scholarly journals In VitroAntimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns of Blastocystis

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (8) ◽  
pp. 4417-4423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamalee Roberts ◽  
Stephen Bush ◽  
John Ellis ◽  
John Harkness ◽  
Damien Stark
Keyword(s):  
Current Treatment ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Drug Treatments ◽  
Resistant Strains ◽  
Susceptibility Patterns ◽  
First Line Treatment

ABSTRACTBlastocystisis the most common human enteric protist with controversial clinical significance. Metronidazole is considered a first-line treatment forBlastocystisinfection; however, there has been increasing evidence for the lack of efficacy of this treatment. Treatment failure has been reported in several clinical cases, and recentin vitrostudies have suggested the occurrence of metronidazole-resistant strains. In this study, we tested 12Blastocystisisolates from 4 commonBlastocystissubtypes (ST1, ST3, ST4, and ST8) against 12 commonly used antimicrobials (metronidazole, paromomycin, ornidazole, albendazole, ivermectin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole [TMP-SMX], furazolidone, nitazoxanide, secnidazole, fluconazole, nystatin, and itraconazole) at 10 different concentrationsin vitro. It was found that each subtype showed little sensitivity to the commonly used metronidazole, paromomycin, and triple therapy (furazolidone, nitazoxanide, and secnidazole). This study highlights the efficacy of other potential drug treatments, including trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ivermectin, and suggests that current treatment regimens be revised.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Proveblue (Methylene Blue) in an Experimental Cerebral Malaria Murine Model

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 3412-3414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérome Dormoi ◽  
Sébastien Briolant ◽  
Camille Desgrouas ◽  
Bruno Pradines
Keyword(s):  
Methylene Blue ◽  
Cerebral Malaria ◽  
Murine Model ◽  
Plasmodium Berghei ◽  
Active Metabolite ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Experimental Cerebral Malaria ◽  
Content Type ◽  
First Line Treatment

ABSTRACTAlthough 100% of untreated mice infected withPlasmodium bergheidied with specific signs of cerebral malaria and 100% of mice treated with 3 mg/kg dihydroartemisinin, the active metabolite of artesunate, which is used as the first-line treatment for severe malaria, also died but showed no specific signs of cerebral malaria, 78% of mice treated with 10 mg/kg Proveblue (methylene blue) and 78% of mice treated with a combination of 3 mg dihydroartemisinin and 10 mg/kg Proveblue survived and showed no specific signs of cerebral malaria or detectable parasites.

A nationwide population-based study comparing survival in unresectable advanced or synchronous metastatic esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 308-308
Author(s):  
Marieke Pape ◽  
Pauline A.J. Vissers ◽  
David Bertwistle ◽  
Laura McDonald ◽  
Hanneke W.M. Van Laarhoven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Tumor Characteristics ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Netherlands Cancer Registry ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Line Treatment

308 Background: Similarities between esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas have been identified in terms of genomic characteristics. There is however no consensus on the combined or stratified inclusion of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) within gastric cancer (GC) clinical trials. The aim of our study was to compare patient and tumor characteristics, first-line treatment regimens and overall survival (OS) of patients with EAC and GC. Methods: We selected patients with unresectable advanced and/or synchronous metastatic EAC (n = 1554) or GC (including junction tumors; n = 2095) diagnosed in the period 2015-2017 from the nationwide Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients with a positive HER2 test result and/or receiving trastuzumab as a first-line treatment were excluded. Data on OS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves with Log-Rank test. Results: The EAC patient population had significantly more male patients (83% vs 66%), lower median age (68 vs 71 years) and higher median BMI (25.4 vs 24.5). Significant differences in location of metastases were identified, with higher percentages in non-regional lymph nodes (48% vs 28%), liver (50% vs 35%), lung (21% vs 9%) and bone (19% vs 7%) and lower in peritoneum (5% vs 42%), in EAC versus GC patients respectively. EAC patients more often received any type (supportive or active systemic) of treatment (76% vs 60%). Median OS was longer in EAC than GC patients (EAC: 4.8 vs GC: 4.1 months; p < 0.01). The percentages of patients receiving first-line systemic treatment were equal in both groups (43%). The number of patients receiving CapOx or FOLFOX was not significantly different (43% vs 47%). Carboplatin+paclitaxel was more frequently given in EAC versus GC (34% vs 3%), while EOX or ECC was given less frequently (12% vs 30%). No significant difference was observed in median OS between EAC and GC patients receiving first-line active systemic treatment (8.0 vs 7.6 months; p = 0.28). Conclusions: Patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment regimens and OS differ between EAC and GC patients. Despite these differences, in patients receiving first-line active systemic treatment no significant differences in OS were found.

scholarly journals 679. In vitro Activity of Cefiderocol (CFDC), a Novel Siderophore Cephalosporin, Against Difficult-to-Treat-Resistant (DTR) Gram-Negative Bacterial Pathogens From the Multi-National Sentinel Surveillance Study, SIDERO-WT (2014–2017)

