Differential expression and activity of the porcine type I interferon family

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongming Sang ◽  
Raymond R. R. Rowland ◽  
Richard A. Hesse ◽  
Frank Blecha
Keyword(s):  
Antiviral Activity ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Type I ◽  
Antiviral Responses ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Antiviral Activities ◽  
Vesicular Stomatitis

Type I interferons (IFNs) are central to innate and adaptive immunity, and many have unique developmental and physiological functions. However, in most species, only two subtypes, IFN-α and IFN-β, have been well studied. Because of the increasing importance of zoonotic viral diseases and the use of pigs to address human research questions, it is important to know the complete repertoire and activity of porcine type I IFNs. Here we show that porcine type I IFNs comprise at least 39 functional genes distributed along draft genomic sequences of chromosomes 1 and 10. These functional IFN genes are classified into 17 IFN-α subtypes, 11 IFN-δ subtypes, 7 IFN-ω subtypes, and single-subtype subclasses of IFN-αω, IFN-β, IFN-ε, and IFN-κ. We found that porcine type I IFNs have diverse expression profiles and antiviral activities against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), with activity ranging from 0 to >105 U·ng−1·ml−1. Whereas most IFN-α subtypes retained the greatest antiviral activity against both PRRSV and VSV in porcine and MARC-145 cells, some IFN-δ and IFN-ω subtypes, IFN-β, and IFN-αω differed in their antiviral activity based on target cells and viruses. Several IFNs, including IFN-α7/11, IFN-δ2/7, and IFN-ω4, exhibited minimal or no antiviral activity in the tested target cell-virus systems. Thus comparative studies showed that antiviral activity of porcine type I IFNs is virus- and cell-dependent, and IFN-αs are positively correlated with induction of MxA, an IFN-stimulated gene. Collectively, these data provide fundamental genomic information for porcine type I IFNs, information that is necessary for understanding porcine physiological and antiviral responses.

scholarly journals Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Inhibits Type I Interferon Signaling by Blocking STAT1/STAT2 Nuclear Translocation

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (21) ◽  
pp. 11045-11055 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deendayal Patel ◽  
Yuchen Nan ◽  
Meiyan Shen ◽  
Krit Ritthipichai ◽  
Xiaoping Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Nuclear Translocation ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Detectable Effect ◽  
Type I ◽  
Live Virus ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Infected Cells

ABSTRACT Type I interferons (IFNs) IFN-α/β play an important role in innate immunity against viral infections by inducing antiviral responses. Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) inhibits the synthesis of type I IFNs. However, whether PRRSV can inhibit IFN signaling is less well understood. In the present study, we found that PRRSV interferes with the IFN signaling pathway. The transcript levels of IFN-stimulated genes ISG15 and ISG56 and protein level of signal transducer and activator of transcription 2 (STAT2) in PRRSV VR2385-infected MARC-145 cells were significantly lower than those in mock-infected cells after IFN-α treatment. IFN-induced phosphorylation of both STAT1 and STAT2 and their heterodimer formation in the PRRSV-infected cells were not affected. However, the majority of the STAT1/STAT2/IRF9 (IFN regulatory factor 9) heterotrimers remained in the cytoplasm of PRRSV-infected cells, which indicates that the nuclear translocation of the heterotrimers was blocked. Overexpression of NSP1β of PRRSV VR2385 inhibited expression of ISG15 and ISG56 and blocked nuclear translocation of STAT1, which suggests that NSP1β might be the viral protein responsible for the inhibition of IFN signaling. PRRSV infection in primary porcine pulmonary alveolar macrophages (PAMs) also inhibited IFN-α-stimulated expression of the ISGs and the STAT2 protein. In contrast, a licensed low-virulence vaccine strain, Ingelvac PRRS modified live virus (MLV), activated expression of IFN-inducible genes, including those of chemokines and antiviral proteins, in PAMs without the addition of external IFN and had no detectable effect on IFN signaling. These findings suggest that PRRSV interferes with the activation and signaling pathway of type I IFNs by blocking ISG factor 3 (ISGF3) nuclear translocation.

