scholarly journals DelafloxacinIn VitroBroth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Guidelines: Susceptibility Breakpoint Criteria and Quality Control Ranges for an Expanded-Spectrum Anionic Fluoroquinolone

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Pfaller ◽  
R. K. Flamm ◽  
S. P. McCurdy ◽  
C. M. Pillar ◽  
D. Shortridge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
Susceptibility Test ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACTDelafloxacin, a recently approved anionic fluoroquinolone, was tested within an international resistance surveillance program. Thein vitrosusceptibilities of 7,914 indicated pathogens causing acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution MIC testing methods. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) susceptibility testing breakpoints and quality control ranges for routine broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods were confirmed. The delafloxacin MIC50/90(% susceptibility) results were as follows:Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA), 0.008/0.25 μg/ml (92.8%);Staphylococcus lugdunensis, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (99.3%);Streptococcus pyogenes, 0.016/0.03 μg/ml (100.0%);Streptococcus anginosusgroup, 0.008/0.016 μg/ml (100.0%);Enterococcus faecalis, 0.12/1 μg/ml (66.2%); andEnterobacteriaceae, 0.12/4 μg/ml (69.5%). The FDA clinical breakpoints were used to assess intermethod test agreement between delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion methods for the indicated pathogens. The intermethod susceptibility test categorical agreement for delafloxacin was acceptable, with only 0.4% very major, false-susceptible errors amongS. aureusstrains. Across all FDA-indicated species, the selected breakpoints produced only 0.0 to 1.7% rates of serious (very major and major errors) intermethod error. Quality control ranges for these standardized delafloxacin susceptibility test methods were calculated from three multilaboratory (12 total sites) studies for six control organisms. In conclusion, the application of FDA MIC breakpoints for delafloxacin against contemporary (2014 to 2016) isolates of ABSSSI pathogens provides additional support for the use of delafloxacin in the treatment of adults with ABSSSI. Delafloxacin MIC and disk diffusion susceptibility testing methods have been standardized for clinical application, achieving high intermethod categorical agreement.

scholarly journals Effects of KPC Variant and Porin Genotype on the In Vitro Activity of Meropenem-Vaborbactam against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Wilson ◽  
Ellen G. Kline ◽  
Chelsea E. Jones ◽  
Kristin T. Morder ◽  
Roberta T. Mettus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant ◽  
Strip Testing ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae

ABSTRACT Meropenem-vaborbactam is a new agent with the potential to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. We describe the in vitro activity of meropenem-vaborbactam against representative CRE genotypes and laboratory-engineered Escherichia coli isolates harboring mutant blaKPC genes associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance. We also compared disk diffusion and gradient strip testing methods to standard broth microdilution methods. Against 120 CRE isolates, median ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam MICs were 1 and 0.03 µg/ml, respectively. Ninety-eight percent (117/120) of isolates were susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam (MICs ≤ 4 µg/ml). Against Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates harboring mutant blaKPC, the addition of vaborbactam lowered the meropenem MICs in 78% of isolates (14/18); 100% were susceptible to meropenem-vaborbactam. Median meropenem-vaborbactam MICs were higher against K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae isolates with mutant ompK36 porin genes (n = 26) than against those with wild-type ompK36 porin genes (n = 54) (0.25 versus 0.03 µg/ml; P < 0.0001). Against E. coli TOP10 isolates with plasmid constructs containing wild-type blaKPC or mutant blaKPC, the addition of vaborbactam at 8 µg/ml lowered the meropenem MICs 2- to 512-fold, resulting in meropenem-vaborbactam MICs of 0.03 µg/ml. The rates of categorical agreement with broth microdilution for disk diffusion or gradient strips ranged from 90 to 95%. Essential agreement rates were higher for research-use-only (RUO) gradient strips manufactured by bioMérieux (82%) than for those manufactured by Liofilchem (48%) (P < 0.0001). Taken together, our data highlight the potent in vitro activity of meropenem-vaborbactam against CRE, including isolates resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Vaborbactam inhibited both wild-type and variant KPC enzymes. On the other hand, KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates with ompK36 mutations displayed higher meropenem-vaborbactam MICs than isolates with wild-type ompK36. The results of susceptibility testing with RUO bioMérieux gradient strips most closely aligned with those of broth microdilution methods.

scholarly journals Determination of Disk Diffusion and MIC Quality Control Ranges for Nafithromycin (WCK 4873), a New Lactone-Ketolide

2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 3021-3027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith A. Hackel ◽  
James A. Karlowsky ◽  
Dana Dressel ◽  
Daniel F. Sahm
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Surveillance Studies ◽  
Testing Patient

