scholarly journals Effect of computerised cognitive training on cognitive outcomes in mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e027062 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haifeng Zhang ◽  
Jonathan Huntley ◽  
Rohan Bhome ◽  
Benjamin Holmes ◽  
Jack Cahill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Executive Function ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cognitive Function ◽  
Cognitive Training ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Future Research

ObjectivesTo determine the effect of computerised cognitive training (CCT) on improving cognitive function for older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesPubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched through January 2018.Eligibility criteriaRandomised controlled trials comparing CCT with control conditions in those with MCI aged 55+ were included.Data extraction and synthesisTwo independent reviewers extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Effect sizes (Hedges’ g and 95% CIs) were calculated and random-effects meta-analyses were performed where three or more studies investigated a comparable intervention and outcome. Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic.Results18 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analyses, involving 690 participants. Meta-analysis revealed small to moderate positive treatment effects compared with control interventions in four domains as follows: global cognitive function (g=0.23, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.44), memory (g=0.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.50), working memory (g=0.39, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.66) and executive function (g=0.20, 95% CI −0.03 to 0.43). Statistical significance was reached in all domains apart from executive function.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis provides evidence that CCT improves cognitive function in older people with MCI. However, the long-term transfer of these improvements and the potential to reduce dementia prevalence remains unknown. Various methodological issues such as heterogeneity in outcome measures, interventions and MCI symptoms and lack of intention-to-treat analyses limit the quality of the literature and represent areas for future research.

Meta-analysis: Resistance Training Improves Cognition in Mild Cognitive Impairment

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 815-823
Author(s):  
Lulu Zhang ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Jingjing Yang ◽  
Fengling Wang ◽  
Qianyun Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Executive Function ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Cognitive Function ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Standardized Mean Difference

AbstractThis study investigated the benefits of resistance training on cognition in patients with mild cognitive impairment. We searched the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, and seven randomized controlled trials were reviewed. We evaluated the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration’s bias assessment tool. Standard mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for statistical analysis. This meta-analysis assessed three variables: general cognitive function, executive function and working memory. The results indicate that general cognitive function improved significantly (standardized mean difference: 0.53, P=0.04), and further subgroup analyses on frequency and duration per session showed that the subgroups ‘twice a week’ (P=0.01) and ‘duration per session >60 min’ (P=0.0006) exhibited better performance than the subgroups ‘three time a week’ (P=0.47) and ‘duration per session <60 min’ (P=0.53). Additionally, a moderate effect size was found in executive function (standardized mean difference: 0.50, P=0.0003), and there was non-significant effect in working memory (P=0.14). In summary, resistance training may mitigate mild cognitive impairment by improving cognition. Larger-scale studies are recommended to demonstrate the relationship between resistance training and cognition in mild cognitive impairment.

scholarly journals A continuum of executive function deficits in early subcortical vascular cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felipe Kenji Sudo ◽  
Patricia Amado ◽  
Gilberto Sousa Alves ◽  
Jerson Laks ◽  
Eliasz Engelhardt
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Executive Function ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Vascular Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Color Test ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Subcortical Vascular Cognitive Impairment

ABSTRACT. Background. Subcortical Vascular Cognitive Impairment (SVCI) is a clinical continuum of vascular-related cognitive impairment, including Vascular Mild Cognitive Impairment (VaMCI) and Vascular Dementia. Deficits in Executive Function (EF) are hallmarks of the disorder, but the best methods to assess this function have yet to be determined. The insidious and almost predictable course of SVCI and the multidimensional concept of EF suggest that a temporal dissociation of impairments in EF domains exists early in the disorder. Objective: This study aims to review and analyze data from the literature about performance of VaMCI patients on the most used EF tests through a meta-analytic approach. Methods: Medline, Web of Knowledge and PsycINFO were searched, using the terms: “vascular mild cognitive impairment” OR “vascular cognitive impairment no dementia” OR “vascular mild neurocognitive disorder” AND “dysexecutive” OR “executive function”. Meta-analyses were conducted for each of the selected tests, using random-effect models. Results: Systematic review showed major discrepancies among the results of the studies included. Meta-analyses evidenced poorer performance on the Trail-Making Test part B and the Stroop color test by VaMCI patients compared to controls. Conclusion: A continuum of EF impairments has been proposed in SVCI. Early deficits appear to occur in cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control.

scholarly journals Serum Ghrelin in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Chen ◽  
Yunfeng Luo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Mild Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Serum Ghrelin

Abstract Background Serum ghrelin levels have been reported to be altered in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and individuals with Mild cognitive impairment (MCI). However, whether serum ghrelin can be used as a biomarker of AD is inconsistent and conflicting. Methods We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the serum levels of ghrelin and acylated ghrelin (AG) in patients with AD or MCI, in comparison with normal controls (NC). We searched PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) from 1999 to March 2021. Results 10 relevant studies were included for this study. 8 studies reported serum levels of ghrelin (417 AD or MCI patients and 382 controls) and 5 studies reported serum levels of AG (142 AD or MCI patients and 152 controls). We found that AD and MCI patients had a tendency toward a decrease in the serum levels of ghrelin (SMD=-1.04; 95%CI (-2.30, 0.23); P = 0.11; significant heterogeneity: I2 = 98%), but no statistical significance was found. AG levels in the serum level of AD and MCI patients were significantly higher than NC subjects (SMD = 0.99; 95%CI (0.21, 1.77); P = 0.01; significant heterogeneity: I2 = 87%). Conclusion This meta-analysis suggested that AG may be a potential MCI or early AD biomarker and confirmed previous findings that ghrelin became desensitized in AD patients. This meta-analysis was limited to small sample sizes and lacked of stratifying the level of heterogeneity in AD and MCI patients. More and large sample, multi-center case-control studies on the relationship between serum AG and AD or MCI patients are still needed in the future.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document