scholarly journals Type I Interferons: Distinct Biological Activities and Current Applications for Viral Infection

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 2377-2396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-fang Li ◽  
Mei-jiao Gong ◽  
Fu-rong Zhao ◽  
Jun-jun Shao ◽  
Yin-li Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biological Activities ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Influenza Viruses ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Virus Infections ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Immunodeficiency Virus ◽  
Potential Applications ◽  
Antiviral Activities

The interferons (IFNs) are a primary defense against pathogens because of the strong antiviral activities they induce. IFNs can be classified into three groups: type I, type II and type III, according to their genetic, structural, and functional characteristics and their receptors on the cell surface. The type I IFNs are the largest group and include IFN-α, IFN-β, IFN-ε, IFN-ω, IFN-κ, IFN-δ, IFN-τ and IFN-ζ. The use of IFNs for the treatment of viral infectious diseases on their antiviral activity may become an important therapeutic option, for example, IFN-α is well known for the successful treatment of hepatitis B and C virus infections, and interest is increasing in the antiviral efficacy of other novel IFN classes and their potential applications. Therefore, in this review, we summarize the recent progress in the study of the biological activities of all the type I IFN classes and their potential applications in the treatment of infections with immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis viruses, and influenza viruses.

scholarly journals Detection of interferon alpha protein reveals differential levels and cellular sources in disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 214 (5) ◽  
pp. 1547-1555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathieu P. Rodero ◽  
Jérémie Decalf ◽  
Vincent Bondet ◽  
David Hunt ◽  
Gillian I. Rice ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Antiviral Responses ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Healthy Donors ◽  
Cellular Source ◽  
Digital Elisa

Type I interferons (IFNs) are essential mediators of antiviral responses. These cytokines have been implicated in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity, most notably systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), diabetes mellitus, and dermatomyositis, as well as monogenic type I interferonopathies. Despite a fundamental role in health and disease, the direct quantification of type I IFNs has been challenging. Using single-molecule array (Simoa) digital ELISA technology, we recorded attomolar concentrations of IFNα in healthy donors, viral infection, and complex and monogenic interferonopathies. IFNα protein correlated well with functional activity and IFN-stimulated gene expression. High circulating IFNα levels were associated with increased clinical severity in SLE patients, and a study of the cellular source of IFNα protein indicated disease-specific mechanisms. Measurement of IFNα attomolar concentrations by digital ELISA will enhance our understanding of IFN biology and potentially improve the diagnosis and stratification of pathologies associated with IFN dysregulation.

scholarly journals HIPK2 is necessary for type I interferon–mediated antiviral immunity

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (573) ◽  
pp. eaau4604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lili Cao ◽  
Guang Yang ◽  
Shandian Gao ◽  
Chunxia Jing ◽  
Ruth R. Montgomery ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Virus ◽  
Antiviral Immunity ◽  
Type I ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Precise Control ◽  
Antiviral Responses ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Vesicular Stomatitis ◽  
Deficient Mice

Precise control of interferons (IFNs) is crucial to maintain immune homeostasis. Here, we demonstrated that homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 2 (HIPK2) was required for the production of type I IFNs in response to RNA virus infection. HIPK2 deficiency markedly impaired IFN production in macrophages after vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) infection, and HIPK2-deficient mice were more susceptible to lethal VSV disease than were wild-type mice. After VSV infection, HIPK2 was cleaved by active caspases, which released a hyperactive, N-terminal fragment that translocated to the nucleus and further augmented antiviral responses. In part, HIPK2 interacted with ELF4 and promoted its phosphorylation at Ser369, which enabledIfn-b transcription. In addition, HIPK2 production was stimulated by type I IFNs to further enhance antiviral immunity. These data suggest that the kinase activity and nuclear localization of HIPK2 are essential for the production of type I IFNs.

scholarly journals Differential inhibition of HIV replication by the 12 interferon-α subtypes

