Histone acetylation: truth of consequences?This paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled CSBMCB’s 51st Annual Meeting – Epigenetics and Chromatin Dynamics, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer K. Choi ◽  
LeAnn J. Howe

Eukaryotic DNA is packaged into a nucleoprotein structure known as chromatin, which is comprised of DNA, histones, and nonhistone proteins. Chromatin structure is highly dynamic, and can shift from a transcriptionally inactive state to an active form in response to intra- and extracellular signals. A major factor in chromatin architecture is the covalent modification of histones through the addition of chemical moieties, such as acetyl, methyl, ubiquitin, and phosphate groups. The acetylation of the amino-terminal tails of histones is a process that is highly conserved in eukaryotes, and was one of the earliest histone modifications characterized. Since its identification in 1964, a large body of evidence has accumulated demonstrating that histone acetylation plays an important role in transcription. Despite our ever-growing understanding of the nuclear processes involved in nucleosome acetylation, however, the exact biochemical mechanisms underlying the downstream effects of histone acetylation have yet to be fully elucidated. To date, histone acetylation has been proposed to function in 2 nonmutually exclusive manners: by directly altering chromatin structure, and by acting as a molecular tag for the recruitment of chromatin-modifying complexes. Here, we discuss recent research focusing on these 2 potential roles of histone acetylation and clarify what we actually know about the function of this modification.


2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Magnus N. Friis ◽  
Michael C. Schultz

Dynamic acetylation of lysine residues in the amino-terminal tails of the core histones is functionally important for the regulation of diverse DNA-dependent processes in the nucleus, including replication, transcription, and DNA repair. The targeted and untargeted activities of histone lysine acetylases (KATs) and deacetylases (HDACs) both contribute to the dynamics of chromatin acetylation. While the mechanisms and functional consequences of targeted on histone acetylation are well understood, relatively little is known about untargeted histone acetylation. Here, we review the current understanding of the mechanisms by which untargeted KAT and HDAC activities modulate the acetylation state of nucleosomal histones, focusing on results obtained for H3 and H4 in budding yeast. We also highlight unresolved problems in this area, including the question of how a particular steady-state level of untargeted acetylation is set in the absence of cis-dependent mechanisms that instruct the activity of KATs and HDACs.



2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia Li ◽  
Chaoyuan Li ◽  
Guangdong Sun

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide despite advances in its prevention and management. A comprehensive understanding of factors contributing to DN is required to develop more effective therapeutic options. It is becoming more evident that histone acetylation (HAc), as one of the epigenetic mechanisms, is thought to be associated with the etiology of diabetic vascular complications such as diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), and DN. Histone acetylases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs) are the well-known regulators of reversible acetylation in the amino-terminal domains of histone and nonhistone proteins. In DN, however, the roles of histone acetylation (HAc) and these enzymes are still controversial. Some new evidence has revealed that HATs and HDACs inhibitors are renoprotective in cellular and animal models of DN, while, on the other hand, upregulation of HAc has been implicated in the pathogenesis of DN. In this review, we focus on the recent advances on the roles of HAc and their covalent enzymes in the development and progression of DN in certain cellular processes including fibrosis, inflammation, hypertrophy, and oxidative stress and discuss how targeting these enzymes and their inhibitors can ultimately lead to the therapeutic approaches for treating DN.



2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Altaf ◽  
Andréanne Auger ◽  
Marcela Covic ◽  
Jacques Côté

The organization of the eukaryotic genome into chromatin makes it inaccessible to the factors required for gene transcription and DNA replication, recombination, and repair. In addition to histone-modifying enzymes and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes, which play key roles in regulating many nuclear processes by altering the chromatin structure, cells have developed a mechanism of modulating chromatin structure by incorporating histone variants. These variants are incorporated into specific regions of the genome throughout the cell cycle. H2A.Z, which is an evolutionarily conserved H2A variant, performs several seemingly unrelated and even contrary functions. Another H2A variant, H2A.X, plays a very important role in the cellular response to DNA damage. This review summarizes the recent developments in our understanding of the role of H2A.Z and H2A.X in the regulation of chromatin structure and function, focusing on their functional links with chromatin modifying and remodeling complexes.



2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Raghuram ◽  
Gustavo Carrero ◽  
John Th’ng ◽  
Michael J. Hendzel

The histone H1 family of nucleoproteins represents an important class of structural and architectural proteins that are responsible for maintaining and stabilizing higher-order chromatin structure. Essential for mammalian cell viability, they are responsible for gene-specific regulation of transcription and other DNA-dependent processes. In this review, we focus on the wealth of information gathered on the molecular kinetics of histone H1 molecules using novel imaging techniques, such as fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. These experiments have shed light on the effects of H1 phosphorylation and core histone acetylation in influencing chromatin structure and dynamics. We also delineate important concepts surrounding the C-terminal domain of H1, such as the intrinsic disorder hypothesis, and how it affects H1 function. Finally, we address the biochemical mechanisms behind low-affinity H1 binding.



