scholarly journals Evolution of psoriatic arthritis study patient population characteristics in the era of biological treatments

RMD Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann-Sophie Vandendorpe ◽  
Kurt de Vlam ◽  
Rik Lories

ObjectivesPsoriatic arthritis is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects the musculoskeletal system. It can include arthritis, spondylitis, dactylitis and enthesitis, and is strongly associated with the presence of psoriasis. The introduction of biological therapies as a treatment option has brought a significant improvement in disease control for patients with psoriatic arthritis. Here, we aimed to detect emerging differences in demographic and clinical characteristics of the psoriatic arthritis patient study population since the introduction of biologicals. We hypothesised that evolving views on control of disease activity and increased experience in the management of psoriatic arthritis have affected the patient population considered for clinical trials and that this may serve as a proxy for changes in clinical practice.MethodsWe systematically searched for and selected 12 phase II and phase III trials and divided them into three treatment periods based on different time periods and working mechanisms of the particular biologicals. We made a selection of patient and disease parameters for which data were available in all three periods, calculated those data per period and looked for statistically significant differences between the treatment periods.ResultsStatistical analysis showed significant differences in patient characteristics, disease characteristics, disease activity, disease effects and use of prior treatments between the patient populations of the three periods.ConclusionThis study shows a clear evolution of the patient population considered for clinical trials since the introduction of biologicals. Further research is needed to see if those changes can be detected in the daily clinical practice.

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 91-94
Author(s):  
N. V. Nekrasova ◽  
Yu. E. Borovikov ◽  
T. G. Zadorkina ◽  
P. V. Nekrasova

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints, spine and enthesis from the group of spondyloarthritis that develops in patients with psoriasis. Guselkumab is a biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, an inhibitor of interleukin 23, which has been shown to be effective in the treatment of plaque psoriasis and PsA.Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of guselkumab treatment in PsA patients.Patients and methods. The study included 16 patients with PsA. All patients received 100 mg of guselkumab subcutaneously at weeks 0, 4, 12, 20. Disease activity and treatment efficacy were assessed at weeks 0, 12 and 24 using the DAS28, ASDAS, BASDAI, DAPSA activity indices, the index of the extent and severity of psoriasis PASI.Results and discussion. During treatment, patients with PsA showed a pronounced positive dynamics of the indices of disease activity and an improvement in the skin condition. Before the treatment with guselkumab, the mean value of the DAS28 index was 4.26±0.64, DAPSA – 37.94±9.45, ASDAS – 2.7±0.65, and BASDAI – 5.49±1.39, after 12 weeks of treatment these indicators decreased to 3.03±0.49; 17.06±4.58; 1.64±0.33 and 3.48±0.66, respectively, and after 24 weeks (after the 4th injection) – to 2.32±0.18; 11.31±2.18; 1.22±0.27 and 2.62±0.78, respectively (p<0.05 for all cases). Before treatment, the average PASI index reached 30.99±15.43, after 12 weeks – 4.55±4.82, and after 24 weeks – 1.05±1.46 (p<0.05). During treatment, a significant improvement in the main manifestations of the disease was noted: regression of peripheral arthritis, spondylitis, and skin rashes.The treatment was well tolerated during the 24 weeks of the study, and no serious adverse events were reported.Conclusion. The data from real clinical practice indicate that guselkumab is highly effective and safe in the treatment of PsA.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscilla C. H. Wong ◽  
Ying-Ying Leung ◽  
Edmund K. Li ◽  
Lai-Shan Tam

Over the past decade, the assessment of the disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has rapidly evolved in view of the need for valid, feasible, and reliable outcome measures that can be ideally employed in longitudinal cohorts, clinical trials, and clinical practice as well as the growing paradigm of tight disease control and treating to target in the management of PsA. This paper reviews the currently available measures used in the assessment of the disease activity in PsA. The composite measures for PsA that are under development are also discussed.


