction of pressure vessels. The code case specified impact test exemption curve A for the impact test requirements for Q345R. However, this provision severely limits the application of this material at low temperature, since most of the minimum design metal temperature (MDMT) of curve A is above the freezing point. In this paper, a series of tests (such as uniaxial tensile test, impact test, and fracture toughness test) were carried out at low temperature to investigate the mechanical properties of Q345R steel plates with thickness of 36–80 mm. This study of low temperature usage of Q345R steel was conducted using the fracture mechanics assessment procedure of API 579-1/ASME FFS-1. The fracture toughness is given by master curve (MC) method in the transition regime. The results show that Q345R can be used at lower temperature and that classifying Q345R steel into curve D is appropriate.

Application of the Master Curve Approach for Abnormal Material Conditions

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tapio Planman ◽  
William Server ◽  
Kim Wallin ◽  
Stan Rosinski
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Lower Bound ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Inhomogeneous Materials ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Material Inhomogeneity ◽  
Fracture Modes ◽  
Material Conditions

The range of applicability of Master Curve testing Standard ASTM E 1921 is limited to macroscopically homogeneous steels with “uniform tensile and toughness properties”. A majority of structural steels appear to satisfy this requirement by exhibiting fracture toughness data which comply with the assumed KJc vs. temperature dependence and scatter within the specified validity area. As indicated in ASTM E 1921 a criterion for material macroscopic inhomogeneity is often applied using the 2% lower bound (possibly also the 98% upper bound). Data falling below this 2% lower-limit curve may be an indication of material inhomogeneity or susceptibility to grain boundary fracture. When this situation occurs, it is recommended to analyze the material with the so-called SINTAP procedure, which is intended for randomly inhomogeneous materials to assure a conservative lower-bound estimate. When a data set distinctly consists of two or more different data populations instead of one (due to variation of irradiation dose or specimen extraction depth, for instance) adoption of a bimodal (or a multimodal) Master Curve model is generally appropriate. These modal models provide information if the deviation of distributions is statistically significant or if different distributions truly exist for values of reference transition temperature, T0, characteristic of separate data populations. In the case of data sets representing thick-walled structures (i.e., reactor pressure vessels), indications of abnormal fracture toughness data can be encountered such that material inhomogeneity or fracture modes other than pure cleavage should be suspected. A state-of-the-art review for extended, non-standard Master Curve data and techniques highlights limits of applicability in situations where the basic ASTM E 1921 procedure is not appropriate for material homogeneity or different fracture modes.

Weld Material Investigations of a WWER-440 Reactor Pressure Vessel: Results From the First Trepan Taken From the Former Greifswald NPP

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Udo Rindelhardt ◽  
Hans-Werner Viehrig ◽  
Joerg Konheiser ◽  
Jan Schuhknecht
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Lower Bound ◽  
Weld Metal ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Neutron Fluence ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Reference Temperature ◽  
Integrity Assessment ◽  
The Core ◽  
Inner Surface

Between 1973 and 1990 4 units of the Russian NPP type WWER-440/230 were operated in Greifswald (former GDR). The operation was stopped after the German reunification, because the units did not completely follow western nuclear safety standards. Material probes from the pressure vessels were gained in the frame of the ongoing decommissioning procedure. The investigations of this material started with material from the circumferential core weld of unit 1. This weld was annealed after 13 cycles and operated further for 2 cycles. Additionally, starting with cycle 11, dummy assemblies were inserted to reduce the neutron fluence in the RPV wall. Firstly this paper presents results of the RPV fluence calculations depending on different loading schemes and on the axial weld position based on the Monte Carlo code TRAMO. The results show, that the use of the dummy assemblies reduces the flux by a factor of 2 – 5 depending on the azimuthal position. The fluence increase is reduced to 1/6 at the position of the maximum fluence. The neutron fluence at the different circumferential welds is closely related to their distance to the core. The circumferential core weld (SN0.1.4) received a fluence of 2.4·1019 neutrons/cm2 at the inner surface, it decreases to 0.8·1019 neutrons/cm2 at the outer surface. The neutron fluences at the both other welds are 2 resp. 4 orders of magnitude smaller according to their distances to the core. It should be mentioned that in this cases the fluence gradient can be negative through the wall. The material investigations were done using a trepan from the circumferential core weld. Master Curve and Charpy V-notch testing were applied. Specimens from 7 locations through the thickness of the welding seam were tested. The reference temperature T0 was calculated with the measured fracture toughness values, KJc, at brittle failure of the specimen. Generally the KJc values measured on pre-cracked and side-grooved Charpy size SE(B) specimens of the investigated weld metal follows the course of the Master Curve. The KJc values show a remarkable scatter. In addition the MC SINTAP procedure was applied to determine T0SINTAP of the brittle fraction of the data set. There are remarkable differences between T0 and T0SINTAP indicating macroscopic inhomogeneous weld metal. The highest T0 was about 50°C at a distance of 22 mm from the inner surface of the weld. It is 40 K higher compared with T0 at the inner surface. This is important for the assessment of ductile-to-brittle temperatures measured with sub size Charpy specimens made of weld metal from the inner RPV wall. This material does not represent the most conservative condition. Nevertheless, the Charpy transition temperature TT41J estimated with results of sub size specimens after the recovery annealing was confirmed by the testing of standard Charpy V-notch specimens. The VERLIFE procedure prepared for the integrity assessment of WWER RPV was applied on the measured results. It enables the determination of a reference temperature, RTT0 to index a lower bound fracture toughness curve. This curve agrees with the MC 5% fractile as specified in ASTM E1921-05. The measured KJc values are not enveloped by this lower bound curve. However, the VERLIFE lower bound curve indexed with the SINTAP reference temperature RTT0SINTAP envelops the KJc values. Therefore for a conservative integrity assessment the fracture toughness curve indexed with a RT representing the brittle fraction of a dataset of measured KJc values has to be applied.

