Civil commitment for opioid misuse: do short-term benefits outweigh long-term harms?

2021 ◽  
pp. medethics-2020-107160
Author(s):  
John C Messinger ◽  
Daniel J Ikeda ◽  
Ameet Sarpatwari
Keyword(s):  
Civil Commitment ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Loss Of Life ◽  
Severe Withdrawal ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Overdose Deaths

In response to a sharp rise in opioid-involved overdose deaths in the USA, states have deployed increasingly aggressive strategies to limit the loss of life, including civil commitment—the forcible detention of individuals whose opioid use presents a clear and convincing danger to themselves or others. While civil commitment often succeeds in providing short-term protection from overdose, emerging evidence suggests that it may be associated with long-term harms, including heightened risk of severe withdrawal, relapse and opioid-involved mortality. To better assess and mitigate these harms, states should collect more robust data on long-term health outcomes, decriminalise proceedings and stays, provide access to medications for opioid use disorder and strengthen post-release coordination of community-based treatment.

Perceived Benefits and Harms of Involuntary Civil Commitment for Opioid Use Disorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 718-734
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Evans ◽  
Calla Harrington ◽  
Robert Roose ◽  
Susan Lemere ◽  
David Buchanan
Keyword(s):  
Civil Commitment ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Treatment Access ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
Ethics Framework ◽  
Vulnerable Patients ◽  
Underserved Patients ◽  
Legal Consequences

Involuntary civil commitment (ICC) to treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) prevents imminent overdose, but also restricts autonomy and raises other ethical concerns. Using the Kass Public Health Ethics Framework, we identified ICC benefits and harms. Benefits include: protection of vulnerable, underserved patients; reduced legal consequences; resources for families; and “on-demand” treatment access. Harms include: stigmatizing and punitive experiences; heightened family conflict and social isolation; eroded patient self-determination; limited or no provision of OUD medications; and long-term overdose risk. To use ICC ethically, it should be recognized as comprising vulnerable patients worthy of added protections; be a last resort option; utilize consensual, humanizing processes; provide medications and other evidence-based-treatment; integrate with existing healthcare systems; and demonstrate effective outcomes before diffusion. ICC to OUD treatment carries significant potential harms that, if unaddressed, may outweigh its benefits. Findings can inform innovations for ensuring that ICC is used in an ethically responsible way.

scholarly journals LO42: A systematic review of short-term use of therapeutic opioids for children and future opioid use disorders

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S22-S22
Author(s):  
S. Ali ◽  
M. Afzalzada-Ahrari ◽  
M. Dyson ◽  
D. DaRosa ◽  
K. Dong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Opioid Misuse ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Individual

Introduction: Despite an overall decline in opioid prescriptions in Canada, healthcare visits, hospitalizations, and deaths due to opioid-related harms continue to rise for children. Clinicians urgently require high quality synthesized evidence to inform personalized decisions regarding opioid use for children. The objective of this systematic review was to examine the association between short-term therapeutic exposure to opioids and development of opioid use disorder. Methods: A medical librarian conducted a comprehensive search of 10 databases from inception to May 2019. Two authors independently assessed studies for inclusion. Studies were eligible if they reported primary research in English or French, and study participants had short (<14 days) or non-specific duration of therapeutic exposure to opioids before age 18 years. Primary outcome was the development of an opioid use disorder; secondary outcomes included opioid addiction, dependence, misuse, and abuse. Data extraction involved two independent reviewers utilizing a standardized form. Methodological quality was assessed using the NIH tools for observational studies. Results are described narratively. Results: The search identified 4,072 unique citations; 82 were selected for review, and 17 were included (3 retrospective cohort, 4 prospective cohort, and 10 cross-sectional). All studies took place in the USA. A total of 1,562,503 participants were analyzed. Nine studies were administered in schools, 3 used administrative data. While most settings were non-specific, 1 study examined opioid use in dentistry, 1 in trauma, and 1 in organized sports. One comparative study showed an association between short-term therapeutic use and opioid misuse. Two studies showed opioid related adverse events (e.g., overdose) among cohorts exposed to short-term use. The remaining 14 studies did not specify duration of exposure; therefore, confirming whether misuse was due to short-term therapeutic exposure was not possible. Conclusion: A small number of studies in this review suggest an association between short-term opioid use and opioid misuse; however, further analysis is underway with consideration of methodological limitations of the individual studies (final results pending). Careful consideration of the risk and benefits of short-term opioid use should be undertaken prior to prescribing opioids. PROSPERO Registration Number: 122681.

