scholarly journals Inhibition of Human Cytomegalovirus Replication by Artemisinins: Effects Mediated through Cell Cycle Modulation

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (7) ◽  
pp. 3870-3879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sujayita Roy ◽  
Ran He ◽  
Arun Kapoor ◽  
Michael Forman ◽  
Jennifer R. Mazzone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Human Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Virus Inhibition ◽  
Human Foreskin Fibroblasts ◽  
Cell Cycle Modulation ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Productive Virus ◽  
Early Late

ABSTRACTArtemisinin-derived monomers and dimers inhibit human cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication in human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs). The monomer artesunate (AS) inhibits CMV at micromolar concentrations, while dimers inhibit CMV replication at nanomolar concentrations, without increased toxicity in HFFs. We report on the variable anti-CMV activity of AS compared to the consistent and reproducible CMV inhibition by dimer 606 and ganciclovir (GCV). Investigation of this phenomenon revealed that the anti-CMV activity of AS correlated with HFFs synchronized to the G0/G1stage of the cell cycle. In contact-inhibited serum-starved HFFs or cells arrested at early/late G1with specific checkpoint regulators, AS and dimer 606 efficiently inhibited CMV replication. However, in cycling HFFs, in which CMV replication was productive, virus inhibition by AS was significantly reduced, but inhibition by dimer 606 and GCV was maintained. Cell cycle analysis in noninfected HFFs revealed that AS induced early G1arrest, while dimer 606 partially blocked cell cycle progression. In infected HFFs, AS and dimer 606 prevented the progression of cell cycle toward the G1/S checkpoint. AS reduced the expression of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 2, 4, and 6 in noninfected cycling HFFs, while the effect of dimer 606 on these CDKs was moderate. Neither compound affected CDK expression in noninfected contact-inhibited HFFs. In CMV-infected cells, AS activity correlated with reduced CDK2 levels. CMV inhibition by AS and dimer 606 also correlated with hypophosphorylation (activity) of the retinoblastoma protein (pRb). AS activity was strongly associated with pRb hypophosphorylation, while its reduced anti-CMV activity was marked by pRb phosphorylation. Roscovitine, a CDK2 inhibitor, antagonized the anti-CMV activities of AS and dimer 606. These data suggest that cell cycle modulation through CDKs and pRb might play a role in the anti-CMV activities of artemisinins. Proteins involved in this modulation may be identified and targeted for CMV inhibition.

scholarly journals The Human Cytomegalovirus UL82 Gene Product (pp71) Accelerates Progression through the G1 Phase of the Cell Cycle

2003 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 3451-3459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert F. Kalejta ◽  
Thomas Shenk
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Human Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Protein Product ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Quiescent Cells ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
The One ◽  
Infectious Cycle

ABSTRACT As viruses are reliant upon their host cell to serve as proper environments for their replication, many have evolved mechanisms to alter intracellular conditions to suit their own needs. For example, human cytomegalovirus induces quiescent cells to enter the cell cycle and then arrests them in late G1, before they enter the S phase, a cell cycle compartment that is presumably favorable for viral replication. Here we show that the protein product of the human cytomegalovirus UL82 gene, pp71, can accelerate the movement of cells through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This activity would help infected cells reach the late G1 arrest point sooner and thus may stimulate the infectious cycle. pp71 also induces DNA synthesis in quiescent cells, but a pp71 mutant protein that is unable to induce quiescent cells to enter the cell cycle still retains the ability to accelerate the G1 phase. Thus, the mechanism through which pp71 accelerates G1 cell cycle progression appears to be distinct from the one that it employs to induce quiescent cells to exit G0 and subsequently enter the S phase.

Protein kinase C involvement in cell cycle modulation

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 1471-1476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Poli ◽  
Sara Mongiorgi ◽  
Lucio Cocco ◽  
Matilde Y. Follo
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cell Models ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Kinase C ◽  
Cell Proliferation And Differentiation ◽  
Cell Cycle Modulation ◽  
Proliferation And Differentiation

