Kill rate by wolves on moose in the Yukon

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
R D Hayes ◽  
A M Baer ◽  
U Wotschikowsky ◽  
A S Harestad
Keyword(s):  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Prey Density ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Prey Selection ◽  
Ecological Factors ◽  
Predation Rate ◽  
Wolf Predation ◽  
Kill Rate

We studied the kill rate by wolves (Canis lupus) after a large-scale wolf removal when populations of wolves, moose (Alces alces), and woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) were all increasing. We followed a total of 21 wolf packs for 4 winters, measuring prey selection, kill rates, and ecological factors that could influence killing behavior. Wolf predation was found to be mainly additive on both moose and caribou populations. Kill rates by individual wolves were inversely related to pack size and unrelated to prey density or snow depth. Scavenging by ravens decreased the amount of prey biomass available for wolves to consume, especially for wolves in smaller packs. The kill rate by wolves on moose calves was not related to the number of calves available each winter. Wolves did not show a strong switching response away from moose as the ratio of caribou to moose increased in winter. The predation rate by wolves on moose was best modeled by the number and size of packs wolves were organized into each winter.

scholarly journals Population Ecology of Caribou in British Columbia

Rangifer ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.R. Seip ◽  
D.B. Cichowski
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Population Decline ◽  
Predation Rate ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Geographic Range ◽  
Population Declines ◽  
Wolf Predation ◽  
Close Proximity

The abundance and geographic range of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) decreased in many areas of British Columbia during the 1900's. Recent studies have found that predation during the summer is the major cause of mortality and current population declines. Increased moose {Alecs alces) populations may be related to past and current caribou declines by sustaining greater numbers of wolves (Canis lupus). Mortality rates were greater in areas where caribou calved in forested habitats, in close proximity to predators and moose. Caribou populations which had calving sites in alpine areas, islands, and rugged mountains experienced lower mortality and were generally stable or increasing. A predator-induced population decline in one area appeared to stabilize at low caribou densities, suggesting that the wolf predation rate may be density dependent.

scholarly journals Predation rate by wolves on the Porcupine caribou herd

Rangifer ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Hayes ◽  
Donald E. Russell
Keyword(s):  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Predation Rate ◽  
Herd Size ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Wolf Predation ◽  
Weather Events ◽  
Constant Rate ◽  
Predatory Strategy ◽  
Dependent Model

Large migratory catibou {Rangifer tarandus) herds in the Arctic tend to be cyclic, and population trends are mainly driven by changes in forage or weather events, not by predation. We estimated daily kill rate by wolves on adult caribou in winter, then constructed a time and space dependent model to estimate annual wolf (Canis lupus) predation rate (P annual) on adult Porcupine caribou. Our model adjusts predation seasonally depending on caribou distribution: Pannual = SIGMAdaily* W *Ap(2)*Dp. In our model we assumed that wolves killed adult caribou at a constant rate (Kdaily, 0.08 caribou wolf1 day1) based on our studies and elsewhere; that wolf density (W) doubled to 6 wolves 1000 km2-1 on all seasonal ranges; and that the average area occupied by the Porcupine caribou herd (PCH) in eight seasonal life cycle periods (Dp ) was two times gteater than the area described by the outer boundaries of telemetry data (Ap /1000 km2). Results from our model projected that wolves kill about 7600 adult caribou each year, regardless of herd size. The model estimated that wolves removed 5.8 to 7.4% of adult caribou as the herd declined in the 1990s. Our predation rate model supports the hypothesis of Bergerud that spacing away by caribou is an effective anti-predatory strategy that greatly reduces wolf predation on adult caribou in the spring and summer.

Wolf predation in a multiple-ungulate system in northern British Columbia

1998 ◽  
Vol 76 (8) ◽  
pp. 1551-1569 ◽  
Author(s):  
A T Bergerud ◽  
J P Elliott
Keyword(s):  
British Columbia ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Adult Mortality ◽  
Recruitment Rate ◽  
Wolf Predation ◽  
Rate Of Increase ◽  
Ovis Dalli ◽  
Hunting Statistics

Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), elk (Cervus canadensis), moose (Alces alces), and Stone's sheep (Ovis dalli stonei) were either decreasing or stable in numbers in two areas in northeastern British Columbia in 1981-1982, prior to reductions in wolf (Canis lupus) numbers. Following the reduction of wolf numbers, recruitment improved 2-5 times for all four species, and all populations increased, based on either hunting statistics, census results, and (or) recruitments greater than 24 offspring at 9 months of age per 100 females. Recruitment of offspring at 9 months of age, when regressed against wolf numbers, declined with decelerating slopes for all four species. This inverse functional response is hypothesized to result from the preparturient spacing of females to reduce predation risk, and in this regard moose seem the least secure and sheep the most effectively spaced. For the four species, mean recruitment at 9 months of age that balanced adult mortality and provided a finite rate of increase of 1.00 was 24.16 ± 0.91 offspring/100 females (n = 11, coefficient of variation = 12.5%). The predicted recruitment rate for all four species in the absence of wolves was 53-57 offspring/100 females. But the birth rate of moose was much higher than those of the other species, indicating greater loss to other factors of which bear predation may be the greatest. Following wolf reductions of 60-86% of entire travelling packs, the wolves quickly recolonized the removal zones, with rates of increase ranging from 1.5 to 5.6.

scholarly journals Pack Size of Wolves, Canis lupus, on Caribou, Rangifer tarandus, Winter Ranges in Westcentral Alberta

2006 ◽  
Vol 120 (3) ◽  
pp. 313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald W. Kuzyk ◽  
Jeff Kneteman ◽  
Fiona K. A. Schmiegelow
Keyword(s):  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Landscape Change ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Prey Size ◽  
Rocky Mountain ◽  
Predation Pressure ◽  
Resource Extraction ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus Caribou ◽  
Pack Size ◽  
Wolf Predation

We studied pack size of Wolves (Canis lupus) on Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) winter ranges in westcentral Alberta. These Caribou winter ranges are experiencing increasing pressure from resource extraction industries (forestry, energy sector) and concerns have been raised regarding increased Wolf predation pressure on Caribou in conjunction with landscape change. Thirty-one Wolves, from eight Wolf packs, were fitted with radiocollars on two Caribou winter ranges in the Rocky Mountain foothills, near Grande Cache, Alberta (2000-2001). There was a mean of 8.2 Wolves/pack and between 30 and 39 Wolves on each of the RedRock/Prairie Creek and Little Smoky Caribou ranges. The average pack size of Wolves in this region does not appear to have increased over that recorded historically, but the range (5-18) in the number of Wolves per pack varied considerably over our study area. Wolves preyed predominately on Moose (Alces alces), averaging one Moose kill every three to five days. There was some indication that pack size was related to prey size, with the smallest pack preying on Deer (Odocoileus spp.). It was clear that Caribou could not be the primary prey for Wolves, due to their low numbers, and relative to the pack size and Wolf kills we observed.

Comment: Regulation of moose populations by wolf predation

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 506-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Messier ◽  
Damien O Joly
Keyword(s):  
Density Dependence ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Recent Article ◽  
Prey Density ◽  
Regulatory Effect ◽  
Wolf Population ◽  
Regulatory Factor ◽  
Killing Rate ◽  
Wolf Predation ◽  
Present Understanding

We discuss regulation of moose (Alces alces) populations by wolves (Canis lupus) in the context of a recent article by Eberhardt (L.L. Eberhardt. 1997. Can. J. Zool. 75: 1940-1944), who contended that the killing rate of moose by wolves was constant. Further, he argued that wolf population size was proportional to prey density, and that wolf predation exerted a regulatory effect on ungulate-prey numbers. We argue that this combination of functional and numerical responses results in density-independent predation that cannot regulate prey numbers. We discuss the present understanding of wolf-moose interactions and conclude that there is evidence suggesting density dependence in both functional and numerical responses. Further, we conclude that predation by wolves is density-dependent, at least at low moose densities, and therefore can act as a regulatory factor.

Effect of snow depth on wolf activity and prey selection in north central Minnesota

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd K. Fuller
Keyword(s):  
Feeding Behavior ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Prey Selection ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
North Central ◽  
Winter Activity ◽  
Induced Changes ◽  
Winter Population ◽  
Winter Severity

Wolf (Canis lupus) activity and interactions with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) were monitored in north central Minnesota during six winters in which mean January–February snow depth alternated between shallow (19–26 cm) and relatively deep (40–47 cm) and winters (winter severity index; L. J. Verme. 1968. J. Wildl. Manage. 32: 566–574) alternated between mild (71–98) and moderately severe (126–137). Wolves traveled farther and more often and spent less time with other pack members in mild than in severe winters. Radio-marked wolves and deer used conifer cover less, and fewer deer were killed there, when snow was shallow. Similarly, fewer wolf-killed deer were found in and near deer concentration areas during mild winters. Of the 74 deer killed by wolves, the proportion that were fawns (54%) differed from the proportion of fawns in the winter population (27%), but neither varied with winter severity. Few deer killed by wolves appeared debilitated. Carcass consumption was high in all winters, regardless of their severity, but wolves scavenged less in mild than in severe winters (10 vs. 29% of deer carcasses observed). Thus, wolves changed winter activity, movement patterns, sociality, and feeding behavior in response to snow-induced changes in deer distribution and mobility.

