scholarly journals Physical and functional sensitivity of zinc finger transcription factors to redox change.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1035-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
X Wu ◽  
N H Bishopric ◽  
D J Discher ◽  
B J Murphy ◽  
K A Webster
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Redox Regulation ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Thiol Groups ◽  
Protein Thiol

Redox regulation of DNA-binding proteins through the reversible oxidation of key cysteine sulfhydryl groups has been demonstrated to occur in vitro for a range of transcription factors. The direct redox regulation of DNA binding has not been described in vivo, possibly because most protein thiol groups are strongly buffered against oxidation by the highly reduced intracellular environment mediated by glutathione, thioredoxin, and associated pathways. For this reason, only accessible protein thiol groups with high thiol-disulfide oxidation potentials are likely to be responsive to intracellular redox changes. In this article, we demonstrate that zinc finger DNA-binding proteins, in particular members of the Sp-1 family, appear to contain such redox-sensitive -SH groups. These proteins displayed a higher sensitivity to redox regulation than other redox-responsive factors both in vitro and in vivo. This effect was reflected in the hyperoxidative repression of transcription from promoters with essential Sp-1 binding sites, including the simian virus 40 early region, glycolytic enzyme, and dihydrofolate reductase genes. Promoter analyses implicated the Sp-1 sites in this repression. Non-Sp-1-dependent redox-regulated genes including metallothionein and heme oxygenase were induced by the same hyperoxic stress. The studies demonstrate that cellular redox changes can directly regulate gene expression in vivo by determining the level of occupancy of strategically positioned GC-binding sites.

scholarly journals Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1405-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
C C Adams ◽  
J L Workman
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Nf Kappa B ◽  
Nucleosomal Dna ◽  
Nucleosome Binding

To investigate mechanisms by which multiple transcription factors access complex promoters and enhancers within cellular chromatin, we have analyzed the binding of disparate factors to nucleosome cores. We used a purified in vitro system to analyze binding of four activator proteins, two GAL4 derivatives, USF, and NF-kappa B (KBF1), to reconstituted nucleosome cores containing different combinations of binding sites. Here we show that binding of any two or all three of these factors to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Thus, the binuclear Zn clusters of GAL4, the helix-loop-helix/basic domains of USF, and the rel domain of NF-kappa B all participated in cooperative nucleosome binding, illustrating that this effect is not restricted to a particular DNA-binding domain. Simultaneous binding by two factors increased the affinity of individual factors for nucleosomal DNA by up to 2 orders of magnitude. Importantly, cooperative binding resulted in efficient nucleosome binding by factors (USF and NF-kappa B) which independently possess little nucleosome-binding ability. The participation of GAL4 derivatives in cooperative nucleosome binding required only DNA-binding and dimerization domains, indicating that disruption of histone-DNA contacts by factor binding was responsible for the increased affinity of additional factors. Cooperative nucleosome binding required sequence-specific binding of all transcription factors, appeared to have spatial constraints, and was independent of the orientation of the binding sites on the nucleosome. These results indicate that cooperative nucleosome binding is a general mechanism that may play a significant role in loading complex enhancer and promoter elements with multiple diverse factors in chromatin and contribute to the generation of threshold responses and transcriptional synergy by multiple activator sites in vivo.

scholarly journals Zinc finger protein ZNF384 is an adaptor of Ku to DNA during classical non-homologous end-joining

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenny Kaur Singh ◽  
Rebecca Smith ◽  
Magdalena B. Rother ◽  
Anton J. L. de Groot ◽  
Wouter W. Wiegant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Zinc Finger Protein ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining

AbstractDNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most deleterious types of DNA damage as they can lead to mutations and chromosomal rearrangements, which underlie cancer development. Classical non-homologous end-joining (cNHEJ) is the dominant pathway for DSB repair in human cells, involving the DNA-binding proteins XRCC6 (Ku70) and XRCC5 (Ku80). Other DNA-binding proteins such as Zinc Finger (ZnF) domain-containing proteins have also been implicated in DNA repair, but their role in cNHEJ remained elusive. Here we show that ZNF384, a member of the C2H2 family of ZnF proteins, binds DNA ends in vitro and is recruited to DSBs in vivo. ZNF384 recruitment requires the poly(ADP-ribosyl) polymerase 1 (PARP1)-dependent expansion of damaged chromatin, followed by binding of its C2H2 motifs to the exposed DNA. Moreover, ZNF384 interacts with Ku70/Ku80 via its N-terminus, thereby promoting Ku70/Ku80 assembly and the accrual of downstream cNHEJ factors, including APLF and XRCC4/LIG4, for efficient repair at DSBs. Altogether, our data suggest that ZNF384 acts as a ‘Ku-adaptor’ that binds damaged DNA and Ku70/Ku80 to facilitate the build-up of a cNHEJ repairosome, highlighting a role for ZNF384 in DSB repair and genome maintenance.

scholarly journals Cysteine 64 of Ref-1 Is Not Essential for Redox Regulation of AP-1 DNA Binding

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 4257-4266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared M. Ordway ◽  
Derek Eberhart ◽  
Tom Curran
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Redox Regulation ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
Reducing Activity

ABSTRACT Ref-1 participates in DNA repair as well as in redox regulation of transcription factor function. The redox function of Ref-1 involves reduction of oxidized cysteine residues within the DNA binding domains of several transcription factors, including Fos and Jun. Reduction of these residues is required for DNA binding, providing a redox-dependent mechanism for regulation of target gene expression. Previous in vitro studies implicated cysteine 65 of human Ref-1 (cysteine 64 of mouse Ref-1) as the redox catalytic site. We analyzed the in vivo role of cysteine 64 in redox regulation of AP-1 activity by introducing a cysteine-to-alanine point mutation into the endogenous mouse Ref-1 gene (ref-1 C64A). Unlike Ref-1 null mice, which die very early in embryonic development, homozygous ref-1 C64A mice are viable, they survive to normal life expectancy, and they display no overt abnormal phenotype. Although Ref-1 provides the major AP-1-reducing activity in murine cells, ref-1 C64A cells retain normal levels of endogenous AP-1 DNA binding activity in vivo as well as normal Fos- and Jun-reducing activity in vitro. These results demonstrate that Ref-1 cysteine 64/65 is not required for redox regulation of AP-1 DNA binding in vivo, and they challenge previous hypotheses regarding the mechanism by which Ref-1 regulates the redox-dependent activity of specific transcription factors.

A feel for the template: zinc finger protein transcription factors and chromatin

2002 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fyodor D Urnov
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Zinc Finger Protein ◽  
Finger Protein ◽  
Cell Biol

Transcription factors and chromatin collaborate in bringing the eukaryotic genome to life. An important, and poorly understood, aspect of this collaboration involves targeting the regulators to correct binding sites in vivo. An implicit and insufficiently tested assumption in the field has been that chromatin simply obstructs most sites and leaves only a few functionally relevant ones accessible. The major class of transcription factors in all metazoa, zinc finger proteins (ZFPs), can bind to chromatin in vitro (as clearly shown for Sp1, GATA-1 and -4, and the nuclear hormone receptors, for example). Data on the accessibility of DNA within heterochromatin to nonhistone regulators (E.A. Sekinger and D.S. Gross. 2001. Mol. Cell 105: 403–414; C. Jolly et al. 2002. J. Cell. Biol. 156: 775–781) and the ability of the basal transcription machinery to reside within highly condensed chromatin (most recently, R. Christova and T. Oelgeschlaeger. 2002. Nat. Cell Biol. 4: 79–82) further weaken the argument that chromatin acts as an across-the-board deterrent to ZFP binding. These proteins, however, do not bind promiscuously in vivo, and recent data on human cells (C.E. Horak et al. 2002. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99: 2924–2929) confirm earlier data on budding yeast (B. Ren et al. 2000. Science (Washington, D.C.), 290: 2306–2309) that primary DNA sequence, i.e., density of binding sites per unit DNA length, is not the primary determinant of where a ZFP transcription factor will bind in vivo. This article reviews these data and uses ZFP transcription factors as a model system to compare in vitro binding to chromatin by transcription factors with their in vivo behavior in gene regulation. DNA binding domain structure, nonrandom nucleoprotein organization of chromatin at target promoters, and cooperativity of regulator action may all contribute to target site selection in vivo.Key words: zinc finger protein, chromatin, transcriptional control, nucleosome.

