scholarly journals Risk of 30-day hospital readmission associated with medical conditions and drug regimens of polymedicated, older inpatients discharged home: a registry-based cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e052755
Author(s):  
Filipa Pereira ◽  
Henk Verloo ◽  
Taushanov Zhivko ◽  
Saviana Di Giovanni ◽  
Carla Meyer-Massetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
Medical Conditions ◽  
Older Inpatients ◽  
Drug Regimens

ObjectivesThe present study analysed 4 years of a hospital register (2015–2018) to determine the risk of 30-day hospital readmission associated with the medical conditions and drug regimens of polymedicated, older inpatients discharged home.DesignRegistry-based cohort study.SettingValais Hospital—a public general hospital centre in the French-speaking part of Switzerland.ParticipantsWe explored the electronic records of 20 422 inpatient stays by polymedicated, home-dwelling older adults held in the hospital’s patient register. We identified 13 802 hospital readmissions involving 8878 separate patients over 64 years old.Outcome measuresSociodemographic characteristics, medical conditions and drug regimen data associated with risk of readmission within 30 days of discharge.ResultsThe overall 30-day hospital readmission rate was 7.8%. Adjusted multivariate analyses revealed increased risk of hospital readmission for patients with longer hospital length of stay (OR=1.014 per additional day; 95% CI 1.006 to 1.021), impaired mobility (OR=1.218; 95% CI 1.039 to 1.427), multimorbidity (OR=1.419 per additional International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision condition; 95% CI 1.282 to 1.572), tumorous disease (OR=2.538; 95% CI 2.089 to 3.082), polypharmacy (OR=1.043 per additional drug prescribed; 95% CI 1.028 to 1.058), and certain specific drugs, including antiemetics and antinauseants (OR=3.216 per additional drug unit taken; 95% CI 1.842 to 5.617), antihypertensives (OR=1.771; 95% CI 1.287 to 2.438), drugs for functional gastrointestinal disorders (OR=1.424; 95% CI 1.166 to 1.739), systemic hormonal preparations (OR=1.207; 95% CI 1.052 to 1.385) and vitamins (OR=1.201; 95% CI 1.049 to 1.374), as well as concurrent use of beta-blocking agents and drugs for acid-related disorders (OR=1.367; 95% CI 1.046 to 1.788).ConclusionsThirty-day hospital readmission risk was associated with longer hospital length of stay, health disorders, polypharmacy and drug regimens. The drug regimen patterns increasing the risk of hospital readmission were very heterogeneous. Further research is needed to explore hospital readmissions caused solely by specific drugs and drug–drug interactions.

scholarly journals 507. Impact of Baricitinib on Outcomes in Patients Treated with Remdesivir and Dexamethasone for SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S355-S356
Author(s):  
Lauren Dea ◽  
Hal Piwonka ◽  
Learned Gonzales ◽  
Shubha Kerkar ◽  
Xolani Mdluli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Dual Therapy ◽  
Supplemental Oxygen ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
Fraction Of Inspired Oxygen ◽  
Inspired Oxygen

Abstract Background There is a lack of data specifically addressing the effects of triple therapy consisting of baricitinib plus remdesivir plus dexamethasone compared to dual therapy with remdesivir plus dexamethasone among patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia. Methods This retrospective study enrolled hospitalized adults with SARS-CoV-2 receiving supplemental oxygen without invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) being treated baricitinib (≤10 days) plus remdesivir (≤10 days) plus dexamethasone (≤10 days) or remdesivir (≤10 days) plus dexamethasone (≤10 days). The primary endpoint was 28-day mortality. Secondary objectives of this study were to measure progression to IMV, pulse oximetry (SpO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) from hospitalization to discharge, hospital length of stay (LOS), 14-day mortality, 14-day hospital readmissions, inflammatory markers, and safety outcomes. Results Among patients receiving supplemental oxygen without IMV, 28-day mortality for triple therapy vs. dual therapy was 20% and 24%, respectively (P=1.000). The effect of triple therapy compared to dual therapy on lung function was demonstrated by a 76% vs. 25% increase in SpO2/FiO2. This benefit must be contextualized by an increased progression to IMV among patients receiving triple therapy compared to dual therapy (10 patients [50%] vs. 7 patients [28%], respectively; P=0.130). The increased incidence of IMV translated to a significantly longer hospital LOS among patients receiving triple therapy compared to dual therapy (26 days vs. 17 days, respectively; P=0.001). Conclusion In patients receiving supplemental oxygen without IMV for SARS-CoV-2, triple therapy was not associated with a clinically meaningful reduction in 28-day mortality when compared to dual therapy. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals 76. Optimizing Clinical Outcomes in Geriatric Patients through a Multidisciplinary Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S56-S56
Author(s):  
James Mauro ◽  
Saman Kannangara ◽  
Roman A Tuma
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Geriatric Patients ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Definitive Therapy

