scholarly journals Covid-19: doctors in final trimester of pregnancy should avoid direct patient contact

BMJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. m1173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abi Rimmer
2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuguang (Grant) Tao ◽  
Janine Giampino ◽  
Deborah A. Dooley ◽  
Frances E. Humphrey ◽  
David M. Baron ◽  
...  

Objectives.To describe the procedures used during an influenza immunization program and the use of a randomized survey to quantify the vaccination rate among healthcare workers with and without patient contact.Design.Influenza immunization vaccination program and a randomized survey.Setting.Johns Hopkins University and Health System.Methods.The 2008/2009 Johns Hopkins Influenza Immunization Program was administered to 40,000 employees, including 10,763 healthcare workers. A 10% randomized sample (1,084) of individuals were interviewed to evaluate the vaccination rate among healthcare workers with direct patient contact.Results.Between September 23, 2008, and April 30, 2009, a total of 16,079 vaccinations were administered. Ninety-four percent (94.5%) of persons who were vaccinated received the vaccine in the first 7 weeks of the campaign. The randomized survey demonstrated an overall vaccination rate of 71.3% (95% confidence interval, 68.6%-74.0%) and a vaccination rate for employees with direct patient contact of 82.8% (95% confidence interval, 80.1%-85.5%). The main reason (25.3%) for declining the program vaccine was because the employee had received documented vaccination elsewhere.Conclusions.The methods used to increase participation in the recent immunization program were successful, and a randomized survey to assess participation was found to be an efficient means of evaluating the workforce's level of potential immunity to the influenza virus.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1111-1113
Author(s):  
Riley Hazard ◽  
Kyle B. Enfield ◽  
Darla J. Low ◽  
Eve T. Giannetta ◽  
Costi D. Sifri

We describe an outbreak of tuberculosis (TB) in the food preparation area of a hospital, which demonstrates that employees in healthcare settings may serve as potential risks for spread of TB even if they have no direct patient contact.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016;37:1111–1113


1991 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 654-662 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Joel Ehrenkranz ◽  
Blanca C. Alfonso

AbstractObjective:The study was designed to compare the efficacies of bland soap handwash and isopropyl alcohol hand rinse in preventing transfer of aerobic gram-negative bacilli to urinary catheters via transient hand colonization acquired from direct patient contact. Glove juice recovery of gram-negative bacteria was considered transient colonization; catheter recovery was considered transfer colonization.Design:The contact source for gram-negative bacteria was a single “high burden” groin skin carrier ( ≥ 104/ml cup scrub fluid). Using a two-period cross-over design, 6 healthcare workers had 2 15-second contacts for each hand followed by either soap handwash or alcohol hand rinse (12 experiments with each treatment). Between 4 to 5 minutes after contact, each hand manipulated a catheter; the catheter was then cultured and the hand was glove juice tested.Results:Soap handwash failed to prevent gram-negative bacteria transfer to the catheter in 11 of 12 (92%) experiments; alcohol hand rinse in 2 of 12 (17%) (p< .001). Soap handwash failed to prevent transient colonization in 12 of 12 (100%) experiments; alcohol in 5 of 12 (42%) (risk ratio 2.4,95% confidence interval 1.2-4.7). Single gram-negative bacteria species carried at source levels ≥ 5.5 × 103/ml (heavy contamination) established transient colonization in 23 of 30 (77%) exposures following soap handwash; single gram-negative bacteria species carried at levels ≤ 3.5 × 103/ml established colonization in 1 of 22 (5%) similar exposures (p<.001).Conclusions:Bland soap handwash was generally ineffective in preventing hand transfer of gram-negative bacteria to catheters following brief contact with a heavy-contamination patient source; alcohol hand rinse was generally effective.


mBio ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Osterholm ◽  
Kristine A. Moore ◽  
Nicholas S. Kelley ◽  
Lisa M. Brosseau ◽  
Gary Wong ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Available evidence demonstrates that direct patient contact and contact with infectious body fluids are the primary modes for Ebola virus transmission, but this is based on a limited number of studies. Key areas requiring further study include (i) the role of aerosol transmission (either via large droplets or small particles in the vicinity of source patients), (ii) the role of environmental contamination and fomite transmission, (iii) the degree to which minimally or mildly ill persons transmit infection, (iv) how long clinically relevant infectiousness persists, (v) the role that “superspreading events” may play in driving transmission dynamics, (vi) whether strain differences or repeated serial passage in outbreak settings can impact virus transmission, and (vii) what role sylvatic or domestic animals could play in outbreak propagation, particularly during major epidemics such as the 2013–2015 West Africa situation. In this review, we address what we know and what we do not know about Ebola virus transmission. We also hypothesize that Ebola viruses have the potential to be respiratory pathogens with primary respiratory spread.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Rivkees ◽  
Shamarial Roberson ◽  
Carina Blackmore

