scholarly journals On leptonic width of X(4260)

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qin-Fang Cao ◽  
Hong-Rong Qi ◽  
Guang-Yi Tang ◽  
Yun-Feng Xue ◽  
Han-Qing Zheng

AbstractNew measurements on cross sections in $$e^+e^-\rightarrow J/\psi \pi ^+\pi ^-$$ e + e - → J / ψ π + π - , $$h_c\pi ^+\pi ^-$$ h c π + π - , $$D^0D^{*-}\pi ^++c.c.$$ D 0 D ∗ - π + + c . c . , $$\psi (2S)\pi ^+\pi ^-$$ ψ ( 2 S ) π + π - , $$\omega \chi _{c0}$$ ω χ c 0 and $$J/\psi \eta $$ J / ψ η channels have been carried out by BESIII, Belle and BABAR experiments, as well as in the $$D_s^{*+}D_s^{*-}$$ D s ∗ + D s ∗ - channel. We perform extensive numerical analyses by combining all these data available, together with those in $$D^+D^{*-}+c.c.$$ D + D ∗ - + c . c . and $$D^{*+}D^{*-}$$ D ∗ + D ∗ - channels. Though the latter show no evident peak around $$\sqrt{s}=4.230$$ s = 4.230 GeV, the missing X(4260) is explained as that it is concealed by the interference effects of the well established charmonia $$\psi (4040)$$ ψ ( 4040 ) , $$\psi (4160)$$ ψ ( 4160 ) and $$\psi (4415)$$ ψ ( 4415 ) . Our analyses reveal that the leptonic decay width of X(4260) ranges from $$\mathcal {O}(10^2)$$ O ( 10 2 ) eV to $$\mathcal {O}(1)$$ O ( 1 ) keV, and hence it is probably explained in the conventional quark model picture. That is, the X(4260) may well be interpreted as a mixture of $$4^3S_1$$ 4 3 S 1 and $$3^3D_1$$ 3 3 D 1 ($$2^3D_1$$ 2 3 D 1 ) states.

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (33) ◽  
pp. 1750184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jielei Zhang ◽  
Limin Yuan

The cross-sections of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] have been measured by BESIII experiment. A new resonance [Formula: see text] is observed in the two decay modes. A combined fit is performed to the two cross-sections. [Formula: see text]’s parameters are determined to be [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. The ratio [Formula: see text] is also obtained and it indicates that [Formula: see text]’s main decay modes maybe [Formula: see text]. We determine the lower limit of its leptonic decay width of around 150 eV, which can be compared with the theoretical expectations of different models. These information may help in understanding the nature of this state.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (03) ◽  
pp. 1850020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jielei Zhang ◽  
Limin Yuan

The cross-sections of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] have been measured by Belle experiment. A resonance [Formula: see text] is observed in [Formula: see text] decay mode, while another resonance [Formula: see text] is observed in [Formula: see text] decay mode. The two resonances [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]’s parameters are consistent with each other, so a combined fit is performed to the two cross-sections assuming [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are same resonance. [Formula: see text]’s parameters are determined to be [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], where the first uncertainties are statistical and the second systematic. The ratio [Formula: see text] is also obtained and it indicates that [Formula: see text]’s main decay modes may be [Formula: see text]. We determine the lower limit of its leptonic decay width of around 40 eV, which can be compared with the theoretical expectations of different models.


Atoms ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
R.I. Campeanu ◽  
Colm T. Whelan

Triple differential cross sections (TDCS) are presented for the electron and positron impact ionization of inert gas atoms in a range of energy sharing geometries where a number of significant few body effects compete to define the shape of the TDCS. Using both positrons and electrons as projectiles has opened up the possibility of performing complementary studies which could effectively isolate competing interactions that cannot be separately detected in an experiment with a single projectile. Results will be presented in kinematics where the electron impact ionization appears to be well understood and using the same kinematics positron cross sections will be presented. The kinematics are then varied in order to focus on the role of distortion, post collision interaction (pci), and interference effects.


2016 ◽  
Vol 761 ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ablikim ◽  
M.N. Achasov ◽  
X.C. Ai ◽  
O. Albayrak ◽  
M. Albrecht ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
E. Santopinto ◽  
A. Giachino ◽  
J. Ferretti ◽  
H. García-Tecocoatzi ◽  
M. A. Bedolla ◽  
...  

AbstractThe observation of five $$\varOmega _c $$Ωc= ssc states by LHCb [Aaij et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 182001 (2017)] and the confirmation of four of them by Belle [Yelton et al. Phys. Rev. D 97, 051102 (2018)], may represent an important milestone in our understanding of the quark organization inside hadrons. By providing results for the spectrum of $$\varOmega _{ c}$$Ωc baryons and predictions for their $$\varXi _{ c}^{+}K^{-}$$Ξc+K- and $$\varXi _{ c}'^{+}K^{-}$$Ξc′+K- decay amplitudes within an harmonic oscillator based model, we suggest a possible solution to the $$\varOmega _{c}$$Ωc quantum number puzzle and we extend our mass and decay width predictions to the $$\varOmega _b$$Ωb states. Finally, we discuss why the set of $$\varOmega _{ c(b)}$$Ωc(b) baryons is the most suitable environment to test the validity of three-quark and quark–diquark effective degrees of freedom.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 2642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Łukasz Drobiec ◽  
Rafał Wyczółkowski ◽  
Artur Kisiołek

The article describes the results of numerical analyses and traditional calculations of the heat transfer coefficient in ceilings with a complex cross-section, and with materials of varying density built-in inside the cross-section. Prefabricated prestressed reinforced concrete, composite reinforced, and ribbed reinforced concrete ceilings were analyzed. Traditional calculations were carried out in accordance with the EN ISO 6946:2017 standard, while the numerical analyses were carried out in a program based on the finite element method (FEM). It has been shown that calculations can be a good alternative to nondestructive testing (NDT) and laboratory tests, whose use in the case of ceilings with different geometries is limited. The differences between the calculations carried out in accordance with EN ISO 6946:2017, and the results of numerical analyses are 12%–39%. The way the air voids are taken into account has an impact on the calculation results. In the traditional method, an equivalent thermal conductivity coefficient was used, while in the numerical analysis, the coefficient was selected from the program’s material database. Since traditional calculations require simplifications, numerical methods should be considered to give more accurate results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document