Factors affecting gray wolf (Canis lupus) encounter rate with elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (9) ◽  
pp. 1032-1042 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.W. Martin ◽  
L.D. Mech ◽  
J. Fieberg ◽  
M.C. Metz ◽  
D.R. MacNulty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervus Elaphus ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Yellowstone National Park ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
National Park ◽  
Encounter Rate ◽  
Encounter Rates ◽  
Hunting Success ◽  
Kill Rate ◽  
The Relationship

Despite encounter rates being a key component of kill rate, few studies of large carnivore predation have quantified encounter rates with prey, the factors that influence them, and the relationship between encounter rate and kill rate. The study’s primary motivation was to determine the relationship between prey density and encounter rate in understanding the mechanism behind the functional response. Elk (Cervus elaphus Linnaeus, 1758) population decline and variable weather in northern Yellowstone National Park provided an opportunity to examine how these factors influenced wolf (Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758) encounter rates with elk. We explored how factors associated with wolf kill rate and encounter rate in other systems (season, elk density, elk group density, average elk group size, snow depth, wolf pack size, and territory size) influenced wolf–elk encounter rate in Yellowstone National Park. Elk density was the only factor significantly correlated with wolf–elk encounter rate, and we found a nonlinear density-dependent relationship that may be a mechanism for a functional response in this system. Encounter rate was correlated with number of elk killed during early winter but not late winter. Weak effects of snow depth and elk group size on encounter rate suggest that these factors influence kill rate via hunting success because kill rate is the product of hunting success and encounter rate.

Wolf functional response and regulation of moose in the Yukon

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
R D Hayes ◽  
A S Harestad
Keyword(s):  
Functional Response ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Response Curve ◽  
Predation Rate ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Prey Switching ◽  
East Central ◽  
Wolf Predation ◽  
Interior Alaska ◽  
Moose Population

We studied kill rates by wolves (Canis lupus) on a rapidly growing moose population in the east-central Yukon. We added these data to the cumulative functional response curve obtained in other North American wolf studies. Our kill rates are higher than those predicted at low moose densities. The kill rate increases rapidly, reaching 2.4 moose per wolf per 100 days at 0.26 moose/km2 and remains constant at this level. No data are available below 0.2 moose/km2 to indicate the shape of the ascending curve. Based on moose distribution and the low prey-switching ability of wolves, we suggest that the functional response curve is of type II. Our wolf predation rate model predicts that moose are held to a low density equilibrium between 0.07 and 0.12/km2, slightly below densities observed in interior Alaska and the Yukon.

scholarly journals Predation and caribou populations

Rangifer ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dale R. Seip
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Predator Avoidance ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
Food Resources ◽  
Numerical Response ◽  
Population Differences ◽  
Annual Increment ◽  
Wolf Predation ◽  
The Impact

Predation, especially wolf (Canis lupus) predation, limits many North American caribou (Rangifer tarandus) populations below the density that food resources could sustain. The impact of predation depends on the parameters for the functional and numerical response of the wolves, relative to the potential annual increment of the caribou population. Differences in predator-avoidance strategies largely explain the major differences in caribou densities that occur naturally in North America. Caribou migrations that spatially separate caribou from wolves allow relatively high densities of caribou to survive. Non-migratory caribou that live in areas where wolf populations are sustained by alternate prey can be eliminated by wolf predation.

Surplus killing as exemplified by wolf predation on newborn caribou

1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank L. Miller ◽  
Anne Gunn ◽  
Eric Broughton
Keyword(s):  
Northwest Territories ◽  
Canis Lupus ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus ◽  
The Other ◽  
Wolf Predation ◽  
Barren Ground ◽  
Rangifer Tarandus Groenlandicus

We searched for newborn calf carcasses of migratory barren-ground caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus) in June 1982 in the Northwest Territories. On 17 June, we found 34 calves killed by wolves (Canis lupus), clumped in a 3-km2 area. The calves had been killed apparently within minutes of each other and about 24 h before being found. Wolves had not fed on 17 of the carcasses and had only partially eaten the other 17. Ground observations illustrate the speed of and efficiency with which wolves can kill calves: a single wolf killed three calves on one occasion and three and possibly four calves on a second occasion at average kill rates of 1 calf/min, and 1 calf/8 min or 1 calf/6 min between the first and last deaths. We attributed the surplus killing of newborn caribou calves to their high densities and their vulnerability on the calving grounds. We recommend that a distinction be made between "surplus killing" and "excessive killing" by predators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document