scholarly journals Neural bases for attenuation of morphine withdrawal by Heantos-4: role of l-tetrahydropalmatine

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Soyon Ahn ◽  
Maya O. Nesbit ◽  
Haiyan Zou ◽  
Giada Vacca ◽  
Peter Axerio-Cilies ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Morphine Dependence ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Severe Withdrawal ◽  
Plausible Mechanism ◽  
Withdrawal Signs ◽  
Opioid Detoxification

AbstractSevere withdrawal symptoms triggered by cessation of long-term opioid use deter many individuals from seeking treatment. Opioid substitution and α2-adrenergic agonists are the current standard of pharmacotherapy for opioid use disorder in western medicine; however, each is associated with significant complications. Heantos-4 is a non-opioid botanical formulation used to facilitate opioid detoxification in Vietnam. While ongoing clinical use continues to validate its safety and effectiveness, a mechanism of action accounting for these promising effects remains to be specified. Here, we assess the effects of Heantos-4 in a rat model of morphine-dependence and present evidence that alleviation of naloxone-precipitated somatic withdrawal signs is related to an upregulation of mesolimbic dopamine activity and a consequent reversal of a hypodopaminergic state in the nucleus accumbens, a brain region implicated in opioid withdrawal. A central dopaminergic mechanism is further supported by the identification of l-tetrahydropalmatine as a key active ingredient in Heantos-4, which crosses the blood–brain barrier and shows a therapeutic efficacy comparable to its parent formulation in attenuating withdrawal signs. The anti-hypodopaminergic effects of l-tetrahydropalmatine may be related to antagonism of the dopamine autoreceptor, thus constituting a plausible mechanism contributing to the effectiveness of Heantos-4 in facilitating opioid detoxification.

scholarly journals Reducing the stigma surrounding opioid use disorder: evaluating an opioid overdose prevention training program applied to a diverse population

2022 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Alexander Bascou ◽  
Benjamin Haslund-Gourley ◽  
Katrina Amber-Monta ◽  
Kyle Samson ◽  
Nathaniel Goss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Overdose Prevention ◽  
Faculty Advisors ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Attitudes And Knowledge ◽  
Overdose Deaths

Abstract Background The opioid epidemic is a rapidly growing public health concern in the USA, as the number of overdose deaths continues to increase each year. One strategy for combating the rising number of overdoses is through opioid overdose prevention programs (OOPPs). Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of an innovative OOPP, with changes in knowledge and attitudes serving as the primary outcome measures. Methods The OOPP was developed by a group of medical students under guidance from faculty advisors. Training sessions focused on understanding stigmatizing factors of opioid use disorder (OUD), as well as protocols for opioid overdose reversal through naloxone administration. Pre- and post-surveys were partially adapted from the opioid overdose attitudes and knowledge scales and administered to all participants. Paired t-tests were conducted to assess differences between pre- and post-surveys. Results A total of 440 individuals participated in the training; 381 completed all or the majority of the survey. Participants came from a diverse set of backgrounds, ages, and experiences. All three knowledge questions showed significant improvements. For attitude questions, significant improvements were found in all three questions evaluating confidence, two of three questions assessing attitudes towards overdose reversal, and four of five questions evaluating stigma and attitudes towards individuals with OUD. Conclusions Our innovative OOPP was effective not only in increasing knowledge but also in improving attitudes towards overdose reversal and reducing stigma towards individuals with OUD. Given the strong improvements in attitudes towards those with OUD, efforts should be made to incorporate the unique focus on biopsychosocial and sociohistorical components into future OOPPs.

