scholarly journals The Efficacy of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus for Postoperative Analgesia after Open Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized Double-Blinded Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shiho Satomi ◽  
Nami Kakuta ◽  
Chiaki Murakami ◽  
Yoko Sakai ◽  
Katsuya Tanaka ◽  
...  

Background. It is well known that the programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) technique effectively provides epidural anesthesia in labor. This randomized double-blind trial compared the postoperative analgesic efficacy of PIEB with that of continuous epidural infusion (CEI) in patients undergoing gynecological surgery under combined general-epidural anesthesia. Methods. Patients undergoing open gynecological surgery under combined general-epidural anesthesia were randomized at a 1 : 1 ratio to receive PIEB or CEI. In the PIEB group, the pump delivered 4 mL ropivacaine 0.2% plus fentanyl 2 μg/mL every hour. In the CEI group, the pump delivered the same solution at a rate of 4 mL/h. In both groups, additional 4 mL boluses of ropivacaine 0.2% plus fentanyl 2 μg/mL were provided, when necessary, by patient-controlled epidural analgesia after surgery. The primary outcome was the total ropivacaine dose 40 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes were the number of PCEA boluses and postoperative pain (evaluated on an 11-point numerical rating scale) 3, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Results. In total, 57 patients were randomized (n=28 and 29 in the PIEB and CEI groups, resp.). The two groups differ significantly in terms of the total ropivacaine dose 40 hours after surgery (mean (standard deviation): 155.38 (4.55) versus 159.73 (7.87) mL, P=0.016). Compared to the CEI group, the PIEB group had significantly lower numerical rating scale scores 3 hours (median [lower–upper quartiles]: 0 [0–0.5] versus 3 [0–5.5], P=0.002), 24 hours (1 [0–2] versus 3 [1–4], P=0.003), and 48 hours (1 [0–2] versus 2 [2–3.5], P=0.002) after surgery. Conclusion. PIEB was better than CEI in terms of providing postoperative analgesia after open gynecological surgery under combined general-epidural anesthesia.

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helena Marzo-Ortega ◽  
Chiara Perella ◽  
Denis Poddubnyy ◽  
Effie Pournara ◽  
Agnieszka Zielińska ◽  
...  

