scholarly journals AB0575 FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS ACTIVITY IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1325.1-1325
Author(s):  
Y. Korsakova ◽  
E. Loginova ◽  
T. Korotaeva ◽  
E. Gubar ◽  
S. Glukhova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Plantar Fascia ◽  
New Combination ◽  
Composite Indices ◽  
Chronic Illness Therapy ◽  
Valid Instrument ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background:Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is a multifaceted disease with various clinical domains. A number of composite indices has been developed recently [1, 2]. DAPSA (Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis) is the valid instrument for assessment of PsA activity focused on peripheral arthritis. But other factors can influence on PsA activity and haven’t studied yet.Objectives:to identify factors that are associated with PsA activity based on the data from RU-PsART cohort.Methods:117 (M/F=63(54%)/54(46%)) patients (pts) with active PsA fulfilling the CASPAR criteria mean age 44.3 ± 10.9 yrs, mean DAPSA 37.8±21.4, mean PsA duration 73.4±78.4 mo, mean PsO duration 213.4±152.5 mo, were included. Data was collected from 43 rheumatology centers of the Russian Federation. All pts underwent standard clinical examination of PsA activity at enrollment. DAPSA, ESR (mm/h), CRP (mg/L), dactylitis, enthesitis by LEI plus Plantar Fascia, BSA (%), HAQ-DI and fatigue by Fatigue Scale (V.4) FACIT (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy), BMI (kg/m2) were evaluated. DAPSA > 28 indicate high activity. Multi-dimensional step-by-step discriminant analysis was used to identify a group of features that are associated with high PsA activity by DAPSA. M±SD, %, OR 95% (CI) were performed.Results:The following features proved to be the most informative: LEI (p=0.739), tenderness of the Plantar Fascia (p=0.003), age (p=0.0004), FACIT (p=0.092), PsA duration >2 yrs (p=0.013), BSA>3% (p=0.021), Nail PsO (p=0.092), BMI (kg/m2) (p=0.22). The area under the ROC-curve (AUC) 0.768, 95% CI (0.624-0.913). Sensitivity/ Specificity of model 77.0%/ 69% accordingly (Figure 1).Figure 1ROC analysis of the Sensitivity and Specificity of the model.Conclusion:Weight, enthesitis, skin and nail PsO severity, fatigue and PsA duration >2 yrs are associated with high PsA activity as well as articular symptoms. New combination indices based on these features should be developed and validated in clinical practice.References:[1]Helliwell P, et al. The development of candidate composite disease activity and responder indices for psoriatic arthritis (GRACE project). Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72: 986-91. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201341.[2]Salaffi F, et al. Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparison of the Discriminative Capacity and Construct Validity of Six Composite Indices in a Real World. BoiMed Res Int 2014; 2014:52805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/528105Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

scholarly journals AB0542 EVALUATION OF APREMILAST USE IN THE ROUTINE CLINICAL PRACTICE IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS NAÏVE TO BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1303.2-1304
Author(s):  
J. Gratacos-Masmitja ◽  
J. L. Álvarez Vega ◽  
E. Beltrán ◽  
A. Urruticoechea-Arana ◽  
C. Fito-Manteca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Wilcoxon Test ◽  
Psychiatric Disease ◽  
Biological Therapies ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Disease Evolution ◽  
Biological Treatments