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 2559-2565 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAFNA D. GLADMAN ◽  
BRIAN D.M. TOM ◽  
PHILIP J. MEASE ◽  
VERNON T. FAREWELL

Objective.To develop a recommended measure of response for use in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) clinical trials and observational cohort studies reflecting joint involvement.Methods.Previously, we used data from phase III randomized placebo-controlled trials of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents to determine models, based primarily on statistical considerations but with some clinical input when necessary, that best distinguish drug-treated from placebo-treated patients. For the same data, we examine response criteria currently used for PsA and logistic regression models based on the individual components of these response criteria. Comparison with our previously developed models, based primarily on statistical consideration, is made.Results.A simplified score, the PsA Joint Activity Index (PsAJAI), based on components of the ACR30, performed better than the ACR20 and PsARC, and comparable to our previously developed models. The PsAJAI is a weighted sum of 30% improvement in core measures with weights of 2 given to the joint count measure, the C-reactive protein laboratory measure, and the physician global assessment of disease activity measure. Weights of 1 should be given to the remaining 30% improvement measures including pain, patient global assessment of disease activity, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire.Conclusion.We recommend the PsAJAI be used as an outcome measure for assessing joint disease response in PsA clinical trials.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1303.2-1304
Author(s):  
J. Gratacos-Masmitja ◽  
J. L. Álvarez Vega ◽  
E. Beltrán ◽  
A. Urruticoechea-Arana ◽  
C. Fito-Manteca ◽  
...  