Abstract Background/Aims  SKIPPAIN (NCT03136861) is the first randomised controlled study involving a biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, with a primary endpoint of spinal pain at Week 8 in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA; ankylosing spondylitis [AS] and non-radiographic [nr]-axSpA). We present the 24-week results of secukinumab in reducing spinal pain and disease activity following step-up dosing. Methods  This double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3b study enrolled patients (aged ≥18 years) with active disease (BASDAI ≥4; average spinal pain numerical rating scale [NRS] score >4 at baseline; inadequate response to ≥ 2 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ≥4 weeks). Patients were randomised (3:1) to subcutaneous secukinumab 150 mg or placebo weekly followed by every 4 weeks (Q4W) from Week 4. At Week 8, placebo patients were re-randomised to secukinumab 150 or 300 mg Q4W. Patients originally randomised to secukinumab 150 mg were classified as responders or non-responders (spinal pain NRS score <4 or ≥ 4, respectively) at Week 8. Responders were re-assigned to continue doubleblind secukinumab 150 mg Q4W (Arm A1). Non-responders were re-randomised to double-blind secukinumab 150 mg (Arm A2) or a step-up dose of 300 mg (Arm A3) Q4W. Treatment was up to Week 24. Primary endpoint: proportion of patients achieving an average spinal pain score <4 on a 0-10 NRS with secukinumab vs placebo at Week 8. Results  380 axSpA patients (269/380 [70.8%] AS; 111/380 [29.2%] nr-axSpA) were randomised to secukinumab 150 mg (N = 285) or placebo (N = 95). The primary endpoint was met (proportion of spinal pain NRS [average] score responders: 32% vs 20%; odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.9 [1.1-3.3] favouring secukinumab vs placebo; P < 0.05). Further reductions in spinal pain occurred at Week 24, especially in those initially randomised to placebo and switched to active drug. Pronounced improvements were observed in other disease activity measurements (Table 1). Numerically, more patients achieved ASDAS low disease activity at Week 24 post-secukinumab dose escalation (Arm A3) vs those remaining on the same dose (Arm A2). Conclusion  Secukinumab provided rapid, significant improvement in spinal pain and led to low disease activity in axSpA patients. Secukinumab dose escalation might be beneficial for patients not responding fully to the starting dose. P188 Table 1:Spinal pain and ASDAS-CRP scores at Weeks 8 and 24Week 8SEC 150 mg (N = 285)PBO (N = 95)Change from baseline in spinal pain NRS score (total), mean (SD) [n]-2.6 (2.5) [279]-1.5 (2.2) [92]Change from baseline in ASDAS-CRP score, mean (SD) [n]-1.2 (1.0) [271]-0.5 (0.8) [89]Week 24Active treatment group (SEC treatment starting at baseline)PBO switchers group (SEC treatment starting at Week 8)Arm A1 (SEC 150 R-150) N = 90Arm A2 (SEC 150 NR-150) N = 94Arm A3 (SEC 150 NR-300) N = 94Arm B1 (PBO-SEC 150) N = 45Arm B2 (PBO-SEC 300) N = 44Change from Week 8 in spinal pain NRS score (total), mean (SD) [n]-0.4 (1.5) [88]-2.1 (2.2) [93]-1.9 (2.2) [91]-2.5 (2.6) [45]-2.9 (2.6) [43]Change from baseline in ASDAS-CRP score, mean (SD) [n]-2.2 (1.0) [86]-1.2 (1.0) [93]-1.5 (1.0) [92]-1.5 (1.1) [44]-1.8 (0.9) [43]Arm A1=SEC responder to SEC 150 mg at Week 8 (SEC 150 R-150); Arm A2=SEC non-responder to SEC 150 mg at Week 8 (SEC 150 NR-150); Arm A3=SEC non-responder to SEC 300 mg at Week 8 (SEC 150 NR-300); Arm B1=Placebo patients to SEC 150 mg (PBO-SEC 150); Arm B2=Placebo patients to SEC 300 mg (PBO-SEC 300). ASDAS-CRP, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score using C-reactive protein; N, total number of patients randomised; n, number of evaluable patients; NR, non-responders; NRS, numerical rating scale; PBO, placebo; R, responders; SD, standard deviation; SEC, secukinumab. Disclosure  H. Marzo-Ortega: Consultancies; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB. Member of speakers’ bureau; AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB. Grants/research support; Janssen, Novartis. C. Perella: Corporate appointments; Employee of Novartis. Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis Stock. D. Poddubnyy: Consultancies; Consultant/speaker for: AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB. Grants/research support; AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer. E. Pournara: Corporate appointments; Employee of Novartis. Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis Stock. A. Zielińska: Consultancies; Novartis, Pfizer. A. Baranauskaite: Consultancies; AbbVie. Member of speakers’ bureau; Novartis, AbbVie, Amgen, Roche, KRKA. S. Sadhu: Corporate appointments; Employee of Novartis. B. Schulz: Corporate appointments; Employee of Novartis. M. Rissler: Corporate appointments; Employee of Novartis. Shareholder/stock ownership; Novartis Stock.


2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Despoina Kakagia ◽  
Theodosia Vogiatzaki ◽  
Savvas Eleftheriadis ◽  
Gregory Trypsiannis ◽  
Christos Iatrou

Background: In this double-blind, randomized study, the efficacy of tramadol, an atypical opioid, was tested versus lidocaine in excision of cutaneous lesions of the face. Methods: Eighty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 mg/kg tramadol 2% plus adrenaline 1:200,000 (group T, n = 46) or 3 mg/kg lidocaine 2% plus adrenaline 1:200,000 (group L, n = 42) for excision of cutaneous lesions. Pain at the injection site, 2 and 20 minutes postinjection and 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively, was monitored on a 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS). Irritation at the injection point and the duration of postoperative analgesia were also recorded. Results: There were no significant differences in demographic data, topography, size of the lesions removed, and operative time between the two groups. A tendency toward lower injection NRS pain scores was observed in group L compared to group T (p = .064). No statistically significant differences between the two groups were found at 2 and 20 minutes postinjection (p = .741 and p = .142, respectively); however, pain scores were significantly higher in group L at 3, 6, and 12 hours postoperatively (all p < .001). Erythema at the injection site was observed in nine group T and two group L patients (p = .076). No postoperative analgesics were required in the tramadol group of patients, whereas acetaminophen with or without codeine was administered in all but five lidocaine group patients during the first 12 hours. Conclusion: Tramadol may be used as a reliable local anesthetic agent, providing longer postoperative analgesia compared to lidocaine; however, it bears a higher incidence of irritation at the injection site.