Background:Apremilast is a non-biologic systemic agent approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis, oral ulcers of Behcet’s disease and PsA with proven efficacy in clinical trials [1,2]. However, more real-world evidence of apremilast use and effectiveness is needed to identify the patient profile most likely to benefit from this treatment [3].Objectives:To evaluate the persistence of apremilast treatment in patients with PsA naïve to biological treatments in routine clinical practice and assess its effectiveness. Baseline clinical characteristics on patients who started apremilast were also evaluated.Methods:Observational, prospective, multicenter (20 centers) study including consecutive adult patients with PsA naïve to biological therapies who had started treatment with apremilast during the previous 5 to 7 months and were followed-up during 12 months. Variables recorded were persistence of treatment with apremilast at 6 months (6mo) and number of swelling joints, presence of enthesitis and dactylitis, and disease activity, measured by the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) score and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of psoriasis, collected at baseline (BL) (i.e., apremilast treatment start) and 6mo; comorbidities were retrospectively collected at BL. Categorical and quantitative variables were compared using McNemar’s and Wilcoxon test, respectively. Data sets analyzed included all assessable patients.Results:Of the 60 patients recruited at the time of this interim analysis, 54 (90.0%) [mean (SD) age 53.4 (13.9) years] were assessable; 41 (75.9%) of these continued treatment with apremilast at 6mo. At BL, 34 (63.0%) patients had at least one comorbidity, the most frequent being cardiovascular disease (n=15, 27.8%), including hypertension (n=8, 14.8%), metabolic/endocrine disease (n=18, 33.3%), including obesity (n=8, 14.8%) and dyslipidemia (n=10, 18.5%). Psychiatric disease (i.e., depression) (n=5, 9.3%) and neoplasia (n=8, 14.8%) were also observed. The number of swelling joints decreased from median (Q1, Q3) 4.0 (2.0, 7.0) at BL to 1.5 (0.0, 4.0) at 6mo (p=0.0012). Patients with dactylitis and enthesitis decreased from 19 (35.2%) and 16 (29.6%) at BL to 10 (18.5%) and 9 (16.7%) at 6mo (p=0.0225 and p=0.0391), respectively. The distribution of patients in the different disease activity categories according to DAPSA scale changed between BL and 6mo, indicating a favorable disease evolution (Figure 1 next page). According to PGA, at BL (n=53), disease activity was categorized as mild in 18.0%, as moderate in 72.0%, and as severe in 10% of patients and, at 6mo (n=54), as mild in 70.6%, as moderate in 25.5%, and as severe in 3.9% of patients. Fifteen (27.8%) patients interrupted treatment permanently (n=13, 24.1%) or temporarily (n=2, 3.7%), due to no/partial response (n=8, 14.8%), tolerability issues leading to adverse events (n=3, 5.6%), patient decision (n=2, 3.7%), and other reasons (n=2, 3.7%) after a mean (SD) treatment of 3.05 (2.20) months.Conclusion:Forty-one (75.9%) patients with PsA naïve to biological therapies were treated with apremilast during ≥6 months. After treatment, the number of swelling joints, and dactylitis and enthesitis decreased and changes in disease activity according to DAPSA and PGA pointed to a favorable disease evolution. Apremilast treatment provides a clinical benefit to patients with PsA treated in clinical practice.References:[1]Gossec L, Smolen JS, Ramiro S, et al. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Feb 10;75(3):499 LP-510[2]Torres T and Puig L. Apremilast: A novel oral treatment for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Am J clin Dermatol. 2018 Feb;19(1):23-32[3]Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015. Treatment Recommendations for Psoriatic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(5):1060– 71.Disclosure of Interests:Jordi Gratacos-Masmitja Speakers bureau: MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Celgene y Lilly., Consultant of: MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Celgene y Lilly., José Luis Álvarez Vega Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Esteve, UCB, Menarini, Pfizer, GSK, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Gebro., Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Esteve, UCB, Menarini, Pfizer, GSK, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Gebro., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Esteve, UCB, Menarini, Pfizer, GSK, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Gebro., Emma Beltrán Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared., C. Fito-Manteca: None declared., Francisco Maceiras: None declared., Joaquin Maria Belzunegui Otano Speakers bureau: Lilly, Amgen, Novartis, Abbvie, Janssen., J. Fernández-Melón Speakers bureau: Amgen SL, Eugenio Chamizo Carmona: None declared., Abad Hernández Speakers bureau: MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Kern, Novartis, Biogen, Sandoz, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Roche and Janssen-Cilag, Consultant of: MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Kern, Novartis, Biogen, Sandoz, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Roche and Janssen-Cilag, Grant/research support from: MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Kern, Novartis, Biogen, Sandoz, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Roche and Janssen-Cilag, Inmaculada Ros Consultant of: Amgen, Grant/research support from: MSD, Roche, Novartis, lilly, Pfizer, Amgen, Eva Pascual Shareholder of: Amgen, Employee of: Amgen, Juan Carlos Torre Speakers bureau: Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Consultant of: Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer.