Protein kinases C (PKCs) are a family of serine/threonine kinases which act as key regulators in cell cycle progression and differentiation. Studies of the involvement of PKCs in cell proliferation showed that their role is dependent on cell models, cell cycle phases, timing of activation and localization. Indeed, PKCs can positively and negatively act on it, regulating entry, progression and exit from the cell cycle. In particular, the targets of PKCs resulted to be some of the key proteins involved in the cell cycle including cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks), Cip/Kip inhibitors and lamins. Several findings described roles for PKCs in the regulation of G1/S and G2/M checkpoints. As a matter of fact, data from independent laboratories demonstrated PKC-related modulations of cyclins D, leading to effects on the G1/S transition and differentiation of different cell lines. Moreover, interesting data were published on PKC-mediated phosphorylation of lamins. In addition, PKC isoenzymes can accumulate in the nuclei, attracted by different stimuli including diacylglycerol (DAG) fluctuations during cell cycle progression, and target lamins, leading to their disassembly at mitosis. In the present paper, we briefly review how PKCs could regulate cell proliferation and differentiation affecting different molecules related to cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Human Cytomegalovirus IE1-72 Protein Interacts with p53 and Inhibits p53-Dependent Transactivation by a Mechanism Different from That of IE2-86 Protein

2009 ◽  
Vol 83 (23) ◽  
pp. 12388-12398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eung-Soo Hwang ◽  
Zhigang Zhang ◽  
Haobin Cai ◽  
David Y. Huang ◽  
Shu-Mei Huong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Human Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
P53 Protein ◽  
Host Cells ◽  
Exon 2 ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Cellular Dna

ABSTRACT Infection of host cells with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) induces cell cycle dysregulation. Two HCMV immediate-early (IE) proteins, IE1-72 and IE2-86, are promiscuous transactivators that have been implicated in the dysregulatory events. Cellular p53 protein is accumulated to high levels in HCMV-infected cells, but the indicative marker of p53 transcriptional activity, p21, is markedly decreased. Both IE1-72 and IE2-86 were able to transactivate the p53 promoter and interact with p53 protein in DNA-transfected or HCMV-infected cells. HCMV UL84, a multiregulatory protein expressed in early periods of HCMV infection, also interacted with p53. HCMV IE1-72 prevented or disrupted p53 binding to p53-specific DNA sequences, while IE2-86 and/or UL84 enhanced p53 binding and induced supershift of this DNA-protein complex. Both HCMV IE1-72 and IE2-86 were able to inhibit p53-dependent transcriptional activation in plasmid-transfected cells. IE1-72, rather than IE2-86, was found to be responsible for p21 downregulation in HCMV-infected HEL cells. DNA transfection analysis using IE1-72 mutants revealed that exon 2/3 and the zinc finger region of IE1-72 are essential for IE1-72's effect on the repression of p53-dependent transcriptional activation. These data suggest that HCMV IE1-72 and/or IE2-86 transactivates the p53 promoter and induces p53 accumulation, but HCMV IE1-72 represses the p53 transactivation activity by a unique binding hindrance mechanism different from that of IE2-86. Thus, various modes of viral IE proteins and p53 interactions might result in multiple outcomes, such as stimulation of cellular DNA synthesis, cell cycle progression and cell cycle arrest, and prevention of program cell death.

scholarly journals Influenza A Virus Replication Induces Cell Cycle Arrest in G0/G1 Phase

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (24) ◽  
pp. 12832-12840 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan He ◽  
Ke Xu ◽  
Bjoern Keiner ◽  
Jianfang Zhou ◽  
Volker Czudai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Influenza A Virus ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Virus Production ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Infected Cells

ABSTRACT Many viruses interact with the host cell division cycle to favor their own growth. In this study, we examined the ability of influenza A virus to manipulate cell cycle progression. Our results show that influenza A virus A/WSN/33 (H1N1) replication results in G0/G1-phase accumulation of infected cells and that this accumulation is caused by the prevention of cell cycle entry from G0/G1 phase into S phase. Consistent with the G0/G1-phase accumulation, the amount of hyperphosphorylated retinoblastoma protein, a necessary active form for cell cycle progression through late G1 into S phase, decreased after infection with A/WSN/33 (H1N1) virus. In addition, other key molecules in the regulation of the cell cycle, such as p21, cyclin E, and cyclin D1, were also changed and showed a pattern of G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest. It is interesting that increased viral protein expression and progeny virus production in cells synchronized in the G0/G1 phase were observed compared to those in either unsynchronized cells or cells synchronized in the G2/M phase. G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest is likely a common strategy, since the effect was also observed in other strains, such as H3N2, H9N2, PR8 H1N1, and pandemic swine H1N1 viruses. These findings, in all, suggest that influenza A virus may provide favorable conditions for viral protein accumulation and virus production by inducing a G0/G1-phase cell cycle arrest in infected cells.

