Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Heart Failure

Author(s):  
Kevin S. Shah ◽  
James C. Fang

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve blood glucose control by blocking renal glucose reabsorption with little subsequent risk of hypoglycemia. Consequently, there are decreases in plasma volume, body weight, and blood pressure. Additional putative benefits include improved cardiovascular energetics, decreased systemic inflammation, and less renal dysfunction. Multiple cardiovascular outcome trials in diabetic patients have demonstrated this drug class reduces the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Reductions in heart failure (HF) hospitalization suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors might prove useful for the primary treatment of HF. Two large subsequent trials studying SGLT2 inhibitors in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) demonstrated a reduction in cardiovascular mortality, HF hospitalizations, and renal-specific adverse events. This medication class is now recognized as a new pillar of therapy for patients with HFrEF. The cardiovascular and HF community await the results of ongoing trials of SGLT2 inhibition in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Volume 62 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazunori Omote ◽  
Frederik H. Verbrugge ◽  
Barry A. Borlaug

Approximately half of all patients with heart failure (HF) have a preserved ejection fraction, and the prevalence is growing rapidly given the aging population in many countries and the rising prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and hypertension. Functional capacity and quality of life are severely impaired in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and morbidity and mortality are high. In striking contrast to HF with reduced ejection fraction, there are few effective treatments currently identified for HFpEF, and these are limited to decongestion by diuretics, promotion of a healthy active lifestyle, and management of comorbidities. Improved phenotyping of subgroups within the overall HFpEF population might enhance individualization of treatment. This review focuses on the current understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying HFpEF and treatment strategies for this complex syndrome. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Medicine, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilaria Ferrari ◽  
Francesco Cicogna ◽  
Claudia Tota ◽  
Leonardo Calò ◽  
Luca Monzo

Abstract Aims The sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors dapagliflozin and empagliflozin have been demonstrated to reduce adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Limited data are available characterizing the generalizability of SGLT2 inhibitors treatment in the clinical practice. The aim of the study was to evaluate the proportion of outpatients with HFrEF that would be eligible for SGLT2 inhibitors in a contemporary real-world population. Methods and results We retrospectively evaluated patients with chronic stable HFrEF followed-up at the HF outpatient clinic of our institution. Patients’ eligibility was assessed according to the entry criteria of DAPA-HF (dapagliflozin) and EMPEROR-Reduced (empagliflozin) trials and to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label criteria (only dapagliflozin). A total of 441 HFrEF patients was enrolled. According to the major inclusion and exclusion criteria from DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials, 198 (45%) patients would be candidates for initiation of both dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, 61 (14%) would be eligible only to dapagliflozin and 23 (5%) only to empagliflozin, without significant differences between diabetic and non-diabetic patients (P = 0.23). Among patients not suitable for gliflozins treatment (159 patients; 36%), the major determinant of ineligibility was the failure to achieve the predefined NT-proBNP inclusion threshold. Excluding NTproBNP as per FDA label criteria, dapagliflozin eligibility increased to 86%. Conclusions In our real-world analysis a large proportion of HFrEF patients would be candidates for initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors, supporting its broad generalizability in clinical practice. This would be expected to reduce morbidity and mortality in eligible patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.A Sayour ◽  
A Olah ◽  
M Ruppert ◽  
I Hartyanszky ◽  
M Polos ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In diabetic patients, multiple cardiovascular outcome trials consistently showed the robust cardioprotective effects of the novel antidiabetic agents, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. However, the DAPA-HF study using the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin have extended these observations onto non-diabetic patients with heart failure (HF), urging previous hypotheses regarding the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2 inhibitors to be revised. This is further complicated by the fact that SGLT2 is not expressed in the human myocardium neither under normal nor diseased states. Hence, it has been postulated that SGLT2 inhibitors might exert direct cardioprotection via non-specific inhibition of SGLT1, which is in turn highly expressed in the myocardium. Purpose Because literature data is scarce regarding the expression profile of myocardial SGLT1, we aimed to characterize left ventricular SGLT1 expression in humans with end-stage HF accordingly to HF aetiology and to investigate whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) affects SGLT1 expression. Methods From patients undergoing mitral valve replacement with otherwise no myocardial disease and preserved LV function, we collected control papillary muscles (Control, n=9). From patients with end-stage HF undergoing heart transplantation (n=72), we obtained LV anterior wall samples according to the following HF aetiology groups: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM, n=7); idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM, n=12); ischaemic heart disease (IHD, n=14), IHD with type 2 diabetes mellitus (IHD+T2DM, n=11); and patients with CRT (CRT-DCM, n=9; CRT-IHD, n=9; CRT-IHD+T2DM, n=10). We measured LV SGLT1 expression on the gene and protein expression levels using qRT-PCR and western blotting, respectively. Echocardiography-derived LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were registered prior to surgery. Results Compared to controls, LV SGLT1 mRNA and protein expressions were significantly upregulated in patients with DCM, IHD and IHD+T2DM (all P<0.05), but not in HCM. In these patient groups, LV SGLT1 mRNA expression showed a significant positive correlation with LVEDD (r=0.493; P<0.001) and significant negative correlation with LVEF (r=−0.477; P<0.001). On the protein expression level, CRT was associated with significant reduction in LV SGLT1 only in patients with DCM and IHD, but not in IHD+T2DM. Conclusions Myocardial SGLT1 is upregulated in patients with HF (except HCM), and correlated strongly with parameters (LVEDD, LVEF) related to adverse LV remodelling. CRT was associated with reduced SGLT1 expression in DCM and IHD patients, but not in those with IHD+T2DM. Our results suggest that SGLT1 is upregulated in HF and might be implicated in adverse myocardial remodelling. Accordingly, whether SGLT2 inhibitors exert direct cardioprotection in HFrEF via non-specific inhibition of SGLT1 needs to be further elucidated. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Research, Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary, Higher Education Institutional Excellence Programme of the Ministry of Human Capacities of Hungary