scholarly journals AB0564 RHEUMATOLOGISTS’ VIEWS AND EXPERIENCES IN MANAGING PsA PATIENTS BASED ON TREATING TO TARGET STRATEGY: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY IN CHINA

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1318.2-1319
Author(s):  
L. Xu ◽  
Z. Wang ◽  
J. Xue ◽  
M. Bai ◽  
H. Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Western Medicine ◽  
Work Experience ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Activity Assessment ◽  
High Level

Background:Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis with progressive, erosive destruction associated with functional impairment. Principles of treat-to-target (T2T) have been widely used in rheumatoid arthritis, which has powerfully improved patient outcomes. In 2017, the concept of T2T has proposed to apply in PsA patients. However, the awareness and implementation of evidence-based T2T treatment guidelines varies across different geographical regions of China, hospital grades, professional status and specialities.Objectives:The study aimed to investigate Rheumatologists’ views and experiences in managing PsA patients with T2T strategy in china.Methods:A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of Rheumatologists in China from 5 August to 15 August 2020 was conducted for this study. Rheumatologists were contacted by WeChat (a Chinese cell/web app) and asked to complete a web-based questionnaire anonymously. The electronic questionnaire was sent out by the internet platform of WenJuanXing via WeChat (https://www.wjx.cn/). The questionnaire was designed to collect: (a) demographic information; (b) patient management in clinical practice for Rheumatologists; (c) familiarity and application of T2T strategy in Rheumatologists. P values ≤0.05 were considered significant.Results:(1) A total of 823 rheumatologists (69.87% female, 30.13% male) provided valid answers to the questionnaire. 71.09% of the participants major in Modern Western Medicine, 28.91% major in traditional chinese medicine. A total of 75.94% worked in Grade-A Tertiary Hospital. A total of 52.73% had more than 10 years of work experience and 63.55% had High-level title. (2) More than half of the patients were followed up by 69% Rheumatologists in their daily practice. The proportion of follow-up patients increased powerfully in the group of Rheumatologists who major in Modern Western Medicine (P=0.014), work in Grade-A Tertiary Hospital (P<0.001), have more than 10 years of work experience (P<0.001) and High-level title (P<0.001). (3) 36.45% Rheumatologist thought the frequency for patient disease activity assessment was every 1 month and 53.1% was every 3 months. And 41.7% Rheumatologist prefer to use PASDAS for disease activity criteria, and only 3.6% choose MDA. (4) A total of 62.43% thought they were familiar with T2T strategy, and 83.6% Rheumatologists applied T2T strategy in clinical practice. Among 135 Rheumatologists who did not apply T2T strategy, 62.2% of Rheumatologists thought that the main barrier to T2T application was that they did not fully understand the strategy. The frequency of application of T2T strategy in clinical practice was significantly different between Rheumatologists who major in Modern Western Medicine (60.75%) and traditional chinese medicine (22.84%) (P=0.023).Conclusion:In china, the management of PsA patients need to be standardized to improve patient outcomes. And the promotion of T2T strategy in PsA need to be further strengthened.References:[1]Smolen JS, Schöls M, Braun J,et al. Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan;77(1):3-17.[2]Tucker LJ, Ye W, Coates LC. Novel Concepts in Psoriatic Arthritis Management: Can We Treat to Target? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018 Sep 18;20(11):71.[3]Coates LC, Helliwell PS. Treating to target in psoriatic arthritis: how to implement in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(4):640-643.Figure 1A. Rheumatologist priority of frequency for patient follow-up in different disease status. B. Rheumatologist priority of frequency for patient disease activity assessment in clinical practice. C. Rheumatologist priority of disease activity criteria for PsA patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

Composite Measures for Routine Clinical Practice in Psoriatic Arthritis: Testing of Shortened Versions in a UK Multicenter Study

2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.201675
Author(s):  
William Tillett ◽  
Oliver FitzGerald ◽  
Laura C. Coates ◽  
Jon Packham ◽  
Deepak R. Jadon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Performance Characteristics ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Routine Practice ◽  
Composite Measures ◽  
Patient Reported

