scholarly journals 540 Baseline mTOR transcriptional signatures in CD8 T cells are associated with immune-related adverse events but not anti-tumor responses in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A570-A570
Author(s):  
Chen Zhao ◽  
Matthew Mule ◽  
Andrew Martins ◽  
Iago Pinal Fernandez ◽  
Renee Donahue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Tumor Immunity ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Effector Memory ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the cancer treatment landscape, but immune-related adverse events (irAEs) can affect a wide range of tissues in patients receiving ICIs. Severe irAEs can be life-threatening or fatal and prohibit patients from receiving further ICI treatment. While the clinical features of irAEs are well documented, the pathological mechanisms and predictive biomarkers are largely unknown. In addition, there is a critical need to preserve ICI-induced anti-tumor immunity while controlling for irAEs, which requires deciphering molecular and cellular signatures associated specifically with irAEs beyond those more generally linked to anti-tumor immunity.MethodsTo unbiasedly identify immune cells and states associated with irAEs, we applied CITE-seq to measure transcripts and surface proteins (83 protein markers) from PBMCs collected from patients with thymic epithelial tumors before and after treatment with an anti-PD-L1 antibody (avelumab, NCT01772004, NCT03076554).ResultsSamples from 9 patients were analyzed. No patient had a history of pre-existing paraneoplastic autoimmune disease. Anti-tumor activity was observed in all cases, and 5 patients had clinical and/or biochemical evidence of immune-related muscle inflammation (myositis with or without myocarditis). Multilevel models applied within highly resolved cell clusters revealed transcriptional states associated with ICI response and more uniquely with irAEs. A total of 190,000 cells were included in the analysis after quality control. Most notably, CD45RA+ effector memory CD8 T cells with an mTOR transcriptional signature were highly enriched at baseline and post treatment in patients with irAEs.ConclusionsOur findings suggest the potential therapeutic avenues by using mTOR inhibitors to dampen autoimmune responses while potentially sparing anti-tumor activity, to prevent treatment discontinuation and improve clinical outcomes for cancer patients treated with ICIs.AcknowledgementsThis research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NCI (the Center for Cancer Research), NIAID and NIAMS, and through a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement between the National Cancer Institute and EMD Serono.Trial RegistrationNCT01772004, NCT03076554Ethics ApprovalThis study is approved by NCI institutional review board.

646 Evaluating a preclinical model of contact hypersensitivity for skin immune checkpoint toxicity

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A683-A683
Author(s):  
Barbara Ma ◽  
Abhinav Jaiswal ◽  
K Sanjana Devi ◽  
Qingrong Huang ◽  
Joy Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Clin Oncol ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Murine Model ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Contact Hypersensitivity

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are limited by the high incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurring in up to 40% of solid tumor patients on anti-PD-1 monotherapy 1 2 and 72% in anti-CTLA-4/anti-PD-1 combination.3 4 These toxicities can cause treatment cessation, hospitalization and even death.5–7 IrAEs are variable in severity, timing, onset, and remain poorly understood. Amongst the different toxicities, skin irAEs are most frequent, occur the earliest, and are correlated with a positive prognosis.4 8 However, there is a lack of preclinical models to study checkpoint toxicity. We evaluated a murine model of allergic contact dermatitis (contact hypersensitivity to 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene) that is mediated by CD8+ T cells to gain a mechanistic understanding of skin checkpoint toxicity.MethodsC57BL/6 mice (n = 5 per group) were sensitized epicutaneously on shaved flank with hapten 0.5% DNFB on day -5 and elicited on their ears with DNFB on day 0. Starting four weeks later, mice were treated with either anti-programmed cell death protein (PD-1) or isotype. At the time of the first recall challenge only, mice were given either anti-PD-1 or isotype. Mice received subsequent rechallenges with DNFB to the ears and ear swelling was measured at various time points. Mice were depleted of circulating or skin CD8+ T cells by anti-CD8 mAbs from day 29 onwards, and maintained weekly, as in this model CD8+ T cells are the main hapten responder population. Samples were collected for histochemistry and analyzed by flow cytometry.ResultsOur data indicate that despite the depletion of circulating T cells, anti-PD-1 recipients mount a higher initial recall response to contact agents. Higher ear swelling was observed with increased inflammation in these mice. Our data suggest anti-PD-1 can liberate local T cell responses in the absence of a contribution from blood, and may offer a model to test therapeutic interventions to alleviate peripheral immune toxicities.ConclusionsOur results suggest that this murine model of contact hypersensitivity represents a potential model for skin immune checkpoint toxicities. This model of locally-mediated inflammatory recall may advance the goal of uncoupling toxicity from efficacy in patients with immune-related adverse events.Ethics ApprovalThe animal study was approved by Weill Cornell Medicine’s IACUC; approval number D16-00186.ReferencesNaidoo J, Page DB, Li BT, et al. Toxicities of the anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies. Ann Oncol 2015;26(12):2375–91. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv383.Belum VR, Benhuri B, Postow MA, et al. Characterisation and management of dermatologic adverse events to agents targeting the PD-1 receptor. Eur J Cancer 2016;60:12–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.02.010.Postow MA, Sidlow R, Hellmann MD. Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Immune Checkpoint Blockade. N Engl J Med 2018;378(2):158–168. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1703481.Martins F, Sofiya L, Sykiotis GP, et al. Adverse effects of immune-checkpoint inhibitors: epidemiology, management and surveillance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019;16(9):563–580. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0218-0.Puzanov I, Diab A, Abdallah K, et al. Managing toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: consensus recommendations from the society for immunotherapy of cancer (SITC) Toxicity Management Working Group. J Immunother Cancer 2017;5(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0300-z.Wills B, Brahmer JR, Naidoo J. Treatment of complications from immune checkpoint inhibition in patients with lung cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2018;19(9):46. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0562-9.Michot JM, Bigenwald C, Champiat S, et al. Immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint blockade: a comprehensive review. Eur J Cancer 2016;54:139–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.11.016.Phillips GS, Wu J, Hellmann MD, et al. Treatment outcomes of immune-related cutaneous adverse events. J Clin Oncol 2019:JCO1802141. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.02141.

