Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective. To systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods. We searched EMBASE (OvidSP), MEDLINE (OvidSP), the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify diagnostic accuracy trials of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. We used a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model to conduct the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Results. A total of 19 comparative trials met the inclusion criteria and were part of the qualitative synthesis. Eight trials using nerve conduction studies as the reference standard were selected for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy were 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.74) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.94), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 4.56 (95% CI 2.93 to 7.10) and 0.53 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.81), respectively. Conclusions. Our review indicated that monofilament tests had limited sensitivity for screening diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The clinical use of the monofilament test in the evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy cannot be encouraged based on currently available evidence.

Download Full-text

Blood-Based Circulating MicroRNAs are Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Leukemia: Result from a Meta-Analysis

Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry ◽

10.1159/000443046 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 38 (3) ◽

pp. 939-949 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Li-hua Xu ◽

Yang Guo ◽

Xue-Li Zhang ◽

Jia-jia Chen ◽

Shao-yan Hu

Keyword(s):

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽

Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽

Sensitivity Analyses ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Circulating Mirnas ◽

Diagnostic Biomarkers ◽

Circulating Micrornas

Aims: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers for leukemia have been validated by emerging studies. This meta-analysis aims to estimate the overall diagnostic accuracy of blood-based circulating miRNAs for leukemia. Methods: We searched multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wan Fang Data and CQVIP) up to June 18, 2015. Results: 32 studies from 10 publications were included in this meta-analysis. Diagnostic capacity was evaluated by pooled sensitivity, specifIcity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) through random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were sequentially performed to find potential sources of heterogeneity. The quality of included studies was assessed by QUADAS (quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy). Meta-Disc 1.4 and Stata 12.0 software were used to perform the meta-analysis. A high diagnostic accuracy was displayed, with a sensitivity of 0.84, a specificity of 0.88, a PLR of 7.20, a NLR of 0.18, a DOR of 52, and an AUC of 0.94. Subgroup analyses revealed better performance for combined miRNAs, acute myeloid leukemia patients and Asian population than other subgroups. Conclusion: Our analyses suggested that blood-based circulating miRNAs are promising diagnostic biomarkers for leukemia, especially combined miRNAs. Its clinical application awaits further study.

Download Full-text

A Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Circular RNAs in Digestive System Malignancy

Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry ◽

10.1159/000487291 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 45 (3) ◽

pp. 962-972 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Zhiqiang Chen ◽

Long Zhang ◽

Guoyong Han ◽

Xueliang Zuo ◽

Yao Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Digestive System ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽

Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Circular Rnas ◽

Cancer Type ◽

Discriminative Ability

Background/Aims: Circular RNAs (circRNAs), a novel class of noncoding RNAs, have been found to be dysregulated in various cancers. However, the clinical application value of these circRNAs in digestive system cancers remains to be clarified. We aimed to comprehensively explore the potential role of circRNAs as diagnostic indicators in digestive system malignancies. Methods: Relevant studies were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The data that were required to complete 2 × 2 contingency tables were obtained from the included studies. Stratified analyses by cancer type, sample size and publication year were performed. Results: Thirteen studies with 2,276 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of circRNAs in the diagnosis of digestive system malignancy were 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.77] and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.81), respectively. The overall positive likelihood ratio was 3.09 (95% CI: 2.64-3.62), and the overall negative likelihood ratio was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.31-0.44). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 8.38 (95% CI: 6.86-10.25), and the overall area under the curve was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84), indicating good discriminative ability of circRNAs as biomarkers for digestive system malignancy. Conclusion: circRNAs distinguish patients with digestive system cancer from controls with relatively high diagnostic accuracy. circRNAs may be used as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of digestive system malignancy.

Download Full-text

Potential Diagnostic Value of Circulating miRNA for Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis.

