scholarly journals Targeted Histone Acetylation at the Yeast CUP1 Promoter Requires the Transcriptional Activator, the TATA Boxes, and the Putative Histone Acetylase Encoded by SPT10

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (18) ◽  
pp. 6406-6416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang-Hui Shen ◽  
Benoit P. Leblanc ◽  
Carolyn Neal ◽  
Ramin Akhavan ◽  
David J. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Transcriptional Activator ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Core Promoters ◽  
High Copper ◽  
Chromatin Activation ◽  
H3 Acetylation ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Cup1 Promoter

ABSTRACT The relationship between chromatin remodeling and histone acetylation at the yeast CUP1 gene was addressed. CUP1 encodes a metallothionein required for cell growth at high copper concentrations. Induction of CUP1 with copper resulted in targeted acetylation of both H3 and H4 at the CUP1 promoter. Nucleosomes containing upstream activating sequences and sequences farther upstream were the targets for H3 acetylation. Targeted acetylation of H3 and H4 required the transcriptional activator (Ace1p) and the TATA boxes, suggesting that targeted acetylation occurs when TATA-binding protein binds to the TATA box or at a later stage in initiation. We have shown previously that induction results in nucleosome repositioning over the entire CUP1 gene, which requires Ace1p but not the TATA boxes. Therefore, the movement of nucleosomes occurring on CUP1 induction is independent of targeted acetylation. Targeted acetylation of both H3 and H4 also required the product of the SPT10 gene, which encodes a putative histone acetylase implicated in regulation at core promoters. Disruption of SPT10 was lethal at high copper concentrations and correlated with slower induction and reduced maximum levels of CUP1 mRNA. These observations constitute evidence for a novel mechanism of chromatin activation at CUP1, with a major role for the TATA box.

Co-dependent recruitment of Ino80p and Snf2p is required for yeast CUP1 activation

2014 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roshini N. Wimalarathna ◽  
Po Yun Pan ◽  
Chang-Hui Shen
Keyword(s):  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Copper Toxicity ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Chromatin Remodelers ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Cup1 Promoter

In yeast, Ace1p-dependent induction of CUP1 is responsible for protecting cells from copper toxicity. Although the mechanism of yeast CUP1 induction has been studied intensively, it is still uncertain which chromatin remodelers are involved in CUP1 transcriptional activation. Here, we show that yeast cells are inviable in the presence of copper when either chromatin remodeler, Ino80p or Snf2p, is not present. This inviability is due to the lack of CUP1 expression in ino80Δ and snf2Δ cells. Subsequently, we observe that both Ino80p and Snf2p are present at the promoter and they are responsible for recruiting chromatin remodeling activity to the CUP1 promoter under induced conditions. These results suggest that they directly participate in CUP1 transcriptional activation. Furthermore, the codependent recruitment of both INO80 and SWI/SNF depends on the presence of the transcriptional activator, Ace1p. We also demonstrate that both remodelers are required to recruit RNA polymerase II and targeted histone acetylation, indicating that remodelers are recruited to the CUP1 promoter before RNA polymerase II and histone acetylases. These observations provide evidence for the mechanism of CUP1 induction. As such, we propose a model that describes novel insight into the order of events in CUP1 activation.

scholarly journals β-Globin Intergenic Transcription and Histone Acetylation Dependent on an Enhancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2980-2986 ◽  
Author(s):  
AeRi Kim ◽  
Hui Zhao ◽  
Ina Ifrim ◽  
Ann Dean
Keyword(s):  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Target Gene ◽  
Globin Gene ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Rna Pol Ii ◽  
Pol Ii ◽  
Transcription Complexes ◽  
And Function ◽  
H3 Acetylation

ABSTRACT Histone acetyltransferases are associated with the elongating RNA polymerase II (Pol II) complex, supporting the idea that histone acetylation and transcription are intertwined mechanistically in gene coding sequences. Here, we studied the establishment and function of histone acetylation and transcription in noncoding sequences by using a model locus linking the β-globin HS2 enhancer and the embryonic ε-globin gene in chromatin. An intact HS2 enhancer that recruits RNA Pol II is required for intergenic transcription and histone H3 acetylation and K4 methylation between the enhancer and target gene. RNA Pol II recruitment to the target gene TATA box is not required for the intergenic transcription or intergenic histone modifications, strongly implying that they are properties conferred by the enhancer. However, Pol II recruitment at HS2, intergenic transcription, and intergenic histone modification are not sufficient for transcription or modification of the target gene: these changes require initiation at the TATA box of the gene. The results suggest that intergenic and genic transcription complexes are independent and possibly differ from one another.

