Acupuncture in Patients with Valvular Heart Disease and Prosthetic Valves

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Stellon
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Acupuncture Treatment ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotics ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Prosthetic Valves ◽  
Small Cohort

Endocarditis has been reported in patients with valvular heart disease who have undergone acupuncture treatment, although most have been associated with the use of semi-permanent needles. This has led reviewers to suggest that acupuncture may not only be contraindicated in such patients but that prophylactic antibiotics should be given. This study investigated the use of acupuncture treatment in patients with proven valvular heart disease and observed whether endocarditis developed in such patients. All patients in a single-handed GP practice with proven valvular heart disease, including those with prosthetic valves, were identified over a ten-year period. Those who had undergone acupuncture treatment underwent a clinical examination and diagnostic tests, which focused on the signs, symptoms and laboratory criteria for the diagnosis of endocarditis and included a transthoracic echocardiogram. Autopsy findings were reviewed in any patient who died. Based on these clinical and laboratory data, using the modified Duke's criteria for the diagnosis of endocarditis, patients were identified as having definite or possible endocarditis, or the diagnosis was rejected. All patients underwent brief acupuncture with no skin disinfectant and no prophylactic antibiotics were given. Semi-permanent needles were avoided. Thirty-six patients with valvular heart disease underwent a total of 479 acupuncture treatments over a ten-year period. The median number of treatments was 9 (range 1 – 72), with a follow-up after treatment of 5.75 years (range 0.5 – 10 years). Definite endocarditis was not found in any patient, but two patients had possible endocarditis, eventually discounted by both negative blood cultures and echocardiography. In conclusion, brief acupuncture was safe in this small cohort of valvular heart disease patients and no case of endocarditis was detected over a ten-year period.

scholarly journals Clinical outcomes of Japanese atrial fibrillation patients with combined valvular heart disease: the Fushimi AF Registry

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Doi ◽  
K Ishigami ◽  
Y Aono ◽  
S Ikeda ◽  
Y Hamatani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Valve Disease ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background We previously reported that valvular heart disease (VHD) was not at the significant risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), but was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in Japanese atrial fibrillation patients. However, the impact of combined VHD on clinical outcomes has been little known. Purpose The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of combined VHD and its clinical characteristics and impact on outcomes such as stroke/SE, all-cause death, cardiac death and hospitalization for HF. Method The Fushimi AF Registry is a community-based prospective survey of AF patients in one of the wards of our city which is a typical urban district of Japan. We started to enroll patients from March 2011, and follow-up data were available for 4,466 patients by the end of November 2019. In the entire cohort, echocardiography data were available for 3,574 patients. 68 AF patients with prosthetic heart valves were excluded and we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes between 488 single VHD (103 Aortic valve disease (AVD), 315 mitral valve disease (MVD), 70 tricuspid valve disease (TVD)) and 158 combined VHD (46 AVD and MVD, 11 AVD and TVD, 66 MVD and TVD, 35 AVD and MVD and TVD). Result Compared with single VHD, patients with combined VHD were older (combined vs. single VHD: 78.5 vs. 76.0 years, respectively; p<0.01), more likely to have persistent/permanent type AF (73.4% vs. 63.9%, p=0.02) and prescription of warfarin (63.1% vs. 53.8%, p=0.04). Combined VHD was less likely to have diabetes mellitus (13.9% vs. 23.6%, p=0.01) and dyslipidemia (26.6% vs. 40.4%, p<0.01). Sex, body weight, hypertension, pre-existing HF were comparable between the two groups. During the median follow-up of 1,474 days, the incidence rate of stroke/SE was not significantly different between the two groups (1.58 vs. 1.89 per 100 person-years, respectively, log rank p=0.10). The incidence rate of all-cause death (7.35 vs. 5.33, p=0.65), cardiac death (1.20 vs. 0.99, p=0.91) and hospitalization for HF (5.55 vs. 4.43, p=0.53) were also not significantly different. We previously reported AVD had significant impacts on cardiac adverse outcomes in AF patients, and we further analyzed event rates between combined VHD including AVD (AVD and MVD/TVD) and without AVD (MVD and TVD). Combined VHD with AVD group had higher incidence rate of all-cause death (10.7 vs. 5.79, p=0.03) than that without AVD group. However, the incidence rate of stroke/SE (1.98 vs. 1.56, p=0.59), cardiac death (0.98 vs. 1.14, p=0.68), hospitalization for HF (8.03 vs. 5.38, p=0.17) were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusion As compared with single VHD, the risk of stroke/SE, all-cause death, cardiac death and hospitalization for HF in combined VHD was not significantly different. Among patients with combined VHD, those having AVD had higher incidence rate of all-cause death than those without AVD. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Coronary risk of patients with valvular heart disease: prospective validation of CT-Valve Score

Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001380
Author(s):  
Rasmus Bo Hasselbalch ◽  
Mia Marie Pries-Heje ◽  
Sarah Louise Kjølhede Holle ◽  
Thomas Engstrøm ◽  
Merete Heitmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Multislice Ct ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Before And After ◽  
History Of ◽  
Artery Disease

ObjectiveTo prospectively validate the CT-Valve score, a new risk score designed to identify patients with valvular heart disease at a low risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) who could benefit from multislice CT (MSCT) first instead of coronary angiography (CAG).MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study of patients referred for valve surgery in the Capital Region of Denmark and Odense University Hospital from the 1 February 2015 to the 1 February 2017. MSCT was implemented for patients with a CT-Valve score ≤7 at the referring physician’s discretion. Patients with a history of CAD or chronic kidney disease were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients needing reevaluation with CAG after MSCT and risk of CAD among the patients determined to be low to intermediate risk.ResultsIn total, 1149 patients were included. The median score was 9 (IQR 3) and 339 (30%) had a score ≤7. MSCT was used for 117 patients. Of these 29 (25%) were reevaluated and 9 (7.7%) had CAD. Of the 222 patients with a score ≤7 that did not receive an MSCT, 14 (6%) had significant CAD. The estimated total cost of evaluation among patients with a score ≤7 before implementation was €132 093 compared with €79 073 after, a 40% reduction. Similarly, estimated total radiation before and after was 608 mSv and 362 mSv, a 41% reduction. Follow-up at a median of 32 months (18–48) showed no ischaemic events for patients receiving only MSCT.ConclusionThe CT-Valve score is a valid method for determining risk of CAD among patients with valvular heart disease. Using a score ≤7 as a cut-off for the use of MSCT is safe and cost-effective.

Abstract 223: Non-Cardiac Comorbidities in Predictive Models for Valvular Heart Disease Interventions

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Wessler ◽  
Christine Lundquist ◽  
Gowri Raman ◽  
Jennifer Lutz ◽  
Jessica Paulus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Predictive Models ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Predictive Analytics ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Valve Surgery ◽  
Comorbid Condition ◽  
Comorbid Conditions

Background: Interventions for patients with valvular heart disease (VHD) now include both surgical and percutaneous procedures. As a result, treatments are being offered to increasingly complex patients with a significant burden of non-cardiac comorbid conditions. There is a major gap in our understanding of how various comorbidities relate to prognosis following interventions for VHD. Here we describe how comorbidities are handled in clinical predictive models for patients undergoing interventions for VHD. Methods: We queried the Tufts Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness (PACE) Clinical Prediction Model (CPM) Registry to identify de novo CPMs for patients undergoing VHD interventions. We systematically extracted information on the non-cardiac comorbidities contained in the CPMs and also measures of model performance. Results: From January 1990- May 2012 there were 12 CPMs predicting measures of morbidity or mortality for patients undergoing interventions for VHD. There were 2 CPMs predicting outcomes for isolated aortic valve replacement, 3 CPMs predicting outcomes for isolated mitral valve surgery, and 7 models predicting outcomes for a combination of valve surgery subtypes. Ten out of twelve (83%) of the CPMs for patients undergoing interventions for VHD predicted mortality. The median number of non-cardiac comorbidities included in the CPMs was 4 (range 0-7). All of the CPMs predicting mortality included at least 1 comorbid condition. The top 3 most common comorbidities included in these CPMs were, renal dysfunction (10/12, 83%), prior CVA (7/12, 58%) and measures of BMI/BSA (7/12, 58%). Diabetes was present in only 25% (3/12) of the models and chronic lung disease in only 17% (2/12). Conclusions: Non-cardiac comorbidities are frequently found in CPMs predicting morbidity and mortality following interventions for VHD. There is significant variation in the number and type of specific comorbid conditions included in these CPMs. More work is needed to understand the directionality, magnitude, and consistency of effect of these non-cardiac comorbid conditions for patients undergoing interventions for VHD.