Abstract Background Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) aim to ensure the appropriate use of antibiotics. There is limited literature evaluating ASP outcomes in hospitalized geriatric patients who are at higher risk for developing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) or other adverse outcomes. The primary objective of this study was to determine if ASP efforts in this age group decreases the rate of 30-day hospital readmissions due to reinfection or development of CDI, hospital length of stay (LOS) and mortality. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to compare the rates of 30-day hospital readmissions because of reinfection or development of CDI in patients 65 years and older who received ASP interventions between January and June 2017. A control group of patients 65 years and older who received antibiotics between January and June 2015 (pre-ASP) was analyzed for comparison. We also assessed their mortality rate and LOS. Patients were included if they received antibiotics for pneumonia (PNA), urinary tract infection (UTI), acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI) and complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI). The ASP team consisted of an infectious diseases physician and a clinical pharmacist who met daily to review patients on broad spectrum antibiotics. ASP interventions consisted of de-escalation of empiric or definitive therapy, change in duration of therapy or discontinuation of therapy. Results Overall, 834 patients (540 control; 294 intervention) were included. The 30-day hospital readmission rate for all infection types decreased during the intervention period (19.6% vs 4.8%, P=0.0001). Both the development of CDI during hospital stay and 30-day readmission due to CDI during the intervention period decreased (2.6% vs 0.34%, P=0.019). There was no statistically significant decrease in 30-day hospital readmissions in the PNA (58.5% vs. 35.7%, P=0.11), UTI (18.9% vs. 35.7%, P=0.15), ABSSSI (12.3% vs. 21.4%, P=0.34) or cIAI (10.4% vs 7.1%, P=0.14) arms. There was no statically significant change in LOS (7.50 days vs 7.26 days, P=0.48) or mortality (9.6% vs 6.5%, P=0.12). Conclusion Multidisciplinary ASP efforts significantly reduced 30-day hospital readmission rates and development of CDI in hospitalized patients 65 years and older. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Comparison of Inpatient Standard-of-Care to Outpatient Oritavancin Therapy for Patients With Acute Uncomplicated Cellulitis

2021 ◽  
pp. 089719002110212
Author(s):  
Brandy Williams ◽  
Justin Muklewicz ◽  
Taylor D. Steuber ◽  
April Williams ◽  
Jonathan Edwards
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Economic Outcomes ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽  
Average Length Of Stay ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
The Difference

Background: Shifting inpatient antibiotic treatment to outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy may minimize treatment for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, including cellulitis. The purpose of this evaluation was to compare 30-day hospital readmission or admission due to cellulitis and economic outcomes of inpatient standard-of-care (SoC) management of acute uncomplicated cellulitis to outpatient oritavancin therapy. Methods: This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted at a 941-bed community teaching hospital. Adult patients 18 years and older treated for acute uncomplicated cellulitis between February 2015 to December 2018 were eligible for inclusion. Information was obtained from hospital and billing department records. Patients were assigned to either inpatient SoC or outpatient oritavancin cohorts for comparison. Results: 1,549 patients were included in the study (1,348 in the inpatient SoC cohort and 201 in the outpatient oritavancin cohort). The average length of stay for patients admitted was 3.6 ± 1.5 days. The primary outcome of 30-day hospital readmission or admission due to cellulitis occurred in 49/1348 (3.6%) patients in the inpatient SoC cohort versus 1/201 (0.5%) in the outpatient oritavancin cohort (p = 0.02). The difference between costs and reimbursement was improved in the outpatient oritavancin group (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Outpatient oritavancin for acute uncomplicated cellulitis was associated with reduction in 30-day hospital readmissions or admissions compared to inpatient SoC. Beneficial economic outcomes for the outpatient oritavancin cohort were observed. Additional studies are required to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Multicentre, prospective observational study of the correlation between the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score and adverse outcomes

