scholarly journals Phosphorylation: The Molecular Switch of Double-Strand Break Repair

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. Summers ◽  
F. Shen ◽  
E. A. Sierra Potchanant ◽  
E. A. Phipps ◽  
R. J. Hickey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Genomic Stability ◽  
Molecular Switches ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Repair Pathways

Repair of double-stranded breaks (DSBs) is vital to maintaining genomic stability. In mammalian cells, DSBs are resolved in one of the following complex repair pathways: nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), or the inclusive DNA damage response (DDR). These repair pathways rely on factors that utilize reversible phosphorylation of proteins as molecular switches to regulate DNA repair. Many of these molecular switches overlap and play key roles in multiple pathways. For example, the NHEJ pathway and the DDR both utilize DNA-PK phosphorylation, whereas the HR pathway mediates repair with phosphorylation of RPA2, BRCA1, and BRCA2. Also, the DDR pathway utilizes the kinases ATM and ATR, as well as the phosphorylation of H2AX and MDC1. Together, these molecular switches regulate repair of DSBs by aiding in DSB recognition, pathway initiation, recruitment of repair factors, and the maintenance of repair mechanisms.

scholarly journals Regulatory and Functional Involvement of Long Non-Coding RNAs in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Mechanisms

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1506
Author(s):  
Angelos Papaspyropoulos ◽  
Nefeli Lagopati ◽  
Ioanna Mourkioti ◽  
Andriani Angelopoulou ◽  
Spyridon Kyriazis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Living Organisms

Protection of genome integrity is vital for all living organisms, particularly when DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) occur. Eukaryotes have developed two main pathways, namely Non-Homologous End Joining (NHEJ) and Homologous Recombination (HR), to repair DSBs. While most of the current research is focused on the role of key protein players in the functional regulation of DSB repair pathways, accumulating evidence has uncovered a novel class of regulating factors termed non-coding RNAs. Non-coding RNAs have been found to hold a pivotal role in the activation of DSB repair mechanisms, thereby safeguarding genomic stability. In particular, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have begun to emerge as new players with vast therapeutic potential. This review summarizes important advances in the field of lncRNAs, including characterization of recently identified lncRNAs, and their implication in DSB repair pathways in the context of tumorigenesis.

Double strand break (DSB) repair pathways in plants and their application in genome engineering

2021 ◽  
pp. 27-62
Author(s):  
Natalja Beying ◽  
◽  
Carla Schmidt ◽  
Holger Puchta ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genome Engineering ◽  
Plant Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

In genome engineering, after targeted induction of double strand breaks (DSBs) researchers take advantage of the organisms’ own repair mechanisms to induce different kinds of sequence changes into the genome. Therefore, understanding of the underlying mechanisms is essential. This chapter will review in detail the two main pathways of DSB repair in plant cells, non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR) and sum up what we have learned over the last decades about them. We summarize the different models that have been proposed and set these into relation with the molecular outcomes of different classes of DSB repair. Moreover, we describe the factors that have been identified to be involved in these pathways. Applying this knowledge of DSB repair should help us to improve the efficiency of different types of genome engineering in plants.

scholarly journals Inhibition of the ATR kinase enhances 5-FU sensitivity independently of nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination repair pathways

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (37) ◽  
pp. 12946-12961
Author(s):  
Soichiro S. Ito ◽  
Yosuke Nakagawa ◽  
Masaya Matsubayashi ◽  
Yoshihiko M. Sakaguchi ◽  
Shinko Kobashigawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Nucleotide Synthesis ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Repair Pathways

The anticancer agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is cytotoxic and often used to treat various cancers. 5-FU is thought to inhibit the enzyme thymidylate synthase, which plays a role in nucleotide synthesis and has been found to induce single- and double-strand DNA breaks. ATR Ser/Thr kinase (ATR) is a principal kinase in the DNA damage response and is activated in response to UV– and chemotherapeutic drug–induced DNA replication stress, but its role in cellular responses to 5-FU is unclear. In this study, we examined the effect of ATR inhibition on 5-FU sensitivity of mammalian cells. Using immunoblotting, we found that 5-FU treatment dose-dependently induced the phosphorylation of ATR at the autophosphorylation site Thr-1989 and thereby activated its kinase. Administration of 5-FU with a specific ATR inhibitor remarkably decreased cell survival, compared with 5-FU treatment combined with other major DNA repair kinase inhibitors. Of note, the ATR inhibition enhanced induction of DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis in 5-FU–treated cells. Using gene expression analysis, we found that 5-FU induced the activation of the intra-S cell-cycle checkpoint. Cells lacking BRCA2 were sensitive to 5-FU in the presence of ATR inhibitor. Moreover, ATR inhibition enhanced the efficacy of the 5-FU treatment, independently of the nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination repair pathways. These findings suggest that ATR could be a potential therapeutic target in 5-FU–based chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Spindle Checkpoint Factors Bub1 and Bub2 Promote DNA Double-Strand Break Repair by Nonhomologous End Joining