Community prevalence, mechanisms and outcome of mitral or tricuspid regurgitation

Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2020-318482
Author(s):  
Thomas J Cahill ◽  
Anthony Prothero ◽  
Jo Wilson ◽  
Andrew Kennedy ◽  
Jacob Brubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Tricuspid Regurgitation ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Age Dependent ◽  
Study Population

ObjectiveThe study aims were (1) to identify the community prevalence of moderate or greater mitral or tricuspid regurgitation (MR/TR), (2) to compare subjects identified by population screening with those with known valvular heart disease (VHD), (3) to understand the mechanisms of MR/TR and (4) to assess the rate of valve intervention and long-term outcome.MethodsAdults aged ≥65 years registered at seven family medicine practices in Oxfordshire, UK were screened for inclusion (n=9504). Subjects with known VHD were identified from hospital records and those without VHD invited to undergo transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within the Oxford Valvular Heart Disease Population Study (OxVALVE). The study population ultimately comprised 4755 subjects. The severity and aetiology of MR and TR were assessed by integrated comprehensive TTE assessment.ResultsThe prevalence of moderate or greater MR and TR was 3.5% (95% CI 3.1 to 3.8) and 2.6% (95% CI 2.3 to 2.9), respectively. Primary MR was the most common aetiology (124/203, 61.1%). Almost half of cases were newly diagnosed by screening: MR 98/203 (48.3%), TR 69/155 (44.5%). Subjects diagnosed by screening were less symptomatic, more likely to have primary MR and had a lower incidence of aortic valve disease. Surgical intervention was undertaken in six subjects (2.4%) over a median follow-up of 64 months. Five-year survival was 79.8% in subjects with isolated MR, 84.8% in those with isolated TR, and 59.4% in those with combined MR and TR (p=0.0005).ConclusionsModerate or greater MR/TR is common, age-dependent and is underdiagnosed. Current rates of valve intervention are extremely low.

5207Bilateral cardiac sympathetic denervation in structural heart disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Dusi ◽  
L Pugliese ◽  
I Passarelli ◽  
R Camporotondo ◽  
M Driussi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Structural Heart Disease ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Sympathetic Denervation ◽  
Icd Shock ◽  
Vt Ablation ◽  
Cardiac Sympathetic Denervation

Abstract Background Left cardiac sympathetic denervation (LCSD) is an established therapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in channelopathies. A multicentric American and Indian case series suggested a greater efficacy of bilateral denervation (BCSD) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). Purpose To describe our single-center experience with BCSD in SHD. Methods Nine patients (78% male, mean 55±18 yrs, mean LVEF 31±14%) with SHD and refractory VAs underwent BCSD. All had a Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS), in 2 cases associated with the robotic technique. The underlying cardiomyopathy (CMP) was non-ischemic (NICMP) in most cases (n=5, 55%), ischemic in 2 cases, arrhythmogenic right ventricular (ARVC) in one and related to lamin A/C deficiency in one. All patients had an ICD, 44% (n=4) a CRT-D. NYHA functional class I was present in 4 patients, the rest were in NYHA class II (n=3) or III (n=2). Three patients were candidates to heart transplant/LV assistance device. The arrhythmic burden pre BCSD included in 7 pts (78%) a history of electrical storm (ES); the median number of shocks/patient in the 12 months before BCSD was 5 (IQ range 3–18). Except for 2 patients with previous thyrotoxicosis, the remaining were either on amiodarone (n=6) or on sotalol (n=1) before BCSD. Main BCSD indications were represented by drug refractory fast VT in 7 pts (cycle <250 msec) and by recurrent monomorphic VT episodes (mean cycle 351 msec) after endocardial VT ablation in 2 patients. Results No major complication occurred. One patient (NICMP, NYHA II), has an uneventful follow up (FU) of less than 1 month and was excluded from the efficacy analysis. The median FU in the remaining 8 patients is 10 months (IQ range 6–19), during which the median number of shocks/patients was 0.5 (IQ range 0–3). Overall, 4 patients (50%) had ICD shock recurrences. Two cases (mean LVEF 17.5%, NYHA class III) had an ES during severe hemodynamic instability and subsequently died because of cardiogenic shock respectively 1 and 7 months after BCSD. One case had three, not consecutive ICD shocks 20 months after BCSD in the setting of severe amiodarone-induced thyrotoxicosis. Finally, one patient received a single intra-hospital ICD shock 5 days after BCSD before reintroduction of full-dose beta-blockers. The figure summarizes ICD shocks burden in the 6 months before and after BCSD. Among the 5 patients with NICMP/ARVC (4 in NYHA class I), only 1 had a single ICD shock recurrence. ICD shocks pre versus post BCSD, n=8 Conclusions Our case series, although numerically small, has a good follow-up and is the first reported in Europe. The results are in agreement with the suggested remarkable efficacy of BCSD in patients with good functional capacity and fast VAs. Therefore, cardiac sympathetic denervation should always be considered in patients with SHD and refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias, especially in case VT ablation is either not indicated or fails.