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Tauzin ◽  
Armando Espinosa Ortiz ◽  
Olivia Blake ◽  
Calaiselvy Soundaramourty ◽  
Charles Joly-Beauparlant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Replication Cycle ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Interferon Α ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Rna Expression ◽  
Type I ◽  
Hiv Replication ◽  
Common Receptor ◽  
Anti Hiv

Type-I interferons (IFNs) are a family of cytokines that represent a first line of defense against virus infections. The 12 different IFN-? subtypes share a common receptor on target cells and trigger similar signaling cascades. Several studies have collectively shown that this apparent redundancy conceals qualitatively different responses induced by individual subtypes, which display different efficacies of inhibition of HIV replication. Some studies, however, provided evidence that the disparities are quantitative rather than qualitative. Since RNA-expression analyses show a large but incomplete overlap of the genes induced, they may support both models. To explore if the IFN-? subtypes induce functionally relevant different anti-HIV activities, we have compared the efficacy of inhibition of all 12 subtypes on HIV spread and on specific steps of the viral replication cycle, including viral entry, reverse transcription, protein synthesis and virus release. Finding different hierarchies of inhibition would validate the induction of qualitatively different responses. We found that while most subtypes similarly inhibit virus entry, they display distinctive potencies on other early steps of HIV replication. In addition, only some subtypes were able to target effectively the late steps. The extent of induction on known anti-HIV factors helps to explain some, but not all differences observed, confirming the participation of additional IFN-induced anti-HIV effectors. Our findings support the notion that different IFN-? subtypes can induce the expression of qualitatively different antiviral activities. Importance The initial response against viruses relies in large part on type-I interferons, which include 12 subtypes of IFN-α. These cytokines bind to a common receptor on the cell surface and trigger the expression of incompletely overlapping sets of genes. Whether the anti-HIV responses induced by IFN-α subtypes differ in the extent of expression or in the nature of the genes involved remains debated. Also, RNA expression profiles led to opposite conclusions, depending on the importance attributed to the induction of common or distinctive genes. To explore if relevant anti-HIV activities can be differently induced by the IFN-α subtypes, we compared their relative efficacies on specific steps of the replication cycle. We show that the hierarchy of IFN potencies depends on the step analyzed, supporting qualitatively different responses. This work will also prompt the search for novel IFN-induced anti-HIV factors acting on specific steps of the replication cycle.

scholarly journals Alveolar macrophage–derived type I interferons orchestrate innate immunity to RSV through recruitment of antiviral monocytes

2015 ◽  
Vol 212 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Goritzka ◽  
Spyridon Makris ◽  
Fahima Kausar ◽  
Lydia R. Durant ◽  
Catherine Pereira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiviral Activity ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Inflammatory Monocytes ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Rsv Infection ◽  
Syncytial Virus ◽  
Severe Lung

Type I interferons (IFNs) are important for host defense from viral infections, acting to restrict viral production in infected cells and to promote antiviral immune responses. However, the type I IFN system has also been associated with severe lung inflammatory disease in response to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Which cells produce type I IFNs upon RSV infection and how this directs immune responses to the virus, and potentially results in pathological inflammation, is unclear. Here, we show that alveolar macrophages (AMs) are the major source of type I IFNs upon RSV infection in mice. AMs detect RSV via mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS)–coupled retinoic acid–inducible gene 1 (RIG-I)–like receptors (RLRs), and loss of MAVS greatly compromises innate immune restriction of RSV. This is largely attributable to loss of type I IFN–dependent induction of monocyte chemoattractants and subsequent reduced recruitment of inflammatory monocytes (infMo) to the lungs. Notably, the latter have potent antiviral activity and are essential to control infection and lessen disease severity. Thus, infMo recruitment constitutes an important and hitherto underappreciated, cell-extrinsic mechanism of type I IFN–mediated antiviral activity. Dysregulation of this system of host antiviral defense may underlie the development of RSV-induced severe lung inflammation.

