Molecular dynamics of histone H1This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Raghuram ◽  
Gustavo Carrero ◽  
John Th’ng ◽  
Michael J. Hendzel
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Histone H1 ◽  
Regulation Of Transcription ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Biochemical Mechanisms ◽  
Specific Regulation ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Selection Of

The histone H1 family of nucleoproteins represents an important class of structural and architectural proteins that are responsible for maintaining and stabilizing higher-order chromatin structure. Essential for mammalian cell viability, they are responsible for gene-specific regulation of transcription and other DNA-dependent processes. In this review, we focus on the wealth of information gathered on the molecular kinetics of histone H1 molecules using novel imaging techniques, such as fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. These experiments have shed light on the effects of H1 phosphorylation and core histone acetylation in influencing chromatin structure and dynamics. We also delineate important concepts surrounding the C-terminal domain of H1, such as the intrinsic disorder hypothesis, and how it affects H1 function. Finally, we address the biochemical mechanisms behind low-affinity H1 binding.

Replicating chromatin: a tale of histonesThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Groth
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Structural Framework ◽  
Dna Strands ◽  
Gain Access ◽  
Selection Of

Chromatin serves structural and functional roles crucial for genome stability and correct gene expression. This organization must be reproduced on daughter strands during replication to maintain proper overlay of epigenetic fabric onto genetic sequence. Nucleosomes constitute the structural framework of chromatin and carry information to specify higher-order organization and gene expression. When replication forks traverse the chromosomes, nucleosomes are transiently disrupted, allowing the replication machinery to gain access to DNA. Histone recycling, together with new deposition, ensures reassembly on nascent DNA strands. The aim of this review is to discuss how histones — new and old — are handled at the replication fork, highlighting new mechanistic insights and revisiting old paradigms.

Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of chromatin: kinetics of relaxation and its effect on chromatin solubility

1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (7) ◽  
pp. 764-773 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Frechette ◽  
Ann Huletsky ◽  
Rémy J. Aubin ◽  
Gilbert de Murcia ◽  
Paul Mandel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Enzyme Activity ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Microscopic Examination ◽  
Electron Microscopic Examination ◽  
Histone H1 ◽  
Electrophoretic Separation ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Modified Forms

We have studied the kinetics of relaxation of poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated polynucleosomes produced by endogenous enzyme activity by comparing the generation of hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ated histone H1 and its effect on the chromatin structure as revealed by electron microscopy. A correlation can be established between the appearance of histone H1 modified forms and the localized relaxation of the chromatin. We have also noticed, in parallel, that poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated chromatin showed increased solubility in the presence of Mg2+ and 0.2 M NaCl. Electron microscopic examination of the solubilized chromatin produced by poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation shows polynucleosomes exhibiting more relaxed conformation, whereas an increasing amount of hyper(ADP-ribosyl)ated histone H1 is found in the pellet, as shown by acid–urea–polyacrylamide electrophoretic separation of histone extracts.

Unique features of the apoptotic endonuclease DFF40/CAD relative to micrococcal nuclease as a structural probe for chromatinThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 27th International West Coast Chromatin and Chromosome Conference, and has undergone the Journal's usual peer review process.

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
Piotr Widlak ◽  
William T. Garrard
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Recombinant Dna ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Micrococcal Nuclease ◽  
Naked Dna ◽  
Dna Library ◽  
Double Stranded Dna ◽  
Structural Probe ◽  
Specific Sequences ◽  
Selection Of

The gold standard for studies of nucleosomal chromatin structure for the past 30 years has been the enzyme micrococcal nuclease (MNase). During the course of our studies on the elucidation of the mechanism of action of the apoptotic nuclease DNA fragmentation factor-40 / caspase-activated deoxyribonuclease (DFF40/CAD) on naked DNA and chromatin substrates, it became clear that this enzyme is superior in certain respects to MNase for studying several aspects of chromatin structure. Here we review our published results supporting this statement. Relative to MNase, we have found that DFF40/CAD has the following properties: (i) it does not cut within nucleosomes to generate subnucleosomal DNA fragments; (ii) it is more specific for the linker regions between nucleosomes; (iii) it lacks exonuclease activity; (iv) it is specific for double-stranded DNA and makes exclusively double-stranded breaks; and (v) it attacks histone-H1-containing chromatin more efficiently. Taken together, these facts explain why DFF40/CAD generates sharper oligonucleosomal DNA ladders compared with those generated by MNase. We therefore recommend the following uses for DFF40/CAD for chromatin research: nucleosome isolation, chromatin-remodeling assays, repeat length measurements, and nucleosome-positioning assays along specific sequences. Other uses include footprinting assays of transcription factor positions, shearing chromatin for immunopreciptitation experiments (ChIP), and shearing DNA for recombinant DNA library preparation or for shotgun cloning for sequencing.