Immunological and clinical profiles of patients with advanced or metastatic melanoma receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors to investigate potential biomarkers for immune-related adverse events.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14037-e14037
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Berg ◽  
Michael Wesolowski ◽  
Brianna Burke ◽  
Courtney Regan Wagner ◽  
Joseph I Clark ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Rank Correlation ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Biological Variables

e14037 Background: Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) related to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may target any organ and originate from autoreactive T cells injuring host tissues. There is a need to develop prognostic and predictive biomarkers to distinguish patients (pts) who will benefit from ICIs avoiding irAEs during treatment. We propose that irAEs are the result of many biological variables. We hypothesize that within each pts complex immunological profile, there may be patterns and associations which exist that represent a state of inflammation that is present prior to ICI therapy and hypothesize this could predict irAEs development. Methods: We created individual immunological profiles of 11 pts diagnosed with MM prior to receiving ICIs. Assays included: PBMC composition, circulating chemokines/cytokines, and IκB degradation status. CD4 and CD8 T cells were studied for their phenotype, activation status, proliferative capacity and cytolytic granules. Clinical data was collected on a larger MM pt cohort (n = 41) and descriptive statistics were utilized to characterize reported irAEs . Results: 110 input markers were utilized for immune signature analysis. 6 of the 11 pts reported grade 2+ irAEs after ICI therapy. The pro-inflammatory CCL13, CCL1, FLT-3, IL12p40, TRAIL, and granzyme b expressing CD4 T cells at steady state and after CD3 activation were significantly higher in pts with irAEs. Known inflammatory suspects (i.e., IL-2, IL-15, TNF-a or % CD8 T cells) were not associated with irAE development . A rank correlation test showed significant associations between the levels of these factors. irAEs were reported in 41% (n = 17) for our larger cohort, most frequently skin rash (7%), colitis (7%), hepatitis (7%) and thyroid dysfunction (4%). Conclusions: The immune signatures of pts with irAEs are highly heterogeneous and possess distinctive immunological patterns. Our results introduce possible molecular mechanisms that may aid understanding of irAE development, perhaps providing the basis for a new model prospectively testing these markers to risk stratify pts receiving ICIs.

scholarly journals Inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR Pathway in Breast Cancer to Enhance Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 5207
Author(s):  
Chi Yan ◽  
Jinming Yang ◽  
Nabil Saleh ◽  
Sheau-Chiann Chen ◽  
Gregory D. Ayers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
T Cells ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Complete Regression ◽  
Mtor Inhibition