Background:Apremilast is a non-biologic systemic agent approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis, oral ulcers of Behcet’s disease and PsA with proven efficacy in clinical trials [1,2]. However, more real-world evidence of apremilast use and effectiveness is needed to identify the patient profile most likely to benefit from this treatment [3].Objectives:To evaluate the persistence of apremilast treatment in patients with PsA naïve to biological treatments in routine clinical practice and assess its effectiveness. Baseline clinical characteristics on patients who started apremilast were also evaluated.Methods:Observational, prospective, multicenter (20 centers) study including consecutive adult patients with PsA naïve to biological therapies who had started treatment with apremilast during the previous 5 to 7 months and were followed-up during 12 months. Variables recorded were persistence of treatment with apremilast at 6 months (6mo) and number of swelling joints, presence of enthesitis and dactylitis, and disease activity, measured by the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) score and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of psoriasis, collected at baseline (BL) (i.e., apremilast treatment start) and 6mo; comorbidities were retrospectively collected at BL. Categorical and quantitative variables were compared using McNemar’s and Wilcoxon test, respectively. Data sets analyzed included all assessable patients.Results:Of the 60 patients recruited at the time of this interim analysis, 54 (90.0%) [mean (SD) age 53.4 (13.9) years] were assessable; 41 (75.9%) of these continued treatment with apremilast at 6mo. At BL, 34 (63.0%) patients had at least one comorbidity, the most frequent being cardiovascular disease (n=15, 27.8%), including hypertension (n=8, 14.8%), metabolic/endocrine disease (n=18, 33.3%), including obesity (n=8, 14.8%) and dyslipidemia (n=10, 18.5%). Psychiatric disease (i.e., depression) (n=5, 9.3%) and neoplasia (n=8, 14.8%) were also observed. The number of swelling joints decreased from median (Q1, Q3) 4.0 (2.0, 7.0) at BL to 1.5 (0.0, 4.0) at 6mo (p=0.0012). Patients with dactylitis and enthesitis decreased from 19 (35.2%) and 16 (29.6%) at BL to 10 (18.5%) and 9 (16.7%) at 6mo (p=0.0225 and p=0.0391), respectively. The distribution of patients in the different disease activity categories according to DAPSA scale changed between BL and 6mo, indicating a favorable disease evolution (Figure 1 next page). According to PGA, at BL (n=53), disease activity was categorized as mild in 18.0%, as moderate in 72.0%, and as severe in 10% of patients and, at 6mo (n=54), as mild in 70.6%, as moderate in 25.5%, and as severe in 3.9% of patients. Fifteen (27.8%) patients interrupted treatment permanently (n=13, 24.1%) or temporarily (n=2, 3.7%), due to no/partial response (n=8, 14.8%), tolerability issues leading to adverse events (n=3, 5.6%), patient decision (n=2, 3.7%), and other reasons (n=2, 3.7%) after a mean (SD) treatment of 3.05 (2.20) months.Conclusion:Forty-one (75.9%) patients with PsA naïve to biological therapies were treated with apremilast during ≥6 months. After treatment, the number of swelling joints, and dactylitis and enthesitis decreased and changes in disease activity according to DAPSA and PGA pointed to a favorable disease evolution. Apremilast treatment provides a clinical benefit to patients with PsA treated in clinical practice.References:[1]Gossec L, Smolen JS, Ramiro S, et al. European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Feb 10;75(3):499 LP-510[2]Torres T and Puig L. Apremilast: A novel oral treatment for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Am J clin Dermatol. 2018 Feb;19(1):23-32[3]Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ et al. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015. Treatment Recommendations for Psoriatic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(5):1060– 71.Disclosure of Interests:Jordi Gratacos-Masmitja Speakers bureau: MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Celgene y Lilly., Consultant of: MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, Janssen Cilag, Novartis, Celgene y Lilly., José Luis Álvarez Vega Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Esteve, UCB, Menarini, Pfizer, GSK, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Gebro., Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Esteve, UCB, Menarini, Pfizer, GSK, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Gebro., Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, MSD, Lilly, Roche, Esteve, UCB, Menarini, Pfizer, GSK, BMS, Janssen, Novartis, Gebro., Emma Beltrán Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, ANA URRUTICOECHEA-ARANA: None declared., C. Fito-Manteca: None declared., Francisco Maceiras: None declared., Joaquin Maria Belzunegui Otano Speakers bureau: Lilly, Amgen, Novartis, Abbvie, Janssen., J. Fernández-Melón Speakers bureau: Amgen SL, Eugenio Chamizo Carmona: None declared., Abad Hernández Speakers bureau: MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Kern, Novartis, Biogen, Sandoz, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Roche and Janssen-Cilag, Consultant of: MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Kern, Novartis, Biogen, Sandoz, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Roche and Janssen-Cilag, Grant/research support from: MSD, Abbvie, Pfizer, Kern, Novartis, Biogen, Sandoz, Amgen, Sanofi, Lilly, Roche and Janssen-Cilag, Inmaculada Ros Consultant of: Amgen, Grant/research support from: MSD, Roche, Novartis, lilly, Pfizer, Amgen, Eva Pascual Shareholder of: Amgen, Employee of: Amgen, Juan Carlos Torre Speakers bureau: Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Consultant of: Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Amgen, Lilly, Novartis, Janssen, Pfizer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1318.2-1319
Author(s):  
L. Xu ◽  
Z. Wang ◽  
J. Xue ◽  
M. Bai ◽  
H. Zhong ◽  
...  