2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie A. Adams-Cioaba ◽  
Jinrong Min

Chromatin structure is regulated by chromatin remodeling factors, histone exchange, linker histone association, and histone modification. Covalent modification of histones is an important factor in the regulation of the associated processes. The implementation and removal of various histone modifications have been implicated in DNA replication, repair, recombination, and transcription, and in RNA processing. In recent years, histone methylation has emerged as one of the key modifications regulating chromatin function. However, the mechanisms involved are complex and not well understood. A large volume of structural and biochemical information has been recently amassed for the Tudor, plant homeodomain (PHD), and malignant brain tumor (MBT) protein families. This review summarizes current knowledge of the structures and modes of recognition employed by the PHD, Tudor, and MBT domains in their interactions with target histone peptides.



Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3759-3759
Author(s):  
Jaesung Seo ◽  
Li Li ◽  
Donald Small

Mutations of DNMT3A are one the most frequently observed alterations in AML patients. The DNMT3A R882 mutation appears to confer a dominant-negative loss-of function effect and changes the DNA binding preference according to recent studies. DNMT3A R882 mutations are also found at increasing frequency with age in healthy elderly populations and are one of the earliest pre-malignant alterations in the clonal evolution progression to leukemia. Studies have shown that DNMT3A mutations decrease overall DNA methylation and through less clear mechanisms, also impact the epigenetic landscape by effecting changes in histone acetylation. Here we investigated potential mechanisms by which loss of DNMT3A activity changes histone acetylation. DNMT3A binds with many proteins that regulate chromatin biology and gene transcription. Among those interacting proteins, we focused on the DNMT3A-HDAC interaction and their regulation of target gene suppression. To investigate whether there are differences in binding of wild-type vs. mutant DNMT3A to HDACs, we performed immunoprecipitation and Western blotting assays using Myc- tagged wild-type and R882 mutated DNMT3A. We found that DNMT3A R882 mutants showed reduced interaction with HDAC1 and 2. In addition, upon treatment with HDAC inhibitors (HDACi), DNMT3A mutant protein was more easily dissociated from HDAC1/2 than was wild-type DNMT3A. Intriguingly, covalent modification of DNMT3A R882 by SUMO1 protein was significantly enhanced relative to wild type DNMT3A. Together, we suggest that the weak complex formation between mutant DNMT3A and HDACs results from augmented SUMOylation of the R882 mutant. Because the DNMT3A R882 mutation reduces its methyl transferase activity, we investigated which genes would be upregulated from the DNMT3A repressor complex. To do this, we established isogenic TF-1 cell lines that harbor haploid DNMT3A knockout (DNMT3A+/-) using the Cripsr-Cas9 system. We also treated cells with HDACi and 5-azacytidine (5-aza) which inhibit HDAC and DNMT, respectively. Interestingly, we discovered that PD-L1 expression is induced by HDACi and 5-aza treatment. Chemical inhibition by 5-aza or genetic inhibition by knockout reduces DNMT3A activity and synergized with HDACi to increase PD-L1 expression. Flow cytometry analysis also demonstrated increased membrane PD-L1 expression in response to HDACi. We also found out that DNMT3A+/- resulted in higher Histone H3K27 acetylation, which is known as a gene activation mark. Higher H3K27 acetylation in DNMT3A+/- cell confirms the findings by other groups but the mechanisms by which this occurs are unknown. We suggest that haploinsufficiency of DNMT3A results in a reduced DNMT3A-HDAC interaction leading to higher H3K27 acetylation and increased PD-L1 expression. Our results also revealed that HDACi treatment induced cell cycle arrest, DNA damage and apoptosis at increasing levels in DNMT3A+/- cell. Even though the DNMT3A+/- TF-1 showed increased sensitivity to HDACi treatment, we observed a correlation of higher phosphor- ERK1/2 and PD-L1 levels in the surviving cells. The enhanced expression of PD-L1 and activation of ERK1/2 may explain in part how mutated DNMT3A contributes to drug resistance and immune checkpoint avoidance. Many oncology clinical trials are underway utilizing HDACi. However, the questions of which mutational backgrounds might be most sensitive to these agents and how to best combine them with other agents remain to be answered. To test whether reduced DNMT3A activity increases PD-L1 expression in vivo, we crossed floxed DNMT3A mice with Mx1-Cre mice. After 4 weeks of induction of Cre recombinase by injecting pIpC in the progeny carrying both genetically engineered changes, lineage depleted mouse BM cells were analyzed for PD-L1 expression using quantitative RT-PCR. BM cells derived from DNMT3A knockout mice showed increased expression of PD-L1 compared to wild-type mice. Treatment of these BM cells with an HDACi and/or 5-aza resulted in a synergistic induction of PD-L1 expression for the combination. Taken together, we suggest that mutant DNMT3A induces higher H3K27 acetylation along with PD-L1 expression due to a looser complex between HDAC1 and mutant DNMT3A. Therefore, we suggest that combined treatment with an HDACi and an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting the PD-L1/PD-1 axis might be a promising strategy for treating DNMT3A mutant AML patients. Disclosures Small: InSilico Medicine: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pharos I, B & T: Consultancy, Research Funding.



