scholarly journals Modafinil Induced Psychosis in a Patient with Bipolar 1 Depression

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander A. DiSciullo ◽  
Clayton D. English ◽  
William T. Horn
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients ◽  
Bipolar Patients

Modafinil has been used as an adjunctive medication in the treatment of bipolar 1 depression with reported success. Case reports have been published demonstrating modafinil induced mania in bipolar patients and modafinil induced psychosis in schizophrenic patients. To our knowledge, we report the only case of modafinil induced psychosis in a patient with bipolar depression treated with both mood stabilizers and antipsychotics. In addition, it is the quickest onset to psychosis (2 days) at the lowest dosage of modafinil (100 mg/day) reported in the literature. Although favorable outcomes using modafinil for treatment of bipolar depression have been reported in literature, clinicians should remain cautious of the potential to rapidly induce psychosis with modafinil at low dosages in patients with bipolar depression despite being treated with mood stabilizers and antipsychotics.

Antidepressant Effect of Mood Stabilizers

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (S12) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Claudia F. Baldassano
Keyword(s):  
American Psychiatric Association ◽  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Mood Stabilizer ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Study Endpoint ◽  
Antidepressant Effect ◽  
Medication Treatment ◽  
Antidepressant Effects ◽  
Bipolar Patients

Bipolar depression certainly poses the greatest challenge to clinicians treating bipolar patients. Having a widespread disability associated with it, bipolar depression is often chronic, is less responsive to medication treatment, and has a particularly high rate of suicide. There are currently no drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of bipolar depression, although full trials have been conducted with lithium, the antipsychotic olan-zapine, and the antiepileptic (AED) lamotrigine. Data for the other AEDs are quite limited and not controlled. The American Psychiatric Association guidelines recommends maximizing the dose in patients who are already on a mood stabilizer and initiating lithium or lamotrigine in patients who are not on a mood stabilizer.Zornberg and Pope reviewed nine studies comparing lithium to placebo in bipolar depression. Among the 145 patients in these studies, there was detectable response in 79% and an unequivocal response in 36%. Although the studies varied in their methodological design and rigor, they argue quite strongly that lithium is an effective anti-depressant. In addition, six of the seven pre1990 studies evaluating lithium for bipolar depression indicated that the drug had significant antidepressant effects.The most recent study of lithium for bipolar depression randomly assigned 117 outpatients with acute bipolar depression to treatment with either placebo, Imipramine, or paroxetine. At the 10-week study endpoint, lithium monotherapy was as effective as the addition of an antidepressant, suggesting lithium's antidepressant properties.

Prevalence of Bipolar Depression

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (S12) ◽  
pp. 2-3
Author(s):  
Robert M. Post
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Unipolar Depression ◽  
The United States ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Positive Screen ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Academic Settings ◽  
Mood Disorder Questionnaire ◽  
Bipolar Patients

Recent data indicate that bipolar illness is underdiagnosed and therefore undertreated in the community (Slide 1). A recent survey of >85,000 households in the United States found a 3.7% positive screen for prominent bipolar symptomatology. Using the Mood Disorder Questionnaire, which has good specificity and sensitivity in outpatient clinics, the study also found that the prevalence was higher, 9.3%, among patients 18–24 years of age. However, most disappointing was that only 20% of the positive screens were diagnosed as bipolar, and among those, most were not treated with mood stabilizers. In addition, 31% of patients had been diagnosed with unipolar depression. Several studies have shown that approximately 20% to 40% of presumptively unipolar patients actually have bipolar II or bipolar disorder not otherwise specified. Combined, the data show that bipolar disorder, bipolar depression in particular, is highly prevalent and often misdiagnosed or unrecognized.Two recent studies found virtually the same data showing that depression is the predominant problem in naturalistically treated bipolar outpatients. Judd and colleagues found that depression was three times more prevalent than mania in bipolar patients. This is exactly what was found in the Stanley Foundation bipolar outpatient follow-up study, which rated the study's first 258 patients every day for 1 year (Slide 2). The study found that patients were ill almost 50% of the time; they were depressed 33% of the days in the year, and hypomanic or manic 10.8% of the days. This occurred despite aggressive treatment with a variety of agents, such as mood stabilizers, antidepressants, and benzodiazepines in 50% of the patients, and typical or atypical neuroleptics in almost 50% of the patients. Thus, even bipolar patients who are intensively treated in academic settings have a very substantial degree of morbidity, particularly depression.

