461 Updated PFS analysis of toripalimab with anlotinib and chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC)

BackgroundThis trail is an open-label, single-arm, phase II study that aims to observe the efficacy and safety of toripalimab combined with anlotinib and platinum-etoposide (EP) chemotherapy as first-line treatment in ES-SCLC (Clinical trial information: NCT04731909). The preliminary results of the study have been presented in 2020 ASCO abstract e20570, which demonstrated 100% objective response rate (ORR) and tolerable safety. Here we report PFS analysis results of the study.MethodsThe study enrolled treatment-naïve ES-SCLC patients (18–75 years, ECOG PS ≤2) who have measurable target lesion evaluated by RECIST v1.1. All enrolled patients received toripalimab (240 mg, d1) combined with etoposide (100 mg/m2, d1–3) plus carboplatin (AUC=5, d1)/cisplatin (75 mg/m2, d1) and anlotinib (12 mg QD, d1–14) of a 21-day cycle. After 4–6 cycles of the treatment, patients who achieved complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) could continue to receive maintenance therapy with toripalimab and anlotinib until disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). ORR, disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety were set as secondary endpoints.ResultsAs of July 16, 2021, the median follow-up was 13.7 months. 9 disease progression events occurred of the enrolled 16 treatment-naïve ES-SCLC patients (14 males, 2 females, median age 63). The investigator-assessed median PFS was 13.3 months (95%CI: 5.0–21.6). The PFS rate at 6 months was 81.3% and the PFS rate at 12 months was 31.3%. 15 patients were still alive and the study treatments for 7 patients were still ongoing. At the data cutoff, there was only 1 patient dead with 37.6 months OS and the median OS was not reached. No new unexpected adverse events were observed.ConclusionsCombined with preliminary data at 2020 ASCO, toripalimab combined with anlotinib and EP chemotherapy showed excellent ORR and PFS as well as tolerable safety in treatment-naïve ES-SCLC. The combination therapy is expected to provide clinically meaningful OS benefit and become a promising treatment option.Trial RegistrationThis study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (National Institutes of Health), number NCT04731909.Ethics ApprovalThe program was approved by the ethics committee of Army Medical Center (Daping Hospital ).

Download Full-text

Capecitabine plus bevacizumab (Cape-Bev) as a maintenance treatment after induction treatment with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI-Bev) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e14683 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e14683-e14683

Author(s):

Ali Murat Tatli ◽

Hasan Senol Coskun ◽

Mukremin Uysal ◽

Sema Sezgin Goksu ◽

Deniz Arslan ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Maintenance Therapy ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Maintenance Treatment ◽

Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Induction Treatment ◽

Severe Toxicity ◽

First Line

e14683 Background: Bevacizumab is human monoclonal antibody that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor and has been shown improvement progression-free survival and overall survival when combined with chemotherapy for treatment of mCRC in the first and second-line settings. The purpose of this study is to show the effectiveness of maintenance therapy with Cape-Bev in patients with mCRC who benefit of first-line (induction) chemotherapy with FOLFIRI-Bev. Methods: The study included patients with mCRC who received FOLFIRI-Bev as first-line chemotherapy. Maintenance therapy with Cape-Bev (Cape 1000 mg/m2 bid d1-14, Bev 7,5 mg/kg d1 q3w) was given until disease progression to patients who had achieved an objective response after 6-months FOLFIRI-Bev regimen. The time to disease progression, survival and toxic effects were analyzed from the beginning of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. Results: We enrolled 30 patients, 16 men and 14 women. The mean age of the patients was 62 years. The patients who administered maintenance treatment received a median number of 11 cycles. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 22±4 months and 39±4 months, respectively. Significantly higher PFS and OS were seen among patients who complete or near-complete response to induction therapy with FOLFIRI-Bev (Table). Acceptable hand-foot syndrome was observed 14 patients (%51) treated with the Cape-Bev. No patient experienced severe toxicity. Conclusions: Cape-Bev regimen may be an effective maintenance treatment after response to first-line (induction) FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab treatment in selected mCRC with favorable safety profile. Further studies will be needed to demonstrate conclusively that. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

