scholarly journals Outcomes of Cryoballoon Ablation in High- and Low-Volume Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Centres: A Russian Pilot Survey

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evgeny N. Mikhaylov ◽  
Dmitry S. Lebedev ◽  
Evgeny A. Pokushalov ◽  
Karapet V. Davtyan ◽  
Eduard A. Ivanitskii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Major Complication Rate ◽  
Low Volume ◽  
Total Event ◽  
Event Rates ◽  
Real Practice

Purpose. The results of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) procedure have been mainly derived from studies conducted in experienced atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation centres. Here, we report on CBA efficacy and complications resulting from real practice of this procedure at both high- and low-volume centres.Methods. Among 62 Russian centres performing AF ablation, 15 (24%) used CBA technology for pulmonary vein isolation. The centres were asked to provide a detailed description of all CBA procedures performed and complications, if encountered.Results. Thirteen sites completed interviews on all CBAs in their centres (>95% of CBAs in Russia). Six sites were high-volume AF ablation (>100 AF cases/year) centres, and 7 were low-volume AF ablation. There was no statistical difference in arrhythmia-free rates between high- and low-volume centres (64.6 versus 60.8% at 6 months). Major complications developed in 1.5% of patients and were equally distributed between high- and low-volume centres. Minor procedure-related events were encountered in 8% of patients and were more prevalent in high-volume centres. Total event and vascular access site event rates were higher in women than in men.Conclusions. CBA has an acceptable efficacy profile in real practice. In less experienced AF ablation centres, the major complication rate is equal to that in high-volume centres.

scholarly journals Redo ablation for atrial fibrillation recurrence post radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation: a high volume single-centre experience

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ribeiro Da Silva ◽  
G Santos Silva ◽  
P Ribeiro Queiros ◽  
R Teixeira ◽  
J Almeida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Veins ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Electrophysiologic Study ◽  
Electroanatomic Mapping System ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Funding Sources ◽  
Time To Recurrence

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is a well-established procedure for the treatment of AF. The cornerstone of AF ablation is the complete and durable isolation of pulmonary veins (PV) through radiofrequency (RF) or cryoballoon (CB) ablation. However, PVI durability between RF or CB was not yet established, as reablation strategy and outcomes in patients (pt) undergoing a redo ablation. Purpose To compare RF versus CB regarding PVI status, reablation procedure and outcomes in pts undergoing a second procedure. Methods Single-centre retrospective study of consecutive pts who underwent a redo between 2016 and 2020. PVI status was assessed during electrophysiologic study with electroanatomic mapping system. Index procedures included second generation CB, conventional RF before 2018 and CLOSE protocol guided RF ablation after 2018. We assessed time-to-redo, number and location of reconnected PVs, procedural characteristics, acute and long-term outcomes between RF and CB index PVI. Results Seventy-four (55 RF and 19 CB) pts were included, 68,9% were male, most pts had paroxysmal AF (71,6%) and a mean CHA2DS2-VASc score of 1,14 ± 1,0. No statistically significant differences were noticed in clinical and echocardiographic characteristics between pts within RF or CB cohorts. Median time to reablation was significantly longer in the RF cohort (38,6 months ±33,6) compared to CB (17,0 months ±9,5) (p = 0,014). The number of reconnected PV was higher in CB than the RF cohort, although not significant (2,37 ±1,2 vs 1,75 ±1,4;p = 0,080). Right inferior PV was significantly more reconnected in pts within the CB compared to RF group (73,7% vs 45,6%;p = 0,034), without differences in the other PV reconnection rates. Regarding reablation procedure, all pts were submitted to RF-redo. Fluoroscopy time was shorter for CB than RF cohort (7,4 ±2,9 vs 13,3 ±8,4;p = 0,002). There were no significant differences between the type of reablation (PVI only vs PVI plus other lesions or cavotricuspid isthmus ablation), with no difference in overall acute success. After the redo procedure, no differences were observed in recurrence rate in the blanking period and after 91 days from reablation. Nevertheless, time-to-recurrence (>91 days) was longer for RF than CB group (13,4 months ±10,7 vs 4,3 months ±1,5;p = 0,016). There were 2 pts in the RF group that were submitted to a third ablation procedure (p = 0,725). There were no differences between groups in the composite of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes (stroke/transient ischemic attack, emergency room visit for AF, hospitalization for AF or CV death); p = 0,715. Conclusions After the index procedure, reablation occur later in RF than CB cohort.  Although the number of reconnected PV were similar between groups, right inferior PV was significantly more reconnected in pts originally treated with CB. After redo, time-to-recurrence was shorter for CB cohort. Recurrence and composite of adverse CV outcomes were similar.