scholarly journals The closely related Drosophila sry beta and sry delta zinc finger proteins show differential embryonic expression and distinct patterns of binding sites on polytene chromosomes

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Payre ◽  
S. Noselli ◽  
V. Lefrere ◽  
A. Vincent
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Polytene Chromosomes ◽  
Duplication Event ◽  
Amino Acid Sequences ◽  
Evolutionary Divergence ◽  
Coding Region ◽  
Protein Coding

Serendipity (sry) beta (beta) and delta (delta) are two finger protein genes resulting from a duplication event. Comparison of their respective protein products shows interspersed blocks of conserved and divergent amino-acid sequences. The most extensively conserved region corresponds to the predicted DNA-binding domain which includes 6 contiguous fingers; no significant sequence conservation is found upstream and downstream of the protein-coding region. We have analysed the evolutionary divergence of the sry beta and delta proteins on two separate levels, their embryonic pattern of expression and their DNA-binding properties in vitro and in vivo. By using specific antibodies and transformant lines containing beta-galactosidase fusion genes, we show that the sry beta and sry delta proteins are maternally inherited and present in embryonic nuclei at the onset of zygotic transcription, suggesting that they are transcription factors involved in this process. Zygotic synthesis of the sry beta protein starts during nuclear division cycles 12–13, prior to cellularisation of the blastoderm, while the zygotic sry delta protein is not detectable before germ band extension (stage 10 embryos). Contrary to sry delta, the zygotic sry beta protein constitutes only a minor fraction of the total embryonic protein. The sry beta and delta proteins made in E. coli bind to DNA, with partly overlapping specificities. Their in vivo patterns of binding to DNA, visualised by immunostaining polytene chromosomes, differ both in the number and position of their binding sites. Thus changes in expression pattern and DNA-binding specificity have contributed to the evolution of the sry beta and delta genes.

scholarly journals Residues in the Swi5 Zinc Finger Protein That Mediate Cooperative DNA Binding with the Pho2 Homeodomain Protein

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (11) ◽  
pp. 6436-6446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leena T. Bhoite ◽  
David J. Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Zinc Finger Protein ◽  
Interaction Analysis ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Two Hybrid

ABSTRACT The Swi5 zinc finger and the Pho2 homeodomain DNA-binding proteins bind cooperatively to the HO promoter.Pho2 (also known as Bas2 or Grf10) activates transcription of diverse genes, acting with multiple distinct DNA-binding proteins. We have performed a genetic screen to identify amino acid residues in Swi5 that are required for synergistic transcriptional activation of a reporter construct in vivo. Nine unique amino acid substitutions within a 24-amino-acid region of Swi5, upstream of the DNA-binding domain, reduce expression of promoters that require both Swi5 and Pho2 for activation. In vitro DNA binding experiments show that the mutant Swi5 proteins bind DNA normally, but some mutant Swi5 proteins (resulting from SWI5* mutations) show reduced cooperative DNA binding with Pho2. In vivo experiments show that these SWI5* mutations sharply reduce expression of promoters that require both SWI5 and PHO2, while expression of promoters that require SWI5 but arePHO2 independent is largely unaffected. This suggests that these SWI5* mutations do not affect the ability of Swi5 to bind DNA or activate transcription but specifically affect the region of Swi5 required for interaction with Pho2. Two-hybrid experiments show that amino acids 471 to 513 of Swi5 are necessary and sufficient for interaction with Pho2 and that the SWI5* point mutations cause a severe reduction in this two-hybrid interaction. Analysis of promoter activation by these mutants suggests that this small region of Swi5 has at least two distinct functions, conferring specificity for activation of the HO promoter and for interaction with Pho2.

scholarly journals Differential Contribution of N- and C-Terminal Regions of HIF1α and HIF2α to Their Target Gene Selectivity

