Appendix cancer mimicking ovarian cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 768-772 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Gehrig ◽  
J. F. Boggess ◽  
D. W. Ollila ◽  
P. A. Groben ◽  
L. Van Le

Appendiceal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy for which there is no characteristic clinical presentation. We describe five women who presented with signs and symptoms characteristic of advanced ovarian cancer but whose final diagnosis was stage IV appendiceal cancer. Between 1998 and 1999, five women treated for presumed ovarian cancer were identified as having primary appendiceal cancer. Medical records and pathology were retrospectively reviewed. The median age was 47 years (range 36–61 years). All had elevated preoperative CA125 levels with a median value of 171 μ/ml (range 46–383). Four women underwent right hemicolectomy with two requiring radical surgical tumor debulking to render them optimally debulked. Four had postoperative chemotherapy, the most common agent used was 5-flourouracil. Median survival was 6.75 months (range 19 days-11 months). Primary adenocarcinoma of the appendix is rare; therefore, the clinical utility of radical tumor debulking and chemotherapy is not well described. Given the poor survival in our series, all efforts should be considered palliative. Although this disease process is uncommon, it should be entertained by gynecologic oncologists in the differential diagnosis of an intra-abdominal mass and ascites. The ability to make the correct diagnosis and differentiate between an ovarian and appendiceal primary is critical as the treatment modalities vary.

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5505-5505 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. F. Conte ◽  
G. Favalli ◽  
A. Gadducci ◽  
D. Katsaros ◽  
P. L. Benedetti Panici ◽  
...  

5505 Background: The majority of advanced ovarian cancer patients (pts) in CR after debulking surgery and Platinum/Paclitaxel will eventually relapse. Role of maintenance CT is still questionable even if a SWOG/GOG trial has shown an improved progression free survival (PFS) with 12 vs 3 cycles of maintenance Pac. In March 1999, the After 6 Italian Cooperative Group initiated a phase III study to determine if maintenance Pac could prolong PFS in pts with a clinical (cCR) or pathological CR (pCR) after first line CT Methods: Pts with advanced ovarian cancer in cCR or pCR after 6 cycles of Platinum/Paclitaxel, were randomised to observation or 6 cycles of Pac 175 mg/sqm iv q 3 wks. Primary end point: PFS; secondary end points: overall survival (OS) and toxicities. Planned sample size: 250 pts to detect a 15% absolute increase in 2-yr PFS. Results: From 03/99 to 07/06, 200 pts were randomised. Due to the low accrual rate, an unplanned interim analysis of futility according to the Bayesian approach was performed. Main patient characteristics: median age 58 yrs, median PS 0 (neurotoxicity ≥ G 2 was an exclusion criteria), stage IIb/IIc 15%, stage III 79%, stage IV 6%; 105 pts (52.5%) were in pCR. 14% of pts randomised to observation received Pac; 22% of pts randomised to Pac stopped treatment after 2–5 cycles (progression or death: 3 pts; toxicity: 9 pts; refusal: 7 pts; others: 3 pts). A G ≥ 2 neurotoxicity was reported in 25% of pts treated with Pac; other toxicities were mild. After a median follow up of 44 months, 94 pts (47%) have relapsed and 42 pts (21%) died. Median PFS were 34 and 34.5 months in observation and Pac arm respectively; 3-yr OS was 88% in observation and 78% in Pac arm. Irrespectively of treatment arm, median PFS was 34.4 months for pts with pCR and 24.5 months for those with cCR; 3-yr survival rates were 87% and 79% respectively (p=0.04). Conclusions: Six courses of maintenance Pac do not prolong PFS or OS in pts in CR after first line platinum/paclitaxel. Irrespectively of assigned treatment, the outcome of these pts is more favourable than previously reported and significantly better in the pCRs. Maintenance CT remains an experimental treatment that should be tested in pts at high risk of relapse. [Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5500-5500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean Kehoe ◽  
Jane Hook ◽  
Matthew Nankivell ◽  
Gordon C. Jayson ◽  
Henry Charles Kitchener ◽  
...  