Failure to Rescue As a Source of Variation in Hospital Mortality for Ovarian Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (32) ◽  
pp. 3976-3982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason D. Wright ◽  
Thomas J. Herzog ◽  
Zainab Siddiq ◽  
Rebecca Arend ◽  
Alfred I. Neugut ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Failure To Rescue ◽  
High Volume Hospital ◽  
Lower Complication ◽  
Major Complication Rate ◽  
Low Volume

Purpose Although the association between high surgical volume and improved outcomes from procedures is well described, the mechanisms that underlie this association are uncertain. There is growing recognition that high-volume hospitals may not necessarily have lower complication rates but rather may be better at rescuing patients with complications. We examined the role of complications, failure to rescue from complications, and mortality based on hospital volume for ovarian cancer. Patients and Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample was used to identify women who underwent surgery for ovarian cancer from 1988 to 2009. Hospitals were ranked on the basis of their procedure volume. We determined the risk-adjusted mortality, major complication rate, and “failure to rescue” rate (mortality in patients with a major complication) for each tertile. Univariate and multivariate associations were then compared. Results We identified 36,624 patients. The mortality rate for the cohort was 1.6%. The major complication rate was 20.4% at low-volume, 23.4% at intermediate-volume, and 24.6% at high-volume hospitals (P < .001). However, the rate of failure to rescue (death after a complication) was markedly higher at low-volume (8.0%) compared with high-volume hospitals (4.9%; P < .001). After accounting for patient and hospital characteristics, women treated at low-volume hospitals who experienced a complication were 48% more likely (odds ratio [OR], 1.48; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.99) to die than patients with a complication at a high-volume hospital. Conclusion Mortality is lower for patients with ovarian cancer treated at high-volume hospitals. The reduction in mortality does not appear to be the result of lower complications rates but rather a result of the ability of high-volume hospitals to rescue patients with complications.

Time-to-isolation-guided cryoballoon ablation reduces oesophageal and mediastinal alterations detected by endoscopic ultrasound: results of the MADE-PVI trial

EP Europace ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1325-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friederike Cordes ◽  
Christian Ellermann ◽  
Dirk G Dechering ◽  
Gerrit Frommeyer ◽  
Simon Kochhäuser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
2Nd Generation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Mean Diameter ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Aims Cryoballoon ablation is safe and efficient for achieving pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation. Structural oesophago-mediastinal lesions, which seem to be associated with an increased risk of the lethal complication of an atrio-oesophageal fistula, have been described. MADE-PVI (Mediastino-oesophageal Alterations Detected by Endosonography after PVI) aimed at evaluating safety of cryoballoon PVI in relation to two different freeze protocols. As time-to-isolation-(TTI)-guided protocol has been reported to be as effective as conventional ‘two freeze protocol’, we hypothesized a TTI-guided protocol causes less oesophago-mediastinal lesions. Methods and results Seventy consecutive patients were scheduled for cryoballoon (2nd generation) PVI employing either a conventional protocol (n = 35: 2 × 180 s per vein) or a TTI-guided approach (n = 35: TTI + 120 s per vein or 1 × 180 s in case TTI could not be measured). Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound, assessing oesophago-mediastinal alterations (e.g. ulceration, oedema) were performed blinded prior and post-ablation. Post-interventional mediastinal oedematous alterations were detected in 70% with a mean diameter of 14 mm (±0.9 mm), while only 15% revealed large mediastinal oedema >20 mm. Oesophageal lesions due to PVI occurred in 5%. Freeze protocols had a distinct impact on oesophago-mediastinal alterations as mean diameter and frequency of large oedema were significantly increased in patients after conventional protocol PVI (17 mm vs. 11 mm; 26% vs. 6%). Furthermore, every oesophageal lesion was detected in patients with conventional protocol (9%). No major complication occurred in either group. Conclusion The present prospective study demonstrates a significant impact of freeze protocol on oesophago-mediastinal alterations. A TTI-guided protocol reduces mediastino-oesophageal lesions and may reduce short- and long-term complications of cryoballoon PVI.