2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 707-714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derick T Wade ◽  
Christine Collin ◽  
Colin Stott ◽  
Paul Duncombe

Objective: To determine the efficacy of Sativex (USAN: nabiximols) in the alleviation of spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis. Methods: The results from three randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind parallel group studies were combined for analysis. Patients: 666 patients with multiple sclerosis and spasticity. Measures: A 0—100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, transformed to a 0—10 scale) or a 0—10 Numerical Rating Scale (0—10 NRS) was used to measure spasticity. Patients achieving a ≥30% improvement from baseline in their spasticity score were defined as ‘responders’. Global impression of change (GIC) at the end of treatment was also recorded. Results: The patient populations were similar. The adjusted mean change of the numerical rating scale from baseline in the treated group was —1.30 compared with —0.97 for placebo. Using a linear model, the treatment difference was —0.32 (95% CI —0.61, —0.04, p = 0.026). A statistically significant greater proportion of treated patients were responders (odds ratio (OR) = 1.62, 95% CI 1.15, 2.28; p = 0.0073) and treated patients also reported greater improvement: odds ratio 1.67 (95% CI 1.05, 2.65; p = 0.030). High numbers of subjects experienced at least one adverse event, but most were mild to moderate in severity and all drug-related serious adverse events resolved. Conclusion: The meta-analysis demonstrates that nabiximols is well tolerated and reduces spasticity.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10089-10089
Author(s):  
Oscar Corli ◽  
Lorenzo Legramandi ◽  
Mirko Marabese ◽  
Anna Roberto

10089 Background: The prolonged use of opioids is usually associated with the appearance of adverse events as drowsiness, constipation, nausea/vomiting, and dizziness. Some effects are self-limiting over time for the onset of tolerance while others, as constipation, persist. Clinical studies demonstrated that the association oxycodone-naloxone (OXN), reduced the constipation in the presence of unchanged analgesic efficacy. Though, the variability of the analgesic response to OXN is not explained yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between the clinical and genetics factors and analgesics response at OXN. Methods: In this study the cancer patients with moderate to severe pain received OXN and followed for 28 days. At each visit pain intensity modifications of therapy and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of responders, defined as patients with a decrease of the average pain intensity from baseline to last visit ≥30% and a final average pain score≤4, measured on 0-10 numerical rating scale. Genetic tests to identify SNPs related to opioid response were performed in each patient. Results: 14 centers participated in the study and recruited 206 patients. Among 176 patients analyzed for a primary endpoint the mean age was 68 (SD 10); 56% were male. Average and worst pain intensity decreased from baseline to last visit from 6.2 to 2.9 and from 8.3 to 4.6 respectively. 81% of patients were responders. Digestive system tumors (p = 0.05), concomitant thyroid endocrinopathy (p = 0.023), psychological irritability (p = 0.0029) and breakthrough pain at baseline were found to decrease the risk of positive response. None of the investigated polymorphisms influenced the analgesic response. Moderate to severe intensity ADRs were mainly constipation (26%), drowsiness (19%) and dry mouth (12%). Conclusions: In patients with moderate to severe cancer pain, OXN showed a strong analgesic effect (about 50% pain reduction). In comparison with other studies the induced constipation appears substantially lower. Some clinical factors influence the analgesic response while none genetic polymorphisms modulate the response. Clinical trial information: NCT02293785.


2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Haye ◽  
L K Døsen ◽  
M Tarangen ◽  
O Shiryaeva

AbstractObjective:Results from telephone interviews may be needed to supplement those from mailed questionnaires when response rates are inadequate. This study assessed the correlation between visual analogue scale ratings used in mailed questionnaires and numerical rating scale scores used in telephone interviews.Methods:Patients scheduled for nasal septal surgery routinely respond to a visual analogue scale of obstruction during the day and at night. In this study, they were also asked to verbally rate their sense of obstruction using whole numbers.Results:There was no significant difference between visual analogue scale and numerical rating scale obstruction scores.Conclusion:Ratings of nasal obstruction obtained with a numerical rating scale in telephone interviews are comparable to visual analogue scale scores in mailed questionnaires.


2006 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manzo Suzuki ◽  
Syuji Haraguti ◽  
Kikuzo Sugimoto ◽  
Takehiko Kikutani ◽  
Yoichi Shimada ◽  
...  