scholarly journals The Paramyxovirus Simian Virus 5 V Protein Slows Progression of the Cell Cycle

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (19) ◽  
pp. 9152-9166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Y. Lin ◽  
Robert A. Lamb
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Simian Virus ◽  
S Phase ◽  
V Protein ◽  
Simian Virus 5 ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
M Phase ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Affect Cell Cycle Progression

ABSTRACT Infection of cells by many viruses affects the cell division cycle of the host cell to favor viral replication. We examined the ability of the paramyxovirus simian parainfluenza virus 5 (SV5) to affect cell cycle progression, and we found that SV5 slows the rate of proliferation of HeLa T4 cells. The SV5-infected cells had a delayed transition from G1 to S phase and prolonged progression through S phase, and some of the infected cells were arrested in G2 or M phase. The levels of p53 and p21CIP1were not increased in SV5-infected cells compared to mock-infected cells, suggesting that the changes in the cell cycle occur through a p53-independent mechanism. However, the phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein (pRB) was delayed and prolonged in SV5-infected cells. The changes in the cell cycle were also observed in cells expressing the SV5 V protein but not in the cells expressing the SV5 P protein or the V protein lacking its unique C terminus (VΔC). The unique C terminus of the V protein of SV5 was shown previously to interact with DDB1, which is the 127-kDa subunit of the multifunctional damage-specific DNA-binding protein (DDB) heterodimer. The coexpression of DDB1 with V can partially restore the changes in the cell cycle caused by expression of the V protein.

scholarly journals Murine Norovirus Replication Induces G0/G1Cell Cycle Arrest in Asynchronously Growing Cells

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 6057-6066 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Davies ◽  
Chris M. Brown ◽  
Dana Westphal ◽  
Joanna M. Ward ◽  
Vernon K. Ward
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Viral Replication ◽  
Host Cell ◽  
Virus Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Murine Norovirus ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Infected Cells ◽  
Favorable Conditions

ABSTRACTMany viruses replicate most efficiently in specific phases of the cell cycle, establishing or exploiting favorable conditions for viral replication, although little is known about the relationship between caliciviruses and the cell cycle. Microarray and Western blot analysis of murine norovirus 1 (MNV-1)-infected cells showed changes in cyclin transcript and protein levels indicative of a G1phase arrest. Cell cycle analysis confirmed that MNV-1 infection caused a prolonging of the G1phase and an accumulation of cells in the G0/G1phase. The accumulation in G0/G1phase was caused by a reduction in cell cycle progression through the G1/S restriction point, with MNV-1-infected cells released from a G1arrest showing reduced cell cycle progression compared to mock-infected cells. MNV-1 replication was compared in populations of cells synchronized into specific cell cycle phases and in asynchronously growing cells. Cells actively progressing through the G1phase had a 2-fold or higher increase in virus progeny and capsid protein expression over cells in other phases of the cell cycle or in unsynchronized populations. These findings suggest that MNV-1 infection leads to prolonging of the G1phase and a reduction in S phase entry in host cells, establishing favorable conditions for viral protein production and viral replication. There is limited information on the interactions between noroviruses and the cell cycle, and this observation of increased replication in the G1phase may be representative of other members of theCaliciviridae.IMPORTANCENoroviruses have proven recalcitrant to growth in cell culture, limiting our understanding of the interaction between these viruses and the infected cell. In this study, we used the cell-culturable MNV-1 to show that infection of murine macrophages affects the G1/S cell cycle phase transition, leading to an arrest in cell cycle progression and an accumulation of cells in the G0/G1phase. Furthermore, we show that MNV replication is enhanced in the G1phase compared to other stages of the cell cycle. Manipulating the cell cycle or adapting to cell cycle responses of the host cell is a mechanism to enhance virus replication. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a norovirus interacting with the host cell cycle and exploiting the favorable conditions of the G0/G1phase for RNA virus replication.