ABSTRACTDisk diffusion and MIC quality control (QC) ranges were determined for nafithromycin, a new lactone-ketolide, following the completion of a nine-laboratory, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document M23-defined tier 2 study. Five QC strains consistent with the spectrum of activity of nafithromycin were tested:Staphylococcus aureusATCC 25923 (disk only),S. aureusATCC 29213 (broth only),Enterococcus faecalisATCC 29212 (broth only),Streptococcus pneumoniaeATCC 49619 (disk and broth), andHaemophilus influenzaeATCC 49247 (disk and broth). Nafithromycin disk diffusion QC ranges were determined to be 25 to 31 mm forS. aureusATCC 25923, 25 to 31 mm forS. pneumoniaeATCC 49619, and 16 to 20 mm forH. influenzaeATCC 49247. Nafithromycin MIC QC ranges were determined to be 0.06 to 0.25 μg/ml forS. aureusATCC 29213, 0.016 to 0.12 μg/ml forE. faecalisATCC 29212, 0.008 to 0.03 μg/ml forS. pneumoniaeATCC 49619, and 2 to 8 μg/ml forH. influenzaeATCC 49247. All disk diffusion and MIC QC ranges established in this study were approved by the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing at their June 2015 meeting and were initially reported in the 2017 M100S document. The QC ranges established in this study should be used for determining thein vitroactivity of nafithromycin in phase 2 and phase 3 human clinical trials and subsequently for testing patient isolates and isolates in phase 4 surveillance studies.

scholarly journals Comparing Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Detecting the In Vitro Activity of Colistin against Different Gram-Negative Bacilli

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shams N ◽  
◽  
AlHiraky H ◽  
Moulana N ◽  
Riahi M ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Infections ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Multidrug Resistant ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Phenotypic Profile

The surge in the prevalence of Multidrug-Resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections with limited treatment led to colistin reusing to treat MDR infections. This study aimed to determine economical, simple, and reliable colistin susceptibility testing methods as an alternative to the microdilution technique. We compared seven colistin susceptibility testing methods, including quantitative and qualitative, namely: Disk diffusion, E-test, ComASPTM SensiTest Colistin, Colistin broth disk elution, and colistin agar test CHROMagarTM COL-APSE, and BD Phoenix ID/AST automated identification and susceptibility testing system to the gold standard Broth Microdilution (BMD). Whole-genome sequencing was performed on all isolates to determine if the genetic resistant factors affect the phenotypic profile of the colistin resistance. Our results revealed that disk diffusion is still an ineffective method for measuring colistin susceptibility in Gram-negative Bacilli with the highest major error (31.75%), the lowest Kappa 0 (0%), and categorical agreement (68.25%) values. Phoenix, and CompASPTM SensiTest colistin methods have remained superior in reproducibility, sturdiness, and simplicity of use, similar to the currently recommended broth microdilution procedure; with high sensitivity of 95.56%, and 97.73%, specificity of 95.24, and 100%, and Kappa values of 0.89 and 0.95, respectively. This study revealed that Phoenix, and ComASPTM SensiTest colistin methods are recommended for routine microbiology laboratories with a large workload.

scholarly journals Comparison of Minocycline Susceptibility Testing Methods for Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (12) ◽  
pp. 2937-2941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Wang ◽  
Sarah L. Bowler ◽  
Serena F. Kantz ◽  
Roberta T. Mettus ◽  
Yan Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acinetobacter Baumannii ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Diffusion Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Testing Methods ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Minor Error ◽  
Carbapenem Resistant

Treatment options for infections due to carbapenem-resistantAcinetobacter baumanniiare extremely limited. Minocycline is a semisynthetic tetracycline derivative with activity against this pathogen. This study compared susceptibility testing methods that are used in clinical microbiology laboratories (Etest, disk diffusion, and Sensititre broth microdilution methods) for testing of minocycline, tigecycline, and doxycycline against 107 carbapenem-resistantA. baumanniiclinical isolates. Susceptibility rates determined with the standard broth microdilution method using cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton (MH) broth were 77.6% for minocycline and 29% for doxycycline, and 92.5% of isolates had tigecycline MICs of ≤2 μg/ml. Using MH agar from BD and Oxoid, susceptibility rates determined with the Etest method were 67.3% and 52.3% for minocycline, 21.5% and 18.7% for doxycycline, and 71% and 29.9% for tigecycline, respectively. With the disk diffusion method using MH agar from BD and Oxoid, susceptibility rates were 82.2% and 72.9% for minocycline and 34.6% and 34.6% for doxycycline, respectively, and rates of MICs of ≤2 μg/ml were 46.7% and 23.4% for tigecycline. In comparison with the standard broth microdilution results, very major rates were low (∼2.8%) for all three drugs across the methods, but major error rates were higher (∼5.6%), especially with the Etest method. For minocycline, minor error rates ranged from 14% to 37.4%. For tigecycline, minor error rates ranged from 6.5% to 69.2%. The majority of minor errors were due to susceptible results being reported as intermediate. For minocycline susceptibility testing of carbapenem-resistantA. baumanniistrains, very major errors are rare, but major and minor errors overcalling strains as intermediate or resistant occur frequently with susceptibility testing methods that are feasible in clinical laboratories.