10.21203/rs.3.rs-47626/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Wen-Ting Zhang ◽

Shuai-Shuai Gao ◽

Yan-Jun Wang ◽

Guo-Xun Zhang

Keyword(s):

Multiple Myeloma ◽

Early Diagnosis ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽

Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Circulating Mirna

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second incurable hematological malignancy. In recent years, due to the rise of microRNA (miRNA), many scholars have participated in the study of its value in the diagnosis of MM, and have obtained good but inconsistent results. Therefore, in order to determine the role of miRNA in the early diagnosis of MM, we searched for related studies including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database as of July 20, 2020 to conduct this meta-analysis. To improve the accuracy, the quality assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study 2 (QUADAS-2) was used. We also applied random effects models to summarize sensitivity and specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) to measure diagnostic values, and subgroup analysis used to discover potential sources of heterogeneity. Finally, we collected 32 studies from 15 articles that included a total of 2053 MM patients and 1118 healthy controls. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC were 0.81, 0.85, 5.5, 0.22, 25 and 0.90, respectively. Subgroup analysis shows that the down-regulation of microRNA clusters with larger samples size of plasma type could carry out a better diagnostic accuracy of MM patients. In addition, publication bias was not found. In conclusion, circulating miRNA could be a potential non-invasive biomarker for early diagnosis of MM. However, multi-center, more rigorous, and larger-scale studies are needed to verify our conclusions.

Download Full-text

The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Medicine ◽

10.3389/fmed.2021.766208 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 ◽

Author(s):

Ru-Dong Li ◽

Min Guan ◽

Zhe Zhou ◽

Shu-Xiao Dong ◽

Qian Liu

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽

Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Diagnostic Biomarker ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Sensitivity Specificity

Background: A novel category of non-coding circular RNAs (circRNAs) has been found to be dysregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) and significantly contribute to its progression. However, the feasibility of using circRNA as a diagnostic biomarker for CRC remains to be elucidated. Herein, we aimed to comprehensively collect and analyze evidence regarding the potential application of circRNAs as diagnostic indicators for CRC.Methods: A comprehensive retrieval of relevant studies dating from January, 2015 to December 2020, was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Data regarding the diagnostic accuracy of circRNA for CRC, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC), were obtained from the included studies. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the methodological quality of each study. Statistical analysis was performed using STAT and RevMan software.Results: Eighteen studies, involving a total of 2021 individuals, were included in the present meta-analysis. The specimens examined included tissue, serum, and plasma. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR, and AUC, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), of circRNAs in the diagnosis of CRC were 0.78 (0.71–0.83), 0.73 (0.68–0.78), 9.68 (6.76–13.85), 2.92 (2.45–3.50), 0.30 (0.23–0.39), and 0.81 (0.78–0.85), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the upregulated circRNAs in the tissue or plasma possessed relatively higher diagnostic values for CRC than the downregulated circRNAs. There was no significant difference between the tissue-derived and non-tissue-derived circRNA subgroups.Conclusion: circRNA may be used as a diagnostic biomarker for CRC because of its relatively high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing CRC patients from normal controls. Further prospective studies are needed to identify more representative circRNAs as diagnostic markers for CRC.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic Accuracy of the ADNEX Model for Ovarian Cancer at the 15% Cut-Off Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.684257 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Xiaotong Huang ◽

Ziwei Wang ◽

Meiqin Zhang ◽

Hong Luo

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Publication Bias ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Characteristic Curve ◽

Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽

Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Meta Regression

ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ADNEX model for ovarian cancer at the 15% cut-off value.MethodsStudies on the identified diagnosis of the ADNEX model for ovarian cancer published in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases from January 1st, 2014 to February 20th, 2021 were searched. Two researchers independently screened the retrieved studies and extracted the basic features and parameter data. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2, and the result was summarized by Review Manager 5.3. Meta-Disc 1.4 and STATA 16.0 were used in statistical analysis. Heterogeneity of this meta-analysis was calculated. Meta-regression was performed to investigate the potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis and Deek’s funnel plot analysis were conducted to evaluate the stability and publication bias, respectively.Results280 studies were initially retrieved through the search strategy, and 10 eligible studies were ultimately included. The random-effects model was selected for data synthesis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89–0.94), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.86), 5.2 (95% CI: 4.1–6.4), 0.10 (95% CI: 0.07–0.13), 54.0 (95% CI: 37.0–77.0) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95). Meta-regression based on study design, country, enrollment and blind method was not statistically significant. This meta-analysis was stable with no obvious publication bias.ConclusionsThe ADNEX model at the 15% cut-off had high diagnostic accuracy in identifying ovarian cancer.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum/Plasma Circular RNAs and the Combination of Circular RNAs and α-Fetoprotein for Detecting Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Frontiers in Genetics ◽