Objective To test shortened versions of the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) composite measures for use in routine clinical practice. Methods Clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed in patients with PsA at 3 consecutive follow-up visits in a UK multicenter observational study. Shortened versions of the Composite Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Index (CPDAI) and Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) Composite Exercise (GRACE) measures were developed using PROMs and tested against the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), composite Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis, and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3). Discrimination between disease states and responsiveness were tested with the t-score, standardized response mean (SRM), and effect size (ES). Data were presented to members at the GRAPPA 2020 annual meeting and members voted on the recommended composite routine practice. Results The SRM for the GRACE, 3 visual analog scale (VAS), and 4VAS were 0.67, 0.77, and 0.63, respectively, and for CPDAI and shortened CPDAI (sCPDAI) were 0.54 and 0.55, respectively. Shortened versions of the GRACE increased the t-score from 7.8 to 8.7 (3VAS) and 9.0 (4VAS), but reduced the t-score in the CPDAI/sCPDAI from 6.8 and 6.1. The 3VAS and 4VAS had superior performance characteristics to the sCPDAI, DAS28, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis, and RAPID3 in all tests. Of the members, 60% agreed that the VAS scales contained enough information to assess disease and response to treatment, 53% recommended the 4VAS for use in routine care, and 26% the 3VAS, while leaving 21% undecided. Conclusion Shortening the GRACE to VAS scores alone enhances the ability to detect status and responsiveness and has the best performance characteristics of the tested composite measures. GRAPPA members recommend further testing of the 3VAS and 4VAS in observational and trial datasets.

scholarly journals Evolution of psoriatic arthritis study patient population characteristics in the era of biological treatments

RMD Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann-Sophie Vandendorpe ◽  
Kurt de Vlam ◽  
Rik Lories
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Chronic Inflammatory Disease ◽  
Population Characteristics ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Study Patient

ObjectivesPsoriatic arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the musculoskeletal system. It can include arthritis, spondylitis, dactylitis and enthesitis, and is strongly associated with the presence of psoriasis. The introduction of biological therapies as a treatment option has brought a significant improvement in disease control for patients with psoriatic arthritis. Here, we aimed to detect emerging differences in demographic and clinical characteristics of the psoriatic arthritis patient study population since the introduction of biologicals. We hypothesised that evolving views on control of disease activity and increased experience in the management of psoriatic arthritis have affected the patient population considered for clinical trials and that this may serve as a proxy for changes in clinical practice.MethodsWe systematically searched for and selected 12 phase II and phase III trials and divided them into three treatment periods based on different time periods and working mechanisms of the particular biologicals. We made a selection of patient and disease parameters for which data were available in all three periods, calculated those data per period and looked for statistically significant differences between the treatment periods.ResultsStatistical analysis showed significant differences in patient characteristics, disease characteristics, disease activity, disease effects and use of prior treatments between the patient populations of the three periods.ConclusionThis study shows a clear evolution of the patient population considered for clinical trials since the introduction of biologicals. Further research is needed to see if those changes can be detected in the daily clinical practice.

Minimal Disease Activity and Remission in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients Treated with Anti-TNF-α Drugs

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 350-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Massimo Perrotta ◽  
Antonio Marchesoni ◽  
Ennio Lubrano
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Joint Disease ◽  
Practice Setting ◽  
Minimal Disease Activity ◽  
Tnf Α ◽  
Clinical Practice Setting ◽  
Minimal Disease