scholarly journals Breathing-focused Yoga as Augmentation for Unipolar and Bipolar Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial: Le yoga axé sur la respiration comme traitement d’appoint pour la dépression unipolaire et bipolaire: Un essai randomisé contrôlé

2020 ◽  
pp. 070674372094053
Author(s):  
Arun V. Ravindran ◽  
Martha S. McKay ◽  
Tricia da Silva ◽  
Claudia Tindall ◽  
Tiffany Garfinkel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Residual Symptoms ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bipolar Patients

Objective: Patients with depression frequently experience persistent residual symptoms even with optimal interventions. These patients often use complementary treatments, including yoga, as a preferred alternative or adjunctive treatment. There is evidence for the benefit of yoga for depression, but this has not been rigorously evaluated, particularly in bipolar depression. We aimed to determine the feasibility and benefit of manualized breathing-focused yoga in comparison to psychoeducation as augmentation to pharmacotherapy for improving residual symptoms of depression in unipolar and bipolar patients. Methods: Using a randomized single-blind crossover design, 72 outpatients with unipolar or bipolar depression were augmented with the two 8-week interventions at separate times, as add-ons to current first-line antidepressants and mood stabilizers. The primary outcome measure was the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Due to the high dropout of participants after crossover at Week 8, analysis focused on between-group comparisons of yoga and psychoeducation during the initial 8 weeks of the study. Results: There was a significant decline in depressive symptoms, as measured by the MADRS, following 8 weeks of yoga. However, there was no significant difference in MADRS ratings between intervention groups. Similar improvements in self-rated depressive symptoms and well-being were also observed across time. Conclusions: Both yoga and psychoeducation may improve residual symptoms of unipolar and bipolar depression as add-on to medications. In-class group sessions and long study durations may reduce feasibility for this population. Larger trials with parallel group design and shorter duration may be more feasible.

Lamotrigine compared to placebo and other agents with antidepressant activity in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes in short-term trials

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Solmi ◽  
Nicola Veronese ◽  
Leonardo Zaninotto ◽  
Marc L. M. van der Loos ◽  
Keming Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Depressive Symptoms ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Antidepressant Activity ◽  
Unipolar Depression ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Bipolar Patients ◽  
Extreme Outlier

