Assembly strategies and GTPase regulation of the eukaryotic and Escherichia coli translocons

2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 593-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyle R Legate ◽  
David W Andrews
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Inner Membrane ◽  
Membrane Bound

The translocation of most proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum or bacterial inner membrane occurs through an aqueous pore that spans the membrane. Substrates that are translocated co-translationally across the membrane are directed to the translocation pore via an interaction between the cytosolic signal recognition particle and its membrane-bound receptor. Together the translocation pore and the receptor are referred to as a translocon. By studying the biogenesis of the translocon a number of alternate targeting and membrane-integration pathways have been discovered that operate independently of the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway. The novel assembly strategies of the translocon and the ways in which these components interact to ensure the fidelity and unidirectionality of the targeting and translocation process are reviewed here.Key words: protein translocation, translocon, SRP receptor, GTPases.

scholarly journals Dissecting the Translocase and Integrase Functions of the Escherichia coli Secyeg Translocon

2000 ◽  
Vol 150 (3) ◽  
pp. 689-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Georg Koch ◽  
Matthias Müller
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Membrane Proteins ◽  
Protein Delivery ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Membrane Vesicles ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Secretory Proteins ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Inner Membrane ◽  
Independent Protein

Recent evidence suggests that in Escherichia coli, SecA/SecB and signal recognition particle (SRP) are constituents of two different pathways targeting secretory and inner membrane proteins to the SecYEG translocon of the plasma membrane. We now show that a secY mutation, which compromises a functional SecY–SecA interaction, does not impair the SRP-mediated integration of polytopic inner membrane proteins. Furthermore, under conditions in which the translocation of secretory proteins is strictly dependent on SecG for assisting SecA, the absence of SecG still allows polytopic membrane proteins to integrate at the wild-type level. These results indicate that SRP-dependent integration and SecA/SecB-mediated translocation do not only represent two independent protein delivery systems, but also remain mechanistically distinct processes even at the level of the membrane where they engage different domains of SecY and different components of the translocon. In addition, the experimental setup used here enabled us to demonstrate that SRP-dependent integration of a multispanning protein into membrane vesicles leads to a biologically active enzyme.

scholarly journals Translocation of α-Synuclein Expressed in Escherichia coli

2007 ◽  
Vol 189 (7) ◽  
pp. 2777-2786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoping Ren ◽  
Xi Wang ◽  
Shufeng Hao ◽  
Hongyu Hu ◽  
Chih-chen Wang
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Lewy Bodies ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Inner Membrane ◽  
Dependent Pathway

ABSTRACT α-Synuclein is a major component of Lewy bodies in Parkinson's disease. Although no signal sequence is apparent, α-synuclein expressed in Escherichia coli is mostly located in the periplasm. The possibilities that α-synuclein translocated into the periplasm across the inner membrane by the SecA or the Tat targeting route identified in bacteria and that α-synuclein was released through MscL were excluded. The signal recognition particle-dependent pathway is involved in the translocation of α-synuclein. The C-terminal 99-to-140 portion of the α-synuclein molecule plays a signal-like role for its translocation into the periplasm, cooperating with the central 61-to-95 section. The N-terminal 1-to-60 region is not required for this translocation.

scholarly journals Emerging View on the Molecular Functions of Sec62 and Sec63 in Protein Translocation

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 12757
Author(s):  
Sung-jun Jung ◽  
Hyun Kim
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Conducting Channel ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved ◽  
Translocation Pathway ◽  
Molecular Functions ◽  
Sec61 Channel

Most secreted and membrane proteins are targeted to and translocated across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane through the Sec61 protein-conducting channel. Evolutionarily conserved Sec62 and Sec63 associate with the Sec61 channel, forming the Sec complex and mediating translocation of a subset of proteins. For the last three decades, it has been thought that ER protein targeting and translocation occur via two distinct pathways: signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent co-translational or SRP-independent, Sec62/Sec63 dependent post-translational translocation pathway. However, recent studies have suggested that ER protein targeting and translocation through the Sec translocon are more intricate than previously thought. This review summarizes the current understanding of the molecular functions of Sec62/Sec63 in ER protein translocation.

scholarly journals Direct probing of the interaction between the signal sequence of nascent preprolactin and the signal recognition particle by specific cross-linking.