scholarly journals Basal Activation of Type I Interferons (Alpha2 and Beta) and2′5′OAS Genes: Insights into Differential Expression Profiles of Interferon System Components in Systemic Sclerosis

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danilo Bretas de Oliveira ◽  
Gabriel Magno de Freitas Almeida ◽  
Antônio Carlos Martins Guedes ◽  
Flávia Patrícia Sena Teixeira Santos ◽  
Claudio Antônio Bonjardim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Basal Expression ◽  
Interferon System ◽  
Type Iii Ifn ◽  
Complex Autoimmune Disease

Objective. Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex autoimmune disease in which interferons (IFNs) may play an essential role. We hypothesized that type I and III IFNs may be found in increased levels in patients and be responsible for SSc autoimmune status.Methods. Type I and III IFN and ISG basal expression profiles were measured by qPCR using RNA from PBMCs of patients and controls .Results. Type I IFNs are increased in SSc patients, while no induction of type III IFNs was detected. This induction cannot be related to IRF7, since no upregulation of this gene was seen on patients. Of the ISGs tested, 2′5′OAS levels were increased in patients, while 6–16 and MxA levels were not.Conclusions. While there is no indication of type III IFN induction, increased levels of type I IFNs may lead to abnormal regulation of ISGs that can be responsible for immune system alterations described for SSc.

scholarly journals AB0042 CYTOKINE NETWORK ELUCIDATED BY THE QUANTIFICATION OF MULTIPLE CYTOKINES IN THE SERUM SEQUENTIALLY SAMPLED FROM RA PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED WITH BIOLOGIC DMARDS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1323.2-1324
Author(s):  
K. Sato ◽  
S. Mamada ◽  
C. Hayashi ◽  
T. Nagashima ◽  
S. Minota
Keyword(s):  
Bone Erosion ◽  
Feedback System ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Cytokine Network ◽  
Biologic Dmards ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Before And After

Background:Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have demonstrated that proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL-) 6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) play important roles in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Other cytokines, such as type I interferons (IFNs), are also implicated in its pathogenesis (ref 1). However, the complete picture of the cytokine network involved in RA remains to be elucidated.Objectives:By quantifying sets of cytokines in the serum of RA patients before and after treatment with various biologic DMARDs, we sought to determine the effects of drugs on (A) type I IFNs, (B) soluble IL-6 receptors, and (C) other cytokines.Methods:52 patients with RA were treated with various biologic DMARDs (tocilizumab (TOC): 16, abatacept (ABT): 15, and TNF inhibitors (TNFi): 21). Serum samples were obtained (1) before, (2) approximately 4 weeks after (3) and approximately 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment. A suspension bead-array system was used for analysis; Bio-Plex Human Cytokine 17-plex Assay kits and Express Custom Panels (Bio-Rad), including IFN-β, IFN-α2, soluble IL-6 receptor α (sIL6Rα) and gp130 were used.Results:(1) As expected, the disease activity score 28-joiny count (DAS28) using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) significantly decreased in all three groups (TOC, ABT and TNFi) by 12 weeks.(2) IFN-α2 was barely detected in the serum samples. IFN-β seemed to increase slightly in the ABT group, but the increase was not statistically significant.(3) The levels of sIL6Rα did not change substantially. Those of gp130 decreased slightly but significantly in the TOC group by 12 weeks.(4) The levels of IL-6 decreased significantly in the ABT group by 12 weeks. Those in the TNFi group decreased significantly at 4 weeks but not 12 weeks (Fig. 1A).(5) The levels of IL-7 decreased significantly only in the TOC group (Fig. 1B).Conclusion:(1) The biologic DMARDs tested in this study did not significantly affect the serum levels of type I IFNs in this study.(2) The decrease in gp130 in the TOC group may imply that gp130 is induced by IL-6, although whether this level of decrease has physiological significance is open to question.(3) Serum IL-6 was significantly decreased in the TNFi group at 4 weeks but not 12 weeks. TNF has been reported to induce IL-6 (ref 2), but negative feedback loop(s) may be present. Such a feedback system might make the discontinuation of TNFi difficult, even if patients are in remission.(4) IL-7 may be a target of IL-6. A higher level of IL-7 has been reported to be present in the joints of RA patients compared with osteoarthrosis and it is a cytokine implicated in the differentiation of osteoclasts (ref 3). This may partly explain the effect of TOC on preventing bone erosion in RA.References:[1]Ann Rheum Dis. 2007; 66: 1008–14[2]Rheumatology 2007; 46: 920-6[3]Rheumatology 2008; 47: 753-9Acknowledgments:We thank all the members of the Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University. We are also grateful to the patients involved in this study.Disclosure of Interests:Kojiro Sato Grant/research support from: Abbie, Pfizer, Chugai, Astellas, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Ono, Takeda, Sachiko Mamada: None declared, Chiyomi Hayashi: None declared, Takao Nagashima: None declared, Seiji Minota: None declared