5500 Background: First line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer (OC) is accepted to be primary surgery (PS) followed by adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (P-CT). However, the EORTC55971 trial suggested neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is an alternative, showing increased optimal debulking rates and reduced surgical complications without detriment to survival. CHORUS (CRUK 07/009) is the 2nd phase III randomized controlled trial to investigate timing of initial surgery in OC. Methods: Patients (pts) with clinical FIGO stage III-IV OC (pelvic mass, extrapelvic metastases and CA125/CEA ratio >25) were randomized to standard treatment (PS followed by 6 cycles P-CT) or NACT (3 cycles P-CT either side of surgery). CHORUS was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of NACT, excluding a 6% absolute detriment in 3yr survival from 50% expected with PS (1-sided alpha 10%). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcomes were progression free survival (PFS), toxicity and quality of life. Results: 550 women (276 PS, 274 NACT) were randomized from 74 centres (72 UK, 2 NZ) between Mar 2004 and Aug 2010. Baseline characteristics were well balanced: median age 65yrs, median tumor size 80mm, 25% FIGO stage IV, 19% WHO PS 2. Median follow-up was 3yrs, 410 pts have died. Treatment data are summarized in the Table. 3yr survival in the control arm was 32%. Intention to treat analysis showed a median OS of 22.8 months for PS vs 24.5 months for NACT (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87 in favor of NACT, 80% CI 0.76 – 0.98) and median PFS of 10.2 vs 11.7 months (HR 0.91, 0.81 – 1.02). OS results represent a 5% absolute benefit in 3yr survival for NACT to 37% and the upper 80% CI allows us to exclude a survival benefit for PS. Conclusions: NACT was associated with increased optimal debulking, less early mortality and similar survival in this poor prognosis group. CHORUS results are consistent with EORTC55971 and strengthen evidence that NACT is a viable alternative to PS. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN74802813. [Table: see text]


1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
James V. Fiorica ◽  
William S. Roberts

Ovarian cancer is difficult to manage because the disease is most often diagnosed at an advanced stage when survival chances are poor. Early detection of ovarian cancer would increase long-term survival, since effective treatment modalities are available for early-onset disease. Screening with transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA 125 suggests promising results, but studies comparing mortality rates for screened vs unscreened populations are needed, and strategies must be developed for prevention or early diagnosis in order to control this disease process.


2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 3-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. F. Ozols

Ovarian cancer remains the number one gynecological killer in the Western world. Most ovarian cancer patients present with advanced-stage disease and are treated with cytoreductive surgery followed by combination chemotherapy. While the majority of patients respond to treatment, most will relapse such that the 5-year survival rates for advanced disease are approximately 20–25%. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) are the primary endpoints in clinical trials in patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In patients with early-stage ovarian cancer, PFS may be the preferred trial endpoint, whereas in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, the primary goal of therapy remains palliation and control of symptoms. Recent studies in recurrent disease have demonstrated that chemotherapy can improve the endpoints of PFS and overall survival, and so they are being used as the primary endpoints for comparing new regimens in phase III trials in relapsed patients. However, it would be easier to compare new treatment modalities if a uniformly accepted instrument was available that could evaluate quality of life and symptom control.


2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1007-1011
Author(s):  
C.-H. Chen ◽  
C.-Y. Huang ◽  
S.-N. Chow

In patients of ovarian cancer combined with multiple pulmonary nodules, the diagnosis of metastatic ovarian cancer is always considered. However, benign pulmonary conditions can be discovered instead. An 80-year-old female presented with a rapidly growing ovarian mass, elevated serum CA-125, and multiple pulmonary varying-sized nodular lesions. The pretreatment workup of her lung lesions failed to show a malignant cell, and it also failed to show any evidence of tuberculosis or other infectious diseases. After surgery, her disease was allotted to ‘stage IV’ epithelial ovarian cancer and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy was then used. However, her sputum culture showed positive growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis 4 weeks later. For fear of reactivation of pulmonary tuberculosis, the anticancer cytotoxic chemotherapy was postponed and the antituberculous treatment was given instead. After 6-month course of antituberculous therapy, no active lung lesion was detectable. In conclusion, infectious or inflammatory conditions can mimic metastatic disease and therefore add to the difficulty of stage determination. We recommend that there must be positive cytologic or pathologic results of lung lesions to allot a case of ovarian cancer to stage IV. Furthermore, whenever pulmonary lesions are seen on imaging, the possibility of diagnoses other than metastatic ovarian cancer should always be considered.


2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 906-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis M. Chiva ◽  
Teresa Castellanos ◽  
Sonsoles Alonso ◽  
Antonio Gonzalez-Martin

