scholarly journals Rubella Virus Capsid Associates with Host Cell Protein p32 and Localizes to Mitochondria

2000 ◽  
Vol 74 (12) ◽  
pp. 5569-5576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin D. Beatch ◽  
Tom C. Hobman
Keyword(s):  
Host Cell ◽  
Capsid Protein ◽  
Rubella Virus ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Virus Assembly ◽  
Cellular Protein ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Multiple Copies

ABSTRACT Togavirus nucleocapsids have a characteristic icosahedral structure and are composed of multiple copies of a capsid protein complexed with genomic RNA. The assembly of rubella virus nucleocapsids is unique among togaviruses in that the process occurs late in virus assembly and in association with intracellular membranes. The goal of this study was to identify host cell proteins which may be involved in regulating rubella virus nucleocapsid assembly through their interactions with the capsid protein. Capsid was used as bait to screen a CV1 cDNA library using the yeast two-hybrid system. One protein that interacted strongly with capsid was p32, a cellular protein which is known to interact with other viral proteins. The interaction between capsid and p32 was confirmed using a number of different in vitro and in vivo methods, and the site of interaction between these two proteins was shown to be at the mitochondria. Interestingly, overexpression of the rubella virus structural proteins resulted in clustering of the mitochondria in the perinuclear region. The p32-binding site in capsid is a potentially phosphorylated region that overlaps the viral RNA-binding domain of capsid. Our results are consistent with the possibility that the interaction of p32 with capsid plays a role in the regulation of nucleocapsid assembly and/or virus-host interactions.

scholarly journals Rubella Virus Capsid Protein Interacts with Poly(A)-Binding Protein and Inhibits Translation

2008 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 4284-4294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina S. Ilkow ◽  
Valeria Mancinelli ◽  
Martin D. Beatch ◽  
Tom C. Hobman
Keyword(s):  
Capsid Protein ◽  
Rubella Virus ◽  
Virus Assembly ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Protein Translation ◽  
Capsid Proteins ◽  
In Vitro Translation ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Translational Efficiency ◽  
Dependent Manner

ABSTRACT During virus assembly, the capsid proteins of RNA viruses bind to genomic RNA to form nucleocapsids. However, it is now evident that capsid proteins have additional functions that are unrelated to nucleocapsid formation. Specifically, their interactions with cellular proteins may influence signaling pathways or other events that affect virus replication. Here we report that the rubella virus (RV) capsid protein binds to poly(A)-binding protein (PABP), a host cell protein that enhances translational efficiency by circularizing mRNAs. Infection of cells with RV resulted in marked increases in the levels of PABP, much of which colocalized with capsid in the cytoplasm. Mapping studies revealed that capsid binds to the C-terminal half of PABP, which interestingly is the region that interacts with other translation regulators, including PABP-interacting protein 1 (Paip1) and Paip2. The addition of capsid to in vitro translation reaction mixtures inhibited protein synthesis in a dose-dependent manner; however, the capsid block was alleviated by excess PABP, indicating that inhibition of translation occurs through a stoichiometric mechanism. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a viral protein that inhibits protein translation by sequestration of PABP. We hypothesize that capsid-dependent inhibition of translation may facilitate the switch from viral translation to packaging RNA into nucleocapsids.

scholarly journals Biochemical Characterization of Rous Sarcoma Virus MA Protein Interaction with Membranes

2005 ◽  
Vol 79 (10) ◽  
pp. 6227-6238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda K. Dalton ◽  
Paul S. Murray ◽  
Diana Murray ◽  
Volker M. Vogt
Keyword(s):  
Host Cell ◽  
Rous Sarcoma Virus ◽  
Biochemical Characterization ◽  
Virus Assembly ◽  
Membrane Association ◽  
Host Cell Membrane ◽  
Rous Sarcoma ◽  
Sarcoma Virus