Alternative RTNDT for Linde 80 Weld Materials

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. K. Yoon ◽  
J. B. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Screening Criteria ◽  
Master Curve Method ◽  
Asme Code ◽  
Curve Method

The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code provides fracture toughness curves of ferritic pressure vessel steels that are indexed by a reference temperature for nil ductility transition (RTNDT). The ASME Code also prescribes how to determine RTNDT. The B&W Owners Group has reactor pressure vessels that were fabricated by Babcock & Wilcox using Linde 80 flux. These vessels have welds called Linde 80 welds. The RTNDT values of the Linde 80 welds are of great interest to the B&W Owners Group. These RTNDT values are used in compliance of the NRC regulations regarding the PTS screening criteria and plant pressure-temperature limits for operation of nuclear power plants. A generic RTNDT value for the Linde 80 welds as a group was established by the NRC, using an average of more than 70 RTNDT values. Emergence of the Master Curve method enabled the industry to revisit the validity issue surrounding RTNDT determination methods. T0 indicates that the dropweight test based TNDT is a better index than Charpy transition temperature based index, at least for the RTNDT of unirradiated Linde 80 welds. An alternative generic RTNDT is presented in this paper using the T0 data obtained by fracture toughness tests in the brittle-to-ductile transition temperature range, in accordance with the ASTM E1921 standard.

Statistical Analysis of the ASME KIc Database

1998 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Sokolov
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Distribution Function ◽  
Lower Bound ◽  
Weibull Distribution ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Lower Boundary ◽  
Transition Range ◽  
Weibull Distribution Function ◽  
American Society ◽  
Function Models

The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) KIc curve is a function of test temperature (T) normalized to a reference nil-ductility temperature, RTNDT, namely, T – RTNDT. It was constructed as the lower boundary to the available KIc database. Being a lower bound to the unique but limited database, the ASME KIc curve concept does not discuss probability matters. However, a continuing evolution of fracture mechanics advances has led to employment of the Weibull distribution function to model the scatter of fracture toughness values in the transition range. The Weibull statistic/master curve approach was applied to analyze the current ASME KIc database. It is shown that the Weibull distribution function models the scatter in KIc data from different materials very well, while the temperature dependence is described by the master curve. Probabilistic-based tolerance-bound curves are suggested to describe lower-bound KIc values.

Application of Master Curve Method to Fracture Toughness Estimation of the Transport and Storage Cask Material

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiminobu Hojo ◽  
Kentaro Yoshimoto ◽  
Ryuichi Yamamoto ◽  
Toshihiro Matsuoka ◽  
Uwe Mayer
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Transition Temperature ◽  
Alloy Steel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Scale Model ◽  
Low Alloy Steel ◽  
Brittle To Ductile Transition ◽  
Data Scatter ◽  
And Storage

The transportation and storage casks have to be designed by considering transport and handling accidents. IAEA safety standard [1] requires drop test using a scale model and demonstration of structural integrity of the cask container vessel from the view point of leakage and instable fracture. For the fracture evaluation, it has to be verified that brittle fracture does not occur at the lowest temperature −40degC. MHI has developed the MSF-57BG cask whose body is made of forged low alloy steel LF3-m. It is well known that low alloy steel has the brittle-to-ductile transition temperature range of fracture toughness and large scatter of toughness value in this region. For the cask’s integrity evaluation, it is needed to obtain the fracture toughness dependent on temperature of this material by considering data scatter. The Master curve procedure [2] was proposed for estimation of fracture toughness of the pressure vessel on the basis of statistical procedure by using relatively small number of specimens. This paper examined the determination method of fracture toughness considering dynamic loading effect and data scatter in the brittle-to-ductile transition temperature by using the Master curve procedure.

