scholarly journals The CCR4 and CAF1 Proteins of the CCR4-NOT Complex Are Physically and Functionally Separated from NOT2, NOT4, and NOT5

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 6642-6651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongli Bai ◽  
Christopher Salvadore ◽  
Yueh-Chin Chiang ◽  
Martine A. Collart ◽  
Hai-Yan Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Genetic Interactions ◽  
Physical Separation ◽  
Amino Acid Region ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Holoenzyme ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Acid Region

ABSTRACT The CCR4-NOT complex (1 mDa in size), consisting of the proteins CCR4, CAF1, and NOT1 to NOT5, regulates gene expression both positively and negatively and is distinct from other large transcriptional complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae such as SNF/SWI, TFIID, SAGA, and RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. The physical and genetic interactions between the components of the CCR4-NOT complex were investigated in order to gain insight into how this complex affects the expression of diverse genes and processes. The CAF1 protein was found to be absolutely required for CCR4 association with the NOT proteins, and CCR4 and CAF1, in turn, physically interacted with NOT1 through its central amino acid region from positions 667 to 1152. The NOT3, NOT4, and NOT5 proteins had no significant effect on the association of CCR4, CAF1, and NOT1 with each other. In contrast, the NOT2, NOT4, and NOT5 interacted with the C-terminal region (residues 1490 to 2108) of NOT1 in which NOT2 and NOT5 physically associated in the absence of CAF1, NOT3, and NOT4. These and other data indicate that the physical ordering of these proteins in the complex is CCR4-CAF1-NOT1-(NOT2, NOT5), with NOT4 and NOT3 more peripheral to NOT2 and NOT5. The physical separation of CCR4 and CAF1 from other components of the CCR4-NOT complex correlated with genetic analysis indicating partially separate functions for these two groups of proteins. ccr4or caf1 deletion suppressed the increased 3-aminotriazole resistance phenotype conferred by not mutations, resulted in opposite effects on gene expression as compared to severalnot mutations, and resulted in a number of synthetic phenotypes in combination with not mutations. These results define the CCR4-NOT complex as consisting of at least two physically and functionally separated groups of proteins.

scholarly journals Amino Acid Differences in the 1753-to-1851 Region of TcdB Influence Variations in TcdB1 and TcdB2 Cell Entry

mSphere ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan J. Hunt ◽  
Jason L. Larabee ◽  
Jimmy D. Ballard
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Cell Entry ◽  
Cell Binding ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Amino Acid Region ◽  
Antibiotic Associated Diarrhea ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Acid Region

ABSTRACT TcdB is a major virulence factor produced by Clostridium difficile, a leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Hypervirulent strains of C. difficile encode a variant of TcdB (TcdB2) that is more toxic than toxin derived from historical strains (TcdB1). Though TcdB1 and TcdB2 exhibit 92% overall identity, a 99-amino-acid region previously associated with cell entry and spanning amino acids 1753 to 1851 has only 77% sequence identity. Results from the present study indicate that the substantial sequence variation in this region could contribute to the differences in cell entry between TcdB1 and TcdB2 and possibly explain TcdB2’s heightened toxicity. Finally, during the course of these studies, an unusual aspect of TcdB cell entry was discovered wherein cell binding appeared to depend on endocytosis. These findings provide insight into TcdB’s variant forms and their mechanisms of cell entry. Clostridium difficile TcdB2 enters cells with a higher efficiency than TcdB1 and exhibits an overall higher level of toxicity. However, the TcdB2-specific sequences that account for more efficient cell entry have not been reported. In this study, we examined the contribution of carboxy-terminal sequence differences to TcdB activity by comparing the binding, uptake, and endosomal localization of TcdB1 and TcdB2 or selected recombinant fragments of these proteins. Our findings suggest that sequence differences in the amino acid 1753 to 1851 region proximal to the combined repetitive oligopeptide domain (CROP) support enhanced uptake of TcdB2 and localization of toxin in acidified endosomes. In the absence of this region, the CROP domains of both forms of the toxin exhibited similar levels of cell interaction, while the addition of amino acids 1753 to 1851 greatly increased toxin binding by only TcdB2. Moreover, the amino acid 1753 to 2366 fragment of TcdB2, but not TcdB1, accumulated to detectable levels in acidified endosomes. Unexpectedly, we discovered an unusual relationship between endocytosis and the efficiency of cell binding for TcdB1 and TcdB2 wherein inhibition of endocytosis by a chemical inhibitor or incubation at a low temperature resulted in a dramatic reduction in cell binding. These findings provide information on sequence variations that may contribute to differences in TcdB1 and TcdB2 toxicity and reveal a heretofore unknown connection between endocytosis and cell binding for this toxin. IMPORTANCE TcdB is a major virulence factor produced by Clostridium difficile, a leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Hypervirulent strains of C. difficile encode a variant of TcdB (TcdB2) that is more toxic than toxin derived from historical strains (TcdB1). Though TcdB1 and TcdB2 exhibit 92% overall identity, a 99-amino-acid region previously associated with cell entry and spanning amino acids 1753 to 1851 has only 77% sequence identity. Results from the present study indicate that the substantial sequence variation in this region could contribute to the differences in cell entry between TcdB1 and TcdB2 and possibly explain TcdB2’s heightened toxicity. Finally, during the course of these studies, an unusual aspect of TcdB cell entry was discovered wherein cell binding appeared to depend on endocytosis. These findings provide insight into TcdB’s variant forms and their mechanisms of cell entry.