Background Ketamine potentiates intravenous or epidural morphine analgesia. The authors hypothesized that very-low-dose ketamine infusion reduces acute and long-term postthoracotomy pain. Methods Forty-nine patients scheduled to undergo open thoracotomy were randomly assigned to receive one of two anesthesia regimens: continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine and morphine, along with intravenous infusion of ketamine (0.05 mg . kg(-1) . h(-1) [approximately 3 mg/h], ketamine group, n = 24) or placebo (saline, control group, n = 25). Epidural analgesia was continued for 2 days after surgery, and infusion of ketamine or placebo was continued for 3 days. Pain was assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery. Patients were asked about their pain, abnormal sensation on the wound, and inconvenience in daily life at 7 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Results The visual analog scale scores for pain at rest and on coughing 24 and 48 h after thoracotomy were lower in the ketamine group than in the control group (pain at rest, 9 +/- 11 vs. 25 +/- 20 and 9 +/- 11 vs. 18 +/- 13; pain on coughing, 26 +/- 16 vs. 50 +/- 17 and 30 +/- 18 vs. 43 +/- 18, mean +/- SD; P = 0.002 and P = 0.01, P &lt; 0.0001 and P = 0.02, respectively). The numerical rating scale scores for baseline pain 1 and 3 months after thoracotomy were significantly lower in the ketamine group (0.5 [0-4] vs. 2 [0-5] and 0 [0-5] vs. 1.5 [0-6], median [range], respectively; P = 0.02). Three months after surgery, a higher number of control patients were taking pain medication (2 vs. 9; P = 0.03). Conclusions Very-low-dose ketamine (0.05 mg . kg(-1) . h(-1)) potentiated morphine-ropivacaine analgesia and reduced postthoracotomy pain.


rThis case focuses on the numerical pain rating scale by asking the question: What degree of change on a 0-to-10 pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS) used for the assessment of chronic pain is associated with clinically important improvement? Patient data were taken from 10 completed studies of pregabalin treatment for chronic pain in diabetic neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, low back pain, fibromyalgia, and osteoarthritis. All 10 of the double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter chronic pain studies used a common study design with identical pain measures. The study findings suggest that a PI-NRS score decrease of 1.74 and a percentage change of 27.9% correlate with a clinically important improvement in pain symptoms.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 1020-1026
Author(s):  
Jin-young Song ◽  
Geon-sik Kong ◽  
So-won Kim ◽  
Jin-hun Park ◽  
Yen-min Wang ◽  
...  

This report describes the efficacy of using Yangshimtang-gamibang for a sleep disorder caused by a traffic accident. We treated a patient with Yangshimtang-gamibang for 12 days for sleep disorder caused by a traffic accident. To evaluate the results, we used the Korean Modified Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (KMLSEQ) to measure sleep disorder. The degree of sleep disorder was also evaluated using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The generic health status was evaluated using the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) scale. Improvements in the NRS and EQ-5D scale scores were observed after the treatments. The change in the KMLSEQ score indicates that the patient's sleep disorder was relieved. The results of this case study suggest that Yangshimtang-gamibang may be an effective treatment for sleep disorders caused by traffic accident.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-86
Author(s):  
Anjali Poudel ◽  
Prashant Kumar Dutta

Background: Modern techniques incorporate regional anesthesia in pain management and it is the best and safest technique. It avoids the side effects that remain with the traditional use of opioids. Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block can provide a satisfactory postoperative analgesia in parturients with pfannenstiel incision thereby reducing postoperative opioid consumption.Objective: To compare opioid consumption and pain relief postoperatively with ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section.Methods: It is a hospital based comparative study done in Nepalgunj Medical College Teaching Hospital, Kohalpur, Banke in a period of one year. Total of sixty patients, thirty in each were randomly allocated into the two groups. Group B received bilateral ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block by landmark technique with 20ml of 0.5% bupivacaine; 10ml in each side. Group NS received ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block with 20ml of 0.9% normal saline. In postoperative period blood pressure, pulse, oxygen saturation, numerical rating scale score at different allocated duration, total dose of tramadol consumption and time to first dose of tramadol were recorded.Results: The total postoperative tramadol consumption in the first 24hr postoperatively was significantly less in group B (125 ± 34.11mg) than in group NS (205 ±37.93mg). The mean effective duration of analgesia measured from the time of onset of spinal blockade to the time of request for tramadol was 264 ±78.27 minutes in group B and 178.17±30.61minutes in group NS, which was statistically significant and also numerical rating scale scores were low at all points postoperatively in group B.Conclusion: Bilateral ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block significantly lowers the consumption of tramadol and also provides adequate postoperative pain relief.Journal of Society of Anesthesiologists of NepalVol. 4, No. 2, 2017, page: 81-86


2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 959-968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lotta Wikström ◽  
Mats Nilsson ◽  
Anders Broström ◽  
Kerstin Eriksson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document