scholarly journals Evaluation of Several Dosing Regimens of Cefepime, with Various Simulations of Renal Function, against Clinical Isolates ofPseudomonas aeruginosa in a Pharmacodynamic Infection Model

1999 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane M. Cappelletty
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Dosing Interval ◽  
Killing Activity ◽  
Central Chamber ◽  
Drug Concentrations

ABSTRACT The objectives of this study were as follows: (i) to examine the killing activity of 2-g doses of cefepime against two clinical isolates (mucoid and nonmucoid) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a pharmacodynamic in vitro infection model, (ii) to compare the percentage of time above the MIC (T > MIC) for each of the regimens against P. aeruginosa, and (iii) to evaluate the area under the bactericidal curve for each regimen. Cefepime was administered at intervals of 8, 12, and 24 h with and without tobramycin, and two different levels of renal function were simulated: normal (creatinine clearance [CLCR] = 90 ml/min) and decreased (CRCL = 60 ml/min). Also, the killing activity of cefepime with and without tobramycin was compared to the killing activity of ceftazidime (2 g every 8 h) with and without tobramycin. The T > MIC was 100% in the central chamber except for the regimen in which cefepime was administered every 12 h and the CLCR was 90 ml/min, which provided concentrations above the MIC for 92% of the dosing interval against the C31 (mucoid; MIC of cefepime, 4 μg/ml) isolate and for 75% of the interval against the C34 (nonmucoid; MIC of cefepime, 8 μg/ml) isolate. All cefepime and ceftazidime monotherapy simulations resulted in 99.9% killing of the nonmucoid isolate within 4 to 8 h and within 4 to 6 h, respectively. Against the mucoid isolate, 99.9% killing was achieved only with combination therapy. The results of this study indicate that cefepime dosed at 2 g every 12 h under conditions of normal renal function and every 24 h with decreased creatinine clearance (60 ml/min) is effective both as monotherapy and in combination therapy against a nonmucoid strain of P. aeruginosa. With cefepime MICs of 4 and 8 μg/ml, the single-agent regimens provided T > MIC values in the central chamber for 92 and ≥75% of the dosing interval against the mucoid and nonmucoid isolates, respectively. Cefepime dosed at 2 g every 12 h, with a creatinine clearance of 90 ml/min, and every 24 h, with a creatinine clearance of 60 ml/min, resulted in killing activity equivalent to that of ceftazidime dosed at 2 g every 8 h. None of the monotherapies provided adequate killing of the mucoid strain of P. aeruginosa despite drug concentrations being above the MIC for ≥92% of all dosing intervals. Finally, combination therapy with tobramycin and either cefepime or ceftazidime enhanced the killing of both the mucoid and nonmucoidP. aeruginosa isolates.

scholarly journals Levofloxacin-ceftazidime administration regimens combat Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the hollow-fiber infection model simulating abnormal renal function in critically ill patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Xiaobing Li ◽  
Xiaojing He ◽  
Lingyan Jian
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Hollow Fiber ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Combination Regimens ◽  
Abnormal Renal Function

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the bactericidal effects of levofloxacin and ceftazidime as both monotherapy and combination therapy, and to determine their effects on resistance suppression in patients with normal and abnormal (Ccr:16–20 mL/min) renal function. Common clinical administration regimens to provide reference values were also evaluated. Methods: The 7-d hollow-fiber infection model was used to inject the Pseudomonas aeruginosa standard strain (ATCC27853). This simulated common clinical administration regimens for patients with different renal function. Ten regimens were stratified into 2 categories based on renal function, and each category contained 3 monotherapy regimens and 2 combination therapy regimens. The total and resistant populations were quantified. Drug concentrations were determined by High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results: Monotherapy regimens resulted in about 0.5-log-CFU/mL bacterial kill in the total population at 6 or 8h, whilst combination regimens resulted in 2- to 3-log-CFU/mL within 2 days. For levofloxacin monotherapy regimens in patients with normal renal function, resistance emergence was seen after 6h, and was seen at 0h in the ceftazidime monotherapy regimen, as well as in all regimens of patients with abnormal renal function. Although resistant subpopulation in combination regimens with abnormal renal function began to increase at 0h, there was a certain downward trend after 8h, while resistant population in the normal renal function group increased after 16h. Conclusions: Combination therapy had greater bactericidal efficacy and resistance inhibition compared with monotherapy. Studying combination regimens in randomized clinical trials is warranted.