First-line treatment of iNHL or MCL patients with BR or R-CHOP/R-CVP: Results of the BRIGHT 5-year follow-up study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.15_suppl.7500 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 7500-7500 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Ian Flinn ◽

Richard van der Jagt ◽

Julie E. Chang ◽

Peter Wood ◽

Tim E. Hawkins ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Rank Test ◽

First Line ◽

Open Label ◽

Free Survival ◽

Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽

Duration Of Response ◽

Treatment Naïve

7500 Background: BRIGHT, a phase 3, open-label, noninferiority study comparing efficacy and safety of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) vs rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) or rituximab with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) in treatment-naive patients (pts) with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), showed that the complete response rate for first-line BR was statistically noninferior to R-CHOP/R-CVP ( Blood 2014). Pts were monitored for ≥5 years (yr) to assess the overall effect of BR or R-CHOP/R-CVP in a controlled clinical setting. This analysis reports the time-to-event variables of the 5-yr follow-up (FU) study. Methods: Pts with iNHL or MCL randomized to 6-8 cycles of BR or R-CHOP/R-CVP underwent complete assessments at end of treatment, then were monitored regularly. Progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS) were compared using a stratified log-rank test. Results: Of 447 randomized pts, 224 received BR, 104 R-CHOP, and 119 R-CVP; 419 entered the FU. The median FU time was 65.0 and 64.1 months for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP, respectively. The 5-yr PFS rate was 65.5% (95% CI 58.5-71.6) and 55.8% (48.4-62.5), and OS was 81.7% (75.7-86.3) and 85% (79.3-89.3) for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP, respectively. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for PFS was 0.61 (0.45-0.85; P= .0025), EFS 0.63 (0.46-0.84; P= .0020), DOR 0.66 (0.47-0.92; P= .0134), and OS 1.15 (0.72-1.84; P= .5461) comparing BR vs R-CHOP/R-CVP. Similar results were found in iNHL [PFS 0.70 (0.49-1.01; P= .0582)] and MCL [PFS 0.40 (0.21-0.75; P= .0035)], with the strongest effect in MCL. Use of R maintenance was similar, 43% in BR and 45% in R-CHOP/R-CVP. B was included as second-line in 27 (36%) of the 75 pts requiring therapy who originally received R-CHOP/R-CVP. Comparable safety profiles with expected adverse events were observed in the FU study in BR vs R-CHOP/R-CVP. Conclusions: The long-term FU of the BRIGHT study has confirmed that PFS, EFS, and DOR were significantly better for BR, and OS was not statistically different between BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP. The safety profile was as previously reported. Clinical trial information: NCT00877006.

Download Full-text

Final results of a phase II trial of first-line FOLFIRINOX for advanced gastroesophageal cancers.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.4532 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4532-4532

Author(s):

Ramon Jin ◽

Haeseong Park ◽

Andrea Wang-Gillam ◽

Rama Suresh ◽

Caron E. Rigden ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase Ii ◽

Clinical Benefit ◽

Objective Response ◽

Sensory Neuropathy ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

First Line ◽

Her2 Positive ◽

Open Label

4532 Background: Standard first-line regimens for patients with metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas have moderate clinical benefit with objective response rates (ORR) of approximately 40-50%. FOLFIRINOX has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated first line therapy in other GI cancers. In this open-label, single-arm phase II study of patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas, we sought to evaluate the safety and clinical activity of FOLFIRINOX. Methods: The primary endpoint was ORR, and secondary endpoints included safety profile, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and duration of response. Estimated sample size included 41 patients with HER2 negative disease with 90% power to detect an ORR≥60% with alpha of 0.10. No enrollment goal was planned for HER2 positive patients, but they were allowed participation to receive study treatment in combination with trastuzumab. Treatment consisted of 400mg/m2 5-FU bolus, 400 mg/m2 leucovorin, 2400 mg/m2 5-FU infusion over 46 hours, 180 mg/m2 irinotecan, and 85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin. Trastuzumab was administered intravenously as a 6 mg/kg loading dose then given 4 mg/kg every 14 days for HER2 positive patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01928290. Results: From November 2013 to May 2019, 67 patients were enrolled, of which 26 (39%) had HER2 positive disease. Median follow-up was 16.1 months. ORR was 61% (25/41) for HER2 negative and 85% (22/26) for HER2 positive groups. Overall, one patient (2%) had a complete response, 36 patients (69%) had partial responses, and 13 patients (19%) had stable disease for >6 months; therefore, CBR was 96%. Median PFS was 11.9 months, median OS was 17.4 months. 41 patients (83.7%) had dose modification or treatment delay with the most common toxicities being neutropenia, diarrhea, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and nausea with no unexpected toxicities. Conclusions: FOLFIRINOX is a highly effective three-drug regimen for first-line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal cancer with expected, tolerable toxicities. Clinical trial information: NCT01928290 .