ObjectivesTo meta-analytically summarize lamotrigine’s effectiveness and safety in unipolar and bipolar depression.MethodsWe conducted systematic PubMed and SCOPUS reviews (last search =10/01/2015) of randomized controlled trials comparing lamotrigine to placebo or other agents with antidepressant activity in unipolar or bipolar depression. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis of depression ratings, response, remission, and adverse effects calculating standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) ±95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsEighteen studies (n=2152, duration=9.83 weeks) in patients with unipolar depression (studies=4, n=187; monotherapy vs lithium=1, augmentation of antidepressants vs placebo=3) or bipolar depression (studies=14, n=1965; monotherapy vs placebo=5, monotherapy vs lithium or olanzapine+fluoxetine=2, augmentation of antidepressants vs placebo=1, augmentation of mood stabilizers vs placebo=3, augmentation of mood stabilizers vs trancylpromine, citalopram, or inositol=3) were meta-analyzed. Lamotrigine’s efficacy for depressive symptoms did not differ significantly in monotherapy vs augmentation studies (vs. placebo: p=0.98, I2=0%; vs active agents: p=0.48, I2=0%) or in unipolar vs bipolar patients (vs placebo: p=0.60, I2=0%), allowing pooling of each placebo-controlled and active-controlled trials. Lamotrigine outperformed placebo regarding depressive symptoms (studies=11, n=713 vs n=696; SMD=–0.15, 95% CI=–0.27, –0.02, p=0.02, heterogeneity: p=0.24) and response (after removing one extreme outlier; RR=1.42, 95% CI=1.13–1.78; p=0.003, heterogeneity: p=0.08). Conversely, lamotrigine did not differ regarding efficacy on depressive symptoms, response, or remission from lithium, olanzapine+fluoxetine, citalopram, or inositol (studies=6, n=306 vs n=318, p-values=0.85–0.92). Adverse effects and all-cause/specific-cause discontinuation were similar across all comparisons.ConclusionsLamotrigine was superior to placebo in improving unipolar and bipolar depressive symptoms, without causing more frequent adverse effects/discontinuations. Lamotrigine did not differ from lithium, olanzapine+fluoxetine, citalopram, or inositol.

scholarly journals Antidepressant Treatment for Acute Bipolar Depression: An Update

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben H. Amit ◽  
Abraham Weizman
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Antidepressant Treatment ◽  
Cochrane Collaboration ◽  
Unipolar Depression ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
The Past ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Concurrent Use ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Bipolar Patients

While studies in the past have focused more on treatment of the manic phase of bipolar disorder (BD), recent findings demonstrate the depressive phase to be at least as debilitating. However, in contrast to unipolar depression, depression in bipolar patients exhibits a varying response to antidepressants, raising questions regarding their efficacy and tolerability.Methods. We conducted a MEDLINE and Cochrane Collaboration Library search for papers published between 2005 and 2011 on the subject of antidepressant treatment of bipolar depression. Sixty-eight articles were included in the present review.Results. While a few studies did advocate the use of antidepressants, most well-controlled studies failed to show a robust effect of antidepressants in bipolar depression, regardless of antidepressant class or bipolar subtype. There was no significant increase in the rate of manic/hypomanic switch, especially with concurrent use of mood stabilizers. Prescribing guidelines published in recent years rely more on atypical antipsychotics, especially quetiapine, as a first-line therapy.Conclusions. Antidepressants probably have no substantial role in acute bipolar depression. However, in light of conflicting results between studies, more well-designed trials are warranted.

Pharmacologic Treatment of Bipolar Disorder

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (S3) ◽  
pp. 10-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Baldassano
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
United States Food ◽  
Mortality Ratio ◽  
States Food ◽  
Disorder Treatment ◽  
Standardized Mortality Ratios ◽  
Bipolar Patients

Regarding the treatment of patients with bipolar disorder, positive findings have shown that patients engaged in treatment may live longer. Angst and Sellaro studied standardized mortality ratios for patients with bipolar disorder and found a significant reduction in mortality ratio in our bipolar patients who were actively in treatment (Slide 1). Data from the Collaborative Depression Study by Judd and colleagues showed that bipolar patients are quite symptomatic. Judd and colleagues followed bipolar patients over a 13-year period and found that these patients were symptomatic ~50% of the study period. What were these patients most likely to be symptomatic with: bipolar depression (Slide 2). Thus, it is important to focus on bipolar depression and examine placebo-controlled trials that were adequately powered in its treatment.Over the last decade, there have been positive trials studying lamotrigine, quetiapine, olanzapine, and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination. Two of these medications are United States Food and Drug Administration—approved in bipolar disorder treatment: quetiapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine. There are a number of negative trials in bipolar depression, including a number of antidepressant monotherapy trials and antidepressants in combination with mood stabilizers (Slide 3). However, what is the most frequent pharmacotherapy treatment used for bipolar depression? It is the use of antidepressants alone; antidepressant monotherapy is twice as commonly prescribed as mood stabilizers (Slide 4). Thus, it is necessary for clinicians to possess knowledge of the evidence and results from both positive and negative antidepressant trials for bipolar disorder.