scholarly journals Levofloxacin-ceftazidime administration regimens combat Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the hollow-fiber infection model simulating abnormal renal function in critically ill patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Xiaobing Li ◽  
Xiaojing He ◽  
Lingyan Jian
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Hollow Fiber ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Combination Regimens ◽  
Abnormal Renal Function

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the bactericidal effects of levofloxacin and ceftazidime as monotherapy and in combination, and to determine their effects on resistance suppression in patients with normal and abnormal (Ccr:16–20 mL/min) renal function. Common clinical administration regimens to provide reference values were also evaluated. Methods: The 7-d hollow-fiber infection model was used to inject the Pseudomonas aeruginosa standard strain (ATCC27853). This simulated common clinical administration regimens for patients with different renal function. Ten regimens were stratified into 2 categories based on renal function, and each category contained 3 monotherapy regimens and 2 combination therapy regimens. The total and resistant populations were quantified. Drug concentrations were determined by High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results: Monotherapy regimens resulted in about 0.5-log-CFU/mL bacterial kill in the total population at 6 or 8h, whilst combination regimens resulted in 2- to 3-log-CFU/mL within 2 days. For levofloxacin monotherapy regimens in patients with normal renal function, resistance emergence was seen after 6h, and was seen at 0h in the ceftazidime monotherapy regimen, as well as in all regimens of patients with abnormal renal function. Although resistant subpopulation in combination regimens with abnormal renal function began to increase at 0h, there was a certain downward trend after 8h, while resistant population in the normal renal function group increased after 16h. Conclusions: Combination therapy had greater bactericidal efficacy and resistance inhibition compared with monotherapy. Studying combination regimens in randomized clinical trials is warranted.

scholarly journals Levofloxacin-ceftazidime administration regimens combat Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the hollow-fiber infection model simulating abnormal renal function in critically ill patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Xiaobing Li ◽  
Xiaojing He ◽  
Lingyan Jian
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Hollow Fiber ◽  
Normal Renal Function ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Combination Regimens ◽  
Abnormal Renal Function

Abstract Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the bactericidal effects of levofloxacin and ceftazidime as both monotherapy and combination therapy, and to determine their effects on resistance suppression in patients with normal and abnormal (Ccr:16–20 mL/min) renal function. Common clinical administration regimens to provide reference values were also evaluated. Methods: The 7-d hollow-fiber infection model was used to inject the Pseudomonas aeruginosa standard strain (ATCC27853). This simulated common clinical administration regimens for patients with different renal function. Ten regimens were stratified into 2 categories based on renal function, and each category contained 3 monotherapy regimens and 2 combination therapy regimens. The total and resistant populations were quantified. Drug concentrations were determined by High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Results: Monotherapy regimens resulted in about 0.5-log-CFU/mL bacterial kill in the total population at 6 or 8h, whilst combination regimens resulted in 2- to 3-log-CFU/mL within 2 days. For levofloxacin monotherapy regimens in patients with normal renal function, resistance emergence was seen after 6h, and was seen at 0h in the ceftazidime monotherapy regimen, as well as in all regimens of patients with abnormal renal function. Although resistant subpopulation in combination regimens with abnormal renal function began to increase at 0h, there was a certain downward trend after 8h, while resistant population in the normal renal function group increased after 16h. Conclusions: Combination therapy had greater bactericidal efficacy and resistance inhibition compared with monotherapy. Studying combination regimens in randomized clinical trials is warranted.

scholarly journals The Combination of Meropenem and Levofloxacin Is Synergistic with Respect to both Pseudomonas aeruginosa Kill Rate and Resistance Suppression