ABSTRACT The MA domain of retroviral Gag proteins mediates association with the host cell membrane during assembly. The biochemical nature of this interaction is not well understood. We have used an in vitro flotation assay to directly measure Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) MA-membrane interaction in the absence of host cell factors. The association of purified MA and MA-containing proteins with liposomes of defined composition was electrostatic in nature and depended upon the presence of a biologically relevant concentration of negatively charged lipids. A mutant MA protein known to be unable to promote Gag membrane association and budding in vivo failed to bind to liposomes. These results were supported by computational modeling. The intrinsic affinity of RSV MA for negatively charged membranes appears insufficient to promote efficient plasma membrane binding during assembly. However, an artificially dimerized form of MA bound to liposomes by at least an order of magnitude more tightly than monomeric MA. This result suggests that the clustering of MA domains, via Gag-Gag interactions during virus assembly, drives membrane association in vivo.

scholarly journals The Rubella Virus Capsid Protein Inhibits Mitochondrial Import

2009 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina S. Ilkow ◽  
Daniel Weckbecker ◽  
Woo Jung Cho ◽  
Stephan Meier ◽  
Martin D. Beatch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rubella Virus ◽  
Viral Protein ◽  
Matrix Protein ◽  
Protein Import ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Virus Assembly ◽  
Mammalian Mitochondria ◽  
Arginine Residues ◽  
Infected Cells

ABSTRACT The rubella virus (RV) capsid is an RNA-binding protein that functions in nucleocapsid assembly at the Golgi complex, the site of virus budding. In addition to its role in virus assembly, pools of capsid associate with mitochondria, a localization that is not consistent with virus assembly. Here we examined the interaction of capsid with mitochondria and showed that this viral protein inhibits the import and processing of mitochondrial precursor proteins in vitro. Moreover, RV-infected cells were found to contain lower intramitochondrial levels of matrix protein p32. In addition to inhibiting the translocation of substrates into mammalian mitochondria, capsid efficiently blocked import into yeast mitochondria, thereby suggesting that it acts by targeting a highly conserved component of the translocation apparatus. Finally, mutation of a cluster of five arginine residues in the amino terminus of capsid, though not interfering with its binding to mitochondria, abrogated its ability to block protein import into mitochondria. This is the first report of a viral protein that affects the import of proteins into mitochondria.

scholarly journals Methods Matter -- Standard Production Platforms for Recombinant AAV Produce Chemically and Functionally Distinct Vectors

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil G. Rumachik ◽  
Stacy A. Malaker ◽  
Nicole Poweleit ◽  
Lucy H. Maynard ◽  
Christopher M. Adams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Host Cell ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
Hek293 Cells ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Proteomic Profiling ◽  
Mouse Tissues ◽  
Baculovirus Infection ◽  
Analytical Approaches

Different manufacturing approaches have been used in the production of recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV). The two leading approaches are transiently transfected human HEK293 cells and live baculovirus infection of Sf9 insect cells. Unexplained differences in vector performance have been seen clinically and preclinically. Thus, we performed for the first time a highly controlled comparative production analysis varying only the host cell species but keeping all other rAAV production parameters the same. We demonstrate that host cell species is critical for determining vector potency. Given these key findings, we then sought to deeply characterize differences in rAAVs when produced by these two manufacturing platforms with multiple analytical approaches including: proteomic profiling by mass spectrometry, isoelectric focusing, cryo-EM, denaturation assays, genomic and epigenomic sequencing of packaged genomes, human cytokine profiling, and comparative functional transduction assessments in vitro and in vivo, including in humanized liver mice. Using these tools we’ve made two major discoveries: 1) rAAV capsids have post-translational modifications (PTMs) including glycosylation, acetylation, phosphorylation, methylation and deamidation, and these PTMs differ between platforms; 2) rAAV genomes are methylated during production, and these methylation marks are also differentially deposited between platforms. In addition, our data also demonstrate that host cell protein impurities differ between platforms and can have their own PTMs including potentially immunogenic N-linked glycans. We show that human-produced rAAVs are more potent than baculovirus-Sf9 vectors in various cell types in vitro (P < 0.05-0.0001), in various mouse tissues in vivo (P < 0.03-0.0001), and in human liver in vivo (P < 0.005). Collectively, our findings were reproducible across vendors, including commercial manufacturers, academic core facilities, and individual laboratory preparations. These vector differences may have clinical implications for rAAV receptor binding, trafficking, expression kinetics, expression durability, vector immunogenicity as well as cost considerations.

