Fifteen-minute consultation: A clinical approach to the management of the child with hypertonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 276-281
Author(s):  
Daniel E Lumsden ◽  
Jill Cadwgan

Elevated tone (hypertonia) is a common problem seen in the paediatric clinic. For most children and young people, hypertonia is just one aspect of a broader disorder of movement and posture. This paper describes a clinical approach to the management of hypertonia in children, considering the contribution of high tone to the functional problems experienced by the child, the potential adverse effects of reducing tone, side effects of the intervention and the importance of setting objectives/goals for intervention which can be measured at follow-up. We describe this as the ‘MOTOR’ approach and provide some examples of how it can be used in practice.

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Williams ◽  
Charlotte L. Hall ◽  
Sue Brown ◽  
Boliang Guo ◽  
Marilyn James ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Medication for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) should be closely monitored to ensure optimisation. There is growing interest in using computerised assessments of ADHD symptoms to support medication monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of one such computerised assessment, the Quantified Behavior (Qb) Test, as part of medication management for ADHD. Methods This feasibility multi-site RCT conducted in child and adolescent mental health and community paediatric settings recruited participants aged 6–15 years diagnosed with ADHD starting stimulant medication. Participants were randomised into one of two arms: experimental (QbTest protocol) where participants completed a QbTest at baseline and two follow-up QbTests on medication (2–4 weeks and 8–10 weeks later) and control where participants received treatment as usual, including at least two follow-up consultations. Measures of parent, teacher, and clinician-rated symptoms and global functioning were completed at each time point. Clinicians recorded treatment decision-making and health economic measures were obtained. Data were analysed using multi-level modelling and participants (children and parents) and clinicians were interviewed about their experiences, resulting data were thematically analysed. Results Forty-four children and young people were randomised. Completion of study outcome measures by care-givers and teachers ranged from 52 to 78% at baseline to 47–65% at follow-up. Participants reported the questionnaires to be useful to complete. SNAP-IV inattention scores showed greater reduction in the intervention than the control group (− 5.85, 95% CI − 10.33, − 1.36,). Engagement with the intervention ranged from 100% at baseline, to 78% follow-up 1 and 57% follow-up 2. However, only 37% of QbTests were conducted in the correct time period. Interview data highlighted that the objectivity of the QbTest was appreciated by clinicians and parents. Clinicians commented that the additional time and resources required meant that it is not feasible to use QbTest for all cases. Conclusion The trial design and protocol appear to be feasible and acceptable but could be improved by modifying QbTest time periods and the method of data collection. With these changes, the protocol may be appropriate for a full trial. Adding QbTest may improve symptom outcome as measured by SNAP-IV. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03368573, prospectively registered, 11th December 2017, and ISRCTN, ISRCTN69461593, retrospectively registered, 10th April 2018


1983 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 346-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald B. Salem

The literature concerning side effects of normal serum levels of lithium on various organ systems is reviewed. Suggestions for monitoring and managing these adverse effects are discussed. A table is presented that provides recommendations for evaluation prior to initiation and during follow-up of therapy.


Author(s):  
Varsha Narayanan

Depression is emerging to be one of the commonest mental health disorders worldwide affecting a wide age group. The prescription of antidepressants has risen considerably in last decade with a preference for using newer antidepressants like Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs). There have been many published reports of Ocular side effects with Antidepressants related to Dry eye, Visual disturbance, Angle closure glaucoma and Retinal effects. There has also been a significant rise in antidepressant usage by the elderly, which is a population at risk for ocular adverse effects. Therefore, it is pertinent to understand the antidepressants from the perspective of their mechanisms of action and all possible Ocular adverse effects, and develop an Ophthalmic screening protocol and follow up for patients being put on Antidepressants. Patients should also be counselled for reporting alert signs of ocular side effects immediately. These steps may help to avert and decrease visual complications with Antidepressants.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Williams ◽  
Charlotte L Hall ◽  
Sue Brown ◽  
Boliang Guo ◽  
Marilyn James ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Medication for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) should be closely monitored to ensure optimisation. There is growing interest in using computerised assessments of ADHD symptoms to support medication monitoring. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of one such computerised assessment, the Quantified Behavior (Qb) Test, as part of medication management for ADHD.Methods: This feasibility multi-site RCT conducted in child and adolescent mental health and community paediatric settings recruited participants aged 6-15 years diagnosed with ADHD starting stimulant medication. Participants were randomised into one of two arms: Experimental (QbTest protocol); participants completed a QbTest at baseline and two follow-up QbTests on medication (2-4 weeks and 8-10 weeks later). Control; participants received treatment-as-usual, including at least two follow-up consultations. Measures of parent, teacher and clinician-rated symptoms and global functioning were completed at each time-point. Clinicians recorded treatment decision-making and health economic measures were obtained. Data were analysed using multi-level modelling and participants (children and parents) and clinicians were interviewed about their experiences, resulting data were thematically analysed.Results: Forty-four children and young people were randomised. Completion of study outcome measures by care-givers and teachers ranged from 52-78% at baseline to 47-65% at follow-up. Participants reported the questionnaires to be useful to complete. SNAP-IV inattention scores showed greater reduction in the intervention than the control group (-5.85, 95%CI -10.33, -1.36, p=0.01). Engagement with the intervention ranged from 100% at baseline, to 78% follow-up 1 and 57% follow-up 2. However, only 37% of QbTests were conducted in the correct time period. Interview data highlighted that the objectivity of the QbTest was appreciated by clinicians and parents. Clinicians commented that the additional time and resources required meant that it is not feasible to use QbTest for all cases.Conclusion: The trial design and protocol appear to be feasible and acceptable, but could be improved by modifying QbTest time periods and the method of data collection. With these changes the protocol may be appropriate for a full trial. Adding QbTest may improve symptom outcome as measured by SNAP-IV.Trial registration: Prospectively registered with Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03368573, 11th December 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03368573) and retrospectively with ISRCTN (ISRCTN69461593, 10th April 2018, http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN69461593).