2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 2646-2654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnold Louie ◽  
Caroline Grasso ◽  
Nadzeya Bahniuk ◽  
Brian Van Scoy ◽  
David L. Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Time Data ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Cell Kill ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT New approaches are needed for the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. All available single agents are suboptimal, especially for resistance suppression. Classical β-lactam/aminoglycoside combinations are not used often enough at least in part because of concern for nephrotoxicity. We evaluated the combination of meropenem and levofloxacin against the P. aeruginosa PAO1 wild type and its isogenic MexAB pump-overexpressed mutant. The drugs were studied using an in vitro hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic infection model. There were 16 different regimens evaluated for both isolates. Both total population and resistant subpopulations were quantified. Drug concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The impact of monotherapy versus that of combination therapy for attainment of a 3-log cell kill and for resistance suppression was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Drug exposures were calculated by fitting the concentration-time data using the ADAPT II package of programs. For both isolates, monotherapy allowed resistance emergence with all but the largest exposure or with all exposures. In contrast, there was no resistance emergence with any combination regimen. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in time to attainment of a 3-log cell kill as well as time to resistance emergence for monotherapy and combination therapy for both isolates, in favor of the combination regimens. Determination of the pharmacodynamic indices associated with resistance suppression demonstrated a 2- to 3-fold reduction with the use of combinations. Combination therapy with meropenem and levofloxacin provides a significantly faster time to attain a 3-log cell kill and significantly better resistance suppression than does either monotherapy. This combination should be evaluated in a clinical trial.

scholarly journals Experimental Validation of a Mathematical Framework to Simulate Antibiotics with Distinct Half-Lives Concurrently in an In Vitro Model

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1256
Author(s):  
Brianna M. Eales ◽  
Cole S. Hudson ◽  
Iordanis Kesisoglou ◽  
Weiqun Wang ◽  
Michael Nikolaou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Compartment Model ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Design Stage ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Multidrug Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Drug Concentrations

Antimicrobial resistance has been steadily increasing in prevalence, and combination therapy is commonly used to treat infections due to multidrug resistant bacteria. Under certain circumstances, combination therapy of three or more drugs may be necessary, which makes it necessary to simulate the pharmacokinetic profiles of more than two drugs concurrently in vitro. Recently, a general theoretical framework was developed to simulate three drugs with distinctly different half-lives. The objective of the study was to experimentally validate the theoretical model. Clinically relevant exposures of meropenem, ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone were simulated concurrently in a hollow-fiber infection model, with the corresponding half-lives of 1, 2.5, and 8 h, respectively. Serial samples were obtained over 24 h and drug concentrations were assayed using validated LC-MS/MS methods. A one-compartment model with zero-order input was used to characterize the observed concentration-time profiles. The experimentally observed half-lives corresponding to exponential decline of all three drugs were in good agreement with the respective values anticipated at the experiment design stage. These results were reproducible when the experiment was repeated on a different day. The validated benchtop setup can be used as a more flexible preclinical tool to explore the effectiveness of various drug combinations against multidrug resistant bacteria.

scholarly journals CharacterizingIn VivoPharmacodynamics of Carbapenems against Acinetobacter baumannii in a Murine Thigh Infection Model To Support Breakpoint Determinations

2013 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 599-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn H. MacVane ◽  
Jared L. Crandon ◽  
David P. Nicolau
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Free Drug ◽  
Bacterial Density ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Dosing Interval ◽  
Drug Concentrations

ABSTRACTPharmacodynamic profiling data of carbapenems forAcinetobacterspp. are sparse. This study aimed to determine the pharmacodynamic targets of carbapenems forAcinetobacter baumanniibased on a range of percentages of the dosing interval in which free drug concentrations remained above the MIC (fT>MIC) in the neutropenic murine thigh infection model.fT>MIC values of 23.7%, 32.8%, and 47.5% resulted in stasis, 1-log reductions, and 2-log reductions in bacterial density after 24 h, respectively. The pharmacodynamic targets of carbapenems forA. baumanniidemonstratedin vivoare similar to those of other Gram-negative bacteria.

scholarly journals Comparison of the bactericidal activities of piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and ampicillin-sulbactam against clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis, Enterococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
M E Klepser ◽  
M N Marangos ◽  
Z Zhu ◽  
D P Nicolau ◽  
R Quintiliani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Enterococcus Faecalis ◽  
Bactericidal Activity ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Mixed Infections ◽  
Dosing Interval ◽  
Drug Concentrations ◽  
Bactericidal Activities ◽  
Dosing Intervals