Objective.A state of remission is the target of therapy in chronic arthritis. The aim of the present study was to assess the rate of minimal disease activity (MDA) and remission in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) blockers. Disease characteristics and predictors of MDA were also evaluated.Methods.Patients fulfilling the ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria and treated with TNF-α blockers adalimumab, etanercept, or golimumab were enrolled and prospectively followed every 4 months for 1 year in a clinical practice setting. Patients were considered in MDA when they met at least 5/7 of the criteria previously defined. Other remission criteria evaluated were 28-joint Disease Activity Score-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) < 2.6 and Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) score ≤ 3.3. Patients achieving MDA were compared to non-MDA to identify outcome predictor factors.Results.Of the 75 patients treated with TNF-α blockers, at baseline no patients were in MDA or had a DAPSA score ≤ 3.3, while 25 (21.3%) had a DAS28-CRP score < 2.6. Five patients (6%) discontinued treatment because of side effects or inefficacy during followup. After 12 months, MDA was achieved in 46 patients (61.3%). No difference was found among the 3 anti-TNF-α drugs. Predictors for MDA were found to be male sex, high CRP, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and low Health Assessment Questionnaire.Conclusion.In our prospective observational study, based on a clinical practice setting, MDA was achieved in 61.3% of patients treated with TNF-α blockers, identifying this as an achievable target for patients with PsA. Predictors of remission were also identified.

Implementing Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score–guided treat-to-target in psoriatic arthritis routine clinical practice: (im)possible?

Rheumatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (12) ◽  
pp. 2330-2331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L M Mulder ◽  
Alfons A den Broeder ◽  
Berbke T J van Ginneken ◽  
Elien A M Mahler ◽  
Frank H J van den Hoogen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Routine Clinical Practice ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Treat To Target

The use of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: evidence from real clinical practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 91-94
Author(s):  
N. V. Nekrasova ◽  
Yu. E. Borovikov ◽  
T. G. Zadorkina ◽  
P. V. Nekrasova
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Skin Condition ◽  
Chronic Inflammatory Disease ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Interleukin 23 ◽  
Real Clinical Practice

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints, spine and enthesis from the group of spondyloarthritis that develops in patients with psoriasis. Guselkumab is a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, an inhibitor of interleukin 23, which has been shown to be effective in the treatment of plaque psoriasis and PsA.Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of guselkumab treatment in PsA patients.Patients and methods. The study included 16 patients with PsA. All patients received 100 mg of guselkumab subcutaneously at weeks 0, 4, 12, 20. Disease activity and treatment efficacy were assessed at weeks 0, 12 and 24 using the DAS28, ASDAS, BASDAI, DAPSA activity indices, the index of the extent and severity of psoriasis PASI.Results and discussion. During treatment, patients with PsA showed a pronounced positive dynamics of the indices of disease activity and an improvement in the skin condition. Before the treatment with guselkumab, the mean value of the DAS28 index was 4.26±0.64, DAPSA – 37.94±9.45, ASDAS – 2.7±0.65, and BASDAI – 5.49±1.39, after 12 weeks of treatment these indicators decreased to 3.03±0.49; 17.06±4.58; 1.64±0.33 and 3.48±0.66, respectively, and after 24 weeks (after the 4th injection) – to 2.32±0.18; 11.31±2.18; 1.22±0.27 and 2.62±0.78, respectively (p<0.05 for all cases). Before treatment, the average PASI index reached 30.99±15.43, after 12 weeks – 4.55±4.82, and after 24 weeks – 1.05±1.46 (p<0.05). During treatment, a significant improvement in the main manifestations of the disease was noted: regression of peripheral arthritis, spondylitis, and skin rashes.The treatment was well tolerated during the 24 weeks of the study, and no serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion. The data from real clinical practice indicate that guselkumab is highly effective and safe in the treatment of PsA.

Patient’s Global Assessment as an Outcome Measure for Psoriatic Arthritis in Clinical Practice: A Surrogate for Measuring Low Disease Activity?

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 2332-2338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ennio Lubrano ◽  
Fabio Massimo Perrotta ◽  
Wendy J. Parsons ◽  
Antonio Marchesoni
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Low Disease Activity