scholarly journals Agreement Assessment of Tigecycline Susceptibilities Determined by the Disk Diffusion and Broth Microdilution Methods among Commonly Encountered Resistant Bacterial Isolates: Results from the TigecyclineIn VitroSurveillance in Taiwan (TIST) Study, 2008 to 2010

2011 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 1414-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jien-Wei Liu ◽  
Wen-Chien Ko ◽  
Cheng-Hua Huang ◽  
Chun-Hsing Liao ◽  
Chin-Te Lu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Total Error ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Resistant Bacteria ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Content Type ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Drug Resistant Bacteria

ABSTRACTThe TigecyclineIn VitroSurveillance in Taiwan (TIST) study, initiated in 2006, is a nationwide surveillance program designed to longitudinally monitor thein vitroactivity of tigecycline against commonly encountered drug-resistant bacteria. This study compared thein vitroactivity of tigecycline against 3,014 isolates of clinically important drug-resistant bacteria using the standard broth microdilution and disk diffusion methods. Species studied included methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA;n= 759), vancomycin-resistantEnterococcus faecium(VRE;n= 191), extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producingEscherichia coli(n= 602), ESBL-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae(n= 736), andAcinetobacter baumannii(n= 726) that had been collected from patients treated between 2008 and 2010 at 20 hospitals in Taiwan. MICs and inhibition zone diameters were interpreted according to the currently recommended U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) criteria and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) criteria. The MIC90values of tigecycline against MRSA, VRE, ESBL-producingE. coli, ESBL-producingK. pneumoniae, andA. baumanniiwere 0.5, 0.125, 0.5, 2, and 8 μg/ml, respectively. The total error rates between the two methods using the FDA criteria were high: 38.4% for ESBL-producingK. pneumoniaeand 33.8% forA. baumannii. Using the EUCAST criteria, the total error rate was also high (54.6%) forA. baumanniiisolates. The total error rates between these two methods were <5% for MRSA, VRE, and ESBL-producingE. coli. For routine susceptibility testing of ESBL-producingK. pneumoniaeandA. baumanniiagainst tigecycline, the broth microdilution method should be used because of the poor correlation of results between these two methods.

scholarly journals Variation in erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae by four test methods.

1997 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
E L Fasola ◽  
S Bajaksouzian ◽  
P C Appelbaum ◽  
M R Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Susceptibility Testing ◽  
Ambient Air ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
Disk Diffusion ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Microdilution Method ◽  
Broth Microdilution Method ◽  
Agar Dilution ◽  
Resistant Strains

Susceptibilities of 124 strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae to erythromycin and clindamycin were determined by the National Committee for the Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth microdilution method, with incubation for 20 to 24 h in ambient air and with modifications of this method by incubation for up to 48 h in air and CO2. Strains were also tested by agar dilution, E-test, and disk diffusion; good correlation was obtained with these methods, with clear separation into bimodal populations of susceptible and resistant stains. The broth microdilution method, however, using incubation in air for 24 h (NCCLS method), misclassified 4 of 92 erythromycin-resistant strains (1 as susceptible and 3 as intermediate) and 25 of 58 clindamycin-resistant strains (all as susceptible). With the exception of one strain with clindamycin, susceptible and resistant strains were correctly classified by the microdilution method with incubation in CO2 for 24 h or in ambient air for 48 h. Disk diffusion, agar dilution, and E-test methods with incubation in 5% CO2 are therefore reliable methods for susceptibility testing of pneumococci against these agents. However, the NCCLS microdilution method, which specifies incubation for 20 to 24 h in ambient air, produced significant very major errors (43%) clindamycin. Modification of the microdilution method by incubation in 5% CO2 or by extension of incubation time in ambient air to 48 h corrected these errors. Disk diffusion, however, was shown to be a simple, convenient, and reliable method for susceptibility testing of pneumococci to erythromycin and clindamycin and is suggested as the method of choice for these agents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document