scholarly journals Improvement of levodopa induced dyskinesias by thalamic deep brain stimulation is related to slight variation in electrode placement: possible involvement of the centre median and parafascicularis complex

1999 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 308-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Caparros-Lefebvre ◽  
S. Blond ◽  
M.-P. Feltin ◽  
P. Pollak ◽  
A. L. Benabid
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Slight Variation ◽  
Deep Brain

Clinical outcomes of asleep vs awake deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease

Neurology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 89 (19) ◽  
pp. 1944-1950 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Brodsky ◽  
Shannon Anderson ◽  
Charles Murchison ◽  
Mara Seier ◽  
Jennifer Wilhelm ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Parkinson Disease ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Microelectrode Recording ◽  
Imaging Guidance ◽  
Motor Outcomes ◽  
Deep Brain

Objective:To compare motor and nonmotor outcomes at 6 months of asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson disease (PD) using intraoperative imaging guidance to confirm electrode placement vs awake DBS using microelectrode recording to confirm electrode placement.Methods:DBS candidates with PD referred to Oregon Health & Science University underwent asleep DBS with imaging guidance. Six-month outcomes were compared to those of patients who previously underwent awake DBS by the same surgeon and center. Assessments included an “off”-levodopa Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II and III, the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire, motor diaries, and speech fluency.Results:Thirty participants underwent asleep DBS and 39 underwent awake DBS. No difference was observed in improvement of UPDRS III (+14.8 ± 8.9 vs +17.6 ± 12.3 points, p = 0.19) or UPDRS II (+9.3 ± 2.7 vs +7.4 ± 5.8 points, p = 0.16). Improvement in “on” time without dyskinesia was superior in asleep DBS (+6.4 ± 3.0 h/d vs +1.7 ± 1.2 h/d, p = 0.002). Quality of life scores improved in both groups (+18.8 ± 9.4 in awake, +8.9 ± 11.5 in asleep). Improvement in summary index (p = 0.004) and subscores for cognition (p = 0.011) and communication (p < 0.001) were superior in asleep DBS. Speech outcomes were superior in asleep DBS, both in category (+2.77 ± 4.3 points vs −6.31 ± 9.7 points (p = 0.0012) and phonemic fluency (+1.0 ± 8.2 points vs −5.5 ± 9.6 points, p = 0.038).Conclusions:Asleep DBS for PD improved motor outcomes over 6 months on par with or better than awake DBS, was superior with regard to speech fluency and quality of life, and should be an option considered for all patients who are candidates for this treatment.Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT01703598.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with PD undergoing DBS, asleep intraoperative CT imaging–guided implantation is not significantly different from awake microelectrode recording–guided implantation in improving motor outcomes at 6 months.

Avoiding the ventricle: a simple step to improve accuracy of anatomical targeting during deep brain stimulation

2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 1283-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludvic Zrinzo ◽  
Arjen L. J. van Hulzen ◽  
Alessandra A. Gorgulho ◽  
Patricia Limousin ◽  
Michiel J. Staal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Neurosurgical Procedures ◽  
Electrode Implantation ◽  
Clinical Observations ◽  
Simple Step ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Deep Brain

Object The authors examined the accuracy of anatomical targeting during electrode implantation for deep brain stimulation in functional neurosurgical procedures. Special attention was focused on the impact that ventricular involvement of the electrode trajectory had on targeting accuracy. Methods The targeting error during electrode placement was assessed in 162 electrodes implanted in 109 patients at 2 centers. The targeting error was calculated as the shortest distance from the intended stereotactic coordinates to the final electrode trajectory as defined on postoperative stereotactic imaging. The trajectory of these electrodes in relation to the lateral ventricles was also analyzed on postoperative images. Results The trajectory of 68 electrodes involved the ventricle. The targeting error for all electrodes was calculated: the mean ± SD and the 95% CI of the mean was 1.5 ± 1.0 and 0.1 mm, respectively. The same calculations for targeting error for electrode trajectories that did not involve the ventricle were 1.2 ± 0.7 and 0.1 mm. A significantly larger targeting error was seen in trajectories that involved the ventricle (1.9 ± 1.1 and 0.3 mm; p < 0.001). Thirty electrodes (19%) required multiple passes before final electrode implantation on the basis of physiological and/or clinical observations. There was a significant association between an increased requirement for multiple brain passes and ventricular involvement in the trajectory (p < 0.01). Conclusions Planning an electrode trajectory that avoids the ventricles is a simple precaution that significantly improves the accuracy of anatomical targeting during electrode placement for deep brain stimulation. Avoidance of the ventricles appears to reduce the need for multiple passes through the brain to reach the desired target as defined by clinical and physiological observations.

