scholarly journals A DNA methylation reader complex that enhances gene transcription

Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 362 (6419) ◽  
pp. 1182-1186 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Jake Harris ◽  
Marion Scheibe ◽  
Somsakul Pop Wongpalee ◽  
Wanlu Liu ◽  
Evan M. Cornett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Arabidopsis Thaliana ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
Methylated Dna ◽  
Transposon Insertion ◽  
Activate Gene

DNA methylation generally functions as a repressive transcriptional signal, but it is also known to activate gene expression. In either case, the downstream factors remain largely unknown. By using comparative interactomics, we isolated proteins in Arabidopsis thaliana that associate with methylated DNA. Two SU(VAR)3-9 homologs, the transcriptional antisilencing factor SUVH1, and SUVH3, were among the methyl reader candidates. SUVH1 and SUVH3 bound methylated DNA in vitro, were associated with euchromatic methylation in vivo, and formed a complex with two DNAJ domain-containing homologs, DNAJ1 and DNAJ2. Ectopic recruitment of DNAJ1 enhanced gene transcription in plants, yeast, and mammals. Thus, the SUVH proteins bind to methylated DNA and recruit the DNAJ proteins to enhance proximal gene expression, thereby counteracting the repressive effects of transposon insertion near genes.

152 SPECIES-SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES IN THE METHYLATION REPROGRAMMING DURING EARLY PRE-IMPLANTATION DEVELOPMENT

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 184
Author(s):  
S. Canovas ◽  
E. Ivanova ◽  
S. Garcia-Martinez ◽  
R. Romar ◽  
N. Fonseca-Balvis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Differential Expression Analysis ◽  
Gene Expression Pattern ◽  
Reproductive Technologies ◽  
Global Methylation ◽  
Species Specific

Studies in mouse and human have shown extensive DNA methylation reprogramming in pre-implantation development followed by remethylation from implantation. However, the extent to which such reprogramming is conserved in mammals and the timing of demethylation and remethylation are unknown. As part of a major objective to characterise methylation dynamics in the bovine and porcine species from the oocyte to the blastocyst stage, we aimed here to compare the distribution of methylation at single-base resolution in both species at Day 7.5 of development. The DNA methylation profiles were obtained from individual blastocysts at Day 7.5 [pig: 3 in vivo, 3 in vitro; cow: 3 in vivo, 3 in vitro, 3 inner cell mass (ICM) and 3 trophoectoderm (TE) dissected from in vitro blastocysts] using the post-bisulphite adaptor tagging method and Illumina sequencing. For oocytes, data (GEO: GSE63330) from Schroeder et al. 2015 were analysed. Raw sequences were mapped, methylation calls made using Bismark and data analysis and visualisation was done within the SeqMonk platform. Gene expression profiles from individual blastocysts (3 pig, 3 cow) were obtained by RNA-seq. Annotated mRNA features were quantitated in SeqMonk and these were fed into DESeq2 for differential expression analysis (P < 0.05) as previously reported (Love et al. 2014 Genome Biol. 15, 550). Global methylation levels in whole blastocysts differed substantially between porcine and bovine embryos (in vivo: 12.33 ± 3.6 v. 28.33 ± 3.5%; in vitro: 15.02 ± 3.3 v. 24.41 ± 4.1%). In addition, the distribution of methylation differed: the pattern of cytosine methylated seemed random in the porcine genome, but was highly structured in the bovine genome, with methylation predominantly over gene bodies, resembling the profile previously reported in oocytes (Schroeder et al. 2015 PLoS Genet. 11, e1005442). Regarding correlation analysis, gene expression versus methylation were plotted. It suggested that gene body methylation reflected gene expression pattern in oocytes as well as in bovine blastocysts. Pair-wise comparison of isolated ICM and TE was filtered to require 5% change, and replicate set statistics were applied. This revealed very similar total and regional methylation levels in the 2 compartments, indicating that remethylation does not initiate preferentially in one compartment in bovine pre-implantation embryos. This confirms, from a viewpoint of the genome-wide DNA methylation, what has been observed in mouse for specific genes: the trophoblast-specific DNA methylation occurs after the segregation of the TE and ICM (Nakanishi et al. 2012 Epigenetics 7, 173–183). Our study is the first to provide whole genome methylation profiles from single blastocysts of economically important livestock species. Our data demonstrate that methylation reprogramming in early pre-implantation development is species specific. Knowledge of these specific patterns may have high importance when decisions are taken regarding the use of assisted reproductive technologies, cloning, or generation of transgenic animals. This work was funded by AGL2015–66341-R (MINECO-FEDER), PRX14/00348 (MECD), 19595/EE/14 (F. Séneca).