Cardiac Outcomes in a Prospective Cohort of Adult Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2656-2656
Author(s):  
Carrie A. Thompson ◽  
Hongxiu Luo ◽  
Matthew J Maurer ◽  
Cristine Allmer ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Mayo Clinic ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
P Value ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Abstract 2656 Background Treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) can lead to development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We sought to describe the cumulative incidence of CVD in adult NHL survivors diagnosed in the recent treatment era (since 2002) and identify clinical and treatment predictors for its development. Methods All patients were from the Mayo component of the Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER) of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE). The MER offers enrollment to all consecutive patients with newly diagnosed NHL who are US residents and age >18 years. Clinical data from the time of diagnosis and treatment data are abstracted from medical records using a standard protocol. Patients are prospectively contacted via telephone or in person per protocol every 6 months for the first 3 years from diagnosis and yearly afterwards to assess disease status and development of comorbid conditions. CVD events, including heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), arrhythmia, pericarditis, and valvular heart disease, occurring after diagnosis were identified during follow-up and validated against medical records. HF was validated with the Cardiovascular Health Study Criteria and/or the Framingham Criteria. MI was validated using case definition standards of coronary heart disease, while arrhythmia, pericarditis, and valvular heart disease were validated using clinical definitions. The prevalence of CVD and associations between CVD and clinical characteristics (sex, age) and treatment (radiation, anthracyclines) were performed using Cox models with a competing risk approach. Results 1164 patients with NHL were enrolled into the MER at Mayo Clinic between 9/1/2002–2/28/2008. 646 were male (56%) and median age at diagnosis was 62 years (range 20–93). Median follow-up of all cases was 59 months (range 1–105). 131 patients reported CVD prior to the diagnosis of NHL and were excluded from analyses. An additional 76 patients did not have follow-up and were excluded. Of the 957 remaining patients, 75 (7.8%) self-reported a new diagnosis of CVD. Of these, 71 cases had available medical records. 57 of the 71 reviewed cases (80%) were validated (18 HF, 9 MI, 21 arrhythmia, 2 pericarditis, and 10 valvular heart disease). Cumulative incidence of CVD at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years was 1.3%, 3.7%, 5.2%, and 7.4%, respectively. Median time from NHL diagnosis to CVD was 26.5 months (range 1–84). Older age was associated with increased risk of overall CVD (p-value<0.001). Gender (p=0.59), radiation therapy (p=0.61), and anthracycline treatment (p=0.25) were not associated with the incidence of overall CVD. Among types of CVD, anthracycline use was associated with development of HF (HR=5.30; p-value=0.008) and arrhythmia (HR=2.68; p-value=0.04). Radiation was associated with development of arrhythmia (HR=2.73; p-value=0.03), while older age was associated with development of HF (HR=1.36 per 5 year increment; p-value=0.003) and arrhythmia (HR=1.25 per 5 year increment; p-value=0.02). Conclusions The risk of CVD in patients with NHL is approximately 1% per year after the initial diagnosis of lymphoma. The most commonly occurring CVDs in this cohort of NHL survivors were arrhythmia and HF. Treatment with anthracyclines and radiation are associated with increased risk of developing some types of CVD. 80% of self-reported CVD events in NHL survivors were validated using epidemiologic criteria. Future studies will include building models incorporating comorbid health conditions and lifestyle factors to determine risk of CVD as well as the impact of CVD on quality of life. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2950-2950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tait D. Shanafelt ◽  
Kari G. Chaffee ◽  
Timothy G. Call ◽  
Sameer A. Parikh ◽  