Download Full-text

Efficacy results of a phase 2 trial of first-line idelalisib plus ofatumumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Blood Advances ◽

10.1182/bloodadvances.2018030221 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 (7) ◽

pp. 1167-1174 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Benjamin L. Lampson ◽

Haesook T. Kim ◽

Matthew S. Davids ◽

Jeremy S. Abramson ◽

Arnold S. Freedman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽

Phase 2 ◽

First Line ◽

Open Label ◽

Phase 2 Trial ◽

Treatment Naïve ◽

Line Setting

Abstract PI3 kinase (PI3K) activity is critical for survival of neoplastic B cells in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Blockade of PI3K signaling with idelalisib is effective for the treatment of relapsed CLL in combination with the anti-CD20 antibody ofatumumab. In this single-arm, open-label, nonrandomized phase 2 study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of idelalisib with ofatumumab in 27 patients with treatment-naïve CLL in need of therapy. Patients were planned to receive idelalisib for 2 monthly cycles, then idelalisib and ofatumumab for 6 cycles, followed by idelalisib indefinitely. The study was closed early and all patients ceased therapy when an increased rate of death as a result of infection was observed on other first-line idelalisib trials. Median time on therapy was 8.1 months, and median duration of follow-up was 39.7 months. We previously reported high rates of hepatotoxicity in a smaller cohort of patients in this trial; toxicities necessitated therapy discontinuation in 15 patients after a median of 7.7 months. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events were transaminitis (52% of patients), neutropenia (33%), and colitis/diarrhea (15%). The best overall response rate (ORR) was 88.9%, including 1 complete response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 23 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-36 months); 11 patients have not yet required second-line therapy. Idelalisib and ofatumumab demonstrated an unacceptable safety profile in the first-line setting, which resulted in a short PFS despite a high ORR. Future development of PI3K inhibitors for use in treatment-naïve CLL will require novel approaches to mitigate toxicities. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02135133.

Download Full-text

Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Real-World Practice in Korea

Liver Cancer ◽

10.1159/000512239 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-11

Author(s):

Myung Ji Goh ◽

Joo Hyun Oh ◽

Yewan Park ◽

Jihye Kim ◽

Wonseok Kang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Prognostic Factors ◽

Disease Progression ◽

Real World ◽

Medical Center ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Eligibility Criteria ◽

Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Background: Lenvatinib has been recently approved as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Korea. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib therapy in a real-world practice and to find prognostic factors related to survival and disease progression. Methods: A hospital-based retrospective study was conducted on 111 consecutive patients who had unresectable HCC and were treated with lenvatinib at Samsung Medical Center from October 2018 to March 2020. Efficacy was determined using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) criteria in 111 patients who completed 1st tumor assessment. Safety was evaluated in 116 HCC patients including 5 patients who discontinued lenvatinib due to adverse events (AEs) before 1st tumor assessment using Common Terminology Criteria for AEs version 5.0. Results: A total of 111 patients with a median age of 59 years were analyzed during a median follow-up duration of 6.2 (4.4–9.0) months. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival was 10.5 months, and the median progression-free survival was 6.2 months. Based on mRECIST criteria, the objective response rate was 18.9% and disease control rate was 75.7%. AEs developed in 86/116 (74.1%) patients, and grade ≥3 AEs developed in 16/116 (13.8%) patients. Diarrhea, hand-foot skin rash, abdominal pain, hypertension, and anorexia were identified as the AEs with the highest frequencies of any grade. REFLECT eligibility criteria including tumor extent ≥50% liver occupation or inadequate bone marrow function and occurrence of anorexia were prognostic factors for survival, and occurrence of diarrhea was a favorable factor for disease progression. Conclusion: Lenvatinib therapy showed a favorable efficacy and safety in a real-world practice. The REFLECT eligibility criteria and specific AEs could be one of the prognostic markers.