scholarly journals Discovery and Validation of Novel Methylation Markers in Helicobacter pylori-Associated Gastric Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Huan Wang ◽  
Nian-Shuang Li ◽  
Cong He ◽  
Chuan Xie ◽  
Yin Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
H Pylori

Previous studies have shown that abnormal methylation is an early key event in the pathogenesis of most human cancers, contributing to the development of tumors. However, little attention has been given to the potential of DNA methylation patterns as markers for Helicobacter pylori- (H. pylori-) associated gastric cancer (GC). In this study, an integrated analysis of DNA methylation and gene expression was conducted to identify some potential key epigenetic markers in H. pylori-associated GC. DNA methylation data of 28 H. pylori-positive and 168 H. pylori-negative GC samples were compared and analyzed. We also analyzed the gene expression data of 18 H. pylori-positive and 145 H. pylori-negative GC cases. Finally, the results were verified by in vitro and in vivo experiments. A total of 5609 differentially methylated regions associated with 2454 differentially methylated genes were identified. A total of 228 differentially expressed genes were identified from the gene expression data of H. pylori-positive and H. pylori-negative GC cases. The screened genes were analyzed for functional enrichment. Subsequently, we obtained 28 genes regulated by methylation through a Venn diagram, and we identified five genes (GSTO2, HUS1, INTS1, TMEM184A, and TMEM190) downregulated by hypermethylation. HUS1, GSTO2, and TMEM190 were expressed at lower levels in GC than in adjacent samples ( P < 0.05 ). Moreover, H. pylori infection decreased HUS1, GSTO2, and TMEM190 expression in vitro and in vivo. Our study identified HUS1, GSTO2, and TMEM190 as novel methylation markers for H. pylori-associated GC.

scholarly journals Sleep deprivation and diet affect human GH gene expression in transgenic mice in vivo

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 1135-1147
Author(s):  
Jessica S Jarmasz ◽  
Yan Jin ◽  
Hana Vakili ◽  
Peter A Cattini
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Sleep Deprivation ◽  
Chow Diet ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Production Studies ◽  
First Time ◽  
Rna Levels

Human (h) growth hormone (GH) production studies are largely limited to effects on secretion. How pituitary hGH gene (hGH-N/GH1) expression is regulated is important in our understanding of the role hGH plays in physiology and disease. Here we assess for the first time the effect of sleep deprivation (SD) and high-fat diet (HFD) on hGH-N expression in vivo using partially humanized 171hGH/CS transgenic (TG) mice, and attempted to elucidate a role for DNA methylation. Activation of hGH-N expression requires interactions between promoter and upstream locus control region (LCR) sequences including pituitary-specific hypersensitive site (HS) I/II. Both SD and diet affect hGH secretion, but the effect of SD on hGH-N expression is unknown. Mice fed a HFD or regular chow diet for 3 days underwent SD (or no SD) for 6 h at Zeitgeber time (ZT) 3. Serum and pituitaries were assessed over 24 h at 6-h intervals beginning at ZT 14. SD and HFD caused significant changes in serum corticosterone and insulin, as well as hGH and circadian clock-related gene RNA levels. No clear association between DNA methylation and the negative effects of SD or diet on hGH RNA levels was observed. However, a correlation with increased methylation at a CpG (cytosine paired with a guanine) in a putative E-box within the hGH LCR HS II was suggested in situ. Methylation at this site also increased BMAL1/CLOCK-related nuclear protein binding in vitro. These observations support an effect of SD on hGH synthesis at the level of gene expression.

scholarly journals The β-cell specific transcription factor Nkx6.1 inhibits glucagon gene transcription by interfering with Pax6

2007 ◽  
Vol 403 (3) ◽  
pp. 593-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit R. Gauthier ◽  
Yvan Gosmain ◽  
Aline Mamin ◽  
Jacques Philippe
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
Promoter Activity ◽  
Islet Cells ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Specific Expression

The transcription factor Nkx6.1 is required for the establishment of functional insulin-producing β-cells in the endocrine pancreas. Overexpression of Nkx6.1 has been shown to inhibit glucagon gene expression while favouring insulin gene activation. Down-regulation resulted in the opposite effect, suggesting that absence of Nkx6.1 favours glucagon gene expression. To understand the mechanism by which Nkx6.1 suppresses glucagon gene expression, we studied its effect on the glucagon gene promoter activity in non-islet cells using transient transfections and gel-shift analyses. In glucagonoma cells transfected with an Nkx6.1-encoding vector, the glucagon promoter activity was reduced by 65%. In BHK21 cells, Nkx6.1 inhibited by 93% Pax6-mediated activation of the glucagon promoter, whereas Cdx2/3 and Maf stimulations were unaltered. Although Nkx6.1 could interact with both the G1 and G3 element, only the former displayed specificity for Nkx6.1. Mutagenesis of the three potential AT-rich motifs within the G1 revealed that only the Pax6-binding site preferentially interacted with Nkx6.1. Chromatin immunoprecipitation confirmed interaction of Nkx6.1 with the glucagon promoter and revealed a direct competition for binding between Pax6 and Nkx6.1. A weak physical interaction between Pax6 and Nkx6.1 was detected in vitro and in vivo suggesting that Nkx6.1 predominantly inhibits glucagon gene transcription through G1-binding competition. We suggest that cell-specific expression of the glucagon gene may only proceed when Nkx6.1, in combination with Pdx1 and Pax4, are silenced in early α-cell precursors.