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S309-S310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Longshaw ◽  
Masakatsu Tsuji ◽  
Meredith M Hackel ◽  
Daniel F Sahm ◽  
Yoshinori Yamano
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Vitro Activity ◽  
Surveillance Study ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
In Vitro Activity ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Acinetobacter Spp ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background DTR organisms are defined as nonsusceptible to all high-efficacy, low-toxicity antibiotics (penicillins, cephalosporins, carbapenems, and quinolones), leaving physicians with limited first-line treatment options. Analyses of electronic health records have shown that patients with DTR Gram-negative bacterial infections are more likely to receive inappropriate antibiotic therapy, have longer hospital stay and increased risk of mortality. CFDC is a novel parenteral siderophore cephalosporin with potent activity against aerobic Gram-negative pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant strains. We evaluated the in vitro activity of CFDC and comparators against DTR pathogens collected by the SIDERO-WT surveillance study. Methods A total of 30,459 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli were systematically collected from United States, Canada, and 11 EU countries during 2014–2017. MICs were determined by broth microdilution for a panel of 7 antibiotics, including CFDC, ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA), ceftolozane–tazobactam (C/T), colistin (CST), cefepime (FEP), meropenem (MEM), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) according to CLSI guidelines. All antibiotics were tested in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth (CAMHB) except CFDC, for which iron-depleted CAMHB was used. Susceptibility was determined according to CLSI interpretive breakpoints except CST, where EUCAST breakpoints were used. DTR pathogens were defined as being nonsusceptible to FEP, MEM, and CIP according to CLSI breakpoints. Results Among 30,459 Gram-negative isolates collected between 2014 and 2017, 9.3% were nonsusceptible to FEP, MEM, and CIP and could be defined as DTR. DTR was most frequently observed in Acinetobacter spp. (55.5%), followed by Burkholderia spp. (19%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9.5%), and Enterobacterales (2.7%). Of the 1,173 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia tested, 97% had MEM MIC of ≥8 mg/L; however, only 2.9% could be defined as DTR. Cefiderocol was the most active antibiotic tested against DTR isolates with 94.5% DTR-Acinetobacter spp., 98.3% DTR-P. aeruginosa, and 99.8% DTR-Enterobacterales susceptible (Table 1). Conclusion CFDC demonstrated potent activity against DTR Gram-negative pathogens with limited first-line treatment options. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Synergistic Efficacy of β-Lactam Combinations againstMycobacterium abscessusPulmonary Infection in Mice

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Story-Roller ◽  
Emily C. Maggioncalda ◽  
Gyanu Lamichhane
Keyword(s):  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Mycobacterium Abscessus ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Chronic Lung Diseases ◽  
Resistant Strains ◽  
Drug Resistant Strains ◽  
Inhibitor Combination

ABSTRACTMycobacterium abscessusis an emerging pathogen capable of causing invasive pulmonary infections in patients with chronic lung diseases. These infections are difficult to treat, necessitating prolonged multidrug therapy, which is further complicated by extensive intrinsic and acquired resistance exhibited by clinicalM. abscessusisolates. Therefore, development of novel treatment regimens effective against drug-resistant strains is crucial. Prior studies have demonstrated synergistic efficacy of several β-lactams againstM. abscessusin vitro; however, these combinations have never been tested in an animal model ofM. abscessuspulmonary disease. We utilized a recently developed murine system of sustainedM. abscessuslung infection delivered via an aerosol route to test the bactericidal efficacy of four novel dual β-lactam combinations and one β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. All five of the novel combinations exhibited synergy and resulted in at least 6-log10reductions in bacterial burden in the lungs of mice at 4 weeks compared to untreated controls (P = 0.038).

Checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
Aung Tun ◽  
Wai Lin Thein ◽  
Aymen Elfiky ◽  
James Gasperino ◽  
Elizabeth Guevara
Keyword(s):  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
First Line Treatment

117 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for ~85% of lung cancers among which the metastatic disease represents ~ 57%, and long-term prognosis remains poor. Combined chemo-immunotherapy can have synergistic anticancer activities through the immunomodulatory impact of checkpoint inhibitors and the immunogenic effect of chemotherapy. Methods: We systematically conducted a comprehensive literature search using PUBMED, EMBASE and SCOPUS databases through October 1, 2018. RCTs of first-line chemotherapy +/- immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC were incorporated in the analysis. A generic inverse variance method was used to calculate the estimated pooled Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The mantel-haenszel method was used to calculate the estimated pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for pooled overall response rate (ORR), all-grade adverse events (AEs), and high-grade AEs (≥ grade 3). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochrane Q-statistic. Random effects were used due to significant heterogeneity among studies. Results: Seven phase 2 & 3 RCTs (Keynote-021,189, 407, IMpower-131, 150, checkmate-227, and Govindan et al) including 3785 patients with advanced NSCLC were included in the analysis. IMpower 150 trial allowed EGFR or ALK mutated patients. The study arm used standard treatment regimens in combination with ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, or nivolumab, while control arm used only standard treatment regimens. The pooled HR for PFS was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.56-0.77; P=0.00001), the pooled HR for OS was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.59-0.90; P=0.003), and the pooled RR for ORR was 1.45 (95 CI: 1.17-1.8; P=0.0007). The pooled RRs for all-grade AEs and high-grade AEs were 1.1 (95% CI: 1-1.21; P=0.05) and 1.28 (95% CI: 1.13-1.46; P=0.0001), respectively. Conclusions: Adding immunotherapy to standard regimen significantly improves PFS, OS, and ORR for the first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. The combined regimen results in a slightly higher risk of high-grade AEs without a significant increase in the risk of all-grade AEs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document