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e026599
Author(s):  
Dominic Jones ◽  
Allan Cameron ◽  
David J Lowe ◽  
Suzanne M Mason ◽  
Colin A O'Keeffe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Prediction Score ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Valuable Insight ◽  
Point Increase ◽  
All Cause Mortality

ObjectivesTo assess whether the Glasgow Admission Prediction Score (GAPS) is correlated with hospital length of stay, 6-month hospital readmission and 6-month all-cause mortality. This study represents a 6-month follow-up of patients who were included in an external validation of the GAPS’ ability to predict admission at the point of triage.SettingSampling was conducted between February and May 2016 at two separate emergency departments (EDs) in Sheffield and Glasgow.ParticipantsData were collected prospectively at triage for consecutive adult patients who presented to the ED within sampling times. Any patients who avoided formal triage were excluded from the study. In total, 1420 patients were recruited.Primary outcomesGAPS was calculated following triage and did not influence patient management. Length of hospital stay, hospital readmission and mortality against GAPS were modelled using survival analysis at 6 months.ResultsOf the 1420 patients recruited, 39.6% of these patients were initially admitted to hospital. At 6 months, 30.6% of patients had been readmitted and 5.6% of patients had died. For those admitted at first presentation, the chance of being discharged fell by 4.3% (95% CI 3.2% to 5.3%) per GAPS point increase. Cox regression indicated a 9.2% (95% CI 7.3% to 11.1%) increase in the chance of 6-month hospital readmission per point increase in GAPS. An association between GAPS and 6-month mortality was demonstrated, with a hazard increase of 9.0% (95% CI 6.9% to 11.2%) for every point increase in GAPS.ConclusionA higher GAPS is associated with increased hospital length of stay, 6-month hospital readmission and 6-month all-cause mortality. While GAPS’s primary application may be to predict admission and support clinical decision making, GAPS may provide valuable insight into inpatient resource allocation and bed planning.

scholarly journals Socioeconomic status (SES) and 30-day hospital readmissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary (COPD) disease: A population-based cohort study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. e0216741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea S. Gershon ◽  
Deva Thiruchelvam ◽  
Shawn Aaron ◽  
Matthew Stanbrook ◽  
Nicholas Vozoris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Day Hospital

scholarly journals Factors Associated With Extended Length of Stay and 90-Day Readmission Rates Following ACDF

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian L. Dial ◽  
Valentine R. Esposito ◽  
Richard Danilkowicz ◽  
Jeffrey O’Donnell ◽  
Barrie Sugarman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Hospital Readmissions ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Asa Score ◽  
Surgery Patient ◽  
Extended Length

Study Design: Retrospective. Objective: Identify patient risk factors for extended length of stay (LOS) and 90-day hospital readmissions following elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Methods: Included ACDF patients from 2013 to 2017 at a single institution. Eligible patients were subset into LOS <2 and LOS ≥2 days, and no 90-day hospital readmission and yes 90-day hospital readmission. Patient and surgical factors were compared between the LOS and readmission groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine the association of independent factors with LOS and 90-day readmission rates. Results: Our sample included 1896 patients; 265 (14%) had LOS ≥2 days, and 121 (6.4%) had a readmission within 90 days of surgery. Patient and surgical factors associated with LOS included patient age ≥65 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.56), marriage (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.79), private health insurance (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15-0.50), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-1.86), African American race (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.38-2.72), and harvesting iliac crest autograft (OR 4.94, 95% CI 2.31-10.8). Patient and surgical factors associated with 90-day hospital readmission included ASA score (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.32-2.49), length of surgery (OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001-1.004), and radiculopathy as indication for surgery (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). Conclusions: Extended LOS and 90-day hospital readmissions may lead to poorer patient outcomes and increased episode of care costs. Our study identified patient and surgical factors associated with extended LOS and 90-day readmission rates. In general, preoperative patient factors affected these outcomes more than surgical factors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document