Connection between histone H2A variants and chromatin remodeling complexesThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Altaf ◽  
Andréanne Auger ◽  
Marcela Covic ◽  
Jacques Côté
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Histone Variants ◽  
Histone H2a ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling Complexes ◽  
And Function

The organization of the eukaryotic genome into chromatin makes it inaccessible to the factors required for gene transcription and DNA replication, recombination, and repair. In addition to histone-modifying enzymes and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes, which play key roles in regulating many nuclear processes by altering the chromatin structure, cells have developed a mechanism of modulating chromatin structure by incorporating histone variants. These variants are incorporated into specific regions of the genome throughout the cell cycle. H2A.Z, which is an evolutionarily conserved H2A variant, performs several seemingly unrelated and even contrary functions. Another H2A variant, H2A.X, plays a very important role in the cellular response to DNA damage. This review summarizes the recent developments in our understanding of the role of H2A.Z and H2A.X in the regulation of chromatin structure and function, focusing on their functional links with chromatin modifying and remodeling complexes.

Src kinase Hck association with the WASp and mDia1 cytoskeletal regulators promotes chemoattractant-induced Hck membrane targeting and activation in neutrophilsThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongquan Shi ◽  
Baoxia Dong ◽  
Helen Miliotis ◽  
Junye Liu ◽  
Arthur S. Alberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Phosphorylation ◽  
Actin Polymerization ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Leading Edge ◽  
Membrane Targeting ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Severe Impairment ◽  
Syndrome Protein ◽  
Proline Rich Region ◽  
Selection Of

The haemopoietic cell kinase (Hck) plays an important but poorly understood role in coupling chemoattractant stimuli to the actin cytoskeletal rearrangement required for neutrophil polarization and chemotaxis. Here, we show that Hck coimmunoprecipitates with the cytoskeletal regulatory Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) and mammalian diaphanous-related formin 1 (mDia1) in chemoattractant-stimulated neutrophils, and that the 3 proteins inducibly colocalize with one another at the leading edge of chemotaxing cells. Hck interaction with WASp was found to be mediated by the Hck SH3 domain binding to the WASp proline-rich region, while Hck interaction with mDia1 was indirect but was required for binding to WASp. In contrast to wild-type cells, both WASp- and mDia1-deficient neutrophils showed severe impairment of chemokine-induced Hck membrane translocation and induction of Hck binding to WASp, and Hck activation and WASp tyrosine phosphorylation were impaired in mDia1−/− cells. Thus, chemotactic stimulation appears to induce an mDia1/Hck/WASp complex required for Hck membrane targeting and for induction of the Hck-mediated WASp tyrosine phosphorylation thought to be required for WASp-driven actin polymerization. These findings reveal that Hck functions in neutrophils to be realized, at least in part, via its interaction with mDia1 and WASp, and identifies the mDia1/Hck/WASp axis as a cytoskeletal signaling interface linking tyrosine phosphorylation to chemotactic and, possibly, other actin-based neutrophil responses.

scholarly journals Nucleosome distribution and linker DNA: connecting nuclear function to dynamic chromatin structureThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in a Special Issue entitled 31st Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather J. Szerlong ◽  
Jeffrey C. Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Secondary Structures ◽  
Hierarchical Organization ◽  
Coding Region ◽  
Nucleosomal Array ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Selection Of

Genetic information in eukaryotes is managed by strategic hierarchical organization of chromatin structure. Primary chromatin structure describes an unfolded nucleosomal array, often referred to as “beads on a string”. Chromatin is compacted by the nonlinear rearrangement of nucleosomes to form stable secondary chromatin structures. Chromatin conformational transitions between primary and secondary structures are mediated by both nucleosome-stacking interactions and the intervening linker DNA. Chromatin model system studies find that the topography of secondary structures is sensitive to the spacing of nucleosomes within an array. Understanding the relationship between nucleosome spacing and higher order chromatin structure will likely yield important insights into the dynamic nature of secondary chromatin structure as it occurs in vivo. Genome-wide nucleosome mapping studies find the distance between nucleosomes varies, and regions of uniformly spaced nucleosomes are often interrupted by regions of nonuniform spacing. This type of organization is found at a subset of actively transcribed genes in which a nucleosome-depleted region near the transcription start site is directly adjacent to uniformly spaced nucleosomes in the coding region. Here, we evaluate secondary chromatin structure and discuss the structural and functional implications of variable nucleosome distributions in different organisms and at gene regulatory junctions.