scholarly journals The rye Mutants Identify a Role for Ssn/Srb Proteins of the RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme During Stationary Phase Entry in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 157 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Wen Chang ◽  
Susie C Howard ◽  
Yelena V Budovskaya ◽  
Jasper Rine ◽  
Paul K Herman
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Stationary Phase ◽  
Yeast Cell ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Transcriptional Response ◽  
Nutrient Deprivation ◽  
Ras Signaling ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii Holoenzyme

Abstract Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells enter into a distinct resting state, known as stationary phase, in response to specific types of nutrient deprivation. We have identified a collection of mutants that exhibited a defective transcriptional response to nutrient limitation and failed to enter into a normal stationary phase. These rye mutants were isolated on the basis of defects in the regulation of YGP1 expression. In wild-type cells, YGP1 levels increased during the growth arrest caused by nutrient deprivation or inactivation of the Ras signaling pathway. In contrast, the levels of YGP1 and related genes were significantly elevated in the rye mutants during log phase growth. The rye defects were not specific to this YGP1 response as these mutants also exhibited multiple defects in stationary phase properties, including an inability to survive periods of prolonged starvation. These data indicated that the RYE genes might encode important regulators of yeast cell growth. Interestingly, three of the RYE genes encoded the Ssn/Srb proteins, Srb9p, Srb10p, and Srb11p, which are associated with the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme. Thus, the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme may be a target of the signaling pathways responsible for coordinating yeast cell growth with nutrient availability.

Association of RAP1 binding sites with stringent control of ribosomal protein gene transcription in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2723-2735 ◽  
Author(s):  
C M Moehle ◽  
A G Hinnebusch
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Ribosomal Protein ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Protein Gene ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Gene ◽  
Ribosomal Protein Genes ◽  
Biosynthetic Genes ◽  
Stringent Control

An amino acid limitation in bacteria elicits a global response, called stringent control, that leads to reduced synthesis of rRNA and ribosomal proteins and increased expression of amino acid biosynthetic operons. We have used the antimetabolite 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole to cause histidine limitation as a means to elicit the stringent response in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fusions of the yeast ribosomal protein genes RPL16A, CRY1, RPS16A, and RPL25 with the Escherichia coli lacZ gene were used to show that the expression of these genes is reduced by a factor of 2 to 5 during histidine-limited exponential growth and that this regulation occurs at the level of transcription. Stringent regulation of the four yeast ribosomal protein genes was shown to be associated with a nucleotide sequence, known as the UASrpg (upstream activating sequence for ribosomal protein genes), that binds the transcriptional regulatory protein RAP1. The RAP1 binding sites also appeared to mediate the greater ribosomal protein gene expression observed in cells growing exponentially than in cells in stationary phase. Although expression of the ribosomal protein genes was reduced in response to histidine limitation, the level of RAP1 DNA-binding activity in cell extracts was unaffected. Yeast strains bearing a mutation in any one of the genes GCN1 to GCN4 are defective in derepression of amino acid biosynthetic genes in 10 different pathways under conditions of histidine limitation. These Gcn- mutants showed wild-type regulation of ribosomal protein gene expression, which suggests that separate regulatory pathways exist in S. cerevisiae for the derepression of amino acid biosynthetic genes and the repression of ribosomal protein genes in response to amino acid starvation.