Postural Instability and Gait Disorder After Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation

2020 ◽  
pp. 119-124
Author(s):  
Mónica M. Kurtis ◽  
Javier R. Pérez-Sánchez
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Subthalamic Nucleus ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Disease Onset ◽  
Postural Instability ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Medication Side ◽  
Balance Problems ◽  
Deep Brain

Parkinson disease (PD) patients who have undergone surgery and develop festinating gait and postural instability are challenging to diagnose and treat. This chapter describes the case of an early-onset PD patient who underwent deep brain stimulation (DBS) 4 years after disease onset due to motor and nonmotor fluctuations and medication side effects (impulse control disorder). A year after surgery, the patient developed gait and balance problems in the on-medication/on-stimulation states that resolved after turning stimulation off or withdrawing medication for 12 hours. However, other symptoms, including as bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor, reappeared. Troubleshooting involved magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate electrode placement and complete screening of all contacts with successful reprogramming and medication adjustments. The pathophysiology of balance problems is discussed, including the synergistic effects of subthalamic nucleus DBS and dopaminergic treatment, which may lead to increased postural sway and lower limb dystonia.

Improving Targeting in Image-Guided Frame-Based Deep Brain Stimulation

2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (suppl_2) ◽  
pp. ons437-ons447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etienne M. Holl ◽  
Erika A. Petersen ◽  
Thomas Foltynie ◽  
Irene Martinez-Torres ◽  
Patricia Limousin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Target Point ◽  
Intended Target ◽  
Image Guided ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Deep Brain

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is commonly used in the treatment of movement disorders such as Parkinson disease (PD), dystonia, and other tremors. OBJECTIVE: To examine systematic errors in image-guided DBS electrode placement and to explore a calibration strategy for stereotactic targeting. METHODS: Pre- and postoperative stereotactic MR images were analyzed in 165 patients. The perpendicular error between planned target coordinates and electrode trajectory was calculated geometrically for all 312 DBS electrodes implanted. Improvement in motor unified PD rating scale III subscore was calculated for those patients with PD with at least 6 months of follow-up after bilateral subthalamic DBS. RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) scalar error of all electrodes was 1.4(0.9) mm with a significant difference between left and right hemispheres. Targeting error was significantly higher for electrodes with coronal approach angle (ARC) ≥10° (P &lt; .001). Mean vector error was X: −0.6, Y: −0.7, and Z: −0.4 mm (medial, posterior, and superior directions, respectively). Targeting error was significantly improved by using a systematic calibration strategy based on ARC and target hemisphere (mean: 0.6 mm, P &lt; .001) for 47 electrodes implanted in 24 patients. Retrospective theoretical calibration for all 312 electrodes would have reduced the mean (standard deviation) scalar error from 1.4(0.9) mm to 0.9(0.5) mm (36% improvement). With calibration, 97% of all electrodes would be within 2 mm of the intended target as opposed to 81% before calibration. There was no significant correlation between the degree of error and clinical outcome from bilateral subthalamic nucleus DBS (R2 = 0.07). CONCLUSION: After calibration of a systematic targeting error an MR image-guided stereotactic approach would be expected to deliver 97% of all electrodes to within 2 mm of the intended target point with a single brain pass.

scholarly journals Incidence and risk factors for seizures associated with deep brain stimulation surgery

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Travis J. Atchley ◽  
Galal A. Elsayed ◽  
Blake Sowers ◽  
Harrison C. Walker ◽  
Gustavo Chagoya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Continuous Outcomes ◽  
Deep Brain