Download Full-text

Anlotinib combined with pemetrexed and carboplatin as first-line treatment in advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ALTER L012.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e21040 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e21040-e21040

Author(s):

Qiming Wang ◽

Xiuli Yang ◽

Tianjiang Ma ◽

Qiumin Yang ◽

Chenghui Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Trial ◽

Kinase Inhibitor ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Line Treatment ◽

First Line ◽

Treatment Naïve ◽

Nsclc Patients ◽

First Line Treatment

e21040 Background: The anti-angiogenic drug bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy has achieved positive results in previous studies. In particular, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for EGFR-negative patients was increased to 8.3 months in the BEYOND study. Unlike bevacizumab, anlotinib is a novel multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor and can be conveniently orally administered. In the phase III trial ALTER 0303, anlotinib significantly improved overall survival (OS) and PFS in advanced NSCLC patients. This exploratory study aims to establish the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin as first-line treatment in advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: This is a multi-center, single-arm clinical trial. Adults with treatment-naive, histologically confirmed stage IIIB-IV non-squamous NSCLC, ECOG 0-1, and without known sensitizing EGFR/ALK alterations are included. Patients received anlotinib (12 mg p.o., QD, d1 to 14, 21 days per cycle) combined with pemetrexed (500 mg/m2, iv, d15-21, Q3W) + carboplatin (AUC = 5, iv, d15-21, Q3W) for 4 cycles followed by anlotinib and pemetrexed maintenance until disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were OS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and safety. Results: Between Mar 2019 and Dec 2020, 40 patients were enrolled in six centers and 31 of them have received at least one tumor assessment. Median age was 62 (33, 75); 66.7% male, 11.1% brain metastasis. At data cutoff (Dec 31, 2020), patients were followed up for a median of 8.26 months. Median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI: NE, NE); ORR was 67.7% (0 CR, 21 PR), DCR was 96.8% (0 CR, 21 PR, 9 SD) and median OS was NE. The most common Grade ≥ 3 AEs were hypertension 22.2%, neutropenia 19.44%, myelosuppression 11.1%, thrombocytopenia 8.33%, leukopenia 5.56%, hand-foot syndrome 5.56% and there were no Grade 5 toxicities. Conclusions: This study finds that anlotinib plus pemetrexed and carboplatin can significantly improve PFS and ORR compared to standard chemotherapy for treatment-naive non-squamous NSCLC patients. The combination was well tolerated, and the AEs were manageable. The follow-up time is not sufficient, and the OS outcomes need further evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT03790228.

Download Full-text

177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Radiosensitizing Capecitabine Versus Octreotide Long-Acting Release as First-Line Systemic Therapy in Advanced Grade 1 or 2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Institution Experience

JCO Global Oncology ◽

10.1200/go.21.00103 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1167-1175

Author(s):

Swayamjeet Satapathy ◽

Bhagwant R. Mittal ◽

Ashwani Sood ◽

Apurva Sood ◽

Rakesh Kapoor ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽

Systemic Therapy ◽

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

First Line ◽

Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽

Free Survival ◽

Octreotide Lar ◽

Treatment Naïve ◽

Long Acting

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) as first-line systemic therapy in advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of consecutive patients of advanced inoperable or metastatic grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs treated with first-line 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine or octreotide LAR from September 2012 to December 2019 were collected and analyzed for response, toxicity, and survival outcomes. RESULTS Seventy-six patients (median age: 53 years; range 14-81 years) with treatment-naïve advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs were included. Thirty-six patients received a median cumulative dose of 27.3 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE intravenously at 8-12 weeks' intervals along with 1,250 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 0-14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE, whereas 40 patients were administered 30 mg octreotide LAR intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Using response evaluation criteria in solid tumor 1.1, the objective response rate was 38% in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm compared with 15% in the octreotide LAR arm ( P = .025), whereas the disease control rates were 88% and 67% in 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms, respectively ( P = .035). The median durations of progression-free survival in the 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms were 54 months and 16 months, respectively ( P = .017), whereas the median overall survival was not reached and not significantly different across both the arms. Of the treatment-related adverse events, no major difference was observed in the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION First-line systemic 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine achieved better radiologic response and longer progression-free survival compared with octreotide LAR in patients with advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs. Future randomized controlled trials are, however, required to determine the best treatment sequence for the treatment-naïve patients with advanced GEP-NETs.