2021 ◽  
pp. 106002802098511
Author(s):  
Filipe Ferrari ◽  
Vítor M. Martins ◽  
Rafael S. Scheffel ◽  
Anderson D. da Silveira ◽  
Marcelo Trotte Motta ◽  
...  

Objective: To provide clinical guidance and an overview of the available data on the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), regardless of the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Data Sources: We searched the MEDLINE database via PubMed (from January 2015 to November 2020) for the following key terms: SGLT2 inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors, SGLT2i, heart failure, and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Study Selection and Data Extraction: To be included in the review, the articles needed to assess the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in the heart failure (HF) scenario. Data Synthesis: There is consistent evidence that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events and hospitalization in patients with HFrEF, even in the absence of T2DM. On May 5, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved dapagliflozin for adults with HFrEF, regardless of the presence of T2DM, even in those patients on standard therapy, including an angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: The SGLT2 inhibitors are well tolerated, and their once-daily dosing without the need for adjustments is convenient. These drugs can be considered a major breakthrough in pharmacotherapy for HF, providing physicians with a new treatment approach to reduce major clinical outcomes. Conclusions: SGLT2 inhibitor therapy reduces CV death and hospitalizations in HFrEF patients regardless of T2DM. The decision to prescribe this class of drugs should not be determined by glycemic status.


The Lancet ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 396 (10254) ◽  
pp. 819-829 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiez Zannad ◽  
João Pedro Ferreira ◽  
Stuart J Pocock ◽  
Stefan D Anker ◽  
Javed Butler ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 (22) ◽  
pp. 1800-1812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senthil Selvaraj ◽  
Daniel P. Kelly ◽  
Kenneth B. Margulies

Despite existing therapy, patients with heart failure (HF) experience substantial morbidity and mortality, highlighting the urgent need to identify novel pathophysiological mechanisms and therapies, as well. Traditional models for pharmacological intervention have targeted neurohormonal axes and hemodynamic disturbances in HF. However, several studies have now highlighted the potential for ketone metabolic modulation as a promising treatment paradigm. During the pathophysiological progression of HF, the failing heart reduces fatty acid and glucose oxidation, with associated increases in ketone metabolism. Recent studies indicate that enhanced myocardial ketone use is adaptive in HF, and limited data demonstrate beneficial effects of exogenous ketone therapy in studies of animal models and humans with HF. This review will summarize current evidence supporting a salutary role for ketones in HF including (1) normal myocardial ketone use, (2) alterations in ketone metabolism in the failing heart, (3) effects of therapeutic ketosis in animals and humans with HF, and (4) the potential significance of ketosis associated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Although a number of important questions remain regarding the use of therapeutic ketosis and mechanism of action in HF, current evidence suggests potential benefit, in particular, in HF with reduced ejection fraction, with theoretical rationale for its use in HF with preserved ejection fraction. Although it is early in its study and development, therapeutic ketosis across the spectrum of HF holds significant promise.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (12) ◽  
pp. 1205-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Shahzeb Khan ◽  
Gregg C. Fonarow ◽  
Darren K. McGuire ◽  
Adrian F. Hernandez ◽  
Muthiah Vaduganathan ◽  
...  