Prescribing practices of Indian psychiatrists in the treatment of bipolar disorder

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 458-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
YC Janardhan Reddy ◽  
Venugopal Jhanwar ◽  
Rajesh Nagpal ◽  
MS Reddy ◽  
Nilesh Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Maintenance Treatment ◽  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Mood Stabilizer ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Objective: The treatment of bipolar disorder is challenging because of its clinical complexity and availability of multiple treatment options, none of which are ideal mood stabilizers. This survey studies prescription practices of psychiatrists in India and their adherence to guidelines. Method: In total, 500 psychiatrists randomly selected from the Indian Psychiatric Society membership directory were administered a face-to-face 22-item questionnaire pertaining to the management of bipolar disorder. Results: For acute mania, most practitioners preferred a combination of a mood stabilizer and an atypical antipsychotic to monotherapy. For acute depression, there was a preference for a combination of an antidepressant and a mood stabilizer over other alternatives. Electroconvulsive therapy was preferred in the treatment of severe episodes and to hasten the process of recovery. Approximately, 50% of psychiatrists prescribe maintenance treatment after the first bipolar episode, but maintenance therapy was rarely offered lifelong. While the majority (85%) of psychiatrists acknowledged referring to various clinical guidelines, their ultimate choice of treatment was also significantly determined by personal experience and reference to textbooks. Limitations: The study did not study actual prescriptions. Hence, the responses to queries in the survey are indirect measures from which we have tried to understand the actual practices, and of course, these are susceptible to self-report and social-desirability biases. This was a cross-sectional study; therefore, temporal changes in responses could not be considered. Conclusion: Overall, Indian psychiatrists seemed to broadly adhere to recommendations of clinical practice guidelines, but with some notable exceptions. The preference for antidepressants in treating depression is contrary to general restraint recommended by most guidelines. Therefore, the efficacy of antidepressants in treating bipolar depression in the context of Indian psychiatrists’ practice needs to be studied systematically. Not initiating maintenance treatment early in the course of illness may have serious implications on the long-term outcome of bipolar disorder.

Neural network dysfunction in bipolar depression: clues from the efficacy of lamotrigine

2009 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 1080-1084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles H. Large ◽  
Elena Di Daniel ◽  
Xingbao Li ◽  
Mark S. George
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Valproic Acid ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Glycogen Synthase ◽  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Mood Stabilizers ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Facilitatory Effect

One strategy to understand bipolar disorder is to study the mechanism of action of mood-stabilizing drugs, such as valproic acid and lithium. This approach has implicated a number of intracellular signalling elements, such as GSK3β (glycogen synthase kinase 3β), ERK (extracellular-signal-regulated kinase)/MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) or protein kinase C. However, lamotrigine does not seem to modulate any of these targets, which is intriguing given that its profile in the clinic differs from that of valproic acid or lithium, with greater efficacy to prevent episodes of depression than mania. The primary target of lamotrigine is the voltage-gated sodium channel, but it is unclear why inhibition of these channels might confer antidepressant efficacy. In healthy volunteers, we found that lamotrigine had a facilitatory effect on the BOLD (blood-oxygen-level-dependent) response to TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) of the prefrontal cortex. This effect was in contrast with an inhibitory effect of lamotrigine when TMS was applied over the motor cortex. In a follow-up study, a similar prefrontal specific facilitatory effect was observed in a larger cohort of healthy subjects, whereas valproic acid inhibited motor and prefrontal cortical TMS-induced BOLD response. In vitro, we found that lamotrigine (3–10 μM) enhanced the power of gamma frequency network oscillations induced by kainic acid in the rat hippocampus, an effect that was not observed with valproic acid (100 μM). These data suggest that lamotrigine has a positive effect on corticolimbic network function that may differentiate it from other mood stabilizers. The results are also consistent with the notion of corticolimbic network dysfunction in bipolar disorder.