Objectives: Inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR pathway suppresses breast cancer (BC) growth, enhances anti-tumor immune responses, and works synergistically with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The objective here was to identify a subclass of PI3K inhibitors that, when combined with paclitaxel, is effective in enhancing response to ICI. Methods: C57BL/6 mice were orthotopically implanted with syngeneic luminal/triple-negative-like PyMT cells exhibiting high endogenous PI3K activity. Tumor growth in response to treatment with anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 (ICI), paclitaxel (PTX), and either the PI3Kα-specific inhibitor alpelisib, the pan-PI3K inhibitor copanlisib, or the broad spectrum PI3K/mTOR inhibitor gedatolisib was evaluated in reference to monotherapy or combinations of these therapies. Effects of these therapeutics on intratumoral immune populations were determined by multicolor FACS. Results: Treatment with alpelisib + PTX inhibited PyMT tumor growth and increased tumor-infiltrating granulocytes but did not significantly affect the number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and did not synergize with ICI. Copanlisib + PTX + ICI significantly inhibited PyMT growth and increased activation of intratumoral CD8+ T cells as compared to ICI alone, yet did not inhibit tumor growth more than ICI alone. In contrast, gedatolisib + ICI resulted in significantly greater inhibition of tumor growth compared to ICI alone and induced durable dendritic-cell, CD8+ T-cell, and NK-cell responses. Adding PTX to this regimen yielded complete regression in 60% of tumors. Conclusion: PI3K/mTOR inhibition plus PTX heightens response to ICI and may provide a viable therapeutic approach for treatment of metastatic BC.

scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Myocarditis from Adjuvant Treatment of Melanoma

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Carrie Lenneman ◽  
John Dasher ◽  
Lavanya Kondapalli ◽  
Carrie Lenneman
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Effective Therapy ◽  
Stage Iii

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective therapy for many metastatic cancers and are now being used as adjuvant treatment for many stage III cancers to reduce the high risk of reoccurrence. ICIs activate a patient’s own T-cells to fight cancer, but in some cases, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with inflammation of many organs can occur. Rare cases of myocarditis have been reported. More data is needed to improve our ability to monitor, diagnose and treat irAEs.

scholarly journals Fibroblastic reticular cells predict response to immune checkpoint inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Biasci ◽  
James Thaventhiran ◽  
Simon Tavaré
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
B Cells ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cancer Immunotherapy ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Reticular Cells

While the role of CD8+ T cells in mediating response to cancer immunotherapy is well established, the role of B cells remains more controversial (1–3). By conducting a large gene expression study of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), we show that pre-treatment expression of B cell genes is associated with ICI response independently of CD8+ T cells. However, we discovered that such association can be completely explained by a single gene (FDCSP) expressed outside of the B cell compartment, in fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs), which form the reticular network that facilitates interactions between B cells, T cells and cognate antigens (4–6) and are required to initiate efficient adaptive immune responses in secondary lymphoid organs (SLO) and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) (4, 7). We validated this finding in three independent cohorts of patients treated with ICI in melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Taken together, these results suggest that FDCSP is an independent predictor of ICI response, thus opening new avenues to explain the mechanisms of resistance to cancer immunotherapy.

scholarly journals Altered interactions between circulating and tissue-resident CD8 T cells with the colonic mucosa define colitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Molly Thomas ◽  
Kamil Slowikowski ◽  
Kasidet Manakongtreecheep ◽  
Pritha Sen ◽  
Jessica Tantivit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Intestinal Barrier Function ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Communication Analysis

Therapeutic blockade of co-inhibitory immune receptors PD-1 and CTLA-4 has revolutionized oncology, but treatments are limited by immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). IRAE Colitis (irColitis) is the most common, severe IRAE affecting up to 25% of patients on dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition. Here, we present a systems biology approach to define the cell populations and transcriptional programs driving irColitis. We collected paired colon mucosal biopsy and blood specimens from 13 patients with irColitis, 8 healthy individuals, and 8 controls on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and analyzed them with single-cell/nuclei RNA sequencing with paired TCR and BCR sequencing, multispectral fluorescence microscopy, and secreted factor analysis (Luminex). We profiled 299,407 cells from tissue and blood and identified 105 cell subsets that revealed significant tissue remodeling in active disease. Colon mucosal immune populations were dominated by tissue-resident memory (Trm) ITGAE-expressing CD8 T cells representing a phenotypic spectrum defined by gene programs associated with T cell activation, cytotoxicity, cycling, and exhaustion. CD8 Trm and effector CD4 T cells upregulated type 17 immune programs (IL17A, IL26) and Tfh-like programs (CXCL13, PDCD1). We also identified for the first time an increased abundance of two KLRG1 and ITGB2-expressing CD8 T cell populations with circulatory cell markers, including a GZMK Trm-like population and a CX3CR1 population that is predicted to be intravascular. These two populations were more abundant in irColitis patients treated with dual PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition than those receiving anti-PD-1 monotherapy. They also had significant TCR sharing with PBMCs, suggesting a circulatory origin. In irColitis we observed significant epithelial turnover marked by fewer LGR5-expressing stem cells, more transit amplifying cells, and upregulation of apoptotic and DNA-sensing programs such as the cGAS-STING pathway. Mature epithelial cells with top crypt genes upregulated interferon-stimulated pathways, CD274 (PD-L1), anti-microbial genes, and MHC-class II genes, and downregulated aquaporin and solute-carrier gene families, likely contributing to epithelial cell damage and absorptive dysfunction. Mesenchymal remodeling was defined by increased endothelial cells, both in irColitis patients and specifically in patients on dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade. Cell-cell communication analysis identified putative receptor-ligand pairs that recruit CD8 T cells from blood to inflamed endothelium and positive feedback loops such as the CXCR3 chemokine system that retain cells in tissue. This study highlights the cellular and molecular drivers underlying irColitis and provides new insights into the role of CTLA-4 and PD-1 signaling in maintaining CD8 Trm homeostasis, regulating CD8 T recruitment from blood, and promoting epithelial-immune crosstalk critical to gastrointestinal immune tolerance and intestinal barrier function.