scholarly journals Yeast TFIID Serves as a Coactivator for Rap1p by Direct Protein-Protein Interaction

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 297-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krassimira A. Garbett ◽  
Manish K. Tripathi ◽  
Belgin Cencki ◽  
Justin H. Layer ◽  
P. Anthony Weil
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
In Vitro Transcription ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Activator Protein 1 ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction

ABSTRACT In vivo studies have previously shown that Saccharomyces cerevisiae ribosomal protein (RP) gene expression is controlled by the transcription factor repressor activator protein 1 (Rap1p) in a TFIID-dependent fashion. Here we have tested the hypothesis that yeast TFIID serves as a coactivator for RP gene transcription by directly interacting with Rap1p. We have found that purified recombinant Rap1p specifically interacts with purified TFIID in pull-down assays, and we have mapped the domains of Rap1p and subunits of TFIID responsible. In vitro transcription of a UASRAP1 enhancer-driven reporter gene requires both Rap1p and TFIID and is independent of the Fhl1p-Ifh1p coregulator. UASRAP1 enhancer-driven transactivation in extracts depleted of both Rap1p and TFIID is efficiently rescued by addition of physiological amounts of these two purified factors but not TATA-binding protein. We conclude that Rap1p and TFIID directly interact and that this interaction contributes importantly to RP gene transcription.

199 IN VITRO-DEVELOPED BOVINE BLASTOCYSTS ARE MARKED WITH ABERRANT HYPER- AND HYPO-METHYLATED GENOMIC REGIONS

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 190
Author(s):  
D. Salilew-Wondim ◽  
M. Hoelker ◽  
U. Besenfelder ◽  
V. Havlicek ◽  
F. Rings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Proximal Promoter ◽  
Altered Gene Expression ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Altered Gene ◽  
Genomic Regions

Most often, in vitro produced embryos display poor quality and altered gene expression patterns compared to their in vivo counterparts. Aberrant DNA methylation occurring during in vitro embryo development is believed to be one of the multifaceted factors which may cause altered gene expression and poor embryo quality. Here, we investigated the genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of in vitro derived embryos using the recently developed Bovine EmbryoGENE Methylation Platform (BEGMP) array (Shojaei Saadi et al. BMC Genomics 2014 15, 451. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-451) to unravel the aberrantly methylated genomic region in in vitro developed embryos. For this, in vitro and in vivo produced blastocysts were produced and used for genome-wide DNA methylation analysis. In vitro blastocysts were produced from oocytes retrieved from ovaries collected from the local abattoir and matured, fertilized, and cultured in vitro using SOF media. The in vivo blastocysts were produced by superovulation and AI of Simmental heifers followed by uterine flushing. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was then isolated from four replicates (each 10 blastocysts) of in vivo and in vitro derived blastocysts using Allprep DNA/RNA micro kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) and the gDNA was then fragmented using the MseI enzyme. Following this, MseLig21 and MseLig were ligated to the MseI-digested genomic fragments in the presence of Ligase enzyme. Methyl-sensitive enzymes, HpaII, AciI, and Hinp1I, were used to cleave unmethlayted genomic regions within the MseI-MseI region of the fragmented DNA. The gDNA was subjected to two rounds of ligation-mediated polymerase chain reaction (LM-PCR) amplification. After removal of the adapters, the amplified gDNA samples from in vivo or in vitro groups were labelled either Cy-3 or Cy-5 dyes in dye-swap design using ULS Fluorescent gDNA labelling kit (Kreatech Biotechnology BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Hybridization was performed for 40 h at 65°C. Slides were scanned using Agilent's High-Resolution C Scanner (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and features were extracted with Agilent's Feature Extraction software (Agilent Technologies Inc.). The results have shown that from a total of 414 566 probes harboured by the BEGMP array, 248 453 and 253 147 probes were detected in in vitro and in vivo derived blastocysts, respectively. Data analysis using the linear modelling for microarray (LIMMA) package and R software (The R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) revealed a total of 3434 differentially methylated regions (DMRs; Fold change ≥1.5, P-value <0.05), of which 42 and 58% were hyper- and hypo-methylated, respectively, in in vitro derived blastocysts compared to their in vivo counterparts. The DMRs were found to be localised in the intronic, exonic, promoter, proximal promoter, and distal promoter, and some of the probes did not have nearby genes. In addition, 10.8% of the DMRs were found to be stretched in short, long, or intermediate CpG islands. Thus, this study demonstrated genome-wide dysregulation in the epigenome landscape of in vitro-derived embryos by the time they reach to the blastocysts stage.