Abstract #283 Diabetes Increases Short-Term but not Long-Term Risk of Fracture: A Community-Based Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 114
Author(s):  
Alyssa Dufour ◽  
Setareh Williams ◽  
Richard Weiss ◽  
Elizabeth Samelson
Keyword(s):  
Short Term ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Risk Of Fracture

scholarly journals Prior National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) opioid use disorder trials as background and rationale for NIDA CTN-0100 “optimizing retention, duration and discontinuation strategies for opioid use disorder pharmacotherapy (RDD)”

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matisyahu Shulman ◽  
Roger Weiss ◽  
John Rotrosen ◽  
Patricia Novo ◽  
Elizabeth Costello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Drug Abuse Treatment ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
National Drug ◽  
Retention In Treatment ◽  
Abuse Treatment

AbstractOpioid use disorder continues to be a significant problem in the United States and worldwide. Three medications—methadone, buprenorphine, and extended-release injectable naltrexone,— are efficacious for treating opioid use disorder (OUD). However, the utility of these medications is limited, in part due to poor rates of retention in treatment. In addition, minimum recovery milestones and other factors that influence when and whether individuals can safely discontinue medications are unknown. The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study “Optimizing Retention, Duration, and Discontinuation Strategies for Opioid Use Disorder Pharmacotherapy” (RDD; CTN-0100) will be among the largest clinical trials on treatment of OUD yet conducted, consisting of two phases, the Retention phase, and the Duration-Discontinuation phase. The Retention phase, open to patients initiating treatment, will test different doses and formulations of buprenorphine (standard dose sublingual, high dose sublingual, or extended-release injection), and a digital therapeutic app delivering contingency management and cognitive behavioral counseling on the primary outcome of retention in treatment. The Discontinuation phase, open to patients in stable remission from OUD and choosing to discontinue medication (including participants from the Retention phase or from the population of patients treated at the clinical site, referred by an outside prescriber or self-referred) will study different tapering strategies for buprenorphine (sublingual taper vs taper with injection buprenorphine), and a digital therapeutic app which provides resources to promote recovery, on the primary outcome of relapse-free discontinuation of medication. This paper describes how the RDD trial derives from two decades of research in the CTN. Initial trials (CTN-0001; CTN-0002; CTN-0003) focused on opioid detoxification, showing buprenorphine-naloxone was effective for detoxification, but that acute detoxification did not appear to be an effective treatment strategy. Trials on comparative effectiveness of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) (CTN-0027; CTN-0030; and CTN-0051) highlighted the problem of dropout from treatment and few trials defined retention on MOUD as the primary outcome. Long-term follow-up studies on those patient samples demonstrated the importance of long-term continuation of medication for many patients to sustain remission. Overall, these trials highlight the potential of a stable research infrastructure such as CTN to advance treatment effectiveness through a programmatic succession of large clinical trials.

scholarly journals Patient Experiences with the Transition to Telephone Counseling during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 663
Author(s):  
Augustine W. Kang ◽  
Mary Walton ◽  
Ariel Hoadley ◽  
Courtney DelaCuesta ◽  
Linda Hurley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Telephone Counseling ◽  
Patient Experiences ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Therapeutic Experience ◽  
Perceived Impact

Background: To identify and document the treatment experiences among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) in the context of the rapid move from in-person to telephone counseling due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Participants (n = 237) completed a survey with open-ended questions that included the following domains: (1) satisfaction with telephone counseling, (2) perceived convenience, (3) changes to the therapeutic relationship, (4) perceived impact on substance use recovery, and (5) general feedback. Responses were coded using thematic analysis. Codes were subsequently organized into themes and subthemes (covering 98% of responses). Interrater reliability for coding of participants’ responses ranged from 0.89 to 0.95. Results: Overall, patients reported that telephone counseling improved the therapeutic experience. Specifically, 74% of respondents were coded as providing responses consistently indicating “positive valency”. “Positive valency” responses include: (1) feeling supported, (2) greater comfort and privacy, (3) increased access to counselors, and (4) resolved transportation barriers. Conversely, “negative valency” responses include: (1) impersonal experience and (2) reduced privacy. Conclusions: Telephone counseling presents its own set of challenges that should be investigated further to improve the quality of care and long-term patient outcomes.