ObjectiveThe objective of this review was to try to determine by searching in the literature what is the survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after a primary debulking with minimal macroscopic residual disease (MMRD; 0.1–10 mm). Additionally, this review aimed to explore the survival in patients with residual disease from 0.1 to 0.5 cm.MethodsA retrospective search was accomplished in the PubMed database looking for all English-language articles published between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2014, under the following search strategy: “ovarian cancer and cytoreduction” or “ovarian cancer and phase III trial”. We selected those articles that contain information on both percentage of MMRD (0.1–1 cm) and median overall survival (OS) in this subset of patients with stage III to stage IV ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery.ResultsThirteen publications were obtained including information of a total 11,999 patients with stage III to stage IV ovarian cancer. Five thousand thirty-seven patients (42%) had MMRD after the primary debulking (0.1–1 cm). Median overall survival in patients with MMRD was 40 months and disease-free survival (DFS) was 16 months. This group of patients obtained an advantage of 10 months in OS (40 vs 30 m) and 4 months in DFS (16 vs 12 m) compared with the group with suboptimal debulking (P < 0.001). Compared with the group of complete resection, patients with minimal macroscopic residuum showed a significant inferior median OS and DFS of 30 months and 14 months, respectively (OS, 70 vs 40 m; DFS, 30 vs 16 m) (P < 0.001). The group of residual disease of 0.1 to 0.5 cm reached a median survival of 53 months.ConclusionsPatients with ovarian cancer with MMRD after primary surgery obtain a modest but significant advantage in survival (10 months) over suboptimal patients. Patients with macroscopic residual disease (0.1–0.5 cm) obtain a better survival (53 months) than those with more than 0.5 to 1 cm. We propose that they should be classified as a different prognostic group.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (32) ◽  
pp. 3854-3863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa A. Meyer ◽  
Angel M. Cronin ◽  
Charlotte C. Sun ◽  
Kristin Bixel ◽  
Michael A. Bookman ◽  
...  

Purpose In 2010, a randomized clinical trial demonstrated noninferior survival for patients with advanced ovarian cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) compared with primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS). We examined the use and effectiveness of NACT in clinical practice. Patients and Methods A multi-institutional observational study of 1,538 women with stages IIIC to IV ovarian cancer who were treated at six National Cancer Institute–designated cancer centers. We examined NACT use in patients who were diagnosed between 2003 and 2012 (N = 1,538) and compared overall survival (OS), morbidity, and postoperative residual disease in a propensity-score matched sample of patients (N = 594). Results NACT use increased from 16% during 2003 to 2010 to 34% during 2011 to 2012 in stage IIIC disease ( Ptrend < .001), and from 41% to 62% in stage IV disease ( Ptrend < .001). Adoption of NACT varied by institution, from 8% to 30% for stage IIIC disease (P < .001) and from 27% to 61% ( P = .007) for stage IV disease during this time period. In the matched sample, NACT was associated with shorter OS in stage IIIC disease (median OS: 33 v 43 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.40; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.77) compared with PCS, but not stage IV disease (median OS: 31 v 36 months; HR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.52). Patients with stages IIIC and IV disease who received NACT were less likely to have ≥ 1 cm postoperative residual disease, an intensive care unit admission, or a rehospitalization (all P ≤ .04) compared with those who received PCS treatment. However, among women with stage IIIC disease who achieved microscopic or ≤ 1 cm postoperative residual disease, NACT was associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.18; P = .04). Conclusion Use of NACT increased significantly between 2003 and 2012. In this observational study, PCS was associated with increased survival in stage IIIC, but not stage IV disease. Future studies should prospectively consider the efficacy of NACT by extent of residual disease in unselected patients.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Kumar ◽  
Amita Maheshwari ◽  
Sudeep Gupta ◽  
Jaya Ghosh ◽  
Jyoti Bajpai ◽  
...  

Introduction: Both primary (PDS) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) have reported similar progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates in various studies. Complete resection of all macroscopic disease is the strongest independent variable in predicting survival in both groups. Objective: To evaluate the demographics, surgical outcomes and survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing IDS. Methods: All women with Stage IIIC or Stage IV epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer, registered at our institution from January 2010 to December 2010, who were treated with NACT followed by IDS, were included in the study. Demographic data, CA-125 levels (baseline and presurgery), chemotherapy and surgical details were collected. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to evaluate factors associated with survival. Results: One hundred fifty women with Stage IIIC or Stage IV epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer were included in the analysis. The mean age was 51.08 years (27 to 73 years) and 97.3% had serous histology. Eighty percent (n = 120) had Stage IIIC and 20% (n = 30) had Stage IV disease. Ninety five percent women received Carboplatin and Paclitaxel or single agent Carboplatin as NACT and the median number of NACT cycles was 3. The median baseline CA-125 was 1649.3 U/ml (Range 16.4–235,100 U/ml) and the median CA-125 post NACT was 42.75 U/ml (Range 4.4–5151 U/ml). Seventy four percent women (n = 111) underwent an optimal cytoreduction – 62.7% (n = 94) had R0 and 11.3% (n = 17) had R1 resection. Twenty six percent women (n = 39) had R2 resection. The median CA-125 post NACT was 27.3 U/ml, 36 U/ml and 99 U/ml in women with R0, R1 and R2 resection respectively and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.0005). The CA125 response was respectively, 97.6%, 95.7% and 93.8% in R0, R1 and R2 resection (p < 0.0005). The median follow up was 42.48 months (Range 1.48–70.93 months). The median PFS was 12.06 months (95% CI 10.02-14.1) – 12.98 months (95% CI 9.7–16.2) in R0, 9.56 months (95% CI 1.7–17.4) in R1 and 6.64 months (95% CI 4.9–8.3) in women with R2 resection (p = 0.158). The median OS was 38.9 months (95% CI 31.7–46.1) – 43.3 months (95% CI 33–53.5) in R0, 46.1 months (95% CI 26.6–65.5) in R1 and 28 months (95% CI 25–30.9) in R2 resection (p = 0.121). The median PFS and OS in women undergoing optimal cytoreduction (R0 and R1) was 12.98 months (95% CI 9.86–16.1) and 43.7 months (95% CI 34.7–52.7) respectively as compared to 6.64 months (95% CI 4.95–8.32) and 28 months (95% CI 25–30.9) respectively in women with R2 resection (PFS p = 0.064, OS p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis discussing the factors affecting the probability of optimal cytoreduction and the survival will be discussed. Conclusion: In women with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing NACT followed by IDS, a high rate of optimal cytoreduction is achieved. Residual disease is a primary factor affecting the survival of these women.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5552-5552
Author(s):  
Suresh Mukkamala ◽  
Sukamal Saha ◽  
Sabarina Ramanathan ◽  
David Livert ◽  
Rajen Oza ◽  
...  

