scholarly journals Diagnostic Accuracy of the ADNEX Model for Ovarian Cancer at the 15% Cut-Off Value: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaotong Huang ◽  
Ziwei Wang ◽  
Meiqin Zhang ◽  
Hong Luo
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Meta Regression

ObjectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ADNEX model for ovarian cancer at the 15% cut-off value.MethodsStudies on the identified diagnosis of the ADNEX model for ovarian cancer published in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases from January 1st, 2014 to February 20th, 2021 were searched. Two researchers independently screened the retrieved studies and extracted the basic features and parameter data. The quality of the eligible studies was evaluated by Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2, and the result was summarized by Review Manager 5.3. Meta-Disc 1.4 and STATA 16.0 were used in statistical analysis. Heterogeneity of this meta-analysis was calculated. Meta-regression was performed to investigate the potential sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis and Deek’s funnel plot analysis were conducted to evaluate the stability and publication bias, respectively.Results280 studies were initially retrieved through the search strategy, and 10 eligible studies were ultimately included. The random-effects model was selected for data synthesis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89–0.94), 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78–0.86), 5.2 (95% CI: 4.1–6.4), 0.10 (95% CI: 0.07–0.13), 54.0 (95% CI: 37.0–77.0) and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91–0.95). Meta-regression based on study design, country, enrollment and blind method was not statistically significant. This meta-analysis was stable with no obvious publication bias.ConclusionsThe ADNEX model at the 15% cut-off had high diagnostic accuracy in identifying ovarian cancer.

scholarly journals The Potential Diagnostic Accuracy of Let-7 Family for Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110330
Author(s):  
Wen-Ting Zhang ◽  
Guo-Xun Zhang ◽  
Shuai-Shuai Gao
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Public Health Problem ◽  
Cochrane Library

Background: Cancer is a global public health problem affecting human health. Early stage of cancer diagnosis, when it is not too large and has not spread is important for successful treatment. Many researchers have proposed that the let-7 microRNA family can be used as a biomarker for cancer diagnosis. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate whether let-7 family can be used as a diagnostic tool for cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang database, updated to October 23, 2020. A random effects model was used to pool the sensitivity and specificity. Besides, we measured the diagnostic value using positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) were pooled. In addition, meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to explore the possible sources of heterogeneity, and Deeks’ funnel chart was used to assess whether there was publication bias. Results: 31 studies from 15 articles were included in the current meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.85), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74-0.86), 4.2 (95% CI: 2.9-5.9), 0.24 (95% CI: 0.19-0.32), 17 (95% CI: 10-29) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.84-0.90), respectively. Subgroup analysis shows that the let-7 family cluster of serum type showed a better diagnostic accuracy of cancer, especially the breast cancer. Although there is no publication bias, it still has some limitations. Conclusions: let-7 family can be considered as a promising non-invasive diagnostic biomarker for cancer.

scholarly journals The Diagnostic Accuracy of HE4 in Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daye Cheng ◽  
Ying Sun ◽  
Hu He
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Diagnosis Of Lung Cancer

The diagnostic value of serum HE4 in patients with lung cancer remains controversial. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of serum HE4 for lung cancer. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WANFANG databases between Jan. 1966 and Nov. 2014. The diagnostic sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) were pooled by Meta-DiSc 1.4 software. A total of seven articles including 715 cases and 549 controls were included for analysis. The summary estimates for serum HE4 in the diagnosis of lung cancer in these studies were pooled SEN 0.72 (95% CI: 0.68–0.75), SPE 0.85 (95% CI: 0.81–0.88), PLR 4.68 (95% CI: 3.23–6.78), NLR 0.31 (95% CI: 0.24–0.39), and DOR 17.14 (95% CI: 9.72–30.20), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.8557. This meta-analysis indicated that serum HE4 is a potential tool in the diagnosis of lung cancer. In addition, considering the high heterogeneity and potential publication bias, further studies with rigorous design and large sample size are needed in the future.

scholarly journals Blood-Based Circulating MicroRNAs are Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for Leukemia: Result from a Meta-Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 939-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-hua Xu ◽  
Yang Guo ◽  
Xue-Li Zhang ◽  
Jia-jia Chen ◽  
Shao-yan Hu
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Circulating Mirnas ◽  
Diagnostic Biomarkers ◽  
Circulating Micrornas

Aims: Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers for leukemia have been validated by emerging studies. This meta-analysis aims to estimate the overall diagnostic accuracy of blood-based circulating miRNAs for leukemia. Methods: We searched multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wan Fang Data and CQVIP) up to June 18, 2015. Results: 32 studies from 10 publications were included in this meta-analysis. Diagnostic capacity was evaluated by pooled sensitivity, specifIcity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) through random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were sequentially performed to find potential sources of heterogeneity. The quality of included studies was assessed by QUADAS (quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy). Meta-Disc 1.4 and Stata 12.0 software were used to perform the meta-analysis. A high diagnostic accuracy was displayed, with a sensitivity of 0.84, a specificity of 0.88, a PLR of 7.20, a NLR of 0.18, a DOR of 52, and an AUC of 0.94. Subgroup analyses revealed better performance for combined miRNAs, acute myeloid leukemia patients and Asian population than other subgroups. Conclusion: Our analyses suggested that blood-based circulating miRNAs are promising diagnostic biomarkers for leukemia, especially combined miRNAs. Its clinical application awaits further study.