Objective.To assess the low disease activity (LDA) in a group of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) receiving antitumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) by using the patient’s global assessment (PtGA) in clinical practice, and to compare PtGA with minimal disease activity (MDA) and other outcome measures.Methods.Patients with PsA classified by the ClASsification for Psoriatic ARthritis (CASPAR) criteria and consecutively admitted to an outpatient clinic dedicated to biologic therapy were assessed during their routine followup. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients achieving a PtGA ≤ 20 at 4-, 8-, and 12-month followups. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients achieving MDA and other outcome measures. Correlation of PtGA with MDA and other process and outcome measures were also performed.Results.During the period of observation, 124 patients were evaluated. PtGA ≤ 20 was achieved in 25.7% at 4 months, 48.9% at 8 months, and 65.3% at 12 months of followup. The percentage of PtGA ≤ 20 statistically improved throughout the 3 timepoint assessments and it was statistically correlated to MDA. A significant correlation with the Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, and Health Assessment Questionnaire was also observed. MDA, DAPSA, and Disease Activity Score at 28 joints with C-reactive protein remission were achieved at 12 months in 64%, 36%, and 71% of patients, respectively.Conclusion.PtGA can estimate the LDA status and could be considered as a surrogate of outcome measures for the assessment of global disease activity in patients with PsA receiving anti-TNF therapy during routine clinical practice. These data suggest that PtGA might be used in outpatient settings, being a simple, reliable, and not time-consuming instrument.

scholarly journals Evidence-based algorithm for diagnosis and assessment in psoriatic arthritis: results by Italian DElphi in psoriatic Arthritis (IDEA)

Reumatismo ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 126 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Lapadula ◽  
A. Marchesoni ◽  
F. Salaffi ◽  
R. Ramonda ◽  
C. Salvarani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Literature Search ◽  
Steering Committee ◽  
Delphi Survey ◽  
Activity Measurement ◽  
Expert Committee ◽  
National Expert ◽  
Assessment Procedures

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving skin, peripheral joints, entheses, and axial skeleton. The disease is frequently associated with extrarticular manifestations (EAMs) and comorbidities. In order to create a protocol for PsA diagnosis and global assessment of patients with an algorithm based on anamnestic, clinical, laboratory and imaging procedures, we established a DElphi study on a national scale, named Italian DElphi in psoriatic Arthritis (IDEA). After a literature search, a Delphi poll, involving 52 rheumatologists, was performed. On the basis of the literature search, 202 potential items were identified. The steering committee planned at least two Delphi rounds. In the first Delphi round, the experts judged each of the 202 items using a score ranging from 1 to 9 based on its increasing clinical relevance. The questions posed to experts were <em>How relevant is this procedure/observation/sign/symptom for assessment of a psoriatic arthritis patient?</em> Proposals of additional items, not included in the questionnaire, were also encouraged. The results of the poll were discussed by the Steering Committee, which evaluated the necessity for removing selected procedures or adding additional ones, according to criteria of clinical appropriateness and sustainability. A total of 43 recommended diagnosis and assessment procedures, recognized as items, were derived by combination of the Delphi survey and two National Expert Meetings, and grouped in different areas. Favourable opinion was reached in 100% of cases for several aspects covering the following areas: medical (familial and personal) history, physical evaluation, imaging tool, second level laboratory tests, disease activity measurement and extrarticular manifestations. After performing PsA diagnosis, identification of specific disease activity scores and clinimetric approaches were suggested for assessing the different clinical subsets. Further, results showed the need for investigation on the presence of several EAMs and risk factors. In the context of any area, a rank was assigned for each item by Expert Committee members, in order to create the logical sequence of the algorithm. The final list of recommended diagnosis and assessment procedures, by the Delphi survey and the two National Expert Meetings, was also reported as an algorithm. This study shows results obtained by the combination of a DElphi survey of a group of Italian rheumatologists and two National Expert Meetings, created with the aim of establishing a clinical procedure and algorithm for the diagnosis and the assessment of PsA patients. In order to find accurate and practical diagnostic and assessment items in clinical practice, we have focused our attention on evaluating the different PsA domains. Hence, we conceived the IDEA algorithm in order to address PsA diagnosis and assessment in the context of daily clinical practice. The IDEA algorithm might eventually lead to a multidimensional approach and could represent a useful and practical tool for addressing diagnosis and for assessing the disease appropriately. However, the elaborated algorithm needs to be further investigated in daily practice, for evidencing and proving its eventual efficacy in detecting and staging PsA and its heterogeneous spectrum appropriately.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document