Reuniting the contrasting functions of H2A.ZThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 27th International West Coast Chromatin and Chromosome Conference, and has undergone the Journal's usual peer review process.

2006 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 528-535 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoît Guillemette ◽  
Luc Gaudreau
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Histone Variants ◽  
Molecular Techniques ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
On Chip ◽  
Inactive Chromatin ◽  
Selection Of

It is now well established that cells modify chromatin to set transcriptionally active or inactive regions. Such control of chromatin structure is essential for proper development of organisms. In addition to the growing number of histone post-translational modifications, cells can exchange canonical histones with different variants that can directly or indirectly change chromatin structure. Moreover, enzymatic complexes that can exchange specific histone variants within the nucleosome have now been identified. One such variant, H2A.Z, has recently been the focus of many studies. H2A.Z is highly conserved in evolution and has many different functions, while defining both active and inactive chromatin in different contexts. Advanced molecular techniques, such as genome-wide binding assays (chromatin immunoprecipitation on chip) have recently given researchers many clues as to how H2A.Z is targeted to chromatin and how it affects nuclear functions. We wish to review the recent literature and summarize our understanding of the mechanisms and functions of H2A.Z.

YEATS domain proteins: a diverse family with many links to chromatin modification and transcriptionThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia M. Schulze ◽  
Alice Y. Wang ◽  
Michael S. Kobor
Keyword(s):  
Review Process ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Chromatin Modification ◽  
Biological Processes ◽  
Chromatin Modifications ◽  
Domain Family ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Eukaryotic Species ◽  
Selection Of

Chromatin modifications play crucial roles in various biological processes. An increasing number of conserved protein domains, often found in multisubunit protein complexes, are involved in establishing and recognizing different chromatin modifications. The YEATS domain is one of these domains, and its role in chromatin modifications and transcription is just beginning to be appreciated. The YEATS domain family of proteins, conserved from yeast to human, contains over 100 members in more than 70 eukaryotic species. Yaf9, Taf14, and Sas5 are the only YEATS domain proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Human YEATS domain family members, such as GAS41, ENL, and AF9, have a strong link to cancer. GAS41 is amplified in glioblastomas and astrocytomas; ENL and AF9 are among the most frequent translocation partners of the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene. This review will focus on the best characterized YEATS proteins, discuss their diverse roles, and reflect potential functions of the YEATS domain.

Transcriptional and epigenetic functions of histone variant H2A.ZThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Draker ◽  
Peter Cheung
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Histone Variants ◽  
Histone Variant ◽  
Post Translational Modifications ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Transcription Process ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Selection Of

The chromatin organization of a genome ultimately dictates the gene expression profile of the cell. It is now well recognized that key mechanisms that regulate chromatin structure include post-translational modifications of histones and the incorporation of histone variants at strategic sites within the genome. H2A.Z is a variant of H2A that is localized to the 5′ end of many genes and is required for proper regulation of gene expression. However, its precise function in the transcription process is not yet well defined. In this review, we discuss some of the recent findings related to this histone variant, how it associates with other histone epigenetic marks, and how post-translational modifications of H2A.Z further define its function.

Histone acetylation: truth of consequences?This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Choi ◽  
LeAnn J. Howe
Keyword(s):  
Histone Acetylation ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Active Form ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Covalent Modification ◽  
Nonhistone Proteins ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Downstream Effects

Eukaryotic DNA is packaged into a nucleoprotein structure known as chromatin, which is comprised of DNA, histones, and nonhistone proteins. Chromatin structure is highly dynamic, and can shift from a transcriptionally inactive state to an active form in response to intra- and extracellular signals. A major factor in chromatin architecture is the covalent modification of histones through the addition of chemical moieties, such as acetyl, methyl, ubiquitin, and phosphate groups. The acetylation of the amino-terminal tails of histones is a process that is highly conserved in eukaryotes, and was one of the earliest histone modifications characterized. Since its identification in 1964, a large body of evidence has accumulated demonstrating that histone acetylation plays an important role in transcription. Despite our ever-growing understanding of the nuclear processes involved in nucleosome acetylation, however, the exact biochemical mechanisms underlying the downstream effects of histone acetylation have yet to be fully elucidated. To date, histone acetylation has been proposed to function in 2 nonmutually exclusive manners: by directly altering chromatin structure, and by acting as a molecular tag for the recruitment of chromatin-modifying complexes. Here, we discuss recent research focusing on these 2 potential roles of histone acetylation and clarify what we actually know about the function of this modification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document