scholarly journals Histone Acetylation at Promoters Is Differentially Affected by Specific Activators and Repressors

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2726-2735 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jutta Deckert ◽  
Kevin Struhl
Keyword(s):  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcriptional Activity ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Dramatic Decrease ◽  
Histone H4 Acetylation ◽  
Apparent Decrease ◽  
H3 Acetylation ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Target Promoters

ABSTRACT We analyzed the relationship between histone acetylation and transcriptional regulation at 40 Saccharomyces cerevisiaepromoters that respond to specific activators and repressors. In accord with the general correlation between histone acetylation and transcriptional activity, Gcn4 and the general stress activators (Msn2 and Msn4) cause increased acetylation of histones H3 and H4. Surprisingly, Gal4-dependent activation is associated with a dramatic decrease in histone H4 acetylation, whereas acetylation of histone H3 is unaffected. A specific decrease in H4 acetylation is also observed, to a lesser extent, at promoters activated by Hap4, Adr1, Met4, and Ace1. Activation by heat shock factor has multiple effects; H4 acetylation increases at some promoters, whereas other promoters show an apparent decrease in H3 and H4 acetylation that probably reflects nucleosome loss or gross alteration of chromatin structure. Repression by targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase is associated with decreased H3 and H4 acetylation, whereas repression by Cyc8-Tup1 is associated with decreased H3 acetylation but variable effects on H4 acetylation; this suggests that Cyc8-Tup1 uses multiple mechanisms to reduce histone acetylation at promoters. Thus, individual activators confer distinct patterns of histone acetylation on target promoters, and transcriptional activation is not necessarily associated with increased acetylation. We speculate that the activator-specific decrease in histone H4 acetylation is due to blocking the access or function of an H4-specific histone acetylase such as Esa1.

scholarly journals p300-Mediated acetylation facilitates the transfer of histone H2A–H2B dimers from nucleosomes to a histone chaperone

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (15) ◽  
pp. 1899-1907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Ito ◽  
Tsuyoshi Ikehara ◽  
Takeya Nakagawa ◽  
W. Lee Kraus ◽  
Masami Muramatsu
Keyword(s):  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Transcriptional Activator ◽  
Histone Chaperone ◽  
Assembly System ◽  
Transcriptional Activators ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Nucleosome Structure ◽  
Core Histones ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling Complexes

We have used a purified recombinant chromatin assembly system, including ACF (Acf-1 + ISWI) and NAP-1, to examine the role of histone acetylation in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. The binding of a transcriptional activator (Gal4–VP16) to chromatin assembled using this recombinant assembly system dramatically enhances the acetylation of nucleosomal core histones by the histone acetyltransferase p300. This effect requires both the presence of Gal4-binding sites in the template and the VP16-activation domain. Order-of-addition experiments indicate that prior activator-meditated, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling by ACF is required for the acetylation of nucleosomal histones by p300. Thus, chromatin remodeling, which requires a transcriptional activator, ACF and ATP, is an early step in the transcriptional process that regulates subsequent core histone acetylation. Glycerol gradient sedimentation and immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that the acetylation of histones by p300 facilitates the transfer of H2A–H2B from nucleosomes to NAP-1. The results from these biochemical experiments suggest that (1) transcriptional activators (e.g., Gal4–VP16) and chromatin remodeling complexes (e.g., ACF) induce chromatin remodeling in the absence of histone acetylation; (2) transcriptional activators recruit histone acetyltransferases (e.g., p300) to promoters after chromatin remodeling has occurred; and (3) histone acetylation is important for a step subsequent to chromatin remodeling and results in the transfer of histone H2A–H2B dimers from nucleosomes to a histone chaperone such as NAP-1. Our results indicate a precise role for histone acetylation, namely to alter the structure of nucleosomes (e.g., facilitate the loss of H2A–H2B dimers) that have been remodeled previously by the action of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes. Thus, transcription from chromatin templates is ordered and sequential, with precise timing and roles for ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling, subsequent histone acetylation, and alterations in nucleosome structure.

scholarly journals Behavioral sensitization induced by methamphetamine causes differential alterations in gene expression and histone acetylation of the prefrontal cortex in rats

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Li ◽  
Jing-An Chen ◽  
Qian-Zhi Ding ◽  
Guan-Yi Lu ◽  
Ning Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Prefrontal Cortex ◽  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Differentially Expressed Genes ◽  
Behavioral Sensitization ◽  
Functional Enrichment ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Adult Rats ◽  
Mrna Microarray ◽  
H3 Acetylation