DNA damage inhibits proteolysis of the B-type cyclin Clb5 in S. cerevisiae

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (15) ◽  
pp. 1813-1820
Author(s):  
D. Germain ◽  
J. Hendley ◽  
B. Futcher
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Tyrosine Phosphorylation ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Ubiquitin Pathway ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Transition Points ◽  
Checkpoint Genes

Cell cycle progression is mediated by waves of specific cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) in all eukaryotes. Cyclins are degraded by the ubiquitin pathway of proteolysis. The recent identification of several components of the cyclin proteolysis machinery has highlighted both the importance of proteolysis at multiple transition points in the cell cycle and the involvement of other substrates degraded by the same machinery. In this study, we have investigated the effects of DNA damage on the cyclin proteolytic machinery in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that the half-life of the B-type cyclin Clb5 is markedly increased following DNA damage while that of G1 cyclins is not. This effect is independent of cell cycle phase. Clb5 turnover requires p34CDC28 activity. Stabilisation of Clb5 correlates with an increase in tyrosine phosphorylation of p34CDC28, but stabilisation does not require this tyrosine phosphorylation. The stabilisation is independent of the checkpoint genes Mec1 and Rad53. These observations establish a new link between the regulation of proteolysis and DNA damage.

scholarly journals Structure-function relationships of the yeast cyclin-dependent kinase Pho85.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 5482-5491 ◽  
Author(s):  
R C Santos ◽  
N C Waters ◽  
C L Creasy ◽  
L W Bergman
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Structure Function ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Substrate Recognition ◽  
The Other ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Induced Mutagenesis

The PHO85 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae encodes a cyclin-dependent kinase involved in both transcriptional regulation and cell cycle progression. Although a great deal is known concerning the structure, function, and regulation of the highly homologous Cdc28 protein kinase, little is known concerning these relationships in regard to Pho85. In this study, we constructed a series of Pho85-Cdc28 chimeras to map the region(s) of the Pho85 molecule that is critical for function of Pho85 in repression of acid phosphatase (PHO5) expression. Using a combination of site-directed and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutagenesis, we have identified numerous residues critical for either activation of the Pho85 kinase, interaction of Pho85 with the cyclin-like molecule Pho80, or substrate recognition. Finally, analysis of mutations analogous to those previously identified in either Cdc28 or cdc2 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe suggested that the inhibition of Pho85-Pho80 activity in mechanistically different from that seen in the other cyclin-dependent kinases.

scholarly journals Phosphorylation-induced unfolding regulates p19INK4dduring the human cell cycle

2018 ◽  
Vol 115 (13) ◽  
pp. 3344-3349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Kumar ◽  
Mohanraj Gopalswamy ◽  
Annika Wolf ◽  
David J. Brockwell ◽  
Mechthild Hatzfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Structural Biology ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinases ◽  
Ankyrin Repeat Protein ◽  
Dependent Protein ◽  
Local Unfolding ◽  
Molecular Mode

Cell cycle progression is tightly regulated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). The ankyrin-repeat protein p19INK4dfunctions as a key regulator of G1/S transition; however, its molecular mode of action is unknown. Here, we combine cell and structural biology methods to unravel the mechanism by which p19INK4dcontrols cell cycle progression. We delineate how the stepwise phosphorylation of p19INK4dSer66 and Ser76 by cell cycle-independent (p38) and -dependent protein kinases (CDK1), respectively, leads to local unfolding of the three N-terminal ankyrin repeats of p19INK4d. This dissociates the CDK6–p19INK4dinhibitory complex and, thereby, activates CDK6. CDK6 triggers entry into S-phase, whereas p19INK4dis ubiquitinated and degraded. Our findings reveal how signaling-dependent p19INK4dunfolding contributes to the irreversibility of G1/S transition.

scholarly journals Inhibition of Cell Division by the Human Cytomegalovirus IE86 Protein: Role of the p53 Pathway or Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 1/Cyclin B1

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (4) ◽  
pp. 2597-2603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon-Jae Song ◽  
Mark F. Stinski
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Human Cytomegalovirus ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Fibroblast Cell ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Atm Kinase

ABSTRACT The human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) IE86 protein induces the human fibroblast cell cycle from G0/G1 to G1/S, where cell cycle progression stops. Cells with a wild-type, mutated, or null p53 or cells with null p21 protein were transduced with replication-deficient adenoviruses expressing HCMV IE86 protein or cellular p53 or p21. Even though S-phase genes were activated in a p53 wild-type cell, IE86 protein also induced phospho-Ser15 p53 and p21 independent of p14ARF but dependent on ATM kinase. These cells did not enter the S phase. In human p53 mutant, p53 null, or p21 null cells, IE86 protein did not up-regulate p21, cellular DNA synthesis was not inhibited, but cell division was inhibited. Cells accumulated in the G2/M phase, and there was increased cyclin-dependent kinase 1/cyclin B1 activity. Although the HCMV IE86 protein increases cellular E2F activity, it also blocks cell division in both p53+/+ and p53−/− cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document