Background:Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis with progressive, erosive destruction associated with functional impairment. Principles of treat-to-target (T2T) have been widely used in rheumatoid arthritis, which has powerfully improved patient outcomes. In 2017, the concept of T2T has proposed to apply in PsA patients. However, the awareness and implementation of evidence-based T2T treatment guidelines varies across different geographical regions of China, hospital grades, professional status and specialities.Objectives:The study aimed to investigate Rheumatologists’ views and experiences in managing PsA patients with T2T strategy in china.Methods:A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of Rheumatologists in China from 5 August to 15 August 2020 was conducted for this study. Rheumatologists were contacted by WeChat (a Chinese cell/web app) and asked to complete a web-based questionnaire anonymously. The electronic questionnaire was sent out by the internet platform of WenJuanXing via WeChat (https://www.wjx.cn/). The questionnaire was designed to collect: (a) demographic information; (b) patient management in clinical practice for Rheumatologists; (c) familiarity and application of T2T strategy in Rheumatologists. P values ≤0.05 were considered significant.Results:(1) A total of 823 rheumatologists (69.87% female, 30.13% male) provided valid answers to the questionnaire. 71.09% of the participants major in Modern Western Medicine, 28.91% major in traditional chinese medicine. A total of 75.94% worked in Grade-A Tertiary Hospital. A total of 52.73% had more than 10 years of work experience and 63.55% had High-level title. (2) More than half of the patients were followed up by 69% Rheumatologists in their daily practice. The proportion of follow-up patients increased powerfully in the group of Rheumatologists who major in Modern Western Medicine (P=0.014), work in Grade-A Tertiary Hospital (P<0.001), have more than 10 years of work experience (P<0.001) and High-level title (P<0.001). (3) 36.45% Rheumatologist thought the frequency for patient disease activity assessment was every 1 month and 53.1% was every 3 months. And 41.7% Rheumatologist prefer to use PASDAS for disease activity criteria, and only 3.6% choose MDA. (4) A total of 62.43% thought they were familiar with T2T strategy, and 83.6% Rheumatologists applied T2T strategy in clinical practice. Among 135 Rheumatologists who did not apply T2T strategy, 62.2% of Rheumatologists thought that the main barrier to T2T application was that they did not fully understand the strategy. The frequency of application of T2T strategy in clinical practice was significantly different between Rheumatologists who major in Modern Western Medicine (60.75%) and traditional chinese medicine (22.84%) (P=0.023).Conclusion:In china, the management of PsA patients need to be standardized to improve patient outcomes. And the promotion of T2T strategy in PsA need to be further strengthened.References:[1]Smolen JS, Schöls M, Braun J,et al. Treating axial spondyloarthritis and peripheral spondyloarthritis, especially psoriatic arthritis, to target: 2017 update of recommendations by an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan;77(1):3-17.[2]Tucker LJ, Ye W, Coates LC. Novel Concepts in Psoriatic Arthritis Management: Can We Treat to Target? Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2018 Sep 18;20(11):71.[3]Coates LC, Helliwell PS. Treating to target in psoriatic arthritis: how to implement in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(4):640-643.Figure 1A. Rheumatologist priority of frequency for patient follow-up in different disease status. B. Rheumatologist priority of frequency for patient disease activity assessment in clinical practice. C. Rheumatologist priority of disease activity criteria for PsA patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 985.1-985
Author(s):  
K. Triantafyllias ◽  
S. Liverakos ◽  
C. Noack ◽  
A. Schwarting

Background:Valid assessment of disease activity leads to improvement of long-term outcomes in patients with inflammatory arthritis (1). Optical spectral transmission (OST) is a modern diagnostic tool able to assess the blood-specific absorption of light transmitted through a tissue, promising quantification of inflammation in the finger and wrist joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (commercial device: HandScan – Demcon/Hemics, The Netherlands) (2). Even though an increasing number of studies have evaluated diagnostic value of this new technology in RA patients (2,3), no data exist regarding psoriatic arthritis (PsA).Objectives:To examine for the first time the diagnostic value of OST in detecting inflammation in patients with PsA and to evaluate its relationship with disease activity markers and various epidemiological and anthropometric patient characteristics.Methods:OST-Measurements were performed in a group of PsA patients and a group of healthy controls. The difference between OST in the two groups was statistically examined and relationships of OST with clinical (tender / swollen joint counts, disease activity on a visual analogue scale) and serological disease activity markers were evaluated. Moreover, joint ultrasound (US) examinations were performed in a subgroup of PsA patients and OST associations with a Power Doppler- and a Grey Scale-US score were examined. Finally, relationships of OST with various anthropometric and epidemiologic parameters (BMI, hand-size, gender, age) were assessed.Results:We recruited 49 PsA patients [65.3% female; mean age 53.3 years (± 11.8 SD)] and 114 control subjects [77.2% female; mean age 46 years (± 12.8 SD)]. OST was statistically significantly higher in the patient group, compared to the control group [14.95 (12.04 - 17.18, IQR) vs. 10.31 (7.84 – 13.79, IQR); p<0.001]. OST correlated moderately-strongly with both examined US scores (Power Doppler-score: r = 0.5; p = 0.026 and Grey Scale-score: r = 0.52; p = 0.028). Moreover, OST showed a moderate, statistically significant association with C-reactive protein (CRP) (r = 0,298; p = 0,037). Finally, males had significantly higher OST values than females and OST associated moderately-weakly with body mass index (BMI) in the control group (rho = 0.24; p< 0.001).Conclusion:This is the first report of a possible diagnostic value of OST in patients with PsA. OST correlated with ultrasound and serological activity markers and may thus prove to be a useful tool of disease activity assessment, next to well established diagnostic modalities, such as the joint US. Correlations of OST with patient characteristics implicate the need to take also anthropometric and epidemiological patient characteristics into account when interprenting OST results in order to avoid confounding.References:[1]Katchamart W, et al. Systematic monitoring of disease activity using an outcome measure improves outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2010;37:1411–1415.[2]Triantafyllias, et al. Diagnostic value of optical spectral transmission in rheumatoid arthritis: associations with clinical characteristics and comparison with joint ultrasonography. J Rheumatol 2020 1;47(9):1314-1322.[3]Onna M Van, et al. Assessment of disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using optical spectral transmission measurements, a non-invasive imaging technique. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:511–518.Disclosure of Interests:Konstantinos Triantafyllias Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, Chugai, Stefanie Liverakos: None declared, Claudia Noack: None declared, Andreas Schwarting: None declared