Owing to the broad spectrum of activity afforded by beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor preparations, these agents are frequently selected as empiric therapy for the treatment of mixed infections such as intra-abdominal and diabetic foot infections, either alone or in combination with an aminoglycoside. Twelve healthy volunteers were enrolled in a randomized, open-label, four-way crossover trial comparing the bactericidal activities of piperacillin-tazobactam, ticarcillin-clavulanate, and ampicillin-sulbactam against microorganisms commonly isolated from mixed infections. Subjects received the following regimes: (i) 3.375 g of piperacillin-tazobactam intravenously (i.v.) every 6 h (q6h) (ii) 4.5 g of piperacillin-tazobactam i.v. q8h, (iii) 3.1 g of ticarcillin-clavulanate i.v. q6h, and (iv) 3.0 g of ampicillin-sulbactam i.v. q6h. Serum bactericidal titers were determined and used to calculate the duration of measurable bactericidal activity over the dosing interval of each of the regimens against two clinical isolates of Bacillus fragilis, Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The percentage of the dosing interval over which drug concentrations in serum remained above the MIC for each organism was determined and compared with the observed duration of bactericidal activity was noted (r = 0.78; P < 0.001). All of the regimens demonstrated good activity against B. fragilis and E. coli. Against E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa, however, all of the regimens provided bactericidal activity for less than 50% of the respective dosing intervals. These data suggest that use of shorter dosing intervals or continuous-infusion regimens should be considered in combination with an aminoglycoside to improve the bactericidal profiles of these agents for E. faecalis and P. aeruginosa.

scholarly journals Mechanistic insights into synergy between nalidixic acid and tetracycline against clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Escherichia coli

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Gaurav ◽  
Varsha Gupta ◽  
Sandeep K. Shrivastava ◽  
Ranjana Pathania
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Nalidixic Acid ◽  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Clinical Isolates ◽  
Hospital Environment ◽  
Infection Model ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
E Coli

AbstractThe increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistance has become a global health problem. Acinetobacter baumannii is an important nosocomial pathogen due to its capacity to persist in the hospital environment. It has a high mortality rate and few treatment options. Antibiotic combinations can help to fight multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacterial infections, but they are rarely used in the clinics and mostly unexplored. The interaction between bacteriostatic and bactericidal antibiotics are mostly reported as antagonism based on the results obtained in the susceptible model laboratory strain Escherichia coli. However, in the present study, we report a synergistic interaction between nalidixic acid and tetracycline against clinical multi-drug resistant A. baumannii and E. coli. Here we provide mechanistic insight into this dichotomy. The synergistic combination was studied by checkerboard assay and time-kill curve analysis. We also elucidate the mechanism behind this synergy using several techniques such as fluorescence spectroscopy, flow cytometry, fluorescence microscopy, morphometric analysis, and real-time polymerase chain reaction. Nalidixic acid and tetracycline combination displayed synergy against most of the MDR clinical isolates of A. baumannii and E. coli but not against susceptible isolates. Finally, we demonstrate that this combination is also effective in vivo in an A. baumannii/Caenorhabditis elegans infection model (p < 0.001)

Meta-analysis comparing impact of age, sex and renal function on the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolisms

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
J She ◽  
B.Z Zhuo
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Acute Venous Thromboembolism

Abstract Background New direct oral anticoagulants (NOACs), as a preferable treatment option for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been recommended with practical advantages as compared to Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in clinical practice. Purpose In our study, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy and safety of NOACs vs. VKAs in patients with different age, sex and renal function for the treatment of VTE. Methods Electronic databases (accessed October 2019) were systematically searched to identify RCTs evaluating apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus VKAs for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. Results NOACs was associated with a borderline higher efficacy in female (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.62–1.02), and a significantly higher efficacy in patients with age more than 75 (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32–0.80) and creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32–0.99). NOACs also show advantage in terms of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding in male (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60–0.86), and patients with creatinine clearance more than 50 mL/min (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67–0.84). Conclusions NOACs have exhibited clinical preference among patients with acute VTE as compared to VKA with significantly decreased thrombosis events and lower bleeding complications, especially in patients with age more than 75 and creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81800390) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi province (2018KW067).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document