Susan M. Schwager ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Male Sex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Consistent with the advanced age at diagnosis (median age ~70 years), most patients with CLL have co-existent health problems. These co-morbidities influence the ability of many CLL patients to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy-based treatment and can also contribute to treatment-related side effects. The recent development of novel signaling inhibitors, particularly the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib, has been a major treatment advance for patients with CLL. While these agents generally have favorable toxicity profiles relative to standard chemotherapy-based treatments, they are chronic therapies which patients typically stay on for an extended period. Preliminary data suggests ibrutinib may be associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (Afib). In one randomized trial comparing ibrutinib to ofatumumab in patient with relapsed CLL, incident grade 3+ Afib occurred in 3% of ibrutinib treated patients compared to 0% of ofatumumab treated patients (NEJM 371:213). Despite these observations, the baseline frequency of Afib in patients with CLL is not well described - particularly incident atrial fibrillation acquired during the course of the disease. METHODS: We used the Mayo Clinic CLL database to evaluate the prevalence of Afib at the time of CLL diagnosis as well as the incidence of Afib during follow-up. All patients with a new diagnosis of CLL after January 1995 who were seen at Mayo within 12 months of diagnosis were included in the analysis. Afib was identified by chart review and by billing search using ICD9 codes. Data on co-morbid conditions associated with risk of Afib was also abstracted (e.g. hypertension, coronary artery disease [CAD], valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, diabetes mellitus, pulmonary disease). RESULTS: A total of 2444 patients with newly diagnosed and previously untreated CLL were seen at Mayo Clinic within 12 months of diagnosis between 1/1995 and 4/2015.Median age at diagnosis was 65 years and 1626 (66.5%) patients were men. A history of Afib was present at the time of CLL diagnosis in 148 (6.1%) patients. Four additional patients had Afib documented in the record but the precise date of onset (e.g. prior to or after CLL diagnosis date) could not be determined. Age, male sex and history of CAD, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with a greater likelihood of having a history of Afib at the time of CLL diagnosis (all p&lt;0.01). Among the 2292 patients without a history of Afib at CLL diagnosis, 139 (6.1%) had incident Afib during the course of follow-up for their CLL. The incidence of Afib among patients without a history of Afib at diagnosis was approximately 1%/year (Figure 1A). Considering both Afib present at the time of CLL diagnosis or acquired during the course of the disease, 291 (11.9%) of the 2444 patients in this cohort experienced Afib (median follow-up: 59 months). Among patients without Afib at the time of CLL diagnosis, the following characteristics at the time of CLL diagnosis were associated with an increased risk of incident Afib on multivariate analysis: older age (age 65-74 HR=2.4, p&lt;0.001; age ≥75 HR=3.6, p&lt;0.001), male sex (HR=1.8, p=0.004); valvular heart disease (HR=2.4, p=0.007), and hypertension (HR=1.5; p=0.02). A predictive model for acquired Afib was subsequently constructed based on the independent factors in the Cox regression model. An individual weighted risk score was assigned to each independent factor based on the regression coefficients of the HRs. The Afib risk score (range 0-7) was defined as the sum of the scores of these independent factors. The risk of incident Afib among patients with risk scores of 0-1, 2-3, 4, and 5+ is shown in Figure 1B. Rates for these 4 groups were significantly different (p&lt;0.001), with the 10-year Afib rates (95% C.I.) for those with a score of 0-1, 2-3, 4, and 5+: 4% (2-6%), 9% (6-13%), 17% (11-23%), and 33% (20-43%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A history of Afib is present in approximately 1 out of every 16 patients with newly diagnosed CLL. Among patients without Afib at diagnosis, the incidence rate of Afib is ~1%/year. The risk of incident Afib in newly diagnosed CLL patients can be predicted based on age, sex, and co-morbid health conditions present at diagnosis. These data provide context to help interpret data on the frequency of Afib in CLL patients treated with ibrutinib and other novel agents. Disclosures Shanafelt: Janssen: Research Funding; Polyphenon E Int'l: Research Funding; Glaxo-Smith_Kline: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Pharmactckucs: Research Funding. Ding:Merek: Research Funding. Kay:Tolero Pharm: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Long‐Term Outcomes Among a Nationwide Cohort of Patients Using an Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillator: UMBRELLA Study Final Results