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (14) ◽  
pp. 2448-2463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Jessulat ◽  
Ramy H. Malty ◽  
Diem-Hang Nguyen-Tran ◽  
Viktor Deineko ◽  
Hiroyuki Aoki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Cell Cycle Regulators ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Content Type

The nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) pathway is essential for the preservation of genome integrity, as it efficiently repairs DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Previous biochemical and genetic investigations have indicated that, despite the importance of this pathway, the entire complement of genes regulating NHEJ remains unknown. To address this, we employed a plasmid-based NHEJ DNA repair screen in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) using 369 putative nonessential DNA repair-related components as queries. Among the newly identified genes associated with NHEJ deficiency upon disruption are two spindle assembly checkpoint kinases, Bub1 and Bub2. Both observation of resulting phenotypes and chromatin immunoprecipitation demonstrated that Bub1 and -2, either alone or in combination with cell cycle regulators, are recruited near the DSB, where phosphorylated Rad53 or H2A accumulates. Large-scale proteomic analysis of Bub kinases phosphorylated in response to DNA damage identified previously unknown kinase substrates on Tel1 S/T-Q sites. Moreover, Bub1 NHEJ function appears to be conserved in mammalian cells. 53BP1, which influences DSB repair by NHEJ, colocalizes with human BUB1 and is recruited to the break sites. Thus, while Bub is not a core component of NHEJ machinery, our data support its dual role in mitotic exit and promotion of NHEJ repair in yeast and mammals.

scholarly journals RAD18 and Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Independently Suppress the Access of Nonhomologous End Joining to Double-Strand Breaks and Facilitate Homologous Recombination-Mediated Repair

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 2562-2571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alihossein Saberi ◽  
Helfrid Hochegger ◽  
David Szuts ◽  
Li Lan ◽  
Akira Yasui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dt40 Cells

ABSTRACT The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD18 gene is essential for postreplication repair but is not required for homologous recombination (HR), which is the major double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway in yeast. Accordingly, yeast rad18 mutants are tolerant of camptothecin (CPT), a topoisomerase I inhibitor, which induces DSBs by blocking replication. Surprisingly, mammalian cells and chicken DT40 cells deficient in Rad18 display reduced HR-dependent repair and are hypersensitive to CPT. Deletion of nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), a major DSB repair pathway in vertebrates, in rad18-deficient DT40 cells completely restored HR-mediated DSB repair, suggesting that vertebrate Rad18 regulates the balance between NHEJ and HR. We previously reported that loss of NHEJ normalized the CPT sensitivity of cells deficient in poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1). Concomitant deletion of Rad18 and PARP1 synergistically increased CPT sensitivity, and additional inactivation of NHEJ normalized this hypersensitivity, indicating their parallel actions. In conclusion, higher-eukaryotic cells separately employ PARP1 and Rad18 to suppress the toxic effects of NHEJ during the HR reaction at stalled replication forks.

scholarly journals Cell cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

1996 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 2164-2173 ◽  
Author(s):  
J K Moore ◽  
J E Haber
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Large Deletions ◽  
Nhej Repair

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, an HO endonuclease-induced double-strand break can be repaired by at least two pathways of nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) that closely resemble events in mammalian cells. In one pathway the chromosome ends are degraded to yield deletions with different sizes whose endpoints have 1 to 6 bp of homology. Alternatively, the 4-bp overhanging 3' ends of HO-cut DNA (5'-AACA-3') are not degraded but can be base paired in misalignment to produce +CA and +ACA insertions. When HO was expressed throughout the cell cycle, the efficiency of NHEJ repair was 30 times higher than when HO was expressed only in G1. The types of repair events were also very different when HO was expressed throughout the cell cycle; 78% of survivors had small insertions, while almost none had large deletions. When HO expression was confined to the G1 phase, only 21% were insertions and 38% had large deletions. These results suggest that there are distinct mechanisms of NHEJ repair producing either insertions or deletions and that these two pathways are differently affected by the time in the cell cycle when HO is expressed. The frequency of NHEJ is unaltered in strains from which RAD1, RAD2, RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, or RAD57 is deleted; however, deletions of RAD50, XRS2, or MRE11 reduced NHEJ by more than 70-fold when HO was not cell cycle regulated. Moreover, mutations in these three genes markedly reduced +CA insertions, while significantly increasing the proportion of both small (-ACA) and larger deletion events. In contrast, the rad5O mutation had little effect on the viability of G1-induced cells but significantly reduced the frequency of both +CA insertions and -ACA deletions in favor of larger deletions. Thus, RAD50 (and by extension XRS2 and MRE11) exerts a much more important role in the insertion-producing pathway of NHEJ repair found in S and/or G2 than in the less frequent deletion events that predominate when HO is expressed only in G1.