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 9401
Author(s):  
Antonio Bouthelier ◽  
Florinda Meléndez-Rodríguez ◽  
Andrés A. Urrutia ◽  
Julián Aragonés
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Transactivation Domain ◽  
Transactivation Domains ◽  
Relative Contribution

Cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF1α and HIF2α. Some genes are preferentially induced by HIF1α or HIF2α, as has been explored in some cell models and for particular sets of genes. Here we have extended this analysis to other HIF-dependent genes using in vitro WT8 renal carcinoma cells and in vivo conditional Vhl-deficient mice models. Moreover, we generated chimeric HIF1/2 transcription factors to study the contribution of the HIF1α and HIF2α DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains to HIF target specificity. We show that the induction of HIF1α-dependent genes in WT8 cells, such as CAIX (CAR9) and BNIP3, requires both halves of HIF, whereas the HIF2α transactivation domain is more relevant for the induction of HIF2 target genes like the amino acid carrier SLC7A5. The HIF selectivity for some genes in WT8 cells is conserved in Vhl-deficient lung and liver tissue, whereas other genes like Glut1 (Slc2a1) behave distinctly in these tissues. Therefore the relative contribution of the DNA binding/heterodimerization and transactivation domains for HIF target selectivity can be different when comparing HIF1α or HIF2α isoforms, and that HIF target gene specificity is conserved in human and mouse cells for some of the genes analyzed.

scholarly journals Genomic targeting of epigenetic probes using a chemically tailored Cas9 system

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 681-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Glen P. Liszczak ◽  
Zachary Z. Brown ◽  
Samuel H. Kim ◽  
Rob C. Oslund ◽  
Yael David ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Chemical Synthesis ◽  
Small Molecules ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Dna Binding Protein ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Live Cells ◽  
Binding Partners

Recent advances in the field of programmable DNA-binding proteins have led to the development of facile methods for genomic localization of genetically encodable entities. Despite the extensive utility of these tools, locus-specific delivery of synthetic molecules remains limited by a lack of adequate technologies. Here we combine the flexibility of chemical synthesis with the specificity of a programmable DNA-binding protein by using protein trans-splicing to ligate synthetic elements to a nuclease-deficient Cas9 (dCas9) in vitro and subsequently deliver the dCas9 cargo to live cells. The versatility of this technology is demonstrated by delivering dCas9 fusions that include either the small-molecule bromodomain and extra-terminal family bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 or a peptide-based PRC1 chromodomain ligand, which are capable of recruiting endogenous copies of their cognate binding partners to targeted genomic binding sites. We expect that this technology will allow for the genomic localization of a wide array of small molecules and modified proteinaceous materials.

scholarly journals Binding of Gal4p and Bicoid to Nucleosomal Sites in Yeast in the Absence of Replication

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 2977-2985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhuvana Balasubramanian ◽  
Randall H. Morse
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Transcriptional Activator ◽  
Nucleosome Positioning ◽  
Living Cells ◽  
Intracellular Environment ◽  
Nucleosomal Dna

ABSTRACT The yeast transcriptional activator Gal4p can bind to sites in nucleosomal DNA in vivo which it is unable to access in vitro. One event which could allow proteins to bind to otherwise inaccessible sites in chromatin in living cells is DNA replication. To determine whether replication is required for Gal4p to bind to nucleosomal sites in yeast, we have used previously characterized chromatin reporters in which Gal4p binding sites are incorporated into nucleosomes. We find that Gal4p is able to perturb nucleosome positioning via nucleosomal binding sites in yeast arrested either in G1, with α-factor, or in G2/M, with nocodazole. Similar results were obtained whether Gal4p synthesis was induced from the endogenous promoter by growth in galactose medium or by an artificial, hormone-inducible system. We also examined binding of theDrosophila transcriptional activator Bicoid, which belongs to the homeodomain class of transcription factors. We show that Bicoid, like Gal4p, can bind to nucleosomal sites inSWI + and swi1Δ yeast and in the absence of replication. Our results indicate that some feature of the intracellular environment other than DNA replication or the SWI-SNF complex permits factor access to nucleosomal sites.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document