scholarly journals The value of ultrasound in diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in emergent or critical conditions: A meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libing Jiang ◽  
Jing Wu ◽  
Xia Feng
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Critical Conditions ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic

Background: Hollow organs perforation is a life-threatening condition. Early diagnosis and emergent intervention are important. Bedside ultrasound may be an alternative diagnostic tool for this condition. Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic value of ultrasound of pneumoperitoneum in emergent or critical conditions through meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for potential studies. Then, two reviewers performed the processes of study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment independently. Finally, diagnostic indexes were analyzed with STATA 12.0 software (Serial No. 40120519635). Results: A total of five studies with moderate to high quality were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio and their 95% confidence interval were 0.91 (95% confidence interval = 0.86–0.94), 0.96 (95% confidence interval = 0.75–0.99), 22.05 (95% confidence interval = 3.10–156.96), and 0.10 (95% confidence interval = 0.07–0.15), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.92 (95% confidence interval = 0.90–0.94). Conclusion: Abdominal ultrasound is a useful alternative tool in diagnosing of pneumoperitoneum. However, due to limited evidence, it is not yet indicated for routine clinical use.

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Circular RNAs in Digestive System Malignancy

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 962-972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiqiang Chen ◽  
Long Zhang ◽  
Guoyong Han ◽  
Xueliang Zuo ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Digestive System ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Circular Rnas ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Discriminative Ability

Background/Aims: Circular RNAs (circRNAs), a novel class of noncoding RNAs, have been found to be dysregulated in various cancers. However, the clinical application value of these circRNAs in digestive system cancers remains to be clarified. We aimed to comprehensively explore the potential role of circRNAs as diagnostic indicators in digestive system malignancies. Methods: Relevant studies were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The data that were required to complete 2 × 2 contingency tables were obtained from the included studies. Stratified analyses by cancer type, sample size and publication year were performed. Results: Thirteen studies with 2,276 individuals were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of circRNAs in the diagnosis of digestive system malignancy were 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65-0.77] and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.81), respectively. The overall positive likelihood ratio was 3.09 (95% CI: 2.64-3.62), and the overall negative likelihood ratio was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.31-0.44). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 8.38 (95% CI: 6.86-10.25), and the overall area under the curve was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.77-0.84), indicating good discriminative ability of circRNAs as biomarkers for digestive system malignancy. Conclusion: circRNAs distinguish patients with digestive system cancer from controls with relatively high diagnostic accuracy. circRNAs may be used as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of digestive system malignancy.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengyi Wang ◽  
Jiaqi Zhang ◽  
Jiadan Yu ◽  
Shaxin Liu ◽  
Rengang Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Qualitative Synthesis

Objective. To systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods. We searched EMBASE (OvidSP), MEDLINE (OvidSP), the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify diagnostic accuracy trials of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. We used a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model to conduct the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Results. A total of 19 comparative trials met the inclusion criteria and were part of the qualitative synthesis. Eight trials using nerve conduction studies as the reference standard were selected for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy were 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.74) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.94), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 4.56 (95% CI 2.93 to 7.10) and 0.53 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.81), respectively. Conclusions. Our review indicated that monofilament tests had limited sensitivity for screening diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The clinical use of the monofilament test in the evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy cannot be encouraged based on currently available evidence.

scholarly journals Potential Diagnostic Value of Circulating miRNA for Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Ting Zhang ◽  
Shuai-Shuai Gao ◽  
Yan-Jun Wang ◽  
Guo-Xun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Circulating Mirna

Abstract Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second incurable hematological malignancy. In recent years, due to the rise of microRNA (miRNA), many scholars have participated in the study of its value in the diagnosis of MM, and have obtained good but inconsistent results. Therefore, in order to determine the role of miRNA in the early diagnosis of MM, we searched for related studies including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Database as of July 20, 2020 to conduct this meta-analysis. To improve the accuracy, the quality assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study 2 (QUADAS-2) was used. We also applied random effects models to summarize sensitivity and specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and area under the curve (AUC) to measure diagnostic values, and subgroup analysis used to discover potential sources of heterogeneity. Finally, we collected 32 studies from 15 articles that included a total of 2053 MM patients and 1118 healthy controls. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR and AUC were 0.81, 0.85, 5.5, 0.22, 25 and 0.90, respectively. Subgroup analysis shows that the down-regulation of microRNA clusters with larger samples size of plasma type could carry out a better diagnostic accuracy of MM patients. In addition, publication bias was not found. In conclusion, circulating miRNA could be a potential non-invasive biomarker for early diagnosis of MM. However, multi-center, more rigorous, and larger-scale studies are needed to verify our conclusions.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Accuracy of Procalcitonin for Bacterial Infection in Liver Failure: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Xinchun He ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
Haiou Chen ◽  
Yuqing Feng ◽  
Baining Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Liver Failure ◽  
Bacterial Infection ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Threshold Effect