5552 Background: Patients (Pts) with advanced ovarian cancer (OvCa) are usually treated with primary debulking (deb) surgery (Sx) followed by adjuvant (adj) chemotherapy (CRx). Recently neo-adjuvant (neo-adj) CRx is increasingly being used to reduce the bulk of the tumor. Hence, we analyzed for any prognostic impact of neo-adj vs adj vs neo-adj plus adj CRx along with deb Sx in the management of advanced OvCa. Methods: Only Stage III and IV Pts in National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2006-2014, who underwent deb Sx without bowel resection (1), with bowel resection (2) and with bowel and bladder resection (3) were analyzed. Group (gp) A Pts had neo-adj CRx, gp B had adj CRx and gp C Pts had neo-adj plus adj CRx. The Pearson Chi square testing was used to evaluate the survival between gp A vs B vs C. Results: A total of 20910 Pts in stage III and 7483 Pts in stage 4 were included. Stage III Pts had a better 5 year (yr) survival in gp B compared to gp A and C, in all Pts who underwent Sx 1, 2 and 3 (Table 1). Stage IV Pts had a better 5 yr survival in gp C compared to gp A and B who underwent Sx 1 and 2, and gp B had a better 5 yr survival in Pts who underwent Sx 3 (Table 1). Overall survival was worse for all stages in Pts with neo-adj ( gp A) than gp Band C. Conclusions: Deb Sx followed by adj CRx had better survival than in gp A or C. This may be secondary to less bulkier disease in the beginning in gp B than those in gp A or C requiring neo-adj CRx for the later. Pts survival also improved after addition of adj CRx following deb Sx compared to no adj CRx. A prospective multicenter randomized trial between each group may further validate the true benefits of neo-adj CRx in advanced OvCa. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5567-5567
Author(s):  
Sukamal Saha ◽  
Sabarina Ramanathan ◽  
Suresh Mukkamala ◽  
Hayman S. Salib ◽  
Rajen Oza ◽  
...  

5567 Background: During debulking surgery (Surg) for advanced ovarian cancer (OvCa), lymph node (LN) sampling are not routinely performed. Hence, prognostic implications of LN involvement following debulking surg and chemotherapy (ChemoRx) were analyzed from National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Only Stage III and Stage IV patients (pts) from 2004 –2014 NCDB pts undergoing Debulking surg. and ChemoRx were included. Group A included pts with debulking surg without bowel resection; Group B with major bowel resection and Group C with bowel and bladder resection. Pts were further subdivided according to the use of 1) NeoAdjuvant (NeoAdj) 2) Adjuvant (Adj) and 3) Neo Adj and Adj ChemoRx. Survival analysis was done based on -ve or +ve LN status. using Pearson Chi Square testing. Results: Out of 10,737 Stage III and 3,102 Stage IV pts, there were 6828 Group A, 6413 Group B and 598 Group C pts. Five year overall survival (OS) for all pts in Stage III with LN-ve vs LN +ve was 59.9% vs 53.9% and Stage IV was 48.7% vs 41.2%. In Group A, B, and C, the 5 yr OS was better in LN – ve than LN +ve pts (Table1). The OS for both LN –ve and LN +ve groups were better in Adjuvant chemoRx in all 3 groups. OS was slightly better in Stage III vs Stage IV pts. Conclusions: Even though LN dissection are not routinely done during debulking surg, overall pts with LN metastasis do worse than LN –ve pts irrespective of the timing of ChemoRx. Hence, LN sampling during debulking surg should be strongly considered as it may provide important prognostic information. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document