Download Full-text

Phase II study of pembrolizumab-based therapy in previously treated extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas: Results of Part B (pembrolizumab + chemotherapy).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.4148 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4148-4148

Author(s):

Jennifer A. Chan ◽

Nitya Prabhakar Raj ◽

Rahul Raj Aggarwal ◽

Susan Calabrese ◽

April DeMore ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Objective Response ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Large Cell ◽

Small Cell ◽

Type I ◽

First Line ◽

Open Label ◽

Total N ◽

Poorly Differentiated ◽

Neuroendocrine Carcinomas

4148 Background: The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy has not been established in extrapulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (EP-PDNECs). In small cell lung cancer, CPI therapy is approved for use in the first-line and salvage settings. We investigated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (PEM)-based therapy in biomarker-unselected patients (pts) with EP-PDNECs. PEM alone (Part A, N=14) was inactive (ASCO GI 2019; Abstr#363). We now report the results of Part B (PEM plus chemotherapy). Methods: We conducted an open label, multicenter, phase 2 study of PEM-based therapy in pts with EP-PDNECs, excluding Merkel cell carcinoma and well differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET), with disease progression on first-line systemic therapy. In Part B of this trial, patients were treated with PEM 200 mg IV every 3 week cycle plus dealers’ choice chemotherapy (chemo): weekly irinotecan (IRI, 125 mg/m2 day 1,8 of every 21 day cycle) or weekly paclitaxel (PAC, 80 mg/m2). After PEM/IRI safety lead-in (N=6), 16 additional pts (total N=22) were enrolled. This was based on a primary endpoint of objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1 and a plan to test Ha ORR 31% vs H0 ORR 10% with 80% power at a type I error rate of 0.05. Secondary endpoints include safety, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). Serial blood samples and baseline tumor biopsies were required in all pts. Results: Preliminary data from Part B are available. Of 22 pts enrolled, male/female 15/7; median age 57 years (range 34-75); ECOG PS 0/1: 10/12; 6 large cell, 8 small cell, 8 NOS. Primary sites of disease: GI 73%, GYN 5%, unknown 23%. Ki67 index (available for 18 pts) median 68% (range 30 to >95%). Chemo choice: 17 IRI (77%) and 5 PAC (23%). PEM/IRI was safe based on lead-in. Median number of cycles of therapy administered was 3 (range 0-13). Treatment-related Gr 3 or 4 AE occurred in 7 (32%) of 22 pts overall: 4 (18%) had at least one Gr 3 AE attributed to PEM (1 pt each with pain, ALT increase, or nausea; 2 with fatigue); 7 (32%) had at least one Gr 3/4 AE attributed to chemo (2 with fatigue, 2 with neutropenia; 1 each with pain, ALT increase, hyponatremia, diarrhea, nausea, and/or acute kidney injury). No grade 5 AE. ORR was 9%: PR in 2 pts (9%), SD 3 pts (14%), PD 13 pts (60%); 4 pts (18%) unevaluable (off study before first scheduled scan). Median PFS 2 mo. At last follow-up, 5 pts (23%) were alive with 1 pt still on treatment. Median OS 4 mo. Of 21 pts off treatment, 76% off for PD, 10% off for AE, 14% off for withdrawal of consent/other therapy. Conclusions: PEM + chemotherapy was not effective in this pretreated, biomarker-unselected population of EP-PDNECs arising in different organs. Biomarker studies are planned (Parts A/B). Clinical trial information: NCT03136055.