10.3389/fgene.2021.722208 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Guilin Nie ◽

Dingzhong Peng ◽

Bei Li ◽

Jiong Lu ◽

Yulong Cai ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Genomic Medicine ◽

Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽

Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Circular Rnas ◽

Liquid Biopsies

The lack of an accurate biomarker in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has hindered early detection, diagnosis, and treatment. Circular RNAs (circRNAs), which can be used as novel biomarkers in liquid biopsies, have been brought to light as a result of the advances in research on molecular biomarkers and the progression of genomic medicine. We conducted a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of serum/plasma circRNAs or the combination of circRNAs and α-fetoprotein (AFP) in HCC. We identified eight studies that met the inclusion/exclusion criteria from PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The data were pooled, and the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The areas under the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves (AUCs) were also calculated. The sensitivity of circRNAs was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.85), and the specificity was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.86). The sensitivity of AFP was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.61–0.68), and the specificity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85–0.93). The AUC was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.91) for circRNAs and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.74–0.81) for AFP. The sensitivity of the combination of circRNAs and AFP was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.84–0.92), specificity was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80–0.91), and AUC was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91–0.96). Additionally, a subgroup analysis was conducted based on the control groups used; the diagnostic accuracy was particularly high in the comparison of HCC vs. healthy controls. In summary, serum/plasma circRNAs are accurate biomarkers suitable for clinical use for detecting HCC, and the combination of circRNAs and AFP improved the diagnostic accuracy.

Download Full-text

Use of the A2DS2 scale to predict morbidity in stroke-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Neurology ◽

10.1186/s12883-021-02060-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Jie Huang ◽

Ming Liu ◽

Weiliang He ◽

Feifei Liu ◽

Jinming Cheng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Random Effect Model ◽

Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽

Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Clinical Applicability ◽

Test Probability

Abstract Background This review aims to evaluate the performance and clinical applicability of the A2DS2 scale via systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods The Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2). Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to evaluate publication bias. The bivariate random-effect model was used for calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve (AUC). A Fagan nomogram was applied to evaluate the clinical applicability of the A2DS2 scale. Results A total of 29 full-text articles met the inclusion criteria, including 19,056 patients. Bivariate mixed-effects regression models yielded a mean sensitivity of 0.78 (95 % CI: 0.73–0.83), a specificity of 0.79 (95 % CI: 0.73–0.84), a positive likelihood ratio of 3.7 (95 % CI: 2.9–4.6), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.27 (95 % CI: 0.23–0.33). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (95 % CI: 0.82–0.88). If given a pre-test probability of 50 %, the Fagan nomogram showed that when A2DS2 was positive, the post-test probability improved to 79 %. In contrast, when A2DS2 was negative, it decreased to 22 %. The results of the subgroup analysis showed no effect on the diagnostic accuracy of the A2DS2 scale in predicting stroke-associated pneumonia, except for the optimal cut-off value. Conclusions The A2DS2 scale demonstrates high clinical applicability and could be a valid scale for the early prediction of stroke-associated pneumonia in stroke patients.