scholarly journals Role of IME1 expression in regulation of meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 6103-6113 ◽  
Author(s):  
H E Smith ◽  
S S Su ◽  
L Neigeborn ◽  
S E Driscoll ◽  
A P Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Alpha Cells ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Gal1 Promoter ◽  
Acid Protein

Two signals are required for meiosis and spore formation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: starvation and the MAT products a1 and alpha 2, which determine the a/alpha cell type. These signals lead to increased expression of the IME1 (inducer of meiosis) gene, which is required for sporulation and sporulation-specific gene expression. We report here the sequence of the IME1 gene and the consequences of IME1 expression from the GAL1 promoter. The deduced IME1 product is a 360-amino-acid protein with a tyrosine-rich C-terminal region. Expression of PGAL1-IME1 in vegetative a/alpha cells led to moderate accumulation of four early sporulation-specific transcripts (IME2, SPO11, SPO13, and HOP1); the transcripts accumulated 3- to 10-fold more after starvation. Two sporulation-specific transcripts normally expressed later (SPS1 and SPS2) did not accumulate until PGAL1-IME1 strains were starved, and the intact IME1 gene was not activated by PGAL1-IME1 expression. In a or alpha cells, which lack alpha 2 or a1, expression of PGAL1-IME1 led to the same pattern of IME2 and SPO13 expression as in a/alpha cells, as measured with ime2::lacZ and spo13::lacZ fusions. Thus, in wild-type strains, the increased expression of IME1 in starved a/alpha cells can account entirely for cell type control, but only partially for nutritional control, of early sporulation-specific gene expression. PGAL1-IME1 expression did not cause growing cells to sporulate but permitted efficient sporulation of amino acid-limited cells, which otherwise sporulated poorly. We suggest that IME1 acts primarily as a positive regulator of early sporulation-specific genes and that growth arrest is an independent prerequisite for execution of the sporulation program.

scholarly journals A Carboxy-Terminal 16-Amino-Acid Region of ς38 ofEscherichia coli Is Important for Transcription under High-Salt Conditions and Sigma Activities In Vivo

2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (16) ◽  
pp. 4628-4631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mio Ohnuma ◽  
Nobuyuki Fujita ◽  
Akira Ishihama ◽  
Kan Tanaka ◽  
Hideo Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acid ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
High Potassium ◽  
Transcription Analysis ◽  
Amino Acid Region ◽  
Sigma Subunit ◽  
Carboxy Terminal ◽  
Acid Region

ABSTRACT ς38 (or ςS, the rpoS gene product) is a sigma subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli and directs transcription from a number of stationary-phase promoters as well as osmotically inducible promoters. In this study, we analyzed the function of the carboxy-terminal 16-amino-acid region of ς38 (residues 315 to 330), which is well conserved among the rpoS gene products of enteric bacterial species. Truncation of this region was shown to result in the loss of sigma activity in vivo using promoter-lacZ fusion constructs, but the mutant ς38 retained the binding activity in vivo to the core enzyme. The in vitro transcription analysis revealed that the transcription activity of ς38 holoenzyme under high potassium glutamate concentrations was significantly decreased by the truncation of the carboxy-terminal tail element.

scholarly journals Genome-Wide Relationships between TAF1 and Histone Acetyltransferases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 2791-2802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Durant ◽  
B. Franklin Pugh
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferases ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
Acetylated Histone H4

ABSTRACT Histone acetylation regulates gene expression, yet the functional contributions of the numerous histone acetyltransferases (HATs) to gene expression and their relationships with each other remain largely unexplored. The central role of the putative HAT-containing TAF1 subunit of TFIID in gene expression raises the fundamental question as to what extent, if any, TAF1 contributes to acetylation in vivo and to what extent it is redundant with other HATs. Our findings herein do not support the basic tenet that TAF1 is a major HAT in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, nor do we find that TAF1 is functionally redundant with other HATs, including Gcn5, Elp3, Hat1, Hpa2, Sas3, and Esa1, which is in contrast to previous conclusions regarding Gcn5. Our findings do reveal that of these HATs, only Gcn5 and Esa1 contribute substantially to gene expression genome wide. Interestingly, histone acetylation at promoter regions throughout the genome does not require TAF1 or RNA polymerase II, indicating that most acetylation is likely to precede transcription and not depend upon it. TAF1 function has been linked to Bdf1, which binds TFIID and acetylated histone H4 tails, but no linkage between TAF1 and the H4 HAT Esa1 has been established. Here, we present evidence for such a linkage through Bdf1.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document