Per-capita, Florida ranks second in those 65 years of age and older (20.5%) with more than 4,500,000 individuals in this category. COVID-19 vaccine was allocated in a phased roll-out beginning December 14, 2020. Phase 1A included health care personnel with direct patient contact, and residents and staff of nursing homes (NHs) and assisted living facilities (ALFs). Following this initial phase, individuals 65 years of age and older became eligible for vaccination, along with individuals determined by hospital providers to be extremely medically vulnerable to COVID-19. This strategy was based on the desire to most immediately reduce morbidity and mortality, as COVID-19 morbidity and mortality is age-related. Through March 15, 2021, 4,338,099 individuals received COVID-19 vaccine, including 2,431,540 individuals who completed their vaccination series. Of all those vaccinated, 70% were 65 years of age and older, and 63% of those 65 years of age and older. Beginning February 1, 2021, the decline in the number of new cases per week became greater in those 65 years of age and older than those younger. By March 15, 2021, the number of new cases, hospitalizations, and deaths per day for those 65 years of age and older relative to mid-January, were 82%, 80%, and 92% lower respectively. In comparison, the number of new cases, hospitalizations, and deaths per day for those younger than 65 years of age were 70%, 60%, and 87% lower respectively. Reductions in rates in those 65 year of age and older, were thus greater than in those who were younger (p <0.01; Wilcoxon test). These data show that vaccination efforts directed at those 65 years of age and older results in accelerated rates of overall declines in COVID-19 hospitalizations and mortality.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 462-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony D. Sung ◽  
Julia A.M. Sung ◽  
Kelly Corbet ◽  
Gloria Broadwater ◽  
Vera Hars ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 462 Respiratory viral infections (RVI) are frequent complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Parainfluenza virus 3 (PIV3) in particular affects patients after HSCT, spreads nosocomially, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Given the absence of proven effective treatments, prevention is key. However, surveillance and isolation of infected patients have been insufficient, likely foiled by asymptomatic viral shedding. Requiring all individuals with direct patient contact to wear a surgical mask is a simple and inexpensive intervention that may reduce droplet exposure by asymptomatic shedders and limit nosocomial spread. Prompted by recurrent clusters of PIV3 affecting our adult HSCT program, we performed an institutional review board approved prospective observational study to assess the impact of surgical mask usage. Between January 10, 2010-January 9, 2012 (mask period), all individuals with direct patient contact, including caregivers, visitors, and medical staff, were required to wear a surgical mask when within 3 feet of a patient, regardless of suspicion of RVI. This continued until the patient returned to their primary residence following completion of HSCT. The primary endpoint was the incidence of RVI compared to the control period of December 1, 2003-November 30, 2009 (pre-mask period). A brief washout period (December 1, 2009-January 9, 2010) allowed for training and implementation. Standard infection prevention precautions including strict hand washing were in place during both the pre-mask and mask periods. RVI (influenza A and B, PIV 1, 2, and 3, adenovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)) were documented by positive culture, polymerase chain reaction, or direct fluorescence antibody testing from respiratory specimens. Metapneumovirus was excluded as our lab only started testing for it February 2011. Secondary endpoints include clusters of RVI, defined as 3 or more infections in a 30-day period, and death from RVI. The study was designed to detect a 40% reduction in the incidence of RVI with 90% power. During the six-year pre-mask period, 920 patients received HSCTs. During the two-year mask period, 454 patients received HSCTs. In the pre-mask and mask groups, mean age was 50 and 54 (t-test p<0.0001) (ranges 19 to 79 and 19 to 81). With the exception of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (21% and 15%) and plasma cell dyscrasia (32% and 46%) (chi-square p=0.004), there were no differences in disease representation among the two cohorts. Allogeneic HSCT constituted 41% and 33% of transplants (two-sided Fisher's Exact Test p=0.004), of which 52% and 59% were myeloablative (p=0.18); 19% and 21% used cord blood as a donor source (p=0.63); 16% and 8% used a haploidentical donor (p=0.02); and 43% and 35% used alemtuzumab (p=0.12). The incidence of any RVI was 10.3% in the pre-mask period and 3.3% in the mask period (one-sided Fisher's Exact Test p<0.0001) (Table 1). Among patients who had an allogeneic HSCT, the incidence was 16.9% and 6.7% (p=0.002); among patients who had an autologous HSCT, the incidence was 5.7% and 1.6% (p=0.005). Surgical mask usage had the most pronounced affect on reducing the incidence of PIV3 (8.2% to 2.0%, p<0.0001), which was the most common virus (74% and 60% of infections), followed by RSV (16% and 13%). There were more clusters in the pre-mask period (1.7/year vs. 0.5/year). In a blinded audit by three physicians (ADS, JAMS, MEH), viral infection contributed to patient death in 1.2% of patients in the pre-mask period and 0.2% in the mask period (p=0.12). Patients with RVI required more peri-transplant care (median 76 days vs. 21 days, Wilcoxon Rank Sum p<0.0001). These data suggest that requiring all individuals with direct patient contact to wear a surgical mask can reduce the incidence of RVI, particularly PIV3, during the most vulnerable period following autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Table 1. Incidence of Viral Infections Virus % (n) Pre-Mask (n = 920) Post-Mask (n = 454) p-value Any 10.3% (95) 3.3% (15) <0.0001 Influenza A 0.5% (5) 0.4% (2) 1.0* Influenza B 0.1% (1) 0% (0) 1.0* Parainfluenza 1 0.1% (1) 0% (0) 1.0* Parainfluenza 2 0.3% (3) 0% (0) 1.0* Parainfluenza 3 8.2% (75) 2.0% (9) <0.0001* Adenovirus 0% (0) 0.4% (2) 1.0* Respiratory Syncytial Virus 1.7% (16) 0.4% (2) 0.24* * One-sided Fisher's Exact Test adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni approach. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 237428952095192
Author(s):  
Cindy B. McCloskey ◽  
Kristen Johnson ◽  
Mark Brissette ◽  
Richard Conran ◽  
John Childs ◽  
...  