Download Full-text

The Potential Diagnostic Accuracy of Let-7 Family for Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment ◽

10.1177/15330338211033061 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 20 ◽

pp. 153303382110330

Author(s):

Wen-Ting Zhang ◽

Guo-Xun Zhang ◽

Shuai-Shuai Gao

Keyword(s):

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Publication Bias ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Cancer Diagnosis ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽

Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽

Public Health Problem ◽

Cochrane Library

Background: Cancer is a global public health problem affecting human health. Early stage of cancer diagnosis, when it is not too large and has not spread is important for successful treatment. Many researchers have proposed that the let-7 microRNA family can be used as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate whether let-7 family can be used as a diagnostic tool for cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang database, updated to October 23, 2020. A random effects model was used to pool the sensitivity and specificity. Besides, we measured the diagnostic value using positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) were pooled. In addition, meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to explore the possible sources of heterogeneity, and Deeks’ funnel chart was used to assess whether there was publication bias. Results: 31 studies from 15 articles were included in the current meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74-0.86), 4.2 (95% CI: 2.9-5.9), 0.24 (95% CI: 0.19-0.32), 17 (95% CI: 10-29) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90), respectively. Subgroup analysis shows that the let-7 family cluster of serum type showed a better diagnostic accuracy of cancer, especially the breast cancer. Although there is no publication bias, it still has some limitations. Conclusions: let-7 family can be considered as a promising non-invasive diagnostic biomarker for cancer.

Download Full-text

The Potential Diagnostic Accuracy of Circulating MicroRNAs for Leukemia: A Meta-Analysis

Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment ◽

10.1177/15330338211011958 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 20 ◽

pp. 153303382110119

Author(s):

Wen-Ting Zhang ◽

Guo-Xun Zhang ◽

Shuai-Shuai Gao

Keyword(s):

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Area Under The Curve ◽

Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽

Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽

Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽

Circulating Micrornas ◽

Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Leukemia is a common malignant disease in the human blood system. Many researchers have proposed circulating microRNAs as biomarkers for the diagnosis of leukemia. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of circulating miRNAs in the diagnosis of leukemia. Methods: A comprehensive literature search (updated to October 13, 2020) in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was performed to identify eligible studies. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) for diagnosing leukemia were pooled for both overall and subgroup analysis. The meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to explore heterogeneity and Deeks’ funnel plot was used to assess publication bias. Results: 49 studies from 22 publications with a total of 3,489 leukemia patients and 2,756 healthy controls were included in this meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and area under the curve were 0.83, 0.92, 10.8, 0.18, 59 and 0.94, respectively. Subgroup analysis shows that the microRNA clusters of plasma type could carry out a better diagnostic accuracy of leukemia patients. In addition, publication bias was not found. Conclusions: Circulating microRNAs can be used as a promising noninvasive biomarker in the early diagnosis of leukemia.

Download Full-text

The value of glycosylated hemoglobin in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

BMC Endocrine Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12902-021-00737-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Bo Zhang ◽

Bingjie Zhang ◽

Zhulin Zhou ◽

Yutong Guo ◽

Dan Wang

Keyword(s):

Diabetic Retinopathy ◽

Likelihood Ratio ◽

Roc Curve ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Glycosylated Hemoglobin ◽

Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽

Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽

Biomedical Literature ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Clinical Value

AbstractObjectiveGlycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) has obvious clinical value in the diagnosis of diabetes, but the conclusions on the diagnostic value of diabetic retinopathy (DR) are not consistent. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the accuracy of glycosylated hemoglobin in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy through the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.MethodsCochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Wanfang Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) were searched until November, 2020. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), negative likelihood ratio (-LR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated by Stata 15.0 software.ResultsAfter screening, 18 high-quality papers were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that the combined DOR = 18.19 (95% CI: 10.99–30.11), the sensitivity= 0.81 (95% CI): 0.75 ~ 0.87), specificity = 0.81 (95%CI: 0.72 ~ 0.87), +LR = 4.2 (95%CI: 2.95 ~ 6.00), −LR = 0.23 (95%CI: 0.17 ~ 0.31), and the area under the Summary ROC curve was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.85 ~ 0.90).ConclusionThe overall accuracy of HbA1cC forin diagnosing diabetic retinopathy is good. As it is more stable than blood sugar and is not affected by meals, it may be a suitable indicator for diabetic retinopathy.

Download Full-text