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sem Briongos‐Figuero ◽  
Arcadio García‐Alberola ◽  
Jerónimo Rubio ◽  
José María Segura ◽  
Aníbal Rodríguez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Dilated Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Icd Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator

Background Large‐scale studies describing modern populations using an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD) are lacking. We aimed to analyze the incidence of arrhythmia, device interventions, and mortality in a broad spectrum of real‐world ICD patients with different heart disorders. Methods and Results The UMBRELLA study is a prospective, multicenter, nationwide study of contemporary patients using an ICD followed up by remote monitoring, with a blinded review of arrhythmic episodes. From November 2005 to November 2017, 4296 patients were followed up. After 46.6±27.3 months, 16 067 episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmia occurred in 1344 patients (31.3%). Appropriate ICD therapy occurred in 27.3% of study population. Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (hazard ratio [HR], 1.51; 95% CI, 1.29–1.78), dilated cardiomyopathy (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07–1.53), and valvular heart disease (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.43–2.62) exhibited a higher risk of appropriate ICD therapies, whereas patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54–0.96) and Brugada syndrome (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.14–0.45) showed a lower risk. All‐cause death was 13.4% at follow‐up. Ischemic cardiomyopathy (HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 2.58–5.90), dilated cardiomyopathy (HR, 3.33; 95% CI, 2.18–5.10), and valvular heart disease (HR, 3.97; 95% CI, 2.25–6.99) had the worst prognoses. Delayed high‐rate detection was enabled in 39.7% of patients, and single‐zone programming occurred in 52.6% of primary prevention patients. Both parameters correlated with lower risk of first appropriate ICD therapy, with no excess risk of mortality. The rate of inappropriate shocks at follow‐up was low (6%) and did not differ among type of ICD but was lower in SmartShock‐capable devices. Conclusions Irrespective of the cause, contemporary ICD patients with heart failure–related disorders had a similar risk of ICD life‐saving interventions and death. Current ICD programming recommendations still need to be implemented. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NTC01561144.

scholarly journals Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in valvular heart disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Cortina Camarero ◽  
M Sarrion Catala ◽  
V Suberviola Sanchez-Caballero ◽  
C Beltran Herrera ◽  
E Gomez Mariscal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Disease ◽  
Valvular Heart Disease ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing ◽  
Symptom Development ◽  
Ventilatory Efficiency ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise ◽  
Peak Vo2 ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters

Abstract Introduction Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CEPT) is not routinely used for the assessment of valvular heart disease (VHD) patients. The cutoff values of percentage of predicted peak VO2 and ventilatory efficiency parameters that carry out a bad prognosis have been predominantly validated in heart failure. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic value of CPET parameters in a broad population of VHD patients. Methods 163 patients (51% female) with moderate or severe VHD who underwent a CEPT (n=197) at their physician's discretion from 2017 until 2019 were included. We calculated the net reclassification index of CPET, compared to the classical clinical or echocardiographic parameters, regarding the need for surgical indication. Also, the predictive value of CPET for death and symptom development during follow-up was estimated using regression analysis. Results At inclusion, all patients were asymptomatic or with minimal equivocal symptoms. Aortic valvular lesions were the most common (47%), followed by mitral valvular disease (44%). There was a predominance of severe valvular heart disease (71%) and most of the CEPTs were performed on a treadmill (74%). The percentage of predicted peak VO2 was 76±18% and at anaerobic threshold was 61±18%. The mean follow-up time was 15±10 months. There were 5 deaths (3%) and 24 patients became symptomatic. The net reclassification index of CPET over either clinical or echocardiographic parameters was 46%. The CEPT parameters that predicted increased risk of death were VE/VCO2 slope (p=0.009), % of predicted peak VO2 (p=0.049) and Eq CO2 at anaerobic threshold (p=0.047). None of the CEPT parameters was predictive of symptom development during follow-up, however, in the subgroup of patients who became clearly symptomatic, the ventilatory efficiency parameters were similar to the cut off values that confer bad prognosis (see Table in Figure). Conclusion In our series, CPET added prognostic mortality value to patients with VHD. The cut off values used for patients with HF can also be applied in a VHD population. In addition, CEPT clearly improved the clinical decision for surgical referral. Nevertheless, these results need to be validated in a broader population. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document