OBJECTIVEThe objective of this study was to determine the incidence of seizures following deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode implantation and to evaluate factors associated with postoperative seizures.METHODSThe authors performed a single-center retrospective case-control study. The outcome of interest was seizure associated with DBS implantation. Univariate analyses were performed using the Student t-test for parametric continuous outcomes. The authors used the Kruskal-Wallis test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for nonparametric continuous outcomes, chi-square statistics for categorical outcomes, and multivariate logistic regression for binomial variables.RESULTSA total of 814 DBS electrode implantations were performed in 645 patients (478 [58.7%] in men and 520 [63.9%] in patients with Parkinson’s disease). In total, 22 (3.4%) patients who had undergone 23 (2.8%) placements experienced seizure. Of the 23 DBS implantation–related seizures, 21 were new-onset seizures (3.3% of 645 patients) and 2 were recurrence or worsening of a prior seizure disorder. Among the 23 cases with postimplantation-related seizure, epilepsy developed in 4 (17.4%) postoperatively; the risk of DBS-associated epilepsy was 0.50% per DBS electrode placement and 0.63% per patient. Nine (39.1%) implantation-related seizures had associated postoperative radiographic abnormalities. Multivariate analyses suggested that age at surgery conferred a modest increased risk for postoperative seizures (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02–1.10). Sex, primary diagnosis, electrode location and sidedness, and the number of trajectories were not significantly associated with seizures after DBS surgery.CONCLUSIONSSeizures associated with DBS electrode placement are uncommon, typically occur early within the postoperative period, and seldom lead to epilepsy. This study suggests that patient characteristics, such as age, may play a greater role than perioperative variables in determining seizure risk. Multiinstitutional studies may help better define and mitigate the risk of seizures after DBS surgery.

scholarly journals Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Horn ◽  
Ningfei Li ◽  
Till A Dembek ◽  
Ari Kappel ◽  
Chadwick Boulay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Brain Stimulation ◽  
Functional Connectivity ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Brain Stimulation ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Electrode Placement ◽  
Imaging Data ◽  
High Field Imaging ◽  
Deep Brain

AbstractDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is a highly efficacious treatment option for movement disorders and a growing number of other indications are investigated in clinical trials. To ensure optimal treatment outcome, exact electrode placement is required. Moreover, to analyze the relationship between electrode location and clinical results, a precise reconstruction of electrode placement is required, posing specific challenges to the field of neuroimaging. Since 2014 the open source toolbox Lead-DBS is available, which aims at facilitating this process. The tool has since become a popular platform for DBS imaging. With support of a broad community of researchers worldwide, methods have been continuously updated and complemented by new tools for tasks such as multispectral nonlinear registration, structural / functional connectivity analyses, brain shift correction, reconstruction of microelectrode recordings and orientation detection of segmented DBS leads. The rapid development and emergence of these methods in DBS data analysis require us to revisit and revise the pipelines introduced in the original methods publication. Here we demonstrate the updated DBS and connectome pipelines of Lead-DBS using a single patient example with state-of-the-art high-field imaging as well as a retrospective cohort of patients scanned in a typical clinical setting at 1.5T. Imaging data of the 3T example patient is co-registered using five algorithms and nonlinearly warped into template space using ten approaches for comparative purposes. After reconstruction of DBS electrodes (which is possible using three methods and a specific refinement tool), the volume of tissue activated is calculated for two DBS settings using four distinct models and various parameters. Finally, four whole-brain tractography algorithms are applied to the patient’s preoperative diffusion MRI data and structural as well as functional connectivity between the stimulation volume and other brain areas are estimated using a total of eight approaches and datasets. In addition, we demonstrate impact of selected preprocessing strategies on the retrospective sample of 51 PD patients. We compare the amount of variance in clinical improvement that can be explained by the computer model depending on the method of choice.This work represents a multi-institutional collaborative effort to develop a comprehensive, open source pipeline for DBS imaging and connectomics, which has already empowered several studies, and may facilitate a variety of future studies in the field.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document