Download Full-text

RAMSETE: A single-arm, multicenter, single-stage phase II trial of RAD001 (everolimus) in advanced and metastatic silent neuro-endocrine tumours in Europe.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.4122 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4122-4122 ◽

Cited By ~ 11

Author(s):

Marianne E. Pavel ◽

Bertram Wiedenmann ◽

Jaume Capdevila ◽

Nicholas Reed ◽

Juan W. Valle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase Ii ◽

Objective Response ◽

Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

High Rate ◽

Mucosal Inflammation ◽

Duration Of Treatment ◽

Open Label ◽

Best Response

4122 Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Everolimus (RAD001), an oral mTOR inhibitor, has antitumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced NET. In this open-label, multicenter, phase II study (RAMSETE), the safety and efficacy of everolimus monotherapy was evaluated in pts with advanced nonsyndromic, nonpancreatic NET. Methods: Pts with advanced (unresectable or metastatic), progressive, nonsyndromic, nonpancreatic NET received everolimus (10 mg/day) as monotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (proportion of pts with best overall complete response [CR] or partial response [PR] per RECIST v1.0) by central radiologic review. A secondary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS). Results: By database soft lock (December 1, 2011), 73 pts from 16 European clinics received everolimus (median duration of treatment: 193 days). Fifty-five (75%) pts discontinued; reasons included disease progression (n=23), adverse events (AEs [n=23]), withdrawal of consent (n=4), death (n=3), and protocol deviation (n=2). In the per protocol population (N=60), 32 (53%) pts received prior antineoplastic therapy. The best response by central review was stable disease in 55%. By local review, 3 (5%) pts had a PR, with SD in 39 (65%) pts. Median PFS by central review was 185 days (95% CI: 158-255). Median PFS by local investigator review was 285 days (95% CI: 231-not estimable). 69 (95%) pts reported treatment-related AEs of any grade, including rash (n=28; 38%), diarrhea (n=20; 27%), mucosal inflammation (n=18; 25%), and decreased appetite (n=17; 23%). Treatment-related grades 3 and 4 AEs and serious AEs were reported by 27 (37%) and 18 (25%) pts, respectively. Conclusions: In this open-label trial of everolimus in pts with advanced, nonsyndromic, extrapancreatic NET, a high rate of disease stabilization was achieved after prior tumor progression with favorable median PFS. This study further supports efficacy of everolimus in types of NET other than those studied in RADIANT-3 (pancreatic NET) and RADIANT-2 (NET associated with carcinoid syndrome).

Download Full-text

The Impact of Tumor Mutation Burden on the Effect of Frontline Trastuzumab Plus Chemotherapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancers

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.792340 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Hye Ryeon Kim ◽

Soomin Ahn ◽

Hyunji Jo ◽

Hongsik Kim ◽

Joohyun Hong ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Objective Response ◽

Growth Factor Receptor ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Complete Response ◽

First Line ◽

Her2 Positive ◽

First Line Therapy ◽

The Status ◽

Tumor Mutational Burden ◽

The Impact

BackgroundTrastuzumab is a HER2-trargeted humanized monoclonal antibody that has been studied as a first-line treatment for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The effect of anti-HER2 therapy according to tumor mutational burden (TMB) in HER2-positive AGC remains unclear.MethodsWe performed next-generation sequencing (NGS), including TMB analysis, in 31 HER2-positive AGC patients with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for recurrent (n=8) or metastatic (n=23) tumors. The TruSight Oncology 500 Assay from Illumina (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to evaluate TMB.ResultsAmong 31 patients, 30 had tumors with immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+, and one was IHC 2+ and silver in situ hybridization (SISH) positive. The median age was 57.0 years old (range, 35-76), and the majority had tumors with low TMB (87.1%, n=27/31). Only four (12.9%) had tumors with high TMB. Of these four, three achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to treatment, and the remaining patient was not evaluable for tumor response. Objective response rate (ORR) to trastuzumab plus chemotherapy showed a favorable trend in patients with high TMB (75.0%, n=3/4) compared to patients with low TMB (59.3%, n=16/27) (P=0.546). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the TMB-high group but was 8.0 months (95% CI, 7.6-8.5) in the TMB-low group (P=0.019)ConclusionThe status of TMB could be a novel biomarker in predicting the efficacy of trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in HER2-positive AGCs.

Download Full-text