scholarly journals TRIM22. A Multitasking Antiviral Factor

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1864
Author(s):  
Isabel Pagani ◽  
Guido Poli ◽  
Elisa Vicenzi
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Influenza A ◽  
Direct Interaction ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Viral Gene ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Type I ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Viral Genomes ◽  
Dna And Rna

Viral invasion of target cells triggers an immediate intracellular host defense system aimed at preventing further propagation of the virus. Viral genomes or early products of viral replication are sensed by a number of pattern recognition receptors, leading to the synthesis and production of type I interferons (IFNs) that, in turn, activate a cascade of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) with antiviral functions. Among these, several members of the tripartite motif (TRIM) family are antiviral executors. This article will focus, in particular, on TRIM22 as an example of a multitarget antiviral member of the TRIM family. The antiviral activities of TRIM22 against different DNA and RNA viruses, particularly human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and influenza A virus (IAV), will be discussed. TRIM22 restriction of virus replication can involve either direct interaction of TRIM22 E3 ubiquitin ligase activity with viral proteins, or indirect protein–protein interactions resulting in control of viral gene transcription, but also epigenetic effects exerted at the chromatin level.

Epigenetic regulation of frog innate immunity: Discovery of frog microRNAs associated with antiviral responses and ranavirus infection using a Xenopus laevis skin epithelial-like cell line

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren A. Todd ◽  
Maxwell P. Bui-Marinos ◽  
Barbara A. Katzenback
Keyword(s):  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Cell Line ◽  
Antiviral Immunity ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Poly I:C ◽  
Type I ◽  
Frog Virus ◽  
Interferon Stimulated Genes ◽  
Antiviral Responses ◽  
Innate Antiviral Immunity

Epigenetic regulators such as microRNAs are emerging as conserved regulators of innate antiviral immunity in vertebrates, yet their roles in amphibian antiviral responses remain uncharacterized. We profiled changes in microRNA expressions in the Xenopus laevis skin epithelial–like cell line Xela DS2 in response to poly(I:C) – an analogue of double-stranded viral RNA and inducer of type I interferons – or frog virus 3 (FV3), an immunoevasive virus associated with amphibian mortality events. We sequenced small RNA libraries generated from untreated, poly(I:C)–treated, and FV3–infected cells. We detected 136 known X. laevis microRNAs and discovered 133 novel X. laevis microRNAs. Sixty–five microRNAs were differentially expressed in response to poly(I:C), many of which were predicted to target regulators of antiviral pathways such as cGAS–STING, RIG–I/MDA–5, TLR signaling, and type I interferon signaling, as well as products of these pathways (NF–κB–induced and interferon-stimulated genes). In contrast, only 49 microRNAs were altered by FV3 infection, fewer of which were predicted to interact with antiviral pathways. Interestingly, poly(I:C) treatment or FV3 infection downregulated transcripts encoding factors of the host microRNA biogenesis pathway. Our study is the first to suggest that host microRNAs regulate innate antiviral immunity in frogs, and sheds light on microRNA–mediated mechanisms of immunoevasion by FV3.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document