scholarly journals Multiple Myo4 motors enhance ASH1 mRNA transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2010 ◽  
Vol 189 (4) ◽  
pp. 755-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunglan Chung ◽  
Peter A. Takizawa
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Purification Method ◽  
Class V ◽  
Transport Unit ◽  
Multiple Copies ◽  
Ash1 Mrna ◽  
Localization Element

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ASH1 mRNA is transported to the bud tip by the class V myosin Myo4. In vivo, Myo4 moves RNA in a rapid and continuous fashion, but in vitro Myo4 is a nonprocessive, monomeric motor that forms a complex with She3. To understand how nonprocessive motors generate continuous transport, we used a novel purification method to show that Myo4, She3, and the RNA-binding protein She2 are the sole major components of an active ribonucleoprotein transport unit. We demonstrate that a single localization element contains multiple copies of Myo4 and a tetramer of She2, which suggests that She2 may recruit multiple motors to an RNA. Furthermore, we show that increasing the number of Myo4–She3 molecules bound to ASH1 RNA in the absence of She2 increases the efficiency of RNA transport to the bud. Our data suggest that multiple, nonprocessive Myo4 motors can generate continuous transport of mRNA to the bud tip.

scholarly journals Analyses of Phosphorylation Events in the Rubella Virus Capsid Protein: Role in Early Replication Events

2006 ◽  
Vol 80 (14) ◽  
pp. 6917-6925 ◽  
Author(s):  
LokMan J. Law ◽  
Carolina S. Ilkow ◽  
Wen-Pin Tzeng ◽  
Matthew Rawluk ◽  
David T. Stuart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Capsid Protein ◽  
Rubella Virus ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Virus Assembly ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Amino Acid Residues ◽  
Direct Role ◽  
Virus Capsid ◽  
Early Replication ◽  
Virus Capsid Protein

ABSTRACT The Rubella virus capsid protein is phosphorylated prior to virus assembly. Our previous data are consistent with a model in which dynamic phosphorylation of the capsid regulates its RNA binding activity and, in turn, nucleocapsid assembly. In the present study, the process of capsid phosphorylation was examined in further detail. We show that phosphorylation of serine 46 in the RNA binding region of the capsid is required to trigger phosphorylation of additional amino acid residues that include threonine 47. This residue likely plays a direct role in regulating the binding of genomic RNA to the capsid. We also provide evidence which suggests that the capsid is dephosphorylated prior to or during virus budding. Finally, whereas the phosphorylation state of the capsid does not directly influence the rate of synthesis of viral RNA and proteins or the assembly and secretion of virions, the presence of phosphate on the capsid is critical for early events in virus replication, most likely the uncoating of virions and/or disassembly of nucleocapsids.

scholarly journals The methyltransferase SETD2 couples transcription and splicing by engaging mRNA processing factors through its SHI domain

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Saikat Bhattacharya ◽  
Michaella J. Levy ◽  
Ning Zhang ◽  
Hua Li ◽  
Laurence Florens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Splicing ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Mrna Processing ◽  
Key Factors ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Mrna Transcripts ◽  
Hnrnp Protein ◽  
Processing Factors

AbstractHeterogeneous ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) are RNA binding molecules that are involved in key processes such as RNA splicing and transcription. One such hnRNP protein, hnRNP L, regulates alternative splicing (AS) by binding to pre-mRNA transcripts. However, it is unclear what factors contribute to hnRNP L-regulated AS events. Using proteomic approaches, we identified several key factors that co-purify with hnRNP L. We demonstrate that one such factor, the histone methyltransferase SETD2, specifically interacts with hnRNP L in vitro and in vivo. This interaction occurs through a previously uncharacterized domain in SETD2, the SETD2-hnRNP Interaction (SHI) domain, the deletion of which, leads to a reduced H3K36me3 deposition. Functionally, SETD2 regulates a subset of hnRNP L-targeted AS events. Our findings demonstrate that SETD2, by interacting with Pol II as well as hnRNP L, can mediate the crosstalk between the transcription and the splicing machinery.