With worsening epidemiological trends for both the incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF) worldwide, it is critical to implement optimal prevention and treatment strategies for patients with these comorbidities, either alone or concomitantly. Several guidelines and consensus statements have recommended glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors as add-ons to lifestyle interventions with or without metformin in those at high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. However, these recommendations are either silent about HF or fail to differentiate between the prevention of HF in those at risk versus the treatment of individuals with manifest HF. Furthermore, these documents do not differentiate among those with different HF phenotypes. This distinction, even though important, may not be critical for sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors in view of the consistent data for benefit for both atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease– and HF-related outcomes that have emerged from the regulatory-mandated cardiovascular outcome trials for all sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors and the recent DAPA-HF trial (Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction)demonstrating the benefit of dapagliflozin on HF-related outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction with or without T2DM. However, the distinction may be crucial for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and other antihyperglycemic agents. Indeed, in several of the new statements, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are suggested treatment not only for patients with T2DM and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but also in those with manifest HF, despite a lack of evidence for the latter recommendation. Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists may be appropriate to use in patients at risk for HF, mechanistic insights and observations from randomized trials suggest no clear benefit on HF-related outcomes and even uncertainty regarding the safety in those with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Conversely, theoretical rationales suggest that these agents may benefit patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. Considering that millions of patients with T2DM have HF, these concerns have public health implications that necessitate the thoughtful use of these therapies. Achieving this aim will require dedicated trials with these drugs in both patients who have HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction with T2DM to assess their efficacy, safety, and risk-benefit profile.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 3870
Author(s):  
Zh. D. Kobalava ◽  
V. V. Medovchshikov ◽  
N. B. Yeshniyazov

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), despite optimal evidence-based treatment, have a high residual risk of adverse outcomes. The favorable results of studies on cardiovascular safety and the effectiveness of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), including outcomes associated with heart failure, were the reason for studying the effectiveness in patients with HFrEF regardless of the T2D status. For the first time in the DAPA-HF study, the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in patients with HFrEF showed a positive effect on hard endpoints. Data of the secondary analysis confirmed the effectiveness of dapagliflozin regardless of the T2D status, therapy, age, and quality of life. The results of DAPA-HF have become a serious statement for changing the standards of the guideline-recommended therapy of HFrEF.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyue Mee Kim ◽  
In-Chang Hwang ◽  
Wonsuk Choi ◽  
Yeonyee E. Yoon ◽  
Goo-Yeong Cho

AbstractAngiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) and sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) have shown benefits in diabetic patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, their combined effect has not been revealed. We retrospectively identified diabetic patients with HFrEF who were prescribed an ARNI and/or SGLT2i. The patients were divided into groups treated with both ARNI and SGLT2i (group 1), ARNI but not SGLT2i (group 2), SGLT2i but not ARNI (group 3), and neither ARNI nor SGLT2i (group 4). After propensity score-matching, the occurrence of hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), cardiovascular mortality, and changes in echocardiographic parameters were analyzed. Of the 206 matched patients, 92 (44.7%) had to undergo HHF and 43 (20.9%) died of cardiovascular causes during a median 27.6 months of follow-up. Patients in group 1 exhibited a lower risk of HHF and cardiovascular mortality compared to those in the other groups. Improvements in the left ventricular ejection fraction and E/e′ were more pronounced in group 1 than in groups 2, 3 and 4. These echocardiographic improvements were more prominent after the initiation of ARNI, compare to the initiation of SGLT2i. In diabetic patients with HFrEF, combination of ARNI and SGT2i showed significant improvement in cardiac function and prognosis. ARNI-SGLT2i combination therapy may improve the clinical course of HFrEF in diabetic patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document