Championing Change to Save Lives: A Call to Action to Implement Reforms to Increase Use of Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder in Correctional Settings

2020 ◽  
pp. 073401682098162
Author(s):  
Sonia L. Canzater ◽  
Regina M. LaBelle
Keyword(s):  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Correctional Facilities ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Correctional Settings ◽  
Overdose Deaths

The disproportional rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) in U.S. correctional facilities make them prime intervention points to treat OUD utilizing medication to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), the evidence-based clinical standard of care. MOUD has been shown to be effective to support recovery and reduce recurrence of OUD, overdose deaths, and recidivism for justice-involved persons both while incarcerated and once they reenter their communities. Despite the high prevalence, most jails and prisons do not offer MOUD. Litigation has spurred expanded access in more facilities, but widespread MOUD access can only become a reality through a comprehensive effort of corrections officials, medical experts, advocates, legislators, and other champions to raise awareness and affect ideological and policy change. It is a legal and ethical imperative that the lives of justice-involved persons not be jeopardized by the lack of evidence-based treatment for OUD in correctional settings.

scholarly journals Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Adolescent Opioid Use Disorder Treatment During a Pandemic: One Step Back, but Two Forward? (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel W Stull ◽  
Erin R McKnight ◽  
Andrea E Bonny
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Mobile Technologies ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
The Face ◽  
One Step ◽  
Clinician Perspectives ◽  
Receive Treatment

UNSTRUCTURED Opioid use disorder (OUD) is one of the most pressing public health problems in the United States and is highly prevalent among adolescents and young adults (AYAs). However, only a small percentage of AYAs with OUD ever receive treatment. Further, among those that do receive treatment, a substantial proportion of patients continue to struggle with OUD, and many prematurely drop out of treatment. These challenges have only been heightened in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, but greater utilization of telehealth and mobile technologies by OUD patients may help counter these barriers, which ultimately may improve AYA OUD treatment in the postpandemic period. This viewpoint presents the perspective of a person in OUD recovery using online and mobile technology to support his own OUD recovery combined with thoughts from two clinicians supporting AYAs with OUD. Their perspectives may provide insights to help counter COVID-19–related consequences and offer clues to improving AYA OUD treatment in the long term.

scholarly journals Implementing a Low-threshold Audio-only Telehealth Model for Medication-assisted Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder at a Community-based Non-profit Organization in Washington, D.C.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellis Jaewon Yeo ◽  
Hannah Kralles ◽  
David Sternberg ◽  
Dana McCullough ◽  
Ajetha Nadanasabesan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Retention Rates ◽  
People Who Use Drugs ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Treatment Access ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Medication Assisted Treatment ◽  
Low Threshold

Abstract BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has had especially devastating effects on people who use drugs. Due to pandemic protocols in the United States, medication-assisted treatment (MAT) regulations became more flexible, permitting our community-based nonprofit organization to transition its low-threshold MAT clinic to an audio-only telehealth model of care in 2020. Case PresentationThis case study describes our transition from a low-threshold community-based in-person MAT clinic to an audio-only telehealth model. We extracted data from electronic health records to describe patient characteristics and to calculate treatment retention rates. We measure the success of our intervention relative to published retention rates, both overall as well as for in-person and telehealth care. ConclusionsLow-threshold medication-assisted treatment in the care of people with opioid use disorder is essential to increasing treatment access and continuity. We found that an audio-only telehealth model was viable. Although we had decreased retention rates following the transition to an audio-only telehealth model, our rates remained excellent compared to published values for in-person MAT care. We call for advocacy and regulations to support continued use of telehealth services throughout and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document