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has highlighted the crucial role of pathologists in the health care system at a time of significant decline in the number of US medical students matching to pathology residency positions. To understand this decline, a national survey of fourth-year US allopathic medical students was conducted to assess experiences, knowledge, and attitudes of pathology and factors that impact specialty choice. Participating in a separate pathology course did not increase the probability of choosing pathology. Experiences significantly associated with choosing pathology included clinical or research opportunities in pathology during the last 2 years of medical school, autopsy observation/participation, and participation in pathology interest groups. Many respondents felt they were not sufficiently exposed to pathology to consider it as a specialty. Those who considered pathology but did not choose it were less likely to report understanding the activities of pathologists and being recruited by pathology faculty and more likely to express a preference for more direct patient contact as compared to those entering pathology. In general, respondents agreed that pathology has a good work–life balance and a satisfying degree of intellectual challenge. On the other hand, respondents generally agreed that information on social media and perception of the pathology job market do not seem to be positive and few agreed that pathology is a highly regarded specialty. We identify steps to address these issues and increase the number of US medical students choosing pathology as a specialty crucial to the future of medicine and public health.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-31
Author(s):  
U Maharjan ◽  
L Rajbanshi ◽  
G Gurung ◽  
R Gautam ◽  
HP Nepal

The main goal of this study was to find out whether personal accessories of Health Care Workers (HCWs) harbored microbes which would inhibit good hand hygiene, and would act as breeding grounds for various disease causing microorganisms. Twenty six culture swabs were taken from the bangles, watches and rings of HCWs. We observed the growth of micrococcus species and coagulase negative staphylococci in 50 % of the samples. Of the positive bacterial growth, 45.5% were in bangles, 60% in watches and 40% in rings. Health Care workers have solemn responsibility to safeguard their patients as well as themselves by complying with good hand hygiene compliance by not wearing these accessories during direct patient contact and washing their hands according to WHO Hand Hygiene guidelines. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmc.v4i2.10858 Journal of Chitwan Medical College 2014; 4(2): 29-31


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document