scholarly journals Activation of CD8 T cells accelerates anti-PD-1 antibody-induced psoriasis-like dermatitis through IL-6

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryota Tanaka ◽  
Yuki Ichimura ◽  
Noriko Kubota ◽  
Akimasa Saito ◽  
Yoshiyuki Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
Cell Death ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cd8 T Cells ◽  
Murine Model ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Skin Inflammation ◽  
Programmed Cell Death 1

Abstract Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors that target programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) can lead to various autoimmune-related adverse events (irAEs) including psoriasis-like dermatitis. Our observations on human samples indicated enhanced epidermal infiltration of CD8 T cells, and the pathogenesis of which appears to be dependent on IL-6 in the PD-1 signal blockade-induced psoriasis-like dermatitis. By using a murine model of imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like dermatitis, we further demonstrated that PD-1 deficiency accelerates skin inflammation with activated cytotoxic CD8 T cells into the epidermis, which engage in pathogenic cross-talk with keratinocytes resulting in production of IL-6. Moreover, genetically modified mice lacking PD-1 expression only on CD8 T cells developed accelerated dermatitis, moreover, blockade of IL-6 signaling by anti-IL-6 receptor antibody could ameliorate the dermatitis. Collectively, PD-1 signal blockade-induced psoriasis-like dermatitis is mediated by PD-1 signaling on CD8 T cells, and furthermore, IL-6 is likely to be a therapeutic target for the dermatitis.

scholarly journals The quality of reporting general safety parameters and immune-related adverse events in clinical trials of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahra Karimian ◽  
Sandra Mavoungou ◽  
Joe-Elie Salem ◽  
Florence Tubach ◽  
Agnès Dechartres
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Safety Information ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Quality Of Reporting ◽  
Link Type

Abstract Background While immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the field of oncology for advanced-stage cancers, they can lead to serious immune toxicities. Several systematic reviews have evaluated the risk of immune-related adverse events (irAEs); however, most have focused on published articles without evaluating trial registries. The objective of this methodological review was to compare the quality of reporting of safety information and in particular, serious irAEs (irSAEs), in both publications and ClinicalTrials.gov for all current FDA-approved ICIs. Methods PubMed was searched to retrieve all published phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs. For each eligible trial, we searched for corresponding registration on ClinicalTrials.gov and extracted relevant safety data from both the publication and results posted on registry. We then compared the quality of reporting and the value of safety data between both sources. Results Of 42 eligible published trials, 34 had results posted on ClinicalTrials.gov. Considerable variability was noted in the reporting of safety in both sources. SAEs were reported for all trial results in ClinicalTrials.gov compared to 23.5% of publications. An overall incidence for irAEs and irSAEs was reported in 58.8 and 8.8% of publications respectively, compared to 11.8 and 5.9% in registry results. Comparing the value of specific irSAEs was not possible between the two sources in 32/34 trials either due to different reporting formats (61.8%) or data not being reported in one or both sources (32.4%). From the 2 studies with compatible irSAE format, only 1 had matching data in both sources. Conclusions The reporting of irAEs / irSAEs varies considerably in publications and registries, which outlines the importance of standardizing the terminologies and methodologies for reporting safety information relevant to ICIs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document