1990 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
M K Spriggs ◽  
P L Collins

Six amino-terminal deletion mutants of the NH2-terminally anchored (type II orientation) hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein of parainfluenza virus type 3 were expressed in tissue culture by recombinant SV-40 viruses. The mutations consisted of progressive deletions of the cytoplasmic domain and, in some cases, of the hydrophobic signal/anchor. Three activities were dissociated for the signal/anchor: membrane insertion, translocation, and anchoring/transport. HN protein lacking the entire cytoplasmic tail was inserted efficiently into the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum but was translocated inefficiently into the lumen. However, the small amounts that were successfully translocated appeared to be processed subsequently in a manner indistinguishable from that of parental HN. Thus, the cytoplasmic domain was not required for maturation of this type II glycoprotein. Progressive deletions into the membrane anchor restored efficient translocation, indicating that the NH2-terminal 44 amino acids were fully dispensable for membrane insertion and translocation and that a 10-amino acid hydrophobic signal sequence was sufficient for both activities. These latter HN molecules appeared to be folded authentically as assayed by hemagglutination activity, reactivity with a conformation-specific antiserum, correct formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds, and homooligomerization. However, most (85-90%) of these molecules accumulated in the ER. This showed that folding and oligomerization into a biologically active form, which presumably represents a virion spike, occurs essentially to completion within that compartment but is not sufficient for efficient transport through the exocytotic pathway. Protein transport also appeared to depend on the structure of the membrane anchor. These latter mutants were not stably integrated in the membrane, and the small proportion (10-15%) that was processed through the exocytotic pathway was secreted. The maturation steps and some of the effects of mutations described here for a type II glycoprotein resemble previous observations for prototypic type I glycoproteins and are indicative of close similarities in these processes for proteins of both membrane orientations.



2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (27) ◽  
pp. eaaz2196 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Barth ◽  
K. Bystricky ◽  
H. A. Shaban

Chromatin conformation regulates gene expression and thus, constant remodeling of chromatin structure is essential to guarantee proper cell function. To gain insight into the spatiotemporal organization of the genome, we use high-density photoactivated localization microscopy and deep learning to obtain temporally resolved super-resolution images of chromatin in living cells. In combination with high-resolution dense motion reconstruction, we find elongated ~45- to 90-nm-wide chromatin “blobs.” A computational chromatin model suggests that these blobs are dynamically associating chromatin fragments in close physical and genomic proximity and adopt topologically associated domain–like interactions in the time-average limit. Experimentally, we found that chromatin exhibits a spatiotemporal correlation over ~4 μm in space and tens of seconds in time, while chromatin dynamics are correlated over ~6 μm and last 40 s. Notably, chromatin structure and dynamics are closely related, which may constitute a mechanism to grant access to regions with high local chromatin concentration.



1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 5487-5494 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L Hsieh

CpG methylation is known to suppress transcription. This repression is generally thought to be related to alterations of chromatin structure that are specified by the methylation. The nature of these chromatin alterations is unknown. Moreover, it has not been clear if the methylation repression occurs in an all-or-none fashion at some critical methylation density, or if intermediate densities of methylation can give intermediate levels of repression. Here I report a stable episomal system which recapitulates many dynamic features of methylation observed in the genome. I have determined the extent of transcriptional repression as a function of four densities of CpG methylation. I find that the repression is a graded but exponential function of the CpG methylation density such that low levels of methylation yield a 67 to 90% inhibition of gene expression. Higher levels of methylation extinguished gene expression completely. Transcription from methylated minichromosomes can be increased by butyrate treatment, suggesting that histone acetylation can reverse some of the repression specified by the methylated state. Sites of preferential demethylation occurred and may have resulted from transcription factor binding or DNA looping.



2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra L. Cann ◽  
Graham Dellaire

Higher order chromatin structure has an impact on all nuclear functions, including the DNA damage response. Over the past several years, it has become increasingly clear that heterochromatin and euchromatin represent separate entities with respect to both damage sensitivity and repair. The chromatin compaction present in heterochromatin helps to protect this DNA from damage; however, when lesions do occur, the compaction restricts the ability of DNA damage response proteins to access the site, as evidenced by its ability to block the expansion of H2AX phosphorylation. As such, DNA damage in heterochromatin is refractory to repair, which requires the surrounding chromatin structure to be decondensed. In the case of DNA double-strand breaks, this relaxation is at least partially mediated by the ATM kinase phosphorylating and inhibiting the function of the transcriptional repressor KAP1. This review will focus on the functions of KAP1 and other proteins involved in the maintenance or restriction of heterochromatin, including HP1 and TIP60, in the DNA damage response. As heterochromatin is important for maintaining genomic stability, cells must maintain a delicate balance between allowing repair factors access to these regions and ensuring that these regions retain their organization to prevent increased DNA damage and chromosomal mutations.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document