2021 ◽  
pp. jrheum.201675
Author(s):  
William Tillett ◽  
Oliver FitzGerald ◽  
Laura C. Coates ◽  
Jon Packham ◽  
Deepak R. Jadon ◽  
...  

Objective To test shortened versions of the psoriatic arthritis (PsA) composite measures for use in routine clinical practice. Methods Clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed in patients with PsA at 3 consecutive follow-up visits in a UK multicenter observational study. Shortened versions of the Composite Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Index (CPDAI) and Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) Composite Exercise (GRACE) measures were developed using PROMs and tested against the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), composite Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis, and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data (RAPID3). Discrimination between disease states and responsiveness were tested with the t-score, standardized response mean (SRM), and effect size (ES). Data were presented to members at the GRAPPA 2020 annual meeting and members voted on the recommended composite routine practice. Results The SRM for the GRACE, 3 visual analog scale (VAS), and 4VAS were 0.67, 0.77, and 0.63, respectively, and for CPDAI and shortened CPDAI (sCPDAI) were 0.54 and 0.55, respectively. Shortened versions of the GRACE increased the t-score from 7.8 to 8.7 (3VAS) and 9.0 (4VAS), but reduced the t-score in the CPDAI/sCPDAI from 6.8 and 6.1. The 3VAS and 4VAS had superior performance characteristics to the sCPDAI, DAS28, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis, and RAPID3 in all tests. Of the members, 60% agreed that the VAS scales contained enough information to assess disease and response to treatment, 53% recommended the 4VAS for use in routine care, and 26% the 3VAS, while leaving 21% undecided. Conclusion Shortening the GRACE to VAS scores alone enhances the ability to detect status and responsiveness and has the best performance characteristics of the tested composite measures. GRAPPA members recommend further testing of the 3VAS and 4VAS in observational and trial datasets.


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 3067-3071
Author(s):  
John G. F. Cleland ◽  
Ian Ford

This chapter is written primarily from the perspective of investigators with limited resources designing clinical trials to assess the effects of interventions on patient well-being and outcomes with the hope that the results might influence clinical practice and guidelines. Other perspectives should be taken into account. The advice may be less applicable when resources are abundant (e.g. phase III trials sponsored by a large commercial company). Much research is funded by commercial companies hoping for a return on investment; they will design clinical trials to increase the chance of a statistically positive result. Many investigators will do the same although their motivation may differ. However, practising clinicians, patients, and health services want trials that help inform their daily clinical practice rather than merely achieving statistical significance. Large studies may be statistically positive but of dubious practical significance. This chapter gives some general guidance on selecting patients, comparators, endpoints, and study design.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document