scholarly journals Differential Effects of DNA Double-Strand Break Repair Pathways on Single-Strand and Self-Complementary Adeno-Associated Virus Vector Genomes

2010 ◽  
Vol 84 (17) ◽  
pp. 8673-8682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcela P. Cataldi ◽  
Douglas M. McCarty
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Single Strand ◽  
Nonhomologous End Joining ◽  
Chromosomal Integration ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Adeno Associated Virus ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Pathways

ABSTRACT The linear DNA genomes of recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) gene delivery vectors are acted upon by multiple DNA repair and recombination pathways upon release into the host nucleus, resulting in circularization, concatemer formation, or chromosomal integration. We have compared the fates of single-strand rAAV (ssAAV) and self-complementary AAV (scAAV) genomes in cell lines deficient in each of three signaling factors, ATM, ATR, and DNA-PKCS, orchestrating major DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways. In cells deficient in ATM, transduction as scored by green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression is increased relative to that in wild-type (wt) cells by 2.6-fold for ssAAV and 6.6-fold for scAAV vectors, arguing against a mechanism related to second-strand synthesis. The augmented transduction is not reflected in Southern blots of nuclear vector DNA, suggesting that interactions with ATM lead to silencing in normal cells. The additional functional genomes in ATM−/− cells remain linear, and the number of circularized genomes is not affected by the mutation, consistent with compartmentalization of genomes into different DNA repair pathways. A similar effect is observed in ATR-deficient cells but is specific for ssAAV vector. Conversely, a large decrease in transduction is observed in cells deficient in DNA-PKCS, which is involved in DSB repair by nonhomologous end joining rather than homologous recombination. The mutations also have differential effects on chromosomal integration of ssAAV versus scAAV vector genomes. Integration of ssAAV was specifically reduced in ATM−/− cells, while scAAV integration was more profoundly inhibited in DNA-PKCS −/− cells. Taken together, the results suggest that productive rAAV genome circularization is mediated primarily by nonhomologous end joining.

Shelterin-Mediated Telomere Protection

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Titia de Lange
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Telomere Protection ◽  
Repair Pathways

For more than a decade, it has been known that mammalian cells use shelterin to protect chromosome ends. Much progress has been made on the mechanism by which shelterin prevents telomeres from inadvertently activating DNA damage signaling and double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways. Shelterin averts activation of three DNA damage response enzymes [the ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) kinases and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1)], blocks three DSB repair pathways [classical nonhomologous end joining (c-NHEJ), alternative (alt)-NHEJ, and homology-directed repair (HDR)], and prevents hyper-resection at telomeres. For several of these functions, mechanistic insights have emerged. In addition, much has been learned about how shelterin maintains the telomeric 3′ overhang, forms and protects the t-loop structure, and promotes replication through telomeres. These studies revealed that shelterin is compartmentalized, with individual subunits dedicated to distinct aspects of the end-protection problem. This review focuses on the current knowledge of shelterin-mediated telomere protection, highlights differences between human and mouse shelterin, and discusses some of the questions that remain.

scholarly journals Harnessing DSB repair to promote efficient homology-dependent and -independent prime editing

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Peterka ◽  
Nina Akrap ◽  
Songyuan Li ◽  
Sandra Wimberger ◽  
Pei-Pei Hsieh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Guide Rna ◽  
Large Deletions ◽  
Dna Double Strand Break ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
Non Homologous End Joining ◽  
Genomic Insertions

Prime editing recently emerged as a next-generation approach for precise genome editing. Here we exploit DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair to develop two novel strategies that install precise genomic insertions using an SpCas9 nuclease-based prime editor (PEn). We first demonstrate that PEn coupled to a regular prime editing guide RNA (pegRNA) efficiently promotes short genomic insertions through a homology-dependent DSB repair mechanism. While PEn editing lead to increased levels of by-products, it rescued pegRNAs that performed poorly with a nickase-based prime editor. We also present a small molecule approach that yielded increased product purity of PEn editing. Next, we developed a homology-independent PEn editing strategy by engineering a single primed insertion gRNA (springRNA) which installs genomic insertions at DSBs through the non-homologous end joining pathway (NHEJ). Lastly, we show that PEn-mediated insertions at DSBs prevent Cas9-induced large chromosomal deletions and provide evidence that continuous Cas9-mediated cutting is one of the mechanisms by which Cas9-induced large deletions arise. Altogether, this work expands the current prime editing toolbox by leveraging distinct DNA repair mechanisms including NHEJ, which represents the primary pathway of DSB repair in mammalian cells.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document