P2848Electrical reconnections after pulmonary vein isolation with or without contact force-guided catheters: a comparison of the proficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Fujimoto ◽  
K Yodogawa ◽  
Y Iwasaki ◽  
M Hachisuka ◽  
R Mimuro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Contact Force ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Surgical Ablation ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Right ◽  
Posterosuperior Segment

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is the most commonly performed catheter ablation (CA) procedure today. The 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS Advanced Training Statement reported that the success rate of AF ablation is higher in high-volume centers than in low-volume centers. We tested whether the procedure proficiency of each operator was associated with the outcome of AF ablation, and whether the ablation outcome depended on whether contact force (CF)-guided catheters were used or not, in a high-volume center. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study including all AF patients who underwent radiofrequency CA with or without CF support since 2016 at our hospital. The patients who underwent CA at other hospitals or underwent a balloon or surgical ablation in the first session were excluded. Each ipsilateral pulmonary vein (PV) pair was divided into 8 segments. The reconnection numbers and sites of the PV segment were evaluated in the second session. Operators were divided into the experienced group (≥100 AF cases/year, at least every 3 years) and developing group (other than the experienced group), respectively. Results Among 728 patients who underwent an initial AF ablation and were followed for 510±306 days, 131 (90 males, 65±10 years) received a second ablation procedure and were analyzed. A total of 260 and 264 PV isolations (PVI) were performed by the experienced and developing group operators in the initial ablation, respectively. Compared to the experienced group, the developing group had a longer procedure time for the PVI (35±15 vs. 28±10 min, p<0.001), higher frequency of reconnections of the PVs (73% vs. 59%, p=0.01) and higher number of reconnection gaps (2.1±2.0 vs. 1.5±2.0, p=0.02), respectively. There were no significantly differences in the number of gaps between the catheters with and without CF (1.6±2.0 vs. 1.4±2.0, p=0.65) in the experienced group, however, in the developing group a smaller total number of gaps (1.5±1.6 vs. 2.4±2.1, p=0.006) and less frequency reconnection gaps of the posterosuperior segment of the right PV (10% vs. 45%, p=0.005) were seen with catheters with CF than without. There was no significant difference in the procedure time for the PVI between catheters with and without CF. Conclusions The operator proficiency may predict the outcome after AF ablation even in high-volume centers. It is preferable to perform PVI with a CF-sensing catheter for operators without adequate proficiency. Acknowledgement/Funding JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP18K15865

486Are the results of the CASTLE-AF trial reproducible in the real life? Clinical outcomes after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure in a nationwide cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Bisson ◽  
F Mondout ◽  
J Herbert ◽  
N Clementy ◽  
B Pierre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Systèmes D’Information ◽  
Event Rates