The purpose of our studies was to systematically assess the accuracy and clinical value of plasma calcitonin in patients with liver failure complicated with bacterial infection. In this study, we included prospective observational studies or randomized controlled trials on PCT. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Heterogeneity, pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, pooled positive likelihood ratio, pooled negative likelihood ratio, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC), and metaregression analysis were performed using Stata16.0 software. Consequently, the studies revealed substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 96, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 94–99). The results of meta-analysis using random effect models suggested that the combined DOR was 10.67 (95% CI = 3.73–30.53). In addition, the threshold effect analysis showed that the threshold effect was 0.23 and the correlation coefficient was −0.48, indicating that there was no threshold effect. In the forest map, the DOR of each study and the combined DOR are not distributed along the same line, and Q = 2.2 × 1014, P ≤ 0.001 . Furthermore, the metaregression analysis of PCT study design, bacterial infection site, and mean age displayed that the P values were >0.05. The combined sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI = 0.54–0.90), the combined specificity was 0.76 (95% CI = 0.70–0.82), the combined positive likelihood ratio was 3.25 (95% CI = 2.33–4.52), the combined negative likelihood ratio was 0.30 (95% CI = 0.14–0.67), and the combined AUC was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.76–0.83). In conclusion, PCT has moderate diagnostic value for adult liver failure complicated with bacterial infection, and it is a better auxiliary diagnostic index for liver failure with bacterial infection. However, the results of procalcitonin must be carefully interpreted combined with medical history, physical examination, and microbiological assessment.

scholarly journals The Role of circRNAs in the Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ru-Dong Li ◽  
Min Guan ◽  
Zhe Zhou ◽  
Shu-Xiao Dong ◽  
Qian Liu
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Diagnostic Biomarker ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: A novel category of non-coding circular RNAs (circRNAs) has been found to be dysregulated in colorectal cancer (CRC) and significantly contribute to its progression. However, the feasibility of using circRNA as a diagnostic biomarker for CRC remains to be elucidated. Herein, we aimed to comprehensively collect and analyze evidence regarding the potential application of circRNAs as diagnostic indicators for CRC.Methods: A comprehensive retrieval of relevant studies dating from January, 2015 to December 2020, was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Data regarding the diagnostic accuracy of circRNA for CRC, including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC), were obtained from the included studies. Quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the methodological quality of each study. Statistical analysis was performed using STAT and RevMan software.Results: Eighteen studies, involving a total of 2021 individuals, were included in the present meta-analysis. The specimens examined included tissue, serum, and plasma. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, NLR, and AUC, with a 95% confidence interval (CI), of circRNAs in the diagnosis of CRC were 0.78 (0.71–0.83), 0.73 (0.68–0.78), 9.68 (6.76–13.85), 2.92 (2.45–3.50), 0.30 (0.23–0.39), and 0.81 (0.78–0.85), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that the upregulated circRNAs in the tissue or plasma possessed relatively higher diagnostic values for CRC than the downregulated circRNAs. There was no significant difference between the tissue-derived and non-tissue-derived circRNA subgroups.Conclusion: circRNA may be used as a diagnostic biomarker for CRC because of its relatively high diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing CRC patients from normal controls. Further prospective studies are needed to identify more representative circRNAs as diagnostic markers for CRC.

scholarly journals miRNA-21 may serve as a promising noninvasive marker of glioma with a high diagnostic performance: a pooled analysis of 997 patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175883592098765
Author(s):  
Xinli Zhao ◽  
Zhihong Xiao ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Hongwei Li ◽  
Bo Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Meta Regression

Background: Although various serum and tissue biomarkers have been investigated for glioma diagnosis, no gold standard has been identified. miRNA-21 was demonstrated to be a promising biomarker for the diagnosis of various brain tumors, whereas there remains uncertainty concerning whether miRNA-21 could be used as a good clinical diagnostic biomarker for glioma. The current meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of miRNA-21 as a potent biomarker in adults with suspected glioma. Methods: The Pubmed and Embase databases were searched systematically from inception to January 2020 to identify relevant research reports. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted to determine the source of heterogeneity and test the robustness of the results. Results: From 5394 citations with 997 subjects that met the inclusion criteria, 11 studies were selected. Summary estimates of the diagnostic performance of miRNA-21 were as follows: sensitivity, 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73–0.89]; specificity, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85–0.96); PLR, 10.20 (95% CI: 5.10–20.30); NLR, 0.19 (95% CI: 0.12–0.31); and DOR, 54 (95% CI: 19–155). The area under the SROC curve was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.92–0.96). Deeks’s funnel plot revealed no evidence of publication bias ( p = 0.59). Meta-regression analysis suggested that study publication year could attribute to the heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis found miRNA-21 had a constant high diagnostic accuracy across different ethnicity, glioma grade, sample source, and study region. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that miRNA-21 has high diagnostic performance and could serve as a promising noninvasive diagnostic marker for glioma. Further large prospective studies are needed to validate its diagnostic value and its prognostic significance and therapeutic effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document