Prediction of Fracture Toughness KIC Transition Curves of Pressure Vessel Steels From Charpy V-Notch Impact Test Results

1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Iwadate ◽  
Y. Tanaka ◽  
H. Takemata
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Pressure Vessel ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Prediction Method ◽  
Pressure Vessels ◽  
Life Extension ◽  
Low Alloy Steels ◽  
Excess Temperature ◽  
Pressure Vessel Steels ◽  
Transition Curves

A single and generalized prediction method of fracture toughness KIC transition curves of pressure vessel steels has been greatly desired by engineers in the petro-chemical and nuclear power industries, especially from the viewpoint of life extension of reactor pressure vessels. In this paper, the toughness degradation of Cr-Mo steels during long-term service was examined and the two prediction methods of fracture toughness KIC transition curves were studied using the data of 54 heats. 1) The toughness degradation of 2 1/4Cr-1Mo steels levels off within around 50,000 h service. 2) The FATT versus J-factor (=(Si+Mn)(P+Sn)×104) and/or X (=(10P+5Sb+4Sn+As)x10−2) relationships to estimate the maximum embrittlement of Cr-Mo steels were obtained. 3) A master curve method developed by authors et al.; that is, the method using a KIC/KIC−US versus excess temperature master curve of each material was presented for 2 1/4Cr-1Mo, 1 1/4Cr-1/2Mo, 1Cr and 1/2Mo chemical pressure vessel steels and ASTM A508 C1.1, A508 C1.2, A508 C1.3 and A533 Gr.B C1.1 nuclear pressure vessel steels, where KIC−US is the upper-shelf fracture toughness and excess temperature is test temperature minus FATT. 4) A generalized prediction method to predict the KIC transition curves of any low-alloy steels was developed. This method consists of KIC/KIC−US versus T–T0 master curve and temperature shift ΔT between fracture toughness and CVN impact transition curves versus yield strength relationship, where To is the temperature showing 50 percent KIC−US of the material. 5) The KIC transition curves predicted using both methods showed a good agreement with the lower bound of measured KJC values obtained from JC tests.

Validation of the Master Curve Approach With Various Welding Conditions: Groove Shapes, Heat Inputs and Welding Processes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Ho Lee ◽  
Ji Hoon Kim ◽  
Myung Hyun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Toughness ◽  
Master Curve ◽  
Impact Test ◽  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Charpy Impact ◽  
Test Sample ◽  
Charpy Impact Test ◽  
Theoretical Background ◽  
Reference Temperature ◽  
Welding Processes

Abstract Engineering critical assessment (ECA) is a procedure for evaluating the soundness of structures with flaws and has been widely applied for assessing the structural integrity. ECA procedure requires reliable fracture toughness data to assess the effect of defects. Ideal data are typically obtained from samples taken during construction of an engineering structure or from the structure afterward, but there are cases in which removal of the test samples is impossible due to the continued operation of the structure. To this end, Appendix J of the BS 7910 provides a procedure for estimating fracture toughness values from appropriate Charpy impact test data. However, the correlation between Charpy impact energy and fracture toughness is known to be overly conservative with not sufficient theoretical background in fracture mechanics perspective. In this regard, the revised BS 7910:2019 provides an improved method for calculating the reference temperature by applying the yield strength and the Charpy upper shelf energy based on empirical data. The target of this study is to validate the master curve approach in the modified BS 7910 for two common offshore grade steels with explicit considerations for various groove shapes, heat inputs and welding processes. For the purpose, the master curves are compared in terms of the reference temperature calculated from Charpy impact test according to BS 7910:2013 and the newly revised 2019 version of BS 7910. The modified master curve resulted in less conservative fracture toughness values anticipated from the decreased reference temperature. The estimated fracture toughness values exhibited a good correlation with experimentally obtained toughness values. The influence of various groove shapes, heat inputs and welding processes in estimating fracture toughness based on the master curve approach is discussed. In addition, the effect of impact test sample locations within weld metals toward estimated fracture toughness values is evaluated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document