1987 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Wiedmann ◽  
T V Kurzchalia ◽  
H Bielka ◽  
T A Rapoport
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Lysine Residues ◽  
Nascent Chain

We have studied the interaction between the signal sequence of nascent preprolactin and the signal recognition particle (SRP) during the initial events in protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. A new method of affinity labeling was used, whereby lysine residues, carrying the photoreactive group 4-(3-trifluoromethyldiazirino) benzoic acid in their side chains, are incorporated into a protein by means of modified lysyl-tRNA, and cross-linking to the interacting component is induced by irradiation. SRP interacts through its Mr 54,000 polypeptide component with the signal sequences of nascent preprolactin chains containing about 70 residues, and with decreasing affinity with longer chains as well; it causes inhibition of elongation. Binding of SRP is reversible and requires the nascent chain to be bound to a functional ribosome. SRP cross-linked to the signal sequence still inhibits elongation but does not prevent it completely. We conclude that SRP does not block the exit site of the polypeptide chain on the ribosome. The SRP receptor of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane displaces the signal sequence from SRP and, even if SRP is cross-linked, releases elongation arrest.

scholarly journals Accumulation of endoplasmic membranes and novel membrane-bound ribosome–signal recognition particle receptor complexes in Escherichia coli

2002 ◽  
Vol 159 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anat A. Herskovits ◽  
Eyal Shimoni ◽  
Abraham Minsky ◽  
Eitan Bibi
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Intracellular Membrane ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Receptor Complexes ◽  
Membrane Bound

In Escherichia coli, ribosomes must interact with translocons on the membrane for the proper integration of newly synthesized membrane proteins, cotranslationally. Previous in vivo studies indicated that unlike the E. coli signal recognition particle (SRP), the SRP receptor FtsY is required for membrane targeting of ribosomes. Accordingly, a putative SRP-independent, FtsY-mediated ribosomal targeting pathway has been suggested (Herskovits, A.A., E.S. Bochkareva, and E. Bibi. 2000. Mol. Microbiol. 38:927–939). However, the nature of the early contact of ribosomes with the membrane, and the involvement of FtsY in this interaction are unknown. Here we show that in cells depleted of the SRP protein, Ffh or the translocon component SecE, the ribosomal targeting pathway is blocked downstream and unprecedented, membrane-bound FtsY–ribosomal complexes are captured. Concurrently, under these conditions, novel, ribosome-loaded intracellular membrane structures are formed. We propose that in the absence of a functional SRP or translocon, ribosomes remain jammed at their primary membrane docking site, whereas FtsY-dependent ribosomal targeting to the membrane continues. The accumulation of FtsY-ribosome complexes induces the formation of intracellular membranes needed for their quantitative accommodation. Our results with E. coli, in conjunction with recent observations made with the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, raise the possibility that the SRP receptor–mediated formation of intracellular membrane networks is governed by evolutionarily conserved principles.

scholarly journals Physiological Basis for Conservation of the Signal Recognition Particle Targeting Pathway in Escherichia coli

2001 ◽  
Vol 183 (7) ◽  
pp. 2187-2197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harris D. Bernstein ◽  
Janine B. Hyndman
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Heat Shock ◽  
Heat Shock Response ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Growth Conditions ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Physiological Basis ◽  
Inner Membrane ◽  
Shock Response ◽  
Shock Proteins

ABSTRACT The Escherichia coli signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein complex that targets nascent inner membrane proteins (IMPs) to transport sites in the inner membrane (IM). Since SRP depletion only partially inhibits IMP insertion under some growth conditions, however, it is not clear why the particle is absolutely essential for viability. Insights into this question emerged from experiments in which we analyzed the physiological consequences of reducing the intracellular concentration of SRP below the wild-type level. We found that even moderate SRP deficiencies that have little effect on cell growth led to the induction of a heat shock response. Genetic manipulations that suppress the heat shock response were lethal in SRP-deficient cells, indicating that the elevated synthesis of heat shock proteins plays an important role in maintaining cell viability. Although it is conceivable that the heat shock response serves to increase the capacity of cells to target IMPs via chaperone-based mechanisms, SRP-deficient cells did not show an increased dependence on either GroEL or DnaK. By contrast, the heat shock-regulated proteases Lon and ClpQ became essential for viability when SRP levels were reduced. These results suggest that the heat shock response protects SRP-deficient cells by increasing their capacity to degrade mislocalized IMPs. Consistent with this notion, a model IMP that was mislocalized in the cytoplasm as the result of SRP depletion appeared to be more stable in a Δlon ΔclpQ strain than in control cells. Taken together, the data provide direct evidence that SRP is essential in E. coli and possibly conserved throughout prokaryotic evolution as well partly because efficient IMP targeting prevents a toxic accumulation of aggregated proteins in the cytoplasm.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document