Abstract Background Methamphetamine (METH) is one of the most widely abused illicit substances worldwide; unfortunately, its addiction mechanism remains unclear. Based on accumulating evidence, changes in gene expression and chromatin modifications might be related to the persistent effects of METH on the brain. In the present study, we took advantage of METH-induced behavioral sensitization as an animal model that reflects some aspects of drug addiction and examined the changes in gene expression and histone acetylation in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) of adult rats. Methods We conducted mRNA microarray and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) coupled to DNA microarray (ChIP-chip) analyses to screen and identify changes in transcript levels and histone acetylation patterns. Functional enrichment analyses, including Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analyses, were performed to analyze the differentially expressed genes. We then further identified alterations in ANP32A (acidic leucine-rich nuclear phosphoprotein-32A) and POU3F2 (POU domain, class 3, transcription factor 2) using qPCR and ChIP-PCR assays. Results In the rat model of METH-induced behavioral sensitization, METH challenge caused 275 differentially expressed genes and a number of hyperacetylated genes (821 genes with H3 acetylation and 10 genes with H4 acetylation). Based on mRNA microarray and GO and KEGG enrichment analyses, 24 genes may be involved in METH-induced behavioral sensitization, and 7 genes were confirmed using qPCR. We further examined the alterations in the levels of the ANP32A and POU3F2 transcripts and histone acetylation at different periods of METH-induced behavioral sensitization. H4 hyperacetylation contributed to the increased levels of ANP32A mRNA and H3/H4 hyperacetylation contributed to the increased levels of POU3F2 mRNA induced by METH challenge-induced behavioral sensitization, but not by acute METH exposure. Conclusions The present results revealed alterations in transcription and histone acetylation in the rat PFC by METH exposure and provided evidence that modifications of histone acetylation contributed to the alterations in gene expression caused by METH-induced behavioral sensitization.

scholarly journals A Novel Human Ada2 Homologue Functions with Gcn5 or Brg1 To Coactivate Transcription

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (19) ◽  
pp. 6944-6957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nickolai A. Barlev ◽  
Alexander V. Emelyanov ◽  
Paola Castagnino ◽  
Philip Zegerman ◽  
Andrew J. Bannister ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Adaptor Protein ◽  
Saga Complex ◽  
Yeast Two Hybrid ◽  
Functional Assays ◽  
Two Hybrid ◽  
Histone Acetyltransferase Activity

ABSTRACT In yeast, the transcriptional adaptor yeast Ada2 (yAda2) is a part of the multicomponent SAGA complex, which possesses histone acetyltransferase activity through action of the yGcn5 catalytic enzyme. yAda2, among several SAGA proteins, serves to recruit SAGA to genes via interactions with promoter-bound transcription factors. Here we report identification of a new human Ada2 homologue, hAda2β. Ada2β differs both biochemically and functionally from the previously characterized hAda2α, which is a stable component of the human PCAF (human Gcn5 homologue) acetylase complex. Ada2β, relative to Ada2α, interacted selectively, although not stably, with the Gcn5-containing histone acetylation complex TFTC/STAGA. In addition, Ada2β interacted with Baf57 (a component of the human Swi/Snf complex) in a yeast two-hybrid screen and associated with human Swi/Snf in vitro. In functional assays, hAda2β (but not Ada2α), working in concert with Gcn5 (but not PCAF) or Brg1 (the catalytic component of hSwi/Snf complex), increased transcription via the B-cell-specific transcription factor Pax5/BSAP. These findings support the view that Gcn5 and PCAF have distinct roles in vivo and suggest a new mechanism of coactivator function, in which a single adaptor protein (Ada2β) can coordinate targeting of both histone acetylation and chromatin remodeling activities.

The Long Road to Understanding RNAPII Transcription Initiation and Related Syndromes

2021 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-219
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Compe ◽  
Jean-Marc Egly
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Rna Polymerase Ii ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Rna Synthesis ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Initiation Mechanism ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Core Promoters ◽  
General Transcription Factors

In eukaryotes, transcription of protein-coding genes requires the assembly at core promoters of a large preinitiation machinery containing RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) and general transcription factors (GTFs). Transcription is potentiated by regulatory elements called enhancers, which are recognized by specific DNA-binding transcription factors that recruit cofactors and convey, following chromatin remodeling, the activating cues to the preinitiation complex. This review summarizes nearly five decades of work on transcription initiation by describing the sequential recruitment of diverse molecular players including the GTFs, the Mediator complex, and DNA repair factors that support RNAPII to enable RNA synthesis. The elucidation of the transcription initiation mechanism has greatly benefited from the study of altered transcription components associated with human diseases that could be considered transcription syndromes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document