scholarly journals Age at onset, course of illness and response to psychotherapy in bipolar disorder: results from the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD)

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (16) ◽  
pp. 3455-3467 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Peters ◽  
L. G. Sylvia ◽  
P. V. da Silva Magalhães ◽  
D. J. Miklowitz ◽  
E. Frank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Collaborative Care ◽  
Bipolar Depression ◽  
Age At Onset ◽  
Number Needed To Treat ◽  
Systematic Treatment ◽  
Illness Duration ◽  
Bipolar Patients ◽  
Depressive Episodes ◽  
Intensive Psychotherapy

Background.The course of bipolar disorder progressively worsens in some patients. Although responses to pharmacotherapy appear to diminish with greater chronicity, less is known about whether patients' prior courses of illness are related to responses to psychotherapy.Method.Embedded in the Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) was a randomized controlled trial of psychotherapy for bipolar depression comparing the efficacy of intensive psychotherapy with collaborative care (a three-session psycho-educational intervention). We assessed whether the number of previous mood episodes, age of illness onset, and illness duration predicted or moderated the likelihood of recovery and time until recovery from a depressive episode in patients in the two treatments.Results.Independently of treatment condition, participants with one to nine prior depressive episodes were more likely to recover and had faster time to recovery than those with 20 or more prior depressive episodes. Participants with fewer than 20 prior manic episodes had faster time to recovery than those with 20 or more episodes. Longer illness duration predicted a longer time to recovery. Participants were more likely to recover in intensive psychotherapy than collaborative care if they had 10–20 prior episodes of depression [number needed to treat (NNT) = 2.0], but equally likely to respond to psychotherapy and collaborative care if they had one to nine (NNT = 32.0) or >20 (NNT = 9.0) depressive episodes.Conclusions.Number of previous mood episodes and illness duration are associated with the likelihood and speed of recovery among bipolar patients receiving psychosocial treatments for depression.

Quality of life in bipolar disorders compared to schizophrenia

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S2) ◽  
pp. 231-231
Author(s):  
L. Zouari ◽  
I. Abida ◽  
M. Walha ◽  
J. Masmoudi ◽  
J. Ben Thabet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Age At Onset ◽  
Bipolar Disorders ◽  
Subscale Score ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Schizophrenic Patients ◽  
Bipolar Patients

IntroductionThe classic opinion of a favorable prognosis of bipolar disorders, compared to schizophrenia, is refuted by modern conceptions.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the quality of life (QOL) in bipolar patients compared to schizophrenic patients’, and to identify clinical and sociodemographic variables statistically associated to a poor QOL in bipolar disorder patients.MethodsOne hundred and twenty outpatients, 50 with bipolar disorder and 70 with schizophrenia, according to DSM-IV-TR criteria, were included in the study. The QOL has been assessed, in all patients, using the «36 item Short-Form Health Survey» (SF-36).ResultsThirty-six percent of the bipolar patients had a poor QOL, versus 37% among the schizophrenic patients. The bipolar patients had the score of the standardized vitality subscale significantly lower than schizophrenic patients’ (p = 0.036); the latter had the standardized general health subscale score significantly lower (p = 0.03). There were no other statistically significant differences. The multivariate analyses showed three variables significantly correlated to a poor QOL in bipolar patients: age at the time of the study ≥ 40 years (p = 0.01), professional irregularity or inactivity (p = 0.005), age at onset ≥ 25 years (p = 0.004).ConclusionOur survey of the QOL in bipolar patients showed that it did not differ globally from the schizophrenic patients’, with the SF-36 scale. Results reported in the literature are not in agreement. Further longitudinal studies on several months, with other assessments, would permit to verify the validity of our results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document