Abstract Background Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a validated therapy for patients with symptomatic AF to prevent recurrences. The CASTLE AF trial indicated that ablation for AF in patients with heart failure (HF) was associated with a lower rate of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening HF than was medical therapy. The purpose of our study was to compare the incidence of these events in AF patients with HF after AF catheter ablation versus those not treated with AF ablation at a nationwide level in centers possibly less well experienced. Methods This French longitudinal cohort study was based on the national hospitalization PMSI (Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information) database covering hospital care from the entire population. We included all patients, over 18 years old, with AF and HF from January 2010 to December 2015. Crude event rates were ascertained and hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards risk model. Propensity-matched Cox regression was also used to compare event rates according to AF ablation usage status. Results Among the 261,449 patients identified with AF and HF, 1,270 patients were treated with AF ablation (24% female, mean age 63±10 yo) and 260,179 did not have AF ablation (45% female, mean age 79±11 yo). During follow-up (417±502 days), there were 56,981 hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of HF and 81,393 deaths were recorded. Incidence of hospitalization for HF was significantly lower in patients with AF ablation than in those with no ablation (13.74% vs 51.11% person per year respectively, p<0.0001). Incidence of death was also significantly lower in patients with AF ablation than in those with no ablation (6.07% vs 27.42% person per year respectively, p<0.0001). These associations were confirmed in a multivariable analysis after adjustment on age and other comorbidities (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.28–0.39, p<0.0001 for HF and HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.31–0.48, p<0.0001 for all-cause death). After 1:1 propensity score matching, AF ablation was also associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for HF (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.31–0.47, p<0.0001) and a lower risk of death (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.42–0.70, p<0.0001). Conclusion In the nationwide analysis of unselected AF patients with HF seen in hospitals, AF ablation was independently associated with a lower risk of hospitalization for HF and death. This provides “real world” data consistent with those observed in recent trials with lower numbers of highly selected patients

scholarly journals Procedural Patterns and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zak Loring ◽  
DaJuanicia N. Holmes ◽  
Roland A. Matsouaka ◽  
Anne B. Curtis ◽  
John D. Day ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Pulmonary Vein Isolation ◽  
Contact Force ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
Life Threatening

Background: Catheter ablation is an increasingly used treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there are limited prospective, nationwide data on patient selection and procedural characteristics. This study describes patient characteristics, techniques, treatment patterns, and safety outcomes of patients undergoing AF ablation. Methods: A total of 3139 patients undergoing AF ablation between 2016 and 2018 in the Get With The Guidelines-Atrial Fibrillation registry from 24 US centers were included. Patient demographics, medical history, procedural details, and complications were abstracted. Differences between paroxysmal and patients with persistent AF were compared using Pearson χ 2 and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Results: Patients undergoing AF ablation were predominantly male (63.9%) and White (93.2%) with a median age of 65. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (67.6%), and patients with persistent AF had more comorbidities than patients with paroxysmal AF. Drug refractory, paroxysmal AF was the most common ablation indication (class I, 53.6%) followed by drug refractory, persistent AF (class I, 41.8%). Radiofrequency ablation with contact force sensing was the most common ablation modality (70.5%); 23.7% of patients underwent cryoballoon ablation. Pulmonary vein isolation was performed in 94.6% of de novo ablations; the most common adjunctive lesions included left atrial roof or posterior/inferior lines, and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation. Complications were uncommon (5.1%) and were life-threatening in 0.7% of cases. Conclusions: More than 98% of AF ablations among participating sites are performed for class I or class IIA indications. Contact force-guided radiofrequency ablation is the dominant technique and pulmonary vein isolation the principal lesion set. In-hospital complications are uncommon and rarely life-threatening.

P1908Left common pulmonary vein in atrial fibrillation ablation with cryoballoon. A meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Gionti ◽  
M C Negro ◽  
M Longobardi ◽  
C Storti
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Pulmonary Vein ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Cryoballoon Ablation ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Af Ablation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Common Pulmonary Vein

Abstract Background Conflicting results regarding the impact of left common pulmonary (LCPV) vein on clinical outcome of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation with cryoballoon technology have been reported. In the present study, we sought to investigate the performance of the 28 mm cryoballoon advance (CB-A) on left common pulmonary vein (LCPV) in terms of post procedural outcome. Methods We systematically searched on PubMed and Cochrane library for the articles that compared the recurrence rate of AF after cryoballoon ablation between patients with four separate and distinct pulmonary vein ostia and with LCPV. Results A total of 5 studies with 1052 patients met our predefined inclusion criteria. Recurrence of AF after CB-A ablation was similar in both groups (Log OR 0.45; 95% CI: −0.03, 0.94; I=48%, p=0.08), Fig 1. Figure 1 Conclusion LCPV doesn't affect clinical outcome of AF ablation with cryoballoon technology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document