Metabolic Power and Efficiency for an Amputee Cyclist: Implications for Cycling Technique
Cycling technique is steeped in cultural lore. One deeply held belief is that "pulling-up" to lift the leg (increased muscular leg flexion) will optimize technique and improve efficiency. In contrast, scientific evidence suggests that when cyclists are instructed to pull-up efficiency decreases. However, such interventions may not have allowed sufficient time for cyclists to adapt and refine their technique. This case study documented how a cyclist with a complete unilateral limb amputation consumed metabolic power to produce mechanical power during single-leg cycling. The cyclist was a 4-time U.S. National Paralympic Champion who performed single-leg cycling for 7yrs and thus was fully adapted to pull-up. We hypothesized that a counterweight system, which reduced the requirement to pull-up, would decrease metabolic power and increase efficiency for this cyclist. The cyclist performed submaximal cycling (100, 135, 170, 205W, 80rpm, 5min) with and without a counterweight (10kg) on the unused crank. Expired gasses were measured, and metabolic power and gross efficiency were calculated. Metabolic power decreased on average by 87±7W (p<0.001) and gross efficiency increased from 16.3±1.9 to 18.0±1.8% (p<0.001) when cycling with the counterweight. During counterweighted single-leg cycling, the metabolic power of unloaded cycling decreased (317 vs. 238W) and delta efficiency was similar (25.2 vs. 25.5%). Results demonstrated that significant metabolic power was associated with pulling-up to produce muscular leg flexion power even in a cyclist who pulled-up substantially during cycling. Our findings confirm observations from previous studies that altered pedaling technique acutely and indicate that pulling-up during cycling is less efficient.