scholarly journals Oncogenic lncRNA ZNF561-AS1 is essential for colorectal cancer proliferation and survival through regulation of miR-26a-3p/miR-128-5p-SRSF6 axis

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zizhen Si ◽  
Lei Yu ◽  
Haoyu Jing ◽  
Lun Wu ◽  
Xidi Wang
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Cancer Proliferation ◽  
Mouse Xenograft ◽  
Mouse Xenograft Model

Abstract Background Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) are reported to influence colorectal cancer (CRC) progression. Currently, the functions of the lncRNA ZNF561 antisense RNA 1 (ZNF561-AS1) in CRC are unknown. Methods ZNF561-AS1 and SRSF6 expression in CRC patient samples and CRC cell lines was evaluated through TCGA database analysis, western blot along with real-time PCR. SRSF6 expression in CRC cells was also examined upon ZNF561-AS1 depletion or overexpression. Interaction between miR-26a-3p, miR-128-5p, ZNF561-AS1, and SRSF6 was examined by dual luciferase reporter assay, as well as RNA binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) assay. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) mediated knockdown experiments were performed to assess the role of ZNF561-AS1 and SRSF6 in the proliferative actives and apoptosis rate of CRC cells. A mouse xenograft model was employed to assess tumor growth upon ZNF561-AS1 knockdown and SRSF6 rescue. Results We find that ZNF561-AS1 and SRSF6 were upregulated in CRC patient tissues. ZNF561-AS1 expression was reduced in tissues from treated CRC patients but upregulated in CRC tissues from relapsed patients. SRSF6 expression was suppressed and enhanced by ZNF561-AS1 depletion and overexpression, respectively. Mechanistically, ZNF561-AS1 regulated SRSF6 expression by sponging miR-26a-3p and miR-128-5p. ZNF561-AS1-miR-26a-3p/miR-128-5p-SRSF6 axis was required for CRC proliferation and survival. ZNF561-AS1 knockdown suppressed CRC cell proliferation and triggered apoptosis. ZNF561-AS1 depletion suppressed the growth of tumors in a model of a nude mouse xenograft. Similar observations were made upon SRSF6 depletion. SRSF6 overexpression reversed the inhibitory activities of ZNF561-AS1 in vivo, as well as in vitro. Conclusion In summary, we find that ZNF561-AS1 promotes CRC progression via the miR-26a-3p/miR-128-5p-SRSF6 axis. This study reveals new perspectives into the role of ZNF561-AS1 in CRC.

scholarly journals RNA-Centric Approaches to Profile the RNA–Protein Interaction Landscape on Selected RNAs

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
André P. Gerber
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Regulatory Networks ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Cell Protein ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory Networks ◽  
Technological Advances

RNA–protein interactions frame post-transcriptional regulatory networks and modulate transcription and epigenetics. While the technological advances in RNA sequencing have significantly expanded the repertoire of RNAs, recently developed biochemical approaches combined with sensitive mass-spectrometry have revealed hundreds of previously unrecognized and potentially novel RNA-binding proteins. Nevertheless, a major challenge remains to understand how the thousands of RNA molecules and their interacting proteins assemble and control the fate of each individual RNA in a cell. Here, I review recent methodological advances to approach this problem through systematic identification of proteins that interact with particular RNAs in living cells. Thereby, a specific focus is given to in vivo approaches that involve crosslinking of RNA–protein interactions through ultraviolet irradiation or treatment of cells with chemicals, followed by capture of the RNA under study with antisense-oligonucleotides and identification of bound proteins with mass-spectrometry. Several recent studies defining interactomes of long non-coding RNAs, viral RNAs, as well as mRNAs are highlighted, and short reference is given to recent in-cell protein labeling techniques. These recent experimental improvements could open the door for broader applications and to study the remodeling of RNA–protein complexes upon different environmental cues and in disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document