scholarly journals DNA methylation and gene expression differences in children conceived in vitro or in vivo

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 3769-3778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunita Katari ◽  
Nahid Turan ◽  
Marina Bibikova ◽  
Oluwatoyin Erinle ◽  
Raffi Chalian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation

scholarly journals DNA Methylation and Chromatin: Role(s) of Methyl-CpG-Binding Protein ZBTB38

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 251686571881111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maud de Dieuleveult ◽  
Benoit Miotto
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Of Gene Expression ◽  
Methylated Dna

DNA methylation plays an essential role in the control of gene expression during early stages of development as well as in disease. Although many transcription factors are sensitive to this modification of the DNA, we still do not clearly understand how it contributes to the establishment of proper gene expression patterns. We discuss here the recent findings regarding the biological and molecular function(s) of the transcription factor ZBTB38 that binds methylated DNA sequences in vitro and in cells. We speculate how these findings may help understand the role of DNA methylation and DNA methylation–sensitive transcription factors in mammalian cells.

scholarly journals Transcriptional regulation of FoxO3 gene by glucocorticoids in murine myotubes

2016 ◽  
Vol 310 (7) ◽  
pp. E572-E585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiyi Kuo ◽  
Patty H. Liu ◽  
Tzu-Chieh Chen ◽  
Rebecca A. Lee ◽  
Jenny New ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Transcription ◽  
Dna Looping ◽  
Micrococcal Nuclease ◽  
Metabolic Effects ◽  
C2c12 Myotubes ◽  
Chromatin Structural ◽  
Genomic Regions

Glucocorticoids and FoxO3 exert similar metabolic effects in skeletal muscle. FoxO3 gene expression was increased by dexamethasone (Dex), a synthetic glucocorticoid, both in vitro and in vivo. In C2C12 myotubes the increased expression is due to, at least in part, the elevated rate of FoxO3 gene transcription. In the mouse FoxO3 gene, we identified three glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binding regions (GBRs): one being upstream of the transcription start site, −17kbGBR; and two in introns, +45kbGBR and +71kbGBR. Together, these three GBRs contain four 15-bp glucocorticoid response elements (GREs). Micrococcal nuclease (MNase) assay revealed that Dex treatment increased the sensitivity to MNase in the GRE of +45kbGBR and +71kbGBR upon 30- and 60-min Dex treatment, respectively. Conversely, Dex treatment did not affect the chromatin structure near the −17kbGBR, in which the GRE is located in the linker region. Dex treatment also increased histone H3 and/or H4 acetylation in genomic regions near all three GBRs. Moreover, using chromatin conformation capture (3C) assay, we showed that Dex treatment increased the interaction between the −17kbGBR and two genomic regions: one located around +500 bp and the other around +73 kb. Finally, the transcriptional coregulator p300 was recruited to all three GBRs upon Dex treatment. The reduction of p300 expression decreased FoxO3 gene expression and Dex-stimulated interaction between distinct genomic regions of FoxO3 gene identified by 3C. Overall, our results demonstrate that glucocorticoids activated FoxO3 gene transcription through multiple GREs by chromatin structural change and DNA looping.

Inactive chromatin spreads from a focus of methylation

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 7372-7379
Author(s):  
S U Kass ◽  
J P Goddard ◽  
R L Adams
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Reporter Gene ◽  
Methylated Dna ◽  
Gene Construct ◽  
Short Region ◽  
Transcriptional Inhibition ◽  
Inhibit Gene Expression ◽  
Inactive Chromatin

The detailed mechanisms of inhibition of transcription by DNA methylation are still unknown, but it has become obvious that the formation of chromatin plays an important role in this process. Using an approach enabling us to methylate, in vitro, chosen regions in a plasmid, we now show that specific methylation of nonpromoter sequences results in transcriptional inhibition of a reporter gene construct and that this inhibition is independent of the position of the methylated region within the plasmid. In plasmid minichromosomes containing a short region of methylated DNA, both methylated and unmethylated sequences are protected from limited MspI digestion. Our results show that inactive chromatin is present at unmethylated regions in partially methylated minichromosomes and can thereby inhibit gene expression. Spreading of the inactive chromatin is not inhibited by the presence of active promoters, nor is it a consequence of transcriptional inactivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document