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 4888-4888
Author(s):  
Evelyne Shabad ◽  
Eitan Mangoubi ◽  
Olga Valkovsky ◽  
Salim Habib Alla ◽  
Miriam Quitt

Abstract Abstract 4888 Introduction. Rituximab (RTX), a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has now become a cornerstone in the treatment of many CD20 positive B cell lymphomas. RTX induces a rapid depletion of normal CD20 expressing B-cells in the peripheral blood, and their level remains low for 2–6 months before returning to pretreatment levels, generally within 12 months. Some patients develop late side effects such as neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia regardless of the level of B cells; these patients are more vulnerable to life-threatening infections. In addition, treatment with RTX is a risk factor for HBV and HCV reactivation in occult and chronic carriers. Aims. The goal of the study was to identify the clinical and laboratory indices that serve as predictors of risk for developing late side effects in patients with non- Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) treated with RTX in a single medical center. Statistical correlation between these variables and occurrence of infectious complications secondary to late hematologic adverse effects such as neutropenia and hypogammaglobulinemia was performed. Clinical outcome of patients with infectious complications was evaluated. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study of 120 patients who were diagnosed with B cell NHL and were followed in the Institute of Hematology of Carmel Medical Center in Haifa between 2000–2008. Each patient received RTX as a monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy. All the patients in the study were RTX naive. The study was approved by the local Helsinki committee. For the purpose of the study, the follow-up period was defined from the time of termination until a period of 24 months from the last therapeutic dose of RTX. Late side effects were defined as side effects that appeared 6 months after the last therapeutic dose of RTX or continued beyond the 6 month period. For each variable we evaluated retrospectively the proportion of patients who developed late side effects. In an attempt to characterize the risk factors such as age, sex, status of lymphoma, type of chemotherapy, number of treatments and the interval between the treatments, comparison was made between the patients who developed side effects and those who did not. Results. Twenty two of the 120 surveyed patients (18.3%) developed infections. Hematologic side effects observed were anemia (28.3%), thrombocytopenia (7.5%) and neutropenia (3.28%). We found that age ≥70 years and recurrence of the disease were significant risk factors for developing side effects. Laboratory indexes that were found to be significant predicting factors for the risk of infection were: PMN<2.0×109/mm3, LDH≥480u/l, SGOT≥44u/l. An active disease and grade 3–4 neutropenia were both variables that contributed to the risk of infection. There was no correlation between gender of patients, the histological type and stage of lymphoma, type of chemotherapy, or number of therapeutic courses with RTX and increased risk of infection. We did not find any association between hypogammaglobulinemia and the risk of infection. Regarding viral infections, only 2 HCV carriers were detected in the study; none of them had reactivation during the follow up. Reactivation of HBV occurred in 1 of the 6 occult carriers (16.7%). Conclusions. In recent years RTX has become an essential component in the therapy of B cell NHL. Late side effects of this drug are now beginning to emerge and require new risk assessment for safety. Twenty two patients (18.33%) in our study developed infectious complications. This rate is lower than the one reported in the literature (30%). In contrast, mortality following infection was 7% as compared to 2% reported in the literature. These data can be explained by the fact that our study examined hospitalized patients who had more severe infections. Our study supports the previous observation that hypogammaglobulinemia does not present a risk factor for infection. In contrary to the reports in literature, we found no correlation between the number of therapeutic courses with RTX and the risk of infection. In conclusion, we suggest that RTX should be used with caution in patients over age 70 and in patients with recurrent disease. In order to confirm our findings, further assessment of late adverse effects on the larger population of patients treated with rituximab is warranted. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (9) ◽  
pp. 1505-1510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Vitale ◽  
Antonio Ciccarelli ◽  
Michele Caraglia ◽  
Maurizio Galderisi ◽  
Riccardo Rossi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Provocative tests for calcitonin (CT) are fundamental in the diagnosis and follow-up of C-cell disease and in the detection of hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) carriers with unknown RET mutations. A recent report has proposed omeprazole, which can increase endogenous gastrin (GT), as a new provocative test for MTC. Methods: We compared the omeprazole test (20 mg twice a day for 4 days) to the pentagastrin test (0.5 μg/kg of body weight) for the diagnosis and management of MTC. Twenty healthy individuals and 20 MTC patients with mildly or moderately increased basal CT serum concentrations underwent the pentagastrin and omeprazole tests. Results: In MTC patients, the pentagastrin test produced a significantly higher increase in serum CT than did omeprazole. After the pentagastrin injection, several patients reported unpleasant side effects, including substantial tightness in 38 of 40 participants. No adverse effects were observed during the omeprazole test. A significant direct correlation was recorded between CT% (ratio of CT peak to basal value × 100) and GT% (ratio of GT peak to basal value × 100) during the omeprazole test in MTC patients (r = 0.73; P &lt;0.001). Conclusions: In spite of several adverse effects, pentagastrin remains the best provocative test for the diagnosis of MTC. Omeprazole may be useful when pentagastrin is contraindicated or refused because of the unpleasant side effects, but further validation is needed.


BJPsych Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. S41-S41
Author(s):  
Ella McGowan

AimsTo identify children and adolescents started on SSRIs to see if they are being followed up in accordance to NICE and Maudsley guidelinesObjectivesHas the patient been followed up after a week to check for adverse effects or improvement in their mental state?Has the patient been re-evaluated every 4-6 weeks, if not is there an alternative plan?If there is no improvement has the dose been increased?If there is an adverse effect has the dose been lowered or the medication stopped?MethodPaper case notes including clinic letters and handwritten notes were reviewed on the 19/10/2020. The following data were collected anonymously.AgeGenderDate seen / Date medication startedName of medicationDate medication startedDate of Follow-upMonitoring of improvementMonitoring of adverse effectsOutcome of monitoringResultA total of 18 sets of cases were identified.Follow-up occurred in 17 of the 18 cases.The one case that had not been followed up had started the medication 8 weeks before the audit. The median follow-up time was 42 days (6 weeks). No cases were followed up within a week.Monitoring of improvement was recorded in 88% of case notes reviewed.Monitoring for adverse effects occurred in 36% of case notes and none of these patients had reported any side effects. 53% of cases did not have monitoring of adverse effects documented. There were two patients (11%) who did not take the medication as prescribed. One out of choice and one their parent had not collected it.The medication dose was increased in 22% of patients without clear documentation of monitoring for adverse effects.ConclusionAfter discussion with the clinical lead it was decided it is impractical to follow up patients a week after starting medication. However, patients and their carers should be informed of the side effects and advised to contact CAMHS if adverse effects occur.The area of practice that can be improved is the documentation of adverse effects at follow-up.Recommendations:All patients to be informed of the common side effects of the medication before it is initiated and advised to contact the CAMHS team if they have concernsAll CAMHS patients started on SSRIs should be followed up within 4-6 weeksAt follow-up any adverse events and clinical response should be discussedAn accurate record of the exchanges of the above information should be documented in the notesRe-audit


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joana Cruz ◽  
Amedine Duret ◽  
Rachel Harwood ◽  
Lorna K. Fraser ◽  
Caroline B. Jones ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundReports of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination with mRNA vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 have occurred after countries began vaccinating adolescents. We undertook a systematic review of cardiac adverse effects associated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in children and young people (CYP)< 18 years.MethodsSystematic review with protocol prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021275380).Six electronic databases were searched from 1 December 2019 to 14 September 2021. Eligible studies were those reporting on CYP with reported or proven myocarditis, pericarditis and/or myopericarditis associated with vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. We summarized findings across all clinical cases reported in case report / case series studies. As a number of studies reported data from two publicly available vaccine surveillance systems, we updated estimates of reporting rates for cardiac adverse events up to 31 October for the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and 13 November for EudraVigilance covering European Union and European Economic Area (EUEA) countries.ResultsTwenty-one studies were included from 338 identified records. Seventeen were case reports/series describing a total of 127 CYP. Three studies described reporting rates from passive surveillance databases (VAERS, EudraVigilance, and the WHO VigiBase) and one described 22 cases from the US Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD).Clinical series reported that 99.2% presented with chest pain, 100% had raised troponin and 73.8% had an abnormal ECG. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in 91 cases identified myocardial injury in 61.5%, with 90.1% showing late gadolinium enhancement. NSAIDs were the most common treatment (76.0%).One US dataset (VSD) estimated a significant excess of 29.6 events per million vaccine doses across both sexes and doses. There were 1129 reports of myocarditis and 358 reports of pericarditis from across the USA and EU/EEA. The VAERS reporting rate per million for myocarditis was 12.4 for boys and 1.4 for girls after the first dose, and 49.6 for boys and 6.1 for girls after the second dose. There was a marked trend for VAERS reporting to be highest soon after initiation of the vaccine schedule, suggesting reporting bias.ConclusionsCardiac adverse effects are very rare after mRNA vaccination for COVID-19 in CYP <18 years. The great majority of cases are mild and self-limiting without significant treatment. No data are yet available on children under 12 